Uttarakhand High Court on Friday issued a set of instructions to the state and central governments while hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in connection with the spread of coronavirus.
The bench of Chief Justice RS Chauhan and Justice Alok Kumar Verma, while hearing the Public Interest Litigation filed by Advocate Dushyant Mainali and others stated that the State should increase the number of daily tests because the state government cannot reduce the number of tests as per ICMR instructions.
"The central government is ordered to seriously consider increasing the state's oxygen quota from 183 metric tons to 300 metric tons. The central government should also consider that a large part of Uttarakhand is a mountainous region which will require continuous oxygen supply, hence the demand made by the state government to the centre in which 10,000 oxygen concentrators, 10,000 oxygen cylinders, 30 pressure swing oxygen plants. And there is a demand for 200 CAP and 200 BiPAP machines and one lakh pulse oximeters. The Central Government should take a serious decision on this," the bench instructed.
The bench also directed the Central government to take a decision in one week on the request made by the State Government to the Centre to use its own quota of oxygen from its own production.
"The state government is being ordered to follow the SOP issued for Char Dham seriously and ensure that priests and local devotees can be protected from the corona. The state government should present proof that it is fully in compliance with the recommendations and suggestions given by the High-Level Committee and the state government is ordered to set up a 100-bed Covid Care Center in Bhawali at Bhawali Sanatorium at the earliest," the bench instructed.
It also said that both the state government and the central government are ordered to continuously ensure an uninterrupted supply of Uttarakhand's quota of Remdesivir.
"The Advocate of the Central government is directed to the competent officer of the Ministry of Government of India on the next date, who may be able to take a decision on the request of the government of Uttarakhand or give an explanation as to why the request sent by Uttarakhand should not be considered," it further said.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU