SARS-CoV-2-associated ssRNAs trigger inflammation and immunity via toll-like receptors

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a positive-sense single-stranded (ssRNA) virus that belongs to the Coronaviridae family. It is also closely related to the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and SARS-CoV-1. SARS-CoV-2 infection causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and develops into severe respiratory distress in a subgroup of patients. Severe COVID-19 causes sepsis-like manifestations, intense lung injury, and multi-organ failure, all associated with the overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This "cytokine storm" directly correlates with poor prognosis in this subgroup of patients.

This suggests that an overactive immune response may be responsible for unleashing virus-dependent immune pathology and inducing the defensive antiviral state mediated by type I IFN release. Thus, inborn errors in production and amplification of type I IFN or pre-existing auto-antibodies against the IFN family of cytokines were also found to be associated with poor prognosis.

Analyzing the SARS-CoV-2 genome to identify activators of endosomal TLR7/8 and MyD88 pathway

SARS-CoV-2-associated molecular patterns (SAMPs) and innate sensors have not been clearly defined so far. Researchers from the UK and Italy recently identified ssRNA fragments from the SARS-CoV-2 genome as direct activators of the endosomal TLR7/8 and MyD88 pathways. These same sequences induced DC activation in humans in terms of phenotype and functions, such as the production of IFN and cytokines and polarization of Th1. The study is posted to the preprint server, bioRxiv*.

"This study characterizes the first SARS-CoV-2 associated molecular patterns (SAMPs) and identifies the TLR7/8/MyD88 axis as a crucial pathway in the activation of human pDCs and cDCs."

The researchers performed a bioinformatic scan of the viral genome and identified hundreds of fragments potentially activating TLR7/8. This suggests that products of virus endosomal processing can possibly activate the IFN and inflammatory responses downstream.

SAMPs activate cytokine secretion and phenotypical maturation of moDCs. (A) moDCs (2x106/ml) were stimulated with increasing concentrations of the indicated viral RNAs or with vehicle alone (-) for 24 hours. The production of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12p70, CXCL8, CCL3 and CXCL9 was evaluated by ELISA in cell-free supernatants. Data are expressed as mean + SEM (n=3). Results of SCV2- RNA1A and SCV2-RNA2A are superimposed in all graphs. (B) moDCs were stimulated as described in (A) and the surface expression of CD83, CD86 and CCR7 evaluated by FACS analysis. Data are expressed as representative cytofluorimetric profiles (upper panels) or as the mean + SEM (n=3) of the Median of Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) (lower panels). (A-B) *P< 0.05 versus (-) by one-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s post-hoc test; # P< 0.05 versus RNA40 by paired Student’s t test.
SAMPs activate cytokine secretion and phenotypical maturation of moDCs. (A) moDCs (2x106/ml) were stimulated with increasing concentrations of the indicated viral RNAs or with vehicle alone (-) for 24 hours. The production of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12p70, CXCL8, CCL3 and CXCL9 was evaluated by ELISA in cell-free supernatants. Data are expressed as mean + SEM (n=3). Results of SCV2- RNA1A and SCV2-RNA2A are superimposed in all graphs. (B) moDCs were stimulated as described in (A) and the surface expression of CD83, CD86 and CCR7 evaluated by FACS analysis. Data are expressed as representative cytofluorimetric profiles (upper panels) or as the mean + SEM (n=3) of the Median of Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) (lower panels). (A-B) *P< 0.05 versus (-) by one-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s post-hoc test; # P< 0.05 versus RNA40 by paired Student’s t test.

TLR7 and TLR8 are important cellular sensors of ssRNAs involved in host resistance and COVID-19 pathogenesis

SAMPs induced MyD88-dependent lung inflammation in vivo, characterized by the accumulation of pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic mediators, immune cell infiltration, and splenic DC phenotypical maturation. These results show that TLR7 and TLR8 are important cellular sensors of ssRNAs that are encoded by SARS-CoV-2 and are involved in host resistance and COVID-19 pathogenesis.

"DCs play a crucial role as activators of both inflammation, and adaptive immune responses and pDCs are the major producers of type I IFNs in response to viral infections."

This study identifies two short sequences in the SARS-CoV-2 ssRNA genome that induce the production of type I IFNs and the ability of human DCs to activate T cells by triggering endosomal TLR7 and TLR8. These sequences represent prototypical examples of the hundreds of other potential TLR ligands that have been identified with the help of a SARS-CoV-2 genome scan.

Findings are in line with results of previous works that analyzed SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids

The study's findings are in agreement with previous study results that demonstrate a 20-fold higher density of GU-rich fragments in the closely related SARS-CoV-1 virus compared to HIV-1. The results also agree with a recent bioinformatic study that showed SARS-CoV-2 encodes many such fragments even larger than SARS-CoV. Therefore, endosomal processing of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids may produce multiple fragments that have the ability to trigger innate immune activation.

"ssRNA-sensing TLRs are also expressed by other innate immune cells, such as macrophages, as well as by peripheral tissues such as lung, bronchus, rectum, and cerebral cortex."

To summarize, this study demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 is a potential source of immunostimulatory nucleic acid fragments and identifies the SARS-CoV-2-specific molecular patterns that can promote inflammation and immunity triggering TLR7 and TLR8. The authors believe that these findings fulfill a gap in understanding host-pathogen interaction in SARS-CoV-2 infection based on previous studies demonstrating the role of type I IFNs and TLR7 against life-threatening SARS-CoV-2 infection and the in vitro pDC activation by SARS-CoV-2.

"Since the magnitude of TLR activation differs in individuals, such as elderly people, differences in TLR activation may help explain differences in the quality of the antiviral immune response independently of SAMP potency."

*Important Notice

bioRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

Journal reference:

Posted in: Medical Research News | Disease/Infection News

Written by

Susha Cheriyedath

Susha has a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) degree in Chemistry and Master of Science (M.Sc) degree in Biochemistry from the University of Calicut, India. She always had a keen interest in medical and health science. As part of her masters degree, she specialized in Biochemistry, with an emphasis on Microbiology, Physiology, Biotechnology, and Nutrition. In her spare time, she loves to cook up a storm in the kitchen with her super-messy baking experiments.