Heading in football: Professional players in England limited to 10 'higher force headers' a week in training
Last updated on .From the section Football

Professional footballers in England are to be limited to 10 "higher force headers" a week in training under new guidelines for the upcoming season.
It comes after recent "multiple studies" were conducted into concerns about the long-term dangers of heading.
In 2019, a study found professional footballers were more likely to suffer from neurodegenerative brain disease.
Guidance for amateurs is "10 headers per session and only one session a week where heading practice is included".
It comes after an MPs' inquiry earlier in July said that sport has been allowed to "mark its own homework" on reducing the risks of brain injury.
"The preliminary studies identified the varying forces involved in heading a football, which were provided to a cross-football working group to help shape the guidance," said a joint statement on behalf of the Football Association, Premier League, English Football League, Professional Footballers' Association and League Managers Association.
"Based on those early findings, which showed the majority of headers involve low forces, the initial focus of the guidance [for professional football] will be on headers that involve higher forces.
"These are typically headers following a long pass (more than 35m) or from crosses, corners and free-kicks.
"It will be recommended that a maximum of 10 higher force headers are carried out in any training week.
"This recommendation is provided to protect player welfare and will be reviewed regularly as further research is undertaken to understand more regarding the impact of heading in football."
Research into football and head trauma has shown professional footballers are three and a half times more likely to die from dementia than people of the same age range in the general population.
The Premier League introduced a trial of additional permanent concussion substitutions in February, while the FA introduced head injury substitutes into the FA Cup in February.
Children aged 11 and are no longer taught to head footballs during training in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland, while FA guidelines for coaches also puts limits on how much heading older children should do.
The new guidance for amateur football is for clubs "up to and including step five of the National League system and tier three and below of the women's football pyramid, and is specifically tailored for this level of the game".
"Our heading guidance now reaches across all players, at all levels of the game," said FA chief executive Mark Bullingham.
"We are committed to further medical research to gain an understanding of any risks within football. In the meantime, this reduces a potential risk factor.
"It is important to remember that the overwhelming medical evidence is that football and other sports have positive impacts on both mental and physical health."

- The life and legacy of one of the UK's greatest talents: Join us for a celebration of Amy Winehouse
- Smalltown Boy: A powerful tale of a young gay man told through a disco classic

Comments
Join the conversation
We won’t really know the real outcome of heading these lighter balls for probably 20 years or so - it’s a very difficult issue, we don’t want to change the fabric of the game, but we must also show the necessary due diligence to protect players including children.
After a session of heading the ball his memory and other skills were worse than before the session. Imagine doing that every day and that's why it becomes a long term health issue.
Also, old footballs were lighter than ones made today, what made them heavier was they absorbed water but modern footballs don't.
So maybe we should have more of an emphasis on passing to feet, rather than lumping the ball skywards?
It is called football after all.
Absolute nonsense.
But there is literally no science behind this
How many 1,000's of players suffer no ill effects are a career and how many do little heading and are permenantly damaged
Surely the problem is the forces involved and even running on hard ground creates them
Like C19 - bucket "everyone is the same" approaches cause false security
More research needed