Internet groups, US Chamber sue Maryland over digital advertising tax
A group representing Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc and Alphabet Inc joined the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others in filing suit to challenge Maryland's first-in-the nation new digital advertising tax.
The Chamber, the largest U.S. business group; the Internet Association, which represents dozens of tech companies; the Computer & Communications Industry Association; and NetChoice filed suit in U.S. District Court in Maryland seeking an injunction to block the new tax adopted last week by the state legislature over the veto of Republican Governor Larry Hogan.
The suit calls the law "a punitive assault on digital, but not print, advertising. It is illegal in myriad ways and should be declared unlawful and enjoined."
State lawmakers estimate the tax could raise as much as $250 million a year after it takes effect. Other states are also considering taxing digital advertising.
Maryland State Senate President Bill Ferguson told CNBC last week internet platforms benefit from state investments in public schools and should "contribute to the ongoing building of our civic society."
The suit argues the act will reduce "resources to support the creation and availability of high-quality ad-supported content, leaving the online field overrun by low-quality 'junk' content."
The suit also challenges the tax's "punitive character, including its severity (up to 10% of gross revenues) (and) its focus on extraterritorial conduct."
The law covers companies with global digital ad revenues of at least $100 million. Supporters have said it is aimed at the largest platforms like Amazon, Facebook, and Alphabet's Google.
The suit also argued Maryland's tax "exacerbates a foreign policy dispute with France and other European countries and makes it impossible for the federal government to speak with one voice on a matter of foreign policy."
France and other countries view digital service taxes as a way to raise revenue from the local operations of big tech companies which they say profit enormously from their markets while making only limited contributions to public coffers.
The Chamber, the largest U.S. business group; the Internet Association, which represents dozens of tech companies; the Computer & Communications Industry Association; and NetChoice filed suit in U.S. District Court in Maryland seeking an injunction to block the new tax adopted last week by the state legislature over the veto of Republican Governor Larry Hogan.
The suit calls the law "a punitive assault on digital, but not print, advertising. It is illegal in myriad ways and should be declared unlawful and enjoined."
State lawmakers estimate the tax could raise as much as $250 million a year after it takes effect. Other states are also considering taxing digital advertising.
Maryland State Senate President Bill Ferguson told CNBC last week internet platforms benefit from state investments in public schools and should "contribute to the ongoing building of our civic society."
The suit argues the act will reduce "resources to support the creation and availability of high-quality ad-supported content, leaving the online field overrun by low-quality 'junk' content."
The suit also challenges the tax's "punitive character, including its severity (up to 10% of gross revenues) (and) its focus on extraterritorial conduct."
The law covers companies with global digital ad revenues of at least $100 million. Supporters have said it is aimed at the largest platforms like Amazon, Facebook, and Alphabet's Google.
The suit also argued Maryland's tax "exacerbates a foreign policy dispute with France and other European countries and makes it impossible for the federal government to speak with one voice on a matter of foreign policy."
France and other countries view digital service taxes as a way to raise revenue from the local operations of big tech companies which they say profit enormously from their markets while making only limited contributions to public coffers.
All Comments (0)+^ Back to Top
Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. Let's work together to keep the conversation civil.
HIDE