Panel: China, WHO should have acted quicker to stop Covid-19 pandemic

The WHO panel also questioned whether the UN health agency should have labelled it a pandemic sooner

Topics
Coronavirus Vaccine | Coronavirus | Coronavirus Tests

AP | PTI  |  Geneva 

The United States played a pivotal role in helping to create the WHO in 1948. Just over 70 years later, President Trump is withdrawing the country from the agency amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Martial Trezzini/EPA
World Health Organization | File

A panel of experts commissioned by the World Health Organisation has criticised China and other countries for not moving to stem the initial outbreak of the earlier and questioned whether the UN health agency should have labelled it a pandemic sooner.

In a report issued on Monday, the panel led by former Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark said there were lost opportunities to apply basic public health measures at the earliest opportunity and that Chinese authorities could have applied their efforts more forcefully in January shortly after the began sickening clusters of people.

The reality is that only a minority of countries took full advantage of the information available to them to respond to the evidence of an emerging pandemic, the panel said.

The experts also wondered why WHO did not declare a global public health emergency sooner. The UN health agency convened its emergency committee on January 22, but did not characterise the emerging pandemic as an emergency until a week later. At the time, WHO said its expert committee was divided on whether a global emergency should be declared.

One more question is whether it would have helped if WHO used the word pandemic earlier than it did, the panel said.

WHO did not describe the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic until March 11, weeks after the virus had begun causing explosive outbreaks in numerous continents, meeting WHO's own definition for a flu pandemic.

As the began spreading across the globe, WHO's top experts disputed how infectious the virus was, saying it was not as contagious as flu and that people without symptoms only rarely spread the virus. Scientists have since concluded that COVID-19 transmits even quicker than the flu and that a significant proportion of spread is from people who don't appear to be sick.

Over the past year, WHO has come under heavy criticism for its handling of the response to COVID-19. US President Trump slammed the UN health agency for colluding with China to cover up the extent of the initial outbreak before halting US funding for WHO and pulling the country out of the organisation.

An Associated Press investigation in June found WHO repeatedly lauded China in public while officials privately complained that Chinese officials stalled on sharing critical epidemic information with them.

Although the panel concluded that many countries took minimal action to prevent the spread (of COVID-19) internally and internationally, it did not name specific countries. It also declined to call out WHO for its failure to more sharply criticise countries for their missteps instead of lauding countries for their response efforts.

Last month, the author of a withdrawn WHO report into Italy's pandemic response warned his bosses in May that people could die and the agency could suffer catastrophic reputational damage if it allowed political concerns to suppress the document, according to emails obtained by the AP.

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Read our full coverage on Coronavirus Vaccine
First Published: Tue, January 19 2021. 16:52 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU