• Contact
  • Advertise
  • Sign in
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Consumer Products
    • Corporate Governance
    • Covid-19
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Consumer Products
    • Corporate Governance
    • Covid-19
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

HomeNewsFrom the Courts
16 Aug 2021 12:30 PM GMT

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Assessment Order Due To dysfunctional Income Tax E-Filing Portal

By Legal Era
Income-Tax-E-Filing

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Assessment Order Due To dysfunctional Income Tax E-Filing Portal

The Court also noted that the assessment order was passed without providing adequate opportunity to submit a reply to the show cause-cum-draft assessment order

The Delhi High Court has set aside an assessment order u/S 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of the National Faceless Assessment Centre due to narrow timeframe and for issues with regards to the new income tax e-filing portal.

A Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi, comprising Justices Manmohan and Navin Chawla, dealt with a matter titled Centum Finance Limited v National Faceless Assessment Centre & Anr.

The Petitioner – Company contended that the assessment order was passed without observing the principles of natural justice since the existing portal was discontinued from 1 June 2021 onwards to give taxpayers time to respond to the new system as a new income tax e-filing portal was recently launched. It was submitted by the Petitioner that the new income tax e-filing portal did not work after the launch and, therefore, compliance till 7 June 2021 could not be made.

The Respondent – Authorities sought time to obtain instructions. The Court, however, declined the request for adjournment.

The Court, primarily noted that the assessment order was passed without providing adequate opportunity to submit a reply in response to the show cause-cum-draft assessment order.

The Court further noted that the timeframe set out in the show cause notice was extremely narrow and found that the new e-filing portal was dysfunctional since it was recently launched.

Therefore, the Court set aside the assessment order and granted liberty to the Assessing Officer to continue the assessment proceedings from the stage at which they were positioned when the show cause notice was issued.

Click to download here Full Judgment

Legal Era

Legal Era

TAGS:
  • Delhi High Court 
  • E-filing portal 
  • Income Tax Act 
  • National Faceless Assessment Centre 
  • Centum Finance Limited 
  • Principles of natural justice 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
Trending Now
Recommended Articles
  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • © All rights reserved Legal Era-Legal Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X