PGCIL didn't recover Rs 6,853 cr relinquishment charges from customers: CAG

The CAG observed that total 26,836 MW of LTA were surrendered by the customers from September 2010 to March 2018

Topics
PGCIL | Power Transmission | cag

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

power, electricity, IIP, demand, discoms, distribution, companies, firms, transmission, transformer, workers
The performance audit was taken up to assess the effectiveness of planning and implementation of transmission projects executed by the PGCIL during the 12th Plan (2012-2017).

State-run Power Grid Corporation did not recover Rs 6,853.43 crore from customers for relinquishing long-term access to transmission network which resulted in higher electricity tariff, a report has flagged.

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audit report on planning and implementation of transmission projects by Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd (PGCIL) was presented in Parliament on Friday.

The performance audit was taken up to assess the effectiveness of planning and implementation of transmission projects executed by the during the 12th Plan (2012-2017).

As per the (Central Electricity Regulatory Commission) Regulations, a long-term customer may relinquish long-term access (LTA) rights fully or partly before the expiry of the full term of LTA by making payment of compensation for stranded (power transmission) capacity.

The observed that total 26,836 MW of LTA were surrendered by the customers from September 2010 to March 2018. However, no relinquishment charges had been collected from the customers till date.

As a result, an amount of Rs 6,853.43 crore is yet to be recovered from the relinquished customers, the report said.

Hence, due to non-collection of compensation charges by the for stranded capacity, the (power) consumers are being put under extra financial burden (higher tariff).

The also found that due to delay in completion of projects within prescribed timelines, the also lost the opportunity of earning Rs 112.51 crore towards additional Return on Equity as part of tariff.

The Central Electricity Authority (CEA) has been entrusted with the responsibility of preparing National Electricity Plan (NEP) for both generation and transmission and Central Transmission Utility (CTU or PGCIL) has the key responsibility of network planning and development based on NEP in coordination with concerned agencies.

The CEA notified NEP (in November 2012) for generation and transmission capacity addition during 2012-17.

However, the CAG said that no Network Plan was found available in the records or on the website of CTU (PGCIL).

As per the guidelines issued by Ministry of Power this network plan is required to include projects for new transmission lines and substations and strengthening and upgradation of existing lines.

In the absence of Network Plan, a structured mechanism for timely dissemination of the likely additions/ modifications to the transmission system to stakeholders, and for assessing and focusing on the requirement for upgradation of the existing lines in advance was not available, the report stated.

During 2012-17, while PGCIL commissioned 233 new lines, upgradation was carried out to only eight lines, it added.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Read our full coverage on PGCIL
First Published: Fri, September 18 2020. 21:39 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU