Fishers’ welfare more important than Marina beautification: HC

During the hearing on Friday, counsel for the petitioner L P Maurya submitted that the main petitions are pending since 2015.

Published: 09th January 2021 06:19 AM  |   Last Updated: 09th January 2021 06:19 AM   |  A+A-

A view of the Marina Beach stretch | shiba prasad sahu

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: The welfare of fishermen and their human rights are more important than beautification of Marina Beach, orally observed the first bench of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy on Friday, while passing directions on the plea-- “Beautification can be carried out simultaneously but first preference is for fishermen welfare.”

The issue pertains to two petitions moved by Fishermen Care - a fishermen rights organisation seeking implementation of the Murari Committee recommendations on high sea fishing and to increase the allowance provided during fishing ban period.

However, the petitions were suo motu expanded by a division bench headed by Justice Vineeth Kothari who was recently transferred to Gujarat High Court, to regulate beach vendors and also the beautification of Marina and Loop Road. Justices Vineet Kothari and MS Ramesh on December 15 had also ordered for appointment of a retired HC judge to ensure transparency by scrutinising applications while allocating 900 shops to vendors.

During the hearing on Friday, counsel for the petitioner L P Maurya submitted that the main petitions are pending since 2015. The original prayers sought for are not being considered by the court but instead, beautification of Marina is being given priority, which is not of primary concern, he added. The bench said, “Beautification is very good aesthetically, but there are other compelling issues which we must not sacrifice, and we must not postpone to see a beautified area.

So, we will concentrate on the other aspect first before we concentrate on beautification.” The court also recorded demands raised by the reservation for disabled persons. The bench said, “All of us must be worried about the most vulnerable sections of the society. We have to give more representation to women and make life somewhat better and easier for people with other kinds of sexual orientation.” The court then adjourned the hearing after the Pongal holidays.


Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.