The Economic Times
English EditionEnglish Editionहिन्दी
| E-Paper
Search
+

View: Why an urban job guarantee scheme is a bad idea

View: Why an urban job guarantee scheme is a bad idea
View: Why an urban job guarantee scheme is a bad idea
A crisis like Covid-19 justifies emergency outlays to help unemployed urban workers.

Synopsis

Since a guaranteed urban wage can be double the MGNREGA rate, any given budget outlay can create up to twice as many jobs in rural as in urban areas.

The government is reportedly considering an urban jobs scheme. Some economists hope this can be the start of an Urban Employment Guarantee Scheme, analogous to the Mahatma Gandhi Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA). Economist Jean Drèze has suggested a Decentralised Urban Employment and Training (DUET) scheme.Emergency action to create jobs in a disaster like Covid-19 is warranted. But scaling this up to an urban job guarantee poses
Share This Article
  • GIFT ARTICLE
  • FONT SIZE
  • SAVE
  • COMMENT

To Read the Full Story, Become an ET Prime Member

Sign in to read the full article

You’ve got this Prime Story as a Free Gift

Access the exclusive Economic Times stories, Editorial and Expert opinion

Why ?

  • Sharp Insight-rich, Indepth stories across 20+ sectors

  • Access the exclusive Economic Times stories, Editorial and Expert opinion

  • Clean experience with
    Minimal Ads
  • Comment & Engage with ET Prime community
  • Exclusive invites to Virtual Events with Industry Leaders
  • A trusted team of Journalists & Analysts who can best filter signal from noise
The Economic Times