Judge Says Breonna Taylor Grand Juror Can Speak About Case

The court sought the law ministry’s response after going through a statement by the World Health Organisation, which has declared virginity testing as unscientific, medically unnecessary and unreliable.
A judge has cleared the way for grand jurors to speak about the proceedings in the case against the police officers who shot Breonna Taylor.
- Associated Press
- Last Updated: October 21, 2020, 2:06 IST
- FOLLOW US ON:
LOUISVILLE, Ky: A judge has cleared the way for grand jurors to speak about the proceedings in the case against the police officers who shot Breonna Taylor.
An anonymous grand juror who sat on the panel last month had sued to speak publicly. None of the officers were charged directly in Taylors death, but one officer was charged with endangering Taylors neighbors.
This is a rare and extraordinary example of a case where, at the time this motion is made, the historical reasons for preserving grand jury secrecy are null, Jefferson Circuit Court Judge Annie OConnell wrote in the ruling.
She wrote that any individual grand juror who wishes to identify themselves as a participant in the proceedings could do so, but was not compelled to do so.
Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron, whose office led the investigation, had opposed letting grand jurors speak about the proceedings. Cameron has said he did not introduce any homicide charges against the two officers who shot Taylor, because they were justified in returning fire after Taylor’s boyfriend shot at them.
It wasn’t immediately known whether Cameron would appeal the ruling.
A Black woman, Taylor was shot five times in her home on March 13 by white officers executing a narcotics warrant.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor