The Bombay High Court on Saturday asked the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) if it has made any arrangements for its differently-abled staff to travel to work during the lockdown.
A Bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice G.S. Kulkarni was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the National Association for the Blind over the BMC not paying its 268 visually-impaired employees full salaries during the lockdown.
As per the plea filed through advocate Uday Warunjikar, the BMC initially exempted its differently-abled staff members from reporting to work during the lockdown. On May 21, the BMC issued a circular informing such employees that they were entitled to a special leave without loss of pay. However, on May 26, it issued another circular saying that the leave was not special, but a “permissible leave,” which involved a loss of pay for the days that the employees failed to show up for work.
As per the May 26 circular, persons with disabilities will not be exempted from reporting to work. They can, however, seek permissible leave. As per the plea, such permissible leave needs to be sanctioned by senior authorities, and for the days that such leave is not sanctioned, an employee has to undergo a loss of pay.
Mr. Warunjikar argued that the permissible leave rule was depriving the physically disabled, particularly the visually impaired, of their salaries as they were unable to commute to work. “In the current scenario, people do not even shake hands with anyone. The visually impaired need help to cross a traffic junction, to take trains, to do anything else. No one is there to hold their hands or help them commute. How will they reach their place of work?” Mr. Warunjikar said.
He also said there existed a Central government resolution that any differently-abled government staffer must not be deprived of his or her pay on account of failure to report to work during the lockdown. While the disabled employees were paid in full between March 23 and May 31 this year, in the subsequent months, the BMC began to make deductions for the days they missed work, the petitioner said.
The BMC, however, claimed before the HC that it took “very good care” of its disabled staff. It said around 1,150 differently-abled staff, including the 268 visually-impaired workers,and had started bus services for them. They were also permitted to use local train services in the city, the BMC said. However, the BMC was not bound by the Central government’s circular, it said.
Irked over the reply, the high court asked the civic body that if the Central government’s resolutions did not bind the BMC then why did the latter implement some circulars, and not others. “Why are you then not asking 100% staff members to attend work? Why are you calling them in shifts and asking only for 75% attendance? Why are you not allowing visitors to meet your officers inside their offices during the pandemic?” the bench asked.
‘Unfortunate stand’
“You can’t say some resolutions of the Central government apply to you while others do not,” the Bench said. The court then asked the BMC to file an affidavit on the travel arrangements it had made for its differently-abled employees.
“We are so fortunate that we can see. That we have all limbs and we can move around as we wish to...It is so unfortunate that the corporation has taken this stand,” the Bench said.
The court concluded all arguments and reserved its verdict on the plea.
(With PTI inputs)