When Rosecrans Baldwin, one of this magazine’s favorite longtime contributors, first moved to Los Angeles, years ago, he was struck by the sense that something was different there. Or maybe that everything was different there. As he writes in his latest book, Everything Now: Lessons From the City-State of Los Angeles, the city provoked in him a feeling that “anything could happen at any second.” And so, Rosecrans, a novelist and screenwriter, burrowed in and paid careful attention to the specific frequencies and unique atmospheres that make the place so singular. The result of that enthusiastic and thoughtful study, Everything Now, is a genre-bending work of reportage and memoir that’s been lauded as one of the best and most inventive books of the summer. It’s a book that delights in the mysteries of the place. “Questions abound,” Rosecrans writes of the city. “Why do conversations in Los Angeles tend to feel more wide-open? Why is the mood often sublimely tense? Why does it feel like history is happening all at once?
The vast “nation-state” that Rosecrans describes in Everything Now is an L.A. that is beguiling and enchanting and frustrating and fascinating all at once. It’s the kind of place—and this is the kind of book—that leaves visitors and readers alike with more curiosity. So, Rosecrans gamely answered a few questions about the mysteries and magic of Los Angeles and how his fellow Angelenos have been reacting to his book.
GQ: You offer a kind organizing explanation for the book when you tell readers that the standard way of thinking about L.A. rests on a fundamental misunderstanding that L.A. is like a typical big American city. You show us that it’s not, at all. I wondered: How did you arrive at this realization that we get L.A. wrong?
Rosecrans Baldwin: Everything stems from my own ignorance. My wife Rachel and I moved to L.A. about six years ago. Right away, I was super confused. How Los Angeles is both a city and a county. How “L.A.” refers not just to Los Angeles, or Beverly Hills, or Compton—all of which are separate cities—but also, for a lot of people, to places as far spread as San Bernardino, Simi Valley, or Newport Beach.
Just L.A. county is 11 million people. Greater L.A., the five counties, is close to 20 million people. I say this in the book, but it was really one of my first feelings, that it could seem, at times, when I drove around L.A., like I was in the middle of everything, and also nowhere at all. The way there’s both vastness and density, diversity and segregation. The thought of L.A. being just another big city like New York or Miami or Houston—the way those places look and operate, how they feel when you live there, and also how they figure into the United States’ understanding of itself—didn’t make sense to me. It just didn’t agree with the facts on the ground.
As for Angelenos, they’re the last people to misunderstand their city; they know their city very well. But I’d also say, because plenty of Angelenos told me this when I was doing my interviews, that they recognize they may only really know their version of Los Angeles, their enclave, their places. Los Angeles has many, many versions.
When you set out, was there any risk of feeling intimidated by the subject? Writers could spend a lifetime immersing themselves in the ideas you’re exploring. Or was there something thrilling about being able to put fresh eyes on the place and make the kinds of connections and insights that a native might have been tempted to overlook?