UP: Illegally promoted during Akhilesh regime, 4 info officers demoted as peon, watchman, operators

The decision was taken after a helper in the information department filed a writ petition in the Allahabad HC against the promotion of the four employees of his rank.

Published: 11th January 2021 05:56 PM  |   Last Updated: 11th January 2021 05:56 PM   |  A+A-

Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath

Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath (Photo | PTI)

By Express News Service

LUCKNOW: In a unique case of demotion, four additional district information officers were demoted to their parent posting as peon, watchman, and cinema operator-cum-communication assistants after their promotions were found to be illegal.

The Uttar Pradesh government issued orders in this regard on Saturday. The decision was taken by the state authorities after a helper in the information department filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking promotion citing the example of four employees of his rank who were promoted as
additional information officers in 2014 during the Samajwadi Party rule.

Following the Saturday decision, Dayashankar, an additional district information officer in Firozabad, was demoted and asked to join his previous posting as a watchman. Similarly, Narsingh, who was also posted as an additional district information officer in Bareilly, was demoted as a peon. Vinod Kumar Sharma and Anil Kumar Singh, who were promoted as additional district information officers in Mathura and Bhadohi respectively, were ordered to return to their previous profile as cinema operator-cum-communication assistant.

Though the court dismissed the petition observing that the right to promotion was strictly regulated by service rules, it also instructed the director (information) to decide on the representation and consider the grievance of the petitioner that other employees of his rank had been promoted.

Following the court order, the information department rummaged through the records and found that the four employees were promoted even though there was no such rule to this effect.

A senior officer in the state information department claimed that the helper’s claim to entitlement was also rejected as inappropriate.


Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.