On Wednesday, Calcutta High Court imposed a Rs 5 lakh superb on Mamata Banerjee for interesting to take away Justice Kaushik Chanda from listening to her case towards BJP chief Suvendu Adhikari’s election win in Nandigram. Justice Kaushik Chanda later withdrew and rescued himself from listening to the case.“Such calculative, psychological and offensive attempt to seek recusal need to be firmly repulsed and a cost of Rs. 5 lakh is imposed upon Petitioner,” Justice Chanda mentioned within the order. As the choose launched the election petition from his courtroom, the matter will now be referred to Acting Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal for assigning it to a unique bench.[PC:Anandabazar]As reported extensively by TFI, Mamata’s lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi and SN Mukherjee urged Justice Chanda to step down on his personal to keep away from a battle of curiosity. However, Justice Chanda identified that Banerjee’s counsel – Abhishek Manu Singhvi is affiliated with the Indian National Congress and SN Mukherjee has connections with the BJP. He added that if the attorneys from different political backgrounds could be trusted, why can’t the petitioner (Mamata Banerjee) belief the choose?Since May 2, Mamata has been making an attempt desperately to retain her CM seat by numerous means, together with confrontations with the Governor, altering the legislative procedures, intimidating the judges, and so on. The superb imposed by Justice Chanda portrays that the judiciary is just not keen to bend to Mamata’s baseless calls for.Read More: Supreme Court has now began listening to the petition looking for to impose President’s rule in West BengalMamata Banerjee’s counsel, nonetheless, justifies their declare as Justice Chanda has usually been seen with BJP leaders however the courtroom took objection to the way by which the demand for the choose’s recusal was made. Responding to this allegation Justice Chanda mentioned that he was by no means a convenor of the BJP Legal Cell, however had appeared in instances representing the social gathering earlier than the Calcutta High Court.This incident displays how the TMC ‘reign of terror’ is just not over but. Political killings, lynchings and bombings are on a regular basis occurrences in West Bengal. Mamata’s reign, thus, appears much like that of a dictator, controlling each facet of the legislature, government and judiciary. The odd residents of West Bengal are helpless. Imagine a state of affairs the place one of many strongest pillars of our nation: The Supreme Court judges are themselves unable to take up the instances towards the TMC goons. This is a grave state of affairs in West Bengal and matches the case for the dissolvement of the present state authorities instantly because the concern of TMC employees is past creativeness.