Now that regulations have changed in the Army, Air Force, and Navy to allow women to wear ponytails while in uniform. Why not allow the men to grow their hair long as well? Any reason they give for allowing women to wear their hair down should also apply to men. Only men have to sacrifice their hair for military service and continue to meet existing standards while regulations are loosened for women.
|
-
Today, 08:34 AM #1
- Join Date: Oct 2006
- Location: United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 11,456
- Rep Power: 22593
Military hair standards, should only women be allowed to have long hair?
R135
└┼┼┤ Save the Manuals!
246
-
Today, 08:36 AM #2
-
Today, 08:38 AM #3
- Join Date: Oct 2006
- Location: United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 11,456
- Rep Power: 22593
But it can't be used against women in combat? Women are now allowed in combat jobs. Even if we take direct combat jobs out of the equation, what about the men that work in medical or offices? Why can't they have long hair if the women are running around rocking ponytails?
R135
└┼┼┤ Save the Manuals!
246
-
Today, 08:41 AM #4
Most military men don't even give two chits. Leave this crap to the women. They have a hard time enough even pt'ing.
I get told "Hey, go cut your hair' I respond Roger and do it. I don't cry to the Capitol asking for equality and changes so I can grow out a nappy fro.[Dallas Cowboys][Dallas Mavericks][Texas Rangers][TCU*NCAA][DFW Crew]
[Law of Attraction Crew]
-
Today, 08:43 AM #5
-
Today, 08:44 AM #6
-
Today, 08:46 AM #7
-
Today, 08:46 AM #8
-
Today, 09:12 AM #9
-
Today, 09:16 AM #10
-
Today, 09:19 AM #11
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 17,628
- Rep Power: 76436
Holding them to their own standards, yes women should have to cut their hair too. But really women shouldn't be in the military at all.
Things like this just show that no one really believes in the equality bullchit.A new world was being revealed, one of the principles of which was: "Whoever opposes communism is ipso facto a war criminal beyond the pale of humanity: he must be hanged like those who were tried at Nuremberg."
Remember when Lord Indra arrived on the Ganges in his chariot to slaughter 6 million dasyu aboriginals, the first word he said was 'Namaste'
-
Today, 09:22 AM #12
-
Today, 09:23 AM #13
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Virginia, United States
- Posts: 20,100
- Rep Power: 233403
Just say you are a woman and you get the easier fitness test while you’re at it. Fuk em. Our military is not supposed to be a fuking social experiment yet here we are. Its funny because I remember the first time we had to receive training on the new trans chit and the first question asked was some dude joking around about if he could do the women’s prt. Everyone thought that chit was retarded and a waste of time to have us come in for it.
US NAVY
Redskins/Buckeyes/Federer
I know no king but the King in the North whose name is Stark.
MAGA
-
Today, 09:27 AM #14
I'm just LOLing to myself at this point because I'm unapologetically confident enough in my powers of discernment to know they are slowly painting themselves into a corner. Not sure how people who were smart enough to get that high up the food-chain don't also see their concessions are forcing them to either contradict themselves or make further concessions.
“When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you'll be successful.”
― Eric Thomas, The Secret to Success
-
Today, 09:42 AM #15
I've spoken with generals in person about this issue. They're willingly doing it. If you confront them on the double speak they will state motifs like "service before self" as if you're simply supposed to just trust what they say. In some aspect, its as if they're saying that's what they're doing.
Problem is that they fought trump on dismantling critical race theory that was being taught in the military, so I lean more to believe the generals are welcoming it.
Think about it, the more ineffective your military becomes, the more you need contractors....These generals are going into either politics or defense companies. They have no motive to maintain a strong domestic military.
I've seen intel positions in the military work well with females, but then I saw female dynamics destroy the operational standards of many physical jobs like maintenance, fire fighters, etc. I'm sure DoD companies want these small easy tasks under their thumb for money.no one thinks that srs
-
Today, 09:44 AM #16
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Location: New Jersey, United States
- Age: 28
- Posts: 4,876
- Rep Power: 43104
get rid of traditional grooming standards(all sexes) get rid of tattoo bans and up the physical standards
let the cards fall as they may*No fap Crew*
*No porn Crew*
*6'1 master race Crew*
*Misc nightshift/vampire Crew*
*To crush your enemies, to see them fall at your feet — to take their horses and goods and hear the lamentation of their women Crew*
-
Today, 09:47 AM #17
Bookmarks