LA judge rejects one of 11 sexual assault allegations against Harvey Weinstein for second time over statute of limitations blunder as disgraced ex-movie mogul, 69, appears shackled in court
- Judge Lisa Lench first dismissed one of 11 sexual assault counts in an indictment of Weinstein as too old and outside the statute of limitations two weeks ago
- But Lench did allow the district attorney's office to amend the allegation against the 69-year-old former movie mogul and convicted rapist
- Weinstein pleaded not guilty Wednesday to four counts of rape and seven other sexual assault counts in California
- On Thursday, she found that neither of two attempts at an amended complaint from prosecutors solved the problem, and rejected the count again
- It could still be re-added to the indictment facing Weinstein if prosecutors are able to re-attach it to the judge's satisfaction
- He attended the hearing in LA County jail attire, and was brought into the courtroom shackled to a wheelchair, uncuffed as the proceedings began
- The pervert was extradited from New York, where he is serving a 23-year sentence for convictions of rape and sexual assault
Harvey Weinstein (pictured) - the 69-year-old convicted rapist and disgraced movie mogul - wears a face mask as he listens in court during a pre-trial hearing in LA on July 29
A Los Angeles judge on Thursday again rejected one of 11 sexual assault counts in an indictment of Harvey Weinstein.
Judge Lisa B. Lench first dismissed the count of sexual battery by restraint as too old and outside the statute of limitations two weeks ago, but allowed the district attorney's office to amend the allegation against the 69-year-old former movie mogul and convicted rapist.
On Thursday, she found that neither of two attempts at an amended complaint from prosecutors solved the problem, and rejected the count again.
Weinstein attended the hearing in LA County jail attire. He was brought into the courtroom shackled to a wheelchair, and was uncuffed as the proceedings began.
Lench gave prosecutors a glimmer of hope on the dismissed count, saying that if they reconvene the grand jury and get it to return a new indictment for it, she may accept it. But she offered no specific instructions - or guarantees.
Weinstein, the convicted rapist and disgraced movie mogul, wears a face mask behind a protective plexiglass screen, as he listens in court during a pre-trial hearing in LA on July 29
Judge Lisa B. Lench (pictured) first dismissed the count of sexual battery by restraint as too old and outside the statute of limitations two weeks ago
'I can't tell you what to do,' the judge said.
The rejected count dates to May 2010. Weinstein was first charged with it in January 2020, before the statute of limitations had expired.
Prosecutors then got an indictment from a grand jury on an identical count six months later, shortly after the statute of limitations had expired.
The judge agreed with Weinstein attorney Alan Jackson that the grand jury indictment was a new prosecution, and therefore was coming too late.
Share this article
'The people are grasping to try to save something that is unsalvageable,' Jackson said in court. 'They did it, they blew it, they can't fix it.'
Prosecutors argued that it was a continuation of the same case.
While the count is a small part of the case, dismissing it removes one of five accusers from Weinstein's forthcoming trial.
Still intact are four counts of rape and six other sexual assault counts. Weinstein pleaded not guilty to all of them last month in his first court appearance in the California case.
The 69-year-old sits with his attorneys Mark Werksman, center, and Alan Jackson, right
He was extradited from New York, where he is serving a 23-year sentence for convictions of rape and sexual assault after a separate trial in February 2020.
Other charges against Weinstein are for even older incidents, but different statutes apply to them.
The defense also revealed at the hearing that they have been given a list of 248 witnesses for the forthcoming trial, for which no date has been set.
Weinstein's attorneys will seek to reject many of them, and more technical fights are likely to come as they attempt to erode the case against him.
'Today's a great example of why we need judges with a backbone,' Weinstein attorney Mark Werksman said outside court, 'and juries with a tough spine to stand up against false accusations.
Comments 0
Share what you think
No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.
