Russell: No rules can place blame in Verstappen/Hamilton racing incident
George Russell believes there are no rules that could be introduced to Formula 1 to stop a repeat of the "racing incident" between Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen at Silverstone.

Title rivals Hamilton and Verstappen collided while battling for the lead on the opening lap of the British Grand Prix, making contact at the high-speed Copse corner.
Verstappen suffered a 51G impact with the barrier, and while Hamilton was hit with a 10-second time penalty for causing a collision, he recovered to win the race and cut the gap at the top of the standings to eight points.
Red Bull has requested a right to review the case, believing Hamilton deserved a harsher penalty, and a hearing is scheduled for Thursday afternoon in Hungary.
The incident has divided opinion among fans in the past two weeks, and led to questions if anything can be done to make clearer which driver has the right to the corner in such incidents.
The stewards' report issuing Hamilton's penalty said that he was predominantly - but not wholly - to blame for causing the crash.
But Williams driver and GPDA director Russell felt it was "absolutely a racing incident", making it difficult to enforce anything that could make it easier to place blame.
"There are no sort of rules in that aspect, I would say, that can say who is right or who is wrong, because it's just one of those things," Russell said when asked by Autosport for his thoughts on the incident.
"Sometimes there is no right or wrong. It's just a racing incident.
Insight: The details at the heart of the Hamilton/Verstappen debate
"Lewis is one of the cleanest and fairest racers out there, always. And there was nothing malicious in the attempt, because there was a clear opportunity.

George Russell, Williams
Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images
"Obviously the consequences were huge and I'm very glad to see Max was relatively fine following the crash. These racing incidents are a difficult one to adjudicate on.
"I don't think there needs to be anything any clearer in that specific scenario, because it was, for me, just purely a racing incident."
Russell's thoughts were shared by McLaren's Daniel Ricciardo, who felt how to approach such incidents did not have to be "written on paper" for drivers.
"We know just through the years of racing and the experience that we have," Ricciardo said.
"Especially in these cars, there is a point where you don't see, there are blind spots where the car's a quarter of the way on the inside.
"We're aware that the chance of the car being there is probably pretty high, so we're always going to leave room for one car if there's a car there.
"Watching Max's onboard, there was room on the inside. I think of course they are racing hard, but I would still say hard but fair through those phases of corners.
"I didn't really see anything out of line with the incident itself. Obviously the consequence was really the big talking point.
"But I think deep down all of us know racing etiquette, when to squeeze and when not, so I think we're pretty clear with that."
Related video

Previous article
Alonso didn’t expect to still be racing in Formula 1 at 40
Next article
Ricciardo: Verstappen has 'ironed out' mistakes from early F1 career

Russell: No rules can place blame in Verstappen/Hamilton racing incident
Trending
Verstappen v Hamilton: Who was at fault?
Formula 1: Sprint Qualifying analysis
Trending Today
The ‘screaming’ F1 engine future that may not be out of reach
OPINION: It wasn't just the Verstappen/Hamilton clash that had the Red Bull and Mercedes bosses at loggerheads at Silverstone, with the nature of Formula 1's 2025 engines also subject for disagreement. But hopes to have loud, emotive engines that are also environmentally friendly don't have to be opposed
The drivers that need to strike gold before F1's summer break
OPINION: Formula 1 is about to break up for summer 2021, with the title battles finely poised. But it’s not just the latest round of Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton that will be worth watching this weekend in Hungary, as plenty of drivers are eying big results to change the stories of their seasons so far
How Lotus F1 uncovered, then squandered its last ‘unfair advantage’
Cast in the mould of its founder Colin Chapman, Lotus was powerful and daring but flawed – as it proved through further soaring peaks and painful troughs into the 1980s. DAMIEN SMITH examines a game-changing era
The core problems Yas Marina’s long-awaited tweaks won't address
OPINION: Changes to the layout of Abu Dhabi’s circuit aim to reverse the trend of insipid Formula 1 races there - the promoter has even described one of the new corners as “iconic”. And that, argues STUART CODLING, is one of this venue’s abiding failings
How Ferrari offered Britain's next F1 prospect what Red Bull couldn't
Last year's Formula 2 runner-up Callum Ilott could be on his way to becoming the first Briton to contest a grand prix in an Alfa Romeo since Reg Parnell in 1950. But, says OLEG KARPOV, the Ferrari Driver Academy protege is having to temper his ambition at the moment – outwardly at least…
The signs that point to F1's rude health
OPINION: Formula 1's calendar might still be facing disruption as the pandemic affects travel but, says MARK GALLAGHER, the business itself is fundamentally strong thanks to the epic rivalry taking place on track and the consistent arrival of new sponsors
The unexpected benefit of F1’s sprint race repeat
OPINION: Formula 1's sprint race trial at Silverstone drew mixed feedback on Saturday, but there remained the true test of how it would impact Sunday's Grand Prix. While fans were busy marvelling at Fernando Alonso's progress, a key lesson was being learned that would directly contribute to the dramatic lap one clash at Copse the following day
The off-track considerations that led to F1’s Hamilton/Verstappen Silverstone shunt
OPINION: Formula 1’s 2021 title fight turned ugly last weekend when Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton collided at the start of the British Grand Prix. Verstappen thankfully walked away unharmed, but this had been a clash long-since coming