Farmers' Protest LIVE Updates: Leaders of the protesting farmers said that they had not sought any relief from the Supreme Court, instead, their appeals are from the government
Representational image of farmers protest. AP
Leaders of the protesting farmers said that they had not sought any relief from the Supreme Court, instead, their appeals are from the government. Maintaining that they will not appear before the committee constituted by the apex court today, they said that this panel was not what they had asked for. The court also has the power to suo motu repeal the laws, they should have done that, they said.
Can anyone expect the protesting farmers demanding repeal of Agri Laws to talk to such a committee?
— Sitaram Yechury (@SitaramYechury) January 12, 2021
Why should they?
Farmers are left with no other option than to boycott this committee? pic.twitter.com/Orclm3IJYx
"We had issued a press note last night stating that we won't accept any committee formed by Supreme Court for mediation. We were confident that Centre will get a committee formed through Supreme Court to take the burden off their shoulders," Krantikari Kisan Union chief, Darshan Pal said in a press congference. The combined front of various farm unions, the Sanyukt Kisan Morcha, has declared that it will not appear before any committee, even though the Supreme Court has mandated that the first sitting of the panel should take place within 10 days,
The Supreme Court bench, in its order, said, "Laudably, the farmers have so far carried on the agitation peacefully and without any untoward incident. But it was pointed out in the course of hearing that a few persons who are not farmers have also joined, with a view to show solidarity with the farmers".
The bench, however, acknowledged allegations that Khalistani protesters are also capitalising on the farmers' movement which has recieved massive support from farmers in Punjab.
The Supreme Court Tuesday asked the Centre to file an affidavit on its claim that some banned organisations including Khalistanis' have infiltrated the ongoing farmers protest against the new farm laws. Attorney General KK Venugopal, appearing for the Centre, said that Khalistanis' have infiltrated the protest and he will file an affidavit along with the necessary inputs of the intelligence bureau (IB).
Leaders of the protesting farmers held a press conference Tuesday, hours after the Supreme Court stayed the three contentious laws and appointed a four-member committee to resolve the dispute.
The farmers appeared unfazed with the day's development and discarded the idea of cooperating with the panel, stating that all members have been vocal advocates of the bills in some form. Farmer leader Balbeer Singh Rajewal said, "We will not appear before any committee; our agitation is against three farm laws. We never even demanded from SC to form such a committee. The government is behind all these tactics."
Bhupinder Singh Mann is a former Rajya Sabha MP, and is presently National President of Bhartiya Kisan Union (BKU) and Chairman of the All India Kisan Coordination Committee.
On 14 December, 2020, a group of farmers' organisations, under the banner of the AIKCC, had handed over a memorandum demanding that the three laws be implemented, but with some amendments. According to an article in The Hindu, the amendments proposed by the organisations were aimed to ensure that judicial recourse is ensured, and that there is a level-playing field created between private and state-run markets
Farmers would any day prefer to talk to Narendra Tomar than to such a blatantly partisan "expert" committee.
— Yogendra Yadav (@_YogendraYadav) January 12, 2021
Wonder how the Supreme Court could be taken for a ride into appointing such a sarkari committee. https://t.co/5uHMKeF9l7
The Centre should repeal the three farm laws or it will cost the ruling BJP-JJP alliance in Haryana "heavily", a section of JJP MLAs said on Tuesday, hours before their party chief and Deputy Chief Minister Dushyant Chautala meets Union Home Minister Amit Shah here.
Farmers' Protest LATEST Updates: Leaders of the protesting farmers said that they had not sought any relief from the Supreme Court, instead, their appeals are from the government. Maintaining that they will not appear before the committee constituted by the apex court today, they said that this panel was not what they had asked for. The court also has the power to suo motu repeal the laws, they should have done that, they said.
The Supreme Court has asked the Centre to file an affidavit on its claim that some banned organisations, including 'Khalistanis', have infiltrated the ongoing farmers' protest against the three farm laws
Leaders of the protesting farmers held a press conference Tuesday, hours after the Supreme Court stayed the three contentious laws and appointed a four-member committee to resolve the dispute.
Quoting articles revealing past positions of all members of the panel on these laws, Yogendra Yadav said that the farmers will rather hold a discussion with Union agriculture minister Narendra Singh Tomar than such a 'partisan' committee.
The Centre should repeal the three farm laws or it will cost the ruling BJP-JJP alliance in Haryana 'heavily', a section of JJP MLAs warned on Tuesday, hours before their party chief Dushyant Chautala is due to meet Amit Shah
The Sanyukt Kisan Morcha has refused to go to the Supreme Court-appointed expert panel for dispute resolution following concerns that all members of the committee have in the past supported the three laws
Farmer leaders welcomed the Supreme Court's order to stay the implementation of three farm laws on Tuesday, but said they would not call off their protest until the legislations are repealed.
While Attorney General KK Venugopal said there is 'huge support' for the laws in Kerala, Karnataka, etc, DMK's P Wilson said that is untrue and Vijaywada is burning with protests against the legislations.
CJI SA Bobde said the proposed committee will evaluate the pros and cons of the farm laws and its findings will be a part of the judicial process.
CJI SA Bobde said the Court has the power to suspend the agricultural laws, but "the suspension of legislation must not be for an empty purpose". He said that the court-appointed committee will submit a report to the Bench and every person interested in solving the issue should cooperate with the committee.
Congress chief Sonia Gandhi has spoken to leaders of Opposition parties to plan out a joint strategy in the budget session of Parliament regarding the Centre's new farm laws.
The Haryana deputy chief minister will hold a meeting with JJP MLAs at his farmhouse in Delhi. All JJP legislators have been asked to come to the National Capital on Tuesday.
A joint front of 40 agitating farmer unions welcomed the suggestion of the Supreme Court for a stay on the agricultural laws but said they are not willing to participate in any proceedings before a committee that may be appointed by it.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday, rapping the Centre over its handling of the ongoing farmers protest at the borders of Delhi, said it is 'extremely disappointed ' with the way negotiations are unfolding.
The apex court asked the government if it would suspend the implementation of the laws or whether the court should step in for the same. The court further stated that it will constitute a committee headed by a former Chief Justice of India to resolve the impasse.
Thousands of farmers, mostly from Punjab and Haryana, are camping at three border points of Delhi —Singhu, Tikri and Ghazipur— for more than a month now, demanding the repeal of the three farm laws and a legal guarantee to the minimum support price (MSP) system for their crops.
The eighth round of talks between the Centre and the farmer unions on 7 January appeared headed nowhere as the Centre ruled out repealing the contentious laws, while the farmers' leaders said they are ready to fight till death and their 'ghar waapsi' will happen only after 'law waapsi'.
The apex court had earlier issued notice and sought the Centre's response on a batch of pleas against the three contentious farm laws —the Farmers' (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, the Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, and the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act.
As per reports, farmers groups said they will not participate in the proceedings of a committee that the Supreme Court might appoint.
"We met our lawyers this evening at length and after deliberation on pros and cons of the suggestions of the committee, we informed them that we are unanimously not agreeable to go before any committee," the Samyukta Kisan Morcha said, as per
Talking to news agency PTI, farmer leaders had earlier said they welcomed the top court's observations, but added that a stay on the implementation of the laws was not a solution as it would only be for a fixed amount of time. The leaders said that their agitation will continue till the laws are scrapped.
Meanwhile, INLD legislator Abhay Singh Chautala, writing to the Haryana Assembly Speaker, said if the Centre does not withdraw the three contentious farm laws by 26 January, then he would resign as an MLA from the House.
Extremely disappointed with negotiation process, says SC
While hearing a batch of petitions challenging the new farm laws as well as the ones raising issues related to the ongoing agitation at Delhi borders, a Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice of India SA Bobde, justices V Ramasubramanian and AS Bopanna, expressed disappointment at the way the government is handling the protest.
"We are extremely disappointed with the negotiation process. We don't want to make any stray observations on your negotiations but we are extremely disappointed with the process," PTI quotes the court as saying.
"We don't know what consultative process you followed before the laws. Many states are up in rebellion," LiveLaw quoted the bench as saying.
When Attorney General KK Venugopal submitted that amendments had started during the previous regime, CJI Bobde said," Mr Attorney, please understand it will not help you that some other government started it," reported Bar and Bench.
The apex court said it is not talking about the repeal of these farm laws at the moment. "This is a very delicate situation," the bench said, adding, "There is not a single petition before us which says that these farm laws are beneficial."
"We are not experts on economy; you tell us whether government is going to put on hold farm laws or we will do this," the bench said.
Venugopal argued that a law cannot be stayed unless the court finds it violates fundamental rights or constitutional schemes. "Our intention is to see whether we can find an amicable solution to all this. That is why we had asked you (Centre) whether you are willing to keep these laws on hold for sometime. But you wanted to buy time," the bench observed.
The apex court, which said the matter is getting worse and people are committing suicides, reiterated the need for having a committee comprising representatives from the government and farmer organisations from over the country and said it will stop the implementation of these laws if the panel advises doing so. It said that the protesting farmer can tell their objections to the committee.
The court asked the parties to suggest two or three names of former CJIs including former CJI RM Lodha who can head the court-appointed panel.
The bench said it did not know whether the protesting farmers were observing social distancing amid the pandemic but was concerned about them getting food and water. The bench also expressed apprehension that there might be some incident which may breach the peace.
"Old people and women are on the ground. Why are old people in the farmers' protests? We don't want to comment on the merit of the agitation," the bench said.
It said after the implementation of these laws are stayed, the protesters can carry on with the agitation as the court doesn't want "anyone to say that we stifled the protest." We are not going to protect any lawbreakers. We want to prevent the loss of property and lives, it said.
When the attorney-general told the court that next meeting between the government and farmers is scheduled for 15 January and the court should not pass any order today, the bench said, "We do not think the Centre is handling the issue correctly. We have to take some action today. We don't think you are being effective. If laws are put on hold then negotiations will have a chance to work out. "
The court refused to grant extra time to the Centre to explore the possibility of amicable solution to the issue, saying it has already granted the government a long rope. "We have given you long rope, Mr Attorney-General, please don't lecture us on patience," the bench said.
"Whether you have faith or not, we are the Supreme Court of India, we will do our job," the bench told the protesting farmer unions.
The court, which indicated during the hearing that it may pass orders in parts, later said that the order will be pronounced on Tuesday.
'Will continue agitation even if implementation stayed'
Farmers leaders said they would continue their agitation even if the government or the Supreme Court stays the implementation, reported PTI. The farmer leaders, who said they were "sharing their personal opinion", were also of the view that a stay is "not a solution" as it is only for a fixed period of time.
The farmers want the laws to be repealed completely. The protest will continue even if the government or the Supreme Court stays their implementation," Haryana Bharatiya Kisan Union president Gurnam Singh Chaduni told the news agency.
Bhog Singh Mansa, president of Indian Farmers Union (Mansa), said "A stay is not a solution. We are here to get these laws scrapped completely... the government has in a way already agreed to scrap the laws when it said it is willing to incorporate as many amendments as farmers want."
"We appeal to the Supreme Court to terminate these laws as these are not valid constitutionally," Mansa said, adding the protest will continue till the "the laws are not repealed or the BJP government completes its tenure".
Punjab Kisan Union president Ruldu Singh Mansa echoed similar sentiments, saying the agitation began with the demand for scrapping the farm laws and "it will end only when we win this fight".
Darshan Pal, president of Krantikari Kisan Union, said the farmer leaders are consulting their lawyers and a formal response will be given after the court gave its verdict.
Centre files affidavit
Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.