Mumbai businessman Raj Kundra and his aide, Ryan Thorpe, have been sent to police custody till July 27, after they were arrested in a case of pornographic content shown through apps.
Police told the court they had seized a massive cache - around 4 TB worth - of images and videos, which are mostly of adult content, from Mr Kundra, who is actor Shilpa Shetty's husband.
51 clips, including 35 from 'Hotshots' - the app through which the content was streamed - were found on a laptop, and police are checking if all these clips were uploaded to the internet.
The court was also told some data had been deleted from other computers a day after Mr Kundra was arrested, and that it would take a day to recover this. They have also asked for permission to investigate four e-mail accounts set up by Mr Thorpe for the 'Hotshots' app.
In addition, police also have a record of transactions - from an account in Yes Bank registered to Mr Kundra to one in the United Bank of Africa. They suspect money from sale of alleged pornographic content was used for online betting. Rs 7.5 crore has been seized so far.
Mr Kundra's lawyer, Abad Ponda, argued against police custody, pointing out his client could still be called to co-operate with the investigation as needed.
Mr Ponda also repeated a point from a hearing earlier in the week - that the content in question could not come under Section 67 of the IT Act, for which bail is not allowed, as similar content is available on OTT platforms like Netflix and Amazon Prime.
It can be covered only under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code - which deals with "lascivious" material, he said, adding "no further custody is needed".
Mr Kundra was arrested late Monday night after police questioning, and after his former assistant, Umesh Kamat, named him. Mr Thorpe was arrested the following day.
The police say Raj Kundra, 45, is a "key conspirator" in the case, and that they had sufficient evidence against him; this includes pornographic clips and emails found in his office.
The case was registered February 4 after a woman told the police she had been forced to take part in a porn film after being promised an acting job, a police officer quoted by PTI said.
"Police is following what web series are doing these days - vulgar content. But that's not really classified as porn. Nothing in this remand shows that two people actually indulged in act of intercourse. If it's not actual intercourse, it's not classified as porn," Mr Ponda said.
