ReutersNEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has refused to declare elections of legislators with charge sheets void, even in cases were a conviction would attract a jail term of five or more years. SC said that the subject was essentially in Parliament’s domain. The court cannot either direct Parliament to frame a law, a bench led by L Nageshwara Rao said on Monday.
Dealing with a plea filed by NGO Lok Prahari which sought elections of charge-sheeted persons as null and void, the bench, however, allowed the petitioner to file a fresh plea seeking to implement the court’s earlier order asking the government to crack down on increasing criminalisation of politics.
Appearing for the NGO, its secretary SN Shukla submitted that the court must intervene under provisions of the Representation of People Act. Shukla said that the percentage of those with criminal records in Delhi and Bihar assemblies had gone up from 20 to 53 and 30 to 51, respectively.
“A law has been pending for over 23 years now due to conflict of interest. This malignancy must be treated as early as possible before it becomes fatal to democracy.” He urged the court to treat a charge-sheeted person on a par with a person accused of non-disclosure of assets and criminal antecedents and declare his election result null and void.
The bench said that the plea went against the Law Commission recommendations that it would rather leave the issue for Parliament to decide. The Law Commission had instead suggested that those whom against whom charges have been framed be prevented from contesting.
There have been repeated demands that those who have been charge sheeted or against whom charges have been framed to be disallowed from contesting elections, with little success. The political class feels that such a law can be manipulated to frame opponents ahead of elections and has been averse to barring them from contesting. At the moment, those convicted for more than 2 years in a criminal case cannot contest elections.
Dealing with a plea filed by NGO Lok Prahari which sought elections of charge-sheeted persons as null and void, the bench, however, allowed the petitioner to file a fresh plea seeking to implement the court’s earlier order asking the government to crack down on increasing criminalisation of politics.
Appearing for the NGO, its secretary SN Shukla submitted that the court must intervene under provisions of the Representation of People Act. Shukla said that the percentage of those with criminal records in Delhi and Bihar assemblies had gone up from 20 to 53 and 30 to 51, respectively.
“A law has been pending for over 23 years now due to conflict of interest. This malignancy must be treated as early as possible before it becomes fatal to democracy.” He urged the court to treat a charge-sheeted person on a par with a person accused of non-disclosure of assets and criminal antecedents and declare his election result null and void.
The bench said that the plea went against the Law Commission recommendations that it would rather leave the issue for Parliament to decide. The Law Commission had instead suggested that those whom against whom charges have been framed be prevented from contesting.
There have been repeated demands that those who have been charge sheeted or against whom charges have been framed to be disallowed from contesting elections, with little success. The political class feels that such a law can be manipulated to frame opponents ahead of elections and has been averse to barring them from contesting. At the moment, those convicted for more than 2 years in a criminal case cannot contest elections.
Read More News on
Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.
Also Read
2 Comments on this Story
 | Ravie Gupta13 minutes ago very bad decision. |
| Nemani Hanumanta Rao14 minutes ago The courts have no jurisdiction in such matters. Only criminals and corrupt leaders get elected. They money & muscle power. Any person without such backing cannot win elections. Better the courts must keep away from such controversial subjects and leave them to Parliament to decide. |