The E, then. It’s more than just a nice piece of design. You’ve read plenty on it this year already in Autocar, most recently its three-and-a-half-star road test rating. Such a rating might be disappointing to Honda, but its range/price Venn diagram performance simply can’t be ignored against cars with the quality of the e-208, and the road test makes no allowance for charm. But charm is a worthy commodity in a long-term test such as this one. This is where we’ll find out just how easy it is to overlook the E’s objective shortcomings and really celebrate so much of what makes it such an interesting and desirable car.
As a quick recap, it’s the first electric Honda sold in Europe and is built on a bespoke architecture. There are just two versions offered: a standard, more efficiency-focused model with 134bhp (badged simply the E) and this more powerful, 152bhp Advance version, which is also much better equipped. Both models are rear-wheel drive and use the same 35.5kWh battery, with the regular version having an official range of 136 miles, while our model, on larger wheels and less economy-focused tyres, records 125 miles. In our road test, the real-world range came in at around 110 miles.
Given that the range of the entry-level model is hardly stellar anyway, the E’s appeal really lies in the Advance, which costs £2500 more than the regular version but comes with a significant uplift in specification. Standard kit includes the choice of 16in or 17in wheels, a premium sound system (which really does have a fantastic sound quality) and a heated windscreen, which has become an essential option for those freezing winter months.
Rarely do you sit inside a car these days and really take a moment to soak in your surroundings, but you do in the E. I haven’t been this taken aback by an interior since the BMW i3. The E has a similar ambience, mixing the right amount of technology with interesting, unusual materials and a real sense of space. The car may look small from the outside, but it feels big inside, and its design is the very definition of a breath of fresh air.

Ambience appreciated, it’s time for the pre-flight checks of getting the seating position right (this is an easy car in which to get comfortable) and adjusting your mirrors. And if you haven’t already, you then notice the E’s party trick of having cameras in place of conventional door mirrors, displaying images on screens at the extremities of the dashboard at the base of the A-pillars. You’ll love them or you’ll hate them (detecting a theme here?), but you’ll definitely take more than a few journeys to get used to them. If and when you do, you’ll appreciate the wider field of vision, improved visibility in low light and the handy green guidelines that appear when it’s safe to change lanes. There’s a digital rear-view mirror in the Advance, too; it’s a bit easier to get used to and similarly boosts low-light performance.
Join the debate
si73
I had a little go in one
scrap
The e-208 isn't 'from the
The e-208 isn't 'from the class above'. They are both superminis, just packaged differently. The Honda is clearly a bigger and more substantial product than, say, a VW Up.
artill
Absolutely a Marmite car. If
Absolutely a Marmite car. If they hadnt done the show car with better styling, 3 doors etc then i might like it more. I havent driven one, but have had a good poke around. Its tiny, the back seats useless (which makes the 5 doors even more annoying).
It is a quality product, and looks it. But the range limits who could run it, and the price restricts that further. I am sure Honda will shift as many as they want to, but it could have been so much more.
mx5xm
Range...
I love the look of the car and sat in one at a car show last year and was impressed. I must admit we've had a few Hondas in the family over the years, so with all that said, the range kills it for me. It is a pretty penny to pay for a car that ends up beimg a local run-about. So roughly 50 miles there and then 50 back, with a bit in reserve. That is just not enough. 250-300 should be the minimum today for a small e-car.
Tom Chet
Anticipation
I'm anticipating this series of long term test reports almost more than on any other car in your fleet. It is obviously a beautiful and interesting object but how much will Mt Tisshaw actually use it? Can't wait to find out.James Taylor at Car Magazine is running a Mini E and despite loving the car's zip and handling he has often had to leave it unused such are, for him, the limitations imposed by the range.
adrian888
Disapointed
I saw one in the metal last week and was underwhelmed, looks better in photos. It is small and expensive but no doubt the iphone must haves will queue up to sign PCP's. There is something about the proportions of the C pillar/rear haunches that are not quite 'right' in the way a Golf mk1 is or the mk1 Civic this is supposed to pay homage to.
Ilys
Honda
As a retired driver, paying almost £30,000 for a town runabout would be utterly ridiculous. I go upto London at least 3 times a year. Driving is going to be a rich mans hobby once fossil fuel cars are no longer available. This Honda is neither practical nor even particularly beautiful, certainly not desirable.
xxxx
Fiat
get an electric fiat 500 then
si73
The reasoning for the 3 star
Add your comment