You say temple is illegally built, yet pray there: HC to petitioner

A petitioner who has filed a PIL challenging an illegally built temple has now told the court that he will continue to pray there.

Published: 10th November 2020 04:36 AM  |   Last Updated: 10th November 2020 04:36 AM   |  A+A-

Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court (File Photo | Debdutta Mitra, EPS)

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: A petitioner who has filed a PIL challenging an illegally built temple has now told the court that he will continue to pray there.The Karnataka High Court on Monday said that the petitioner then cannot be allowed to continue as pro bono litigant.A division bench of Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice S Vishwajith Shetty passed the order after the petitioner, A Velumurugan, filed an affidavit stating that he will continue to visit Shiva Subramanya Swamy temple which was allegedly constructed encroaching 20 acres forest land at Bhadragiri of MC Halli in Tarikere taluk of Chikkamagaluru district.

Then the bench said that even after taking note of the fact that the temple was constructed encroaching forest land, the petitioner wanted to take the benefit of the temple. “He is not a pro bono petitioner and cannot be allowed to prosecute the matter,” the bench said.

While hearing the petition on September 30, the bench had observed that no God would say he should be worshipped in an illegally built temple and directed the petitioner to file an affidavit stating whether still he wanted to visit that temple.In response to this, the petitioner had filed the affidavit stating that the temple was built before his birth. Recently he came to know that it was constructed over government property. He said his family has religious faith in that temple.

He stated that his visit to the temple will not come in the way of ventilating the grievances in respect of mismanagement of the temple and encroachment. Hence, he prayed that the court issue a  direction that the temple be handed over to the Muzrai Department. Further hearing was adjourned to November 24.


Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.