In response to my last Monday article (‘Notifications on GST exemptions puzzle exporters’), some readers have sought clarifications. Here, I opine on some of the queries raised by them. The notification 54/2018-CT dated October 9, 2018, operates with prospective effect.
In my opinion, the judgment of the Gujarat High Court in the case of Cosmo Films that it is effective from October 23, 2017, is incorrect. In fact, I think the judgment contains more errors. The Department of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) has taken advantage of this judgment and asked exporters to pay up IGST on ...
TO READ THE FULL STORY, SUBSCRIBE NOW NOW AT JUST Rs
Key stories on business-standard.com are available to premium subscribers only.
Already a premium subscriber? LOGIN NOW
Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU