Red Bull lodges FIA request to review Silverstone F1 clash
Red Bull has lodged a request for the FIA to review the Formula 1 crash between Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen at the British Grand Prix.

Following its examination of the accident and the decision by the FIA stewards to deem that Hamilton was ‘predominantly’ to blame for the collision, Red Bull has pushed forward with its desire to take the matter further.
The FIA has confirmed that, in according with its International Sporting Code (ISC), Red Bull has lodged a petition for the matter to be looked at again.
A video conference hearing has now been called for 4pm CEST time this Thursday, ahead of the Hungarian Grand Prix, to look into the matter.
Red Bull has been notified that it is allowed to send three attendees in total, including its team manager, to the hearing.
Furthermore, Mercedes has also been told that a team representative must attend the preliminary hearing. It will also be allowed to send up to three team members.
The Red Bull decision to take the matter further is not an actual appeal, but falls under regulations that allow competitors a right to review cases if new evidence has come to light.
Article 14 of the FIA’s ISC states: “If, in Competitions forming part of an FIA Championship, cup, trophy, challenge or series, or of an international series, a significant and relevant new element is discovered which was unavailable to the parties seeking the review at the time of the decision concerned, the stewards who have given a ruling or, failing this, those designated by the FIA, may decide to re-examine their decision following a petition for review…”

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB16B, Lewis Hamilton Mercedes W12
Photo by: Glenn Dunbar / Motorsport Images
For the review case to go further, Red Bull will need to provide proof that a ‘significant and relevant’ new element has come to light since the accident.
Read Also:
At the time the stewards decided that Hamilton was predominantly to blame for the crash, it said it had reviewed video and telemetry data – so it is unlikely that those will form part of Red Bull’s push for action.
However, Red Bull could potentially offer a witness statement from Verstappen for his view on the incident - as the Dutchman was not available at the time of the verdict due to him being transferred to the medical centre and then later to hospital.
After the 2019 Canadian Grand Prix, when Ferrari pushed for a right to review the penalty handed to Sebastian Vettel for forcing Hamilton wide off track, it proposed various elements that it believed were new to the stewards.
However, the FIA deemed at the time that a Vettel witness statement, a video analysis provided by Sky’s Karun Chandhok, and other video and photographs, were not ‘significant and relevant’ even though some of them were new.
The stewards deemed that some elements, such as Vettel’s own testimony, had been available to the stewards during the competition and before the end of scrutineering.
Only if the FIA rules that the new evidence is ‘significant’ and ‘relevant’ will the matter go any further and examine the actual British GP incident itself.
Related video

Previous article
F1 should let Hamilton/Verstappen duel rip, says Webber
Next article
Masi: "No frustration" over F1 team radio calls

Red Bull lodges FIA request to review Silverstone F1 clash
Trending
Verstappen v Hamilton: Who was at fault?
Formula 1: Sprint Qualifying analysis
Trending Today
How Lotus F1 uncovered, then squandered its last ‘unfair advantage’
Cast in the mould of its founder Colin Chapman, Lotus was powerful and daring but flawed – as it proved through further soaring peaks and painful troughs into the 1980s. DAMIEN SMITH examines a game-changing era
The core problems Yas Marina’s long-awaited tweaks won't address
OPINION: Changes to the layout of Abu Dhabi’s circuit aim to reverse the trend of insipid Formula 1 races there - the promoter has even described one of the new corners as “iconic”. And that, argues STUART CODLING, is one of this venue’s abiding failings
How Ferrari offered Britain's next F1 prospect what Red Bull couldn't
Last year's Formula 2 runner-up Callum Ilott could be on his way to becoming the first Briton to contest a grand prix in an Alfa Romeo since Reg Parnell in 1950. But, says OLEG KARPOV, the Ferrari Driver Academy protege is having to temper his ambition at the moment – outwardly at least…
The signs that point to F1's rude health
OPINION: Formula 1's calendar might still be facing disruption as the pandemic affects travel but, says MARK GALLAGHER, the business itself is fundamentally strong thanks to the epic rivalry taking place on track and the consistent arrival of new sponsors
The unexpected benefit of F1’s sprint race repeat
OPINION: Formula 1's sprint race trial at Silverstone drew mixed feedback on Saturday, but there remained the true test of how it would impact Sunday's Grand Prix. While fans were busy marvelling at Fernando Alonso's progress, a key lesson was being learned that would directly contribute to the dramatic lap one clash at Copse the following day
The off-track considerations that led to F1’s Hamilton/Verstappen Silverstone shunt
OPINION: Formula 1’s 2021 title fight turned ugly last weekend when Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton collided at the start of the British Grand Prix. Verstappen thankfully walked away unharmed, but this had been a clash long-since coming
Will 2022's all-new cars look like F1's concept model?
Formula 1 provided its clearest example yet of what the 2022 cars are set to look like when it presented a full-scale concept to the world during the build-up to last weekend’s British Grand Prix. Underneath the special shiny livery was a design that hinted at the future, but teams will be digging into key areas that may reap differing results
British Grand Prix Driver Ratings
The 2021 British Grand Prix will live long in the memory for the dramatic clash between Formula 1's two title protagonists, which opened the door for other drivers to capitalise. One did so in spectacular fashion, while others fluffed their lines