Elgar Parishad case: Varavara Rao discharged from hospital, released on interim bail for six months

Earlier, the Bombay High Court had directed that Rao should be released immediately on bail after being discharged from hospital

Press Trust of India March 07, 2021 08:46:18 IST
Elgar Parishad case: Varavara Rao discharged from hospital, released on interim bail for six months

File image of Varavara Rao. PTI

Mumbai: Poet and activist Varavara Rao, an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, was discharged from Nanavati Hospital here on late Saturday night, sources said.

The Bombay High Court on 22 February granted Rao, 82, interim bail on medical grounds for six months.

He later requested the court that he be allowed to furnish cash sureties until solvent sureties could be found. The court had granted the request on Monday.

It had earlier directed that he be released immediately on bail after being discharged from hospital.

Rao had been admitted to the private hospital due to ill-health.

Updated Date:

Subscribe to Moneycontrol Pro at ₹499 for the first year. Use code PRO499. Limited period offer. *T&C apply

also read

Bombay HC orders Amazon Prime Video to take down Nani's V till makers delete disputed scene
Entertainment

Bombay HC orders Amazon Prime Video to take down Nani's V till makers delete disputed scene

Mumbai-based model and actor Sakshi Malik filed a complaint against the makers of V for allegedly using her photograph without permission

Wife's refusal to make tea for husband no provocation for assault, says Bombay High Court
India

Wife's refusal to make tea for husband no provocation for assault, says Bombay High Court

The court made the remarks earlier this month while upholding the conviction of a 35-year-old man from Pandharpur for assaulting his wife

Bombay HC upholds bail for Areeb Majeed, Kalyan resident accused of having Islamic State links
India

Bombay HC upholds bail for Areeb Majeed, Kalyan resident accused of having Islamic State links

The bench hearing the matter said it was upholding the lower court's order on the grounds of pendency of trial and not on merits of the case