Former AIADMK minister M Manikandan granted bail in sexual assault case

The Madras High Court on Wednesday granted conditional bail to former AIADMK minister M Manikandan who was arrested on charges of raping and cheating a Malaysian actress. 

Published: 08th July 2021 05:06 AM  |   Last Updated: 08th July 2021 05:06 AM   |  A+A-

Former Tamil Nadu Minister M Manikandan

Former Tamil Nadu Minister M Manikandan (Photo | EPS)

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: The Madras High Court on Wednesday granted conditional bail to former AIADMK minister M Manikandan who was arrested on charges of raping and cheating a Malaysian actress.  Justice M Nirmal Kumar ordered the former minister to be released on bail by surrendering his passport, executing two sureties for a sum of Rs 10,000 and appearing before the investigating officer every day for two weeks and whenever he is called.

According to the prosecution, the duo had been living together though Manikandan was married. Manikandan had sexual relations with her on the pretext of marriage after divorcing his wife. The complainant also submitted in the court that she got pregnant thrice and was forced to abort by the minister. The prosecution also said that Manikandan was arrested from Bengaluru on June 20 under various sections of IPC and Section 67A of IT Act.

However, the counsel for the minister argued that a substantial portion of the investigation is over and assured the court that he will “not evade from justice and shall abide by any condition”. He stated that the case was filed out of political vendetta. 

Justice M Nirmal Kumar in his orders noted “that the duo was in a relationship from May 2017 to April 2021 was not in dispute.” The court said that the complainant had the intelligence to understand what she was consenting to. “The de facto complainant was well aware of the consequence that the marriage between her and the petitioner would not take place,” said the judge. 

“Thus leading to the inference that she freely, voluntarily and consciously consented to have sexual intercourse with the petitioner and her consent was not in consequence of any misconception of fact and they were living together as man and wife. Thus, there is a clear distinction between rape and consensual sex,” he added.


Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.