Rajiv Gandhi assassination: SC unhappy with delay on Perarivalan’s remission

The recommendation is pending with the Governor for over two years as the government is waiting for a larger conspiracy angle to be probed. 

Published: 04th November 2020 03:26 AM  |   Last Updated: 04th November 2020 03:27 AM   |  A+A-

AG Perarivalan

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI/CHENNAI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed unhappiness over delay in executing the Tamil Nadu government’s recommendation for remission of sentence awarded to AG Perarivalan, convicted in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. The recommendation is pending with the Governor for over two years as the government is waiting for a larger conspiracy angle to be probed. 

Perarivalan was awarded the death penalty in 1991 for his involvement in the conspiracy to assassinate the former Prime Minister. He was charged with providing a 9-volt battery to co-conspirator Sivarasan, which was used in the explosive device that killed Rajiv Gandhi. In 2014, the apex court commuted his sentence to life imprisonment. 

On Tuesday, a bench comprising justices L Nageswara Rao, Ajay Rastogi and Hemant Gupta asked the additional advocate general for TN, Balaji Srinivasan, to find out why the Governor Banwarilal Purohit had not decided on the recommendations of the State government. Srinivasan informed the Court that the matter before Governor was that of a larger conspiracy, and that he was awaiting a report from the CBI.

‘After 20 yrs, still waiting for replies to rogatory letters?’

Additional Solicitor General for India KN Nataraj told the court that the investigation on the angle of a larger conspiracy was spread over the United Kingdom and Sri Lanka, and that the CBI was awaiting replies to its letters rogatory. “The larger conspi racy probe i s pending for 20 years and is ongoing. Still, you are at the stage of getting replies to rogatory letters?” asked Justice Rao.

‘We don’t want to exercise jurisdiction, but we are not happy with how the recommendation has been pending before the Governor for two years,” the bench noted. Appearing for the petitioner, Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan cited the Nilofer Nisha case, which is related to the same remission notification, wherein the court exercised its powers under Article 142 of the Constitutionto release the prisoners. Sankaranarayanan further stated that grant of remission was the prerogative of the Governor and is not under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). Soon after, Opposition parties in Tamil Nadu urged Governor Banwarilal Purohit to initiate steps to release the seven convicts in the case.


Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.