Akhilesh Yadav lobs ‘Chanda Jeevis’ barb; Farooq calls for social harmony
Participating within the debate on the movement of because of the President’s deal with, Yadav queried if going by the PM’s ‘Andolan Jeevi’ moniker for agitators, these in search of donations will be known as ‘Chanda Jeevis’, prompting the treasury benches to criticism Yadav was referring to donations sought for the Ram temple in Ayodhya, whilst regulation minister Ravi Shankar Prasad objected to Yadav taking the President’s title.
Yadav demanded to know what stopped the Centre from repealing legal guidelines: “Who is stopping the government from withdrawing the farms laws which the farmers are not interested in? It is clear that these laws are for the corporates. Why was the PM trying to run down the agitators in the movement? Didn’t we get freedom through a movement led by Gandhiji? Didn’t we get many of our right through agitations? If they are Andolan Jeevis, what should I call those who collect money for certain thing these days? Aren’t you chanda-jeevis?”
Yadav charged the UP authorities with failing to proceed the developmental work launched by his earlier SP regime, equivalent to growing agri markets and procurement centres. Alleging UP recorded most crimes, particularly towards girls, Yadav hit out at CM Yogi Adityanath by saying “there is a ‘thoko neeti’ (encounter policy) in Uttar Pradesh. We also have a CM who is the only CM to have withdrawn a case against himself.”
In his speech, National Conference’s Farooq Abdullah made a passionate name for communal harmony and inclusive strategy by the Centre. “As a health care provider, I can guarantee you that when a affected person is rushed to hospital for blood, he doesn’t search to know whether or not the blood is from a Muslim or a Brahmin or a Dalit. All {that a} affected person need is blood to save lots of his life. Because all us have the identical blood’, Abdullah instructed the House. He stated neither did Ram belong solely to Hindus nor Quran solely to Muslims and asserted each Bhagwan and Allah belonged to all. He additionally urged the federal government to succeed in out to agitating farmers.
Abdullah complemented the vaccination drive towards Covid-19, pressured the necessity for quick central help to revive tourism in his Union Territory and complained of interferences to affect the chairpersons of the just lately elected District Development Councils. “The DDC polls were conducted fairly but now collectors and other officials are pressuring people to elect other chairpersons. Please don’t go against the people’s mandate, as people may feel disappointed that money power has replaced their choice”.
BJP’s Sunita Duggal hit again at Abdullah by asking, “where was your sense of pain when Kashmiri Pandits were attacked.” She praised the PM’s strategy and thanked Modi for constructing 10 crore bogs and serving to lady youngsters to get entry to colleges. Lauding the initiative to fight Covid-19, she stated, “China gave the world the virus and India gave the world the vaccine”.
Congress member Praneet Kaur objected to the remedy meted out to agitating farmers. “I am saddened to hear farmers being called terrorists. Why is the government scared of the agitation? Why have you put barbed wires and cement barricades on the Delhi border where the young, old and children are sitting in protest, seeking their rights. What is the message sent to their children at the borders? Why allege foreign interference when farmers get support from across the world? It is time the government shed its arrogance and accepted the legitimate demands of the farmers”.
Trinamool’s Saugata Roy stated he was completely satisfied to see the PM crying within the Rajya Sabha whereas bidding farewell to Ghulam Nabi Azad however questioned why the PM couldn’t take an identical emotional strategy in the direction of farmers agitating on the borders of Delhi. RSP’s NK Premachandran sought to maneuver a decision, questioning why the federal government didn’t object to the Supreme Court encroaching on the legislative area of Parliament by suspending farms legal guidelines and forming a panel to look at the regulation, which he stated solely Parliament may do by repealing them.
