Why we’re running it: To see if the CX-30’s sleek style and driver-focused dynamics make it stand out in the congested family SUV class
Month 2 - Month 1 - Specs
Life with a Mazda CX-30: Month 2
It blends in with all those crossovers… but it drives like no other - 24 February 2020
There’s nothing like standing out in a crowd, right? Believe the adverts and choosing a compact crossover will mark you out as an adventure-seeking individual who won’t be bound by convention; yet as the picture above shows, the reality is rather more humdrum. Swing into almost any suburban parking space today and it’s virtually guaranteed that you will be slotting into a line of SUV-tinged family hatchbacks, none of them having tackled anything more terrifying than the school run.
Yet the more time I spend with our Mazda CX-30, the more I’m reminded why these things are so damned popular. The marginally raised ride height makes it a little easier to see out of and a touch more straightforward to load people and things into; and while they’re all a touch bigger on the outside than the traditional hatchbacks that underpin them, these machines are pretty much just as wieldy to steer and cost as little to run.
As we predicted when it arrived, though, where the CX-30 really has one over on its rivals is its ability to throw driver delight into the mix. Perhaps it’s the effects of lockdown limitations on travel making any chance to drive something to relish, but I genuinely look forward to outings in the Mazda. Its increasingly rare blend of naturally aspirated engine, linear throttle response and delightfully snappy manual gearshift (there are bona fide sports cars that can’t match it in this regard) allow you to revel in the act of simply making a car go. It’s a surprisingly heady combination and one that allows you take satisfaction from even the most mundane journeys.
Sure, the 118bhp four-pot is no firebrand, but now that it’s run in, it’s proving that power isn’t everything. Yes, I have to wring its neck when I’m really in a rush, but it sounds good in a raspy sort of way, plus there’s something quite liberating about really extending an engine through the gears without having to keep one eye glued to the speedometer.
In fact, the only time that I really miss the muscle of turbocharged rivals is on the motorway, where sixth-gear roll-on acceleration is glacial, particularly when there’s an incline. It’s not that the engine lacks outright torque, but the 157lb ft peak doesn’t arrive until 4000rpm, which in the tall-striding top gear equates to somewhere well north of 100mph. On the plus side, a snifter over 40mpg isn’t a bad return for a 2.0-litre atmo petrol, particularly one that has spent a lot of time on short hops.
Join the debate
Add your comment
It's a shame and somewhat surprising that in the UK the CX-30 is only available with weedy engine options.
Here in North America, there are 3 engines options for the CX-30. The base engine comes with 155 bhp and 150 lb-ft of torque, next is 186 bhp and 186 lb-ft of torque with the top spec being a turbo unit with up to 250 bhp and 320 lb-ft of torque.
Having driven the base and the Turbo engines in a 3 Saloon I can tell you neither disappoint, especially the turbo which sounds and drives more like a naturally aspirated 6-Cylinder!
I'm no SUV fan, but I'm sure many customers will be prepared to pay the extra for this over the 3 hatchback. You benefit from the same high quality interior, but don't have to put up with the cave like rear quarters nor the leaden exterior appearance.
Sky inactive at work again, not sure how a small suv 2 litre 4 pot with a mild hybrid can take nearly 11 seconds to get 60 and have so little torque, would not be so bad if the mpg was brilliant. These are 1980s figures.