Analysis | The Trump campaign was not denied access to Philadelphia’s ballot count

But, the truth is, Trump’s personal legal professionals have attested in courtroom that his campaign was granted access and noticed the method, each in Philadelphia and in different cities, and has discovered no proof of fraud.

President-elect Joe Biden gained Pennsylvania by more than 80,000 votes, a greater exhibiting than Trump’s 44,000-vote margin in 2016.

The Trump campaign has filed lawsuits in search of to throw out 680,000 mail ballots within the state, cut up nearly evenly between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.

At first, the campaign argued the ballots needs to be chucked as a result of Trump observers have been not allowed to monitor the counting. If true, that may have been a violation of Pennsylvania’s election code, which says that “one authorized representative of each candidate in an election and one representative from each political party shall be permitted to remain in the room in which the absentee ballots and mail-in ballots are pre-canvassed … [and] canvassed.”

The Trump campaign had a minimum of one consultant contained in the Philadelphia Convention Center as town’s 350,000 mail ballots have been being processed, and the allegations that the campaign was denied access have been later deleted from one among Trump’s lawsuits.

However, Trump and his private lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani preserve repeating this false declare. Giuliani told a federal court Tuesday that the allegations have been nonetheless lively, earlier than conceding that they had been deleted after which including they might be restored. An amended lawsuit filed Wednesday asserts that “it was physically impossible to view the envelopes or ballots” and that “in Philadelphia County, poll watchers and canvass representatives were denied access altogether.”

Who is aware of what authorized maneuver or about-face is coming subsequent? But Trump’s tweet is demonstrably false.

He wrote, “They didn’t even allow Republican Observers into the building to watch,” after which appended one other tweet from a reporter quoting from a courtroom opinion.

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dominated towards Trump in a 5-2 determination Tuesday, discovering that native election officers legally exercised their energy in organising a waist-high barrier and buffer zone of 15 to 18 toes between the campaign observers and the election employees contained in the Philadelphia Convention Center.

Had Trump learn the tweet he was quoting, he would have seen language from the Supreme Court opinion stating that these circumstances “allowed candidate representatives to observe the Board conducting its activities as prescribed under the Election Code.”

Had Trump learn the opinion itself, or inquired together with his personal campaign, he would have realized {that a} lawyer, Jeremy A. Mercer, was representing him contained in the room and monitoring the election employees’ actions in Philadelphia.

Had Trump tuned in to one other courtroom case in Pennsylvania, he would have heard a campaign lawyer telling a federal decide that Trump had “a nonzero number of people in the room.”

“According to Attorney Mercer’s candid testimony, which the trial court accepted as credible, from his vantage point, he could view the entirety of the pre-canvassing and canvassing process,” the state Supreme Court opinion says.

“Clearly, then, Attorney Mercer had the opportunity to observe the mechanics of the canvassing process. Specifically, Attorney Mercer witnessed Board employees inspecting the back of ballot envelopes containing the voter’s declaration, before sending them on for processing; witnessed ballots being removed from their secrecy envelopes, and naked ballots which had been delivered to the Board without a secrecy envelope being segregated from ballots which arrived within such envelopes; saw that the ballot processing methods utilized by the Board were not destroying the ballot envelopes containing the voter’s declaration; and perceived that the ballot secrecy envelopes were being preserved during their processing.”

Mercer said that he may not see all the things, nonetheless, and the Trump campaign argued that he couldn’t “meaningfully” observe the proceedings. Although observers may stroll freely behind the barrier, the primary row of tables was 15 to 18 toes away. Each of the three rows had 15 tables, in order that the farthest have been about 100 toes away from the commentary space.

A decrease courtroom in Pennsylvania had decreased the buffer to 6 toes, however that call was overturned by the state Supreme Court.

The courtroom indicated that Mercer may see sufficient to monitor the method, as Pennsylvania legislation permits, however not sufficient to problem particular person ballots, which he may not legally do: “Although Attorney Mercer related that he could not view the actual declarations on the ballot envelopes, nor examine individual secrecy envelopes for improper markings … this information would only be necessary if he were making challenges to individual ballots during the pre-canvassing and canvassing process … [but] such challenges are not permissible under the Election Code.”

The two justices within the minority did not rule for Trump. They stated the case was moot as a result of the vote count had nearly concluded.

A spokesman for the Trump campaign did not reply to a request for remark. Mercer did not reply to emailed questions. His legislation agency, Porter Wright, final week filed and then abruptly withdrew from one of Trump’s Pennsylvania lawsuits, which alleges voter “irregularities” throughout the state, and one lawyer on the agency stop in protest over its Trump work in the course of the summer season, in accordance to the New York Times. (“Leftist mobs descended upon some of the lawyers representing the president’s campaign and they buckled,” Trump campaign spokesman Tim Murtaugh stated in response.)

Absurd, false, corrosive and contradicted by the very tweet he quoted, the courtroom ruling he was citing and his personal legal professionals, Trump’s declare simply deserves Four Pinocchios.

A Trump campaign consultant gave granular testimony about what he was in a position to see and not see contained in the Philadelphia Convention Center as mail ballots have been being processed. We observe that Trump has made the identical allegation about different cities, reminiscent of Detroit, the place Republicans additionally had access and monitored the count.

Send us details to examine by filling out this form