Telangana High Court sets aside notice seeking removal of sarpanch

After hearing the case, Justice Amarnath said it appeared that a final conclusion was made even before the submission of an explanation.

Published: 14th March 2021 01:06 AM  |   Last Updated: 14th March 2021 10:53 AM   |  A+A-

Telangana High Court

Telangana High Court (File Photo | EPS)

By Express News Service

In  a relief to the sarpanch of Bommakal gram panchayat, the Telangana High Court set aside the notices issued by the Karimnagar District Collector to the sarpanch, who had allegedly committed fraud and other irregularities and is facing 22 criminal cases. The court observed that the authorities concerned did not follow the procedure prescribed in the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018, while issuing notices for his removal from the post of sarpanch.

Justice T Amarnath Goud recently passed this order while allowing the petition filed by sarpanch P Srinivas seeking direction to the respondent authorities - Principal Secretary to Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Karimnagar District Collector and District Panchayat Officer - from taking disciplinary action against him.

Petitioner’s counsel J Ravi Shankar contended that the two notices issued to his client were ‘predetermined notices’, and that the sarpanch was not put on notice about the alleged irregularities on his part. He also contended that the report of the three-member committee appointed by the Collector to look into the irregularities was submitted behind his back. The notices were given with a political motivation, he argued. On the other hand, the government counsel for the Panchayat Raj Department submitted that the authorities concerned issued notices to the petitioner and that there was no violation of principles of natural justice. 

After hearing the case, Justice Amarnath said it appeared that a final conclusion was made even before the submission of an explanation. He said that it seemed that the Collector simply gave the notices based on the report submitted by the committee and no charges were framed for offering explanation and for causing any enquiry on specific charges. Such a practice should be deprecated, the judge noted, and allowed the petition by setting aside the impugned notices.


Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.