The International Trade Administration (ITA), under the United States department of commerce, has recommended levying a countervailing duty against wind energy equipment manufacturers from India. The recent steps are a stark reminder of the Obama era battle in the World Trade Organization (WTO) between India and the United States to protect the latter’s local renewable energy industry.
With the Joe Biden-led Democrats now in office, the US clean energy lobby appears to be back in action.
A notice by the department of commerce said, “The department of commerce preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of utility scale wind towers from India. The period of investigation is April 1, 2019, through March 31, 2020.”
In November last year, the US department of commerce published its initiation of the countervailing duty investigation of utility scale wind towers from India.
In February 2021, nine additional new subsidy allegations were filed and the department recommended initiating investigations on eight programmes under question.
Among the Indian government programmes under investigation are the priority sector lending programme, concessional Customs duty exemption certificate and the enhancement of competitiveness in the capital goods sector: technology acquisition fund programme. The incentives to industries under the Gujarat industrial policy are also subject to investigation.
The ITA said, “The merchandise covered by this investigation consists of certain wind towers, whether or not tapered, and sections thereof. Certain wind towers support the nacelle and rotor blades in a wind turbine with a minimum rated electrical power generation capacity. This is in excess of 100 Kw and with a minimum height of 50 m measured from the base of the tower to the bottom of the nacelle when fully assembled.”
Vestas Wind Technology India is the only individually examined exporter/producer in this investigation. The department of commerce has preliminarily determined a subsidy of 3.74 per cent. It has estimated a rate of 397.16 per cent (subsidy) against Naiks Brass & Iron Works, Nordex India, Prommada Hindustan, Suzlon Energy, Vinayaka Energy Tek, Wish Energy Solutions and Zeeco India based on the adverse facts available.
This aggressive posturing by the US government is similar to the stand taken during the previous stint of Democrats in the US. India had faced criticism at the WTO for its domestic content requirement clause in government tenders.
The US had then alleged that Indian tenders were discriminating against American businesses that wanted to participate in India’s solar energy deployment programmes. India had lost this case at the WTO in 2016.
Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU