Poco X3 NFC long-term review
64GB 6GB RAM | $ 238.49![]() |
$ 239.99![]() |
128GB 6GB RAM | $ 264.99![]() |
$ 284.00![]() |
Show all prices |
Introduction
The Poco X3 NFC is called Poco X3 NFC even though it should probably have been named Poco X3 120Hz. That's a much more important feature to list in a phone's name, especially at this price point, than the presence of NFC - for most people, at least.
Alas, NFC made the cut into the name, and this is the last time we're mentioning it. It's there, it works; there's no need for it to be affixed to the smartphone's name. None at all. That said, the Poco X3 does, in fact, also have a 120 Hz refresh rate for its display, which is still incredibly intriguing in its price range, and not something often seen from its competitors.

We'll tell you all about how that headline feature actually behaves in normal day-to-day use since for this long-term review, we've had the Poco X3 as our one and only smartphone. We wanted to get to know it better, much better than we were able to in our normal review, and see what it's like to live with day in and day out.
Will the experience turn out as good as the specs imply? Will we be raving about what amazing value for money this phone is, by the end of the review? Well, there's only one way to find out - join us over the next few pages where we'll tell you our thoughts about our prolonged affair with the Poco X3 - what the ups and downs were, what we liked, and what we didn't. So grab a drink and a bowl of popcorn, and let's go.
Poco X3 NFC long-term review - Reader comments
I don't understand why LCD display don't have always on display. My Nokia E51 had always on display but these new smartphones with 120hz can't have it.
- a
- HBJ
Poco X3 NFC Camera Failures One of the main problems reported about Poco X3 NFC in the forums has to do with the performance of the camera. Problems when changing the sensor, poor focus with the main lens, and the Camera app that hangs all the...
whereas expensive flagships are now starting to forgo the brick in the name of extra profits (sorry - we meant saving the environment or some such thing). the reviewer is throwing some shade at crapple and sammy.