QS ranking: IISc, IIM-Bangalore not on the same page

In this spirit, IISc has no comment on the methodology used by QS on this, or any other, metric.

Published: 11th June 2021 05:28 AM  |   Last Updated: 11th June 2021 05:28 AM   |  A+A-

ndian Institute of Science

Indian Institute of Science (IISC) in Bengaluru. (File photo| EPS)

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: Two institutes of national importance based out of the city — Indian Institute of Management and Indian Institute of Science — responded quite differently to the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings 2021, which released on Wednesday. 

With IIM Bangalore ranking first in India for its Business & Management Studies, Director Rishikesh T Krishanan said, “This is certainly a huge achievement for IIMB, and I want to extend my gratitude to everyone who made this possible. We have scored well in Academic Reputation and H-Index Citation parameters and this reflects on our efforts in ensuring academic excellence in the subject and research capabilities in the domain. I would also like to congratulate all other institutions recognised by QS Ranking.

”Meanwhile, the office of the Director, IISc in a reply to Express, said that as a matter of policy, IISc does not comment on ranking exercises by non-academic and non-governmental bodies. In this spirit, IISc has no comment on the methodology used by QS on this, or any other, metric.

“Having said that, it is worth mentioning some factors that have enabled IISc to excel, leading to such recognitions: high-quality basic and applied research conducted by our faculty members and students, generous support from the Ministry of Education under its Institute of Eminence programme, and various interdisciplinary initiatives undertaken by IISc (such as autonomous systems, artificial intelligence, and quantum technologies) in line with the New Education Policy. We are also thankful to various other government agencies, alumni, corporates and philanthropists for their continued support,” they said.

IISc ranked number one on the Citations per Faculty (CPF) indicator, which put it in the league with Princeton, Havard, and even MIT. Its overall ranking, however, had dropped by one from 185 to 186 this year.


Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.