Former Mumbai City, Indian Arrows and FIFA U-17 World Cup team defender Anwar Ali is at crossroads today. He wants to continue playing for he says "football is the only thing I know" but his heart condition has left his future in the hands of All India Football Federation (AIFF). The federation's medical committee is currently deciding whether or not Anwar should be allowed to play.

Just a year ago, Anwar had signed a lucrative contract with Mumbai City FC and before that, he was a prominent figure in the Indian Arrows team. However, his world turned upside down last year when he was diagnosed with his congenital heart condition -- an extremely rare form of the already uncommon Hypercardio Myopathy (HCM). He took off to France for treatment and now that he is back, he wants to play again.

He signed with Kolkata club Mohammedan Sporting to play the I-League second division but he cannot do that until and unless he is given a green signal from the AIFF.

"Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees me the right to earn a livelihood for myself. If I wish to take an informed risk and am ready to monitor my condition with the help of medical experts, then it is ultimately my choice, whether I wish to take the risk of playing football professionally.

"If any club feels that they do not wish to take the risk to play me, they will not sign me, but if I am willing and my club is willing and I am ready to take necessary precautions then I do not see how my right to earn my bread and butter can be taken away from me," Anwar wrote in a detailed letter running into 57 pages - with documentary evidences and medical reports - to the AIFF on Tuesday, as stated by Times of India.

The news report states that before receiving Anwar's letter, the medical committee had "verbally" agreed that the youngster should not be allowed to play but they delayed the decision after receiving his letter and audio transcripts of Anwar's appointment with Dr F. Carre, head of sports medicine at CHU Rennes in France.

Anwar grew up grazing cattle in a small dairy farm - one that his father owns in Adampur, Punjab. He feels if not for football, he would be grazing cattle today as well. "Being a large family and me being the only earning member, it is very difficult for us to make ends meet even when I am earning as a professional footballer," Anwar further said.

If Anwar takes the field with his heart condition, there is always going to be a risk of a cardiac arrest on field, which may even lead to his death. But Anwar said that AIFF's ban would be a "a death sentence" anyway.

"If AIFF bans me, I'll be forced to play in low level tournaments like Khep in Kolkata to make ends meet. There are no medical facilities in these tournaments, so the chances of me dying on the field will be much higher. Your disqualification of me will be a death sentence for me and my family. I beg you to let me play," said Anwar.

Anwar, who is unhappy with the fact that he has not been given a personal hearing with the medical committee, pointed out how AIFF had not intervened in situation with some footballers in a similar situation in the past like Dipendu Biswas and Anwar Ali Senior's heart attack on the field while with East Bengal..

"There is more risk of me and my family dying from hunger if my only earning source is taken from me, than there is of me dying from Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) on the field while playing," Anwar said.

Two days before External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi reached an agreement in Moscow, heightened tensions along the Line of Actual Control in Ladakh had led Indian and Chinese troops to open fire on the north bank of Pangong Tso. While the Indian troops had moved towards the western side of Finger 3, the Chinese army had moved to occupy the area between Finger 3 and 4. The step by both the countries led to firing of "100 to 200 shots" in the air as the troops came 300 metre close to each other.

A report by Indian Express quoted a top government officer, aware of the details, as saying: "100 to 200 shots were fired in the air by both sides on the ridgeline where Finger 3 and Finger 4 merge before moving north as one ridge."

"In the first week of September, there was a lot of movement" on both the north and south banks of Pangong Tso, the officer was quoted as saying, mentioning "multiple" incidents of firing in the region in the first week of September.

Top government sources told News18 that India and China exchanged fire twice at LAC. The first round of firing took place in Chushul sub-sector on September 7. These were said to be warning shots. The second round of firing occurred on September 8 at North Bank — "this was serious". At least 100 rounds were fired, sources said.

The IE report stated that till date, neither side has officially said anything about the firing on the north bank which took place after the Chushul incident, and was bigger in scale.

The situation, however, has since calmed down, the officer was quoted. "Now things have cooled down because of the talks between our Defence Minister and their Defence Minister and the Foreign Ministers. The focus has shifted towards dialogue," he said.

The two sides have agreed to hold another round of talks between the Corps Commanders though the date is still to be decided. The officer indicated that this time, the talks may include an official from the Ministry of External Affairs, the report stated.

The officer was further quoted as saying that before India occupied the heights along the LAC in the Chushul sub-sector, China was in a position of advantage, and at the discussions at the military and diplomatic levels, "they were trying to bargain for time" as "at that particular stage they were better off" and "they had no reason to negotiate".

On current positions on the Fingers on the north bank, the officer was quoted as saying that the Indian soldiers were above the Chinese deployment on Finger 4.

Chinese troops, he said, are "trying to go further up" but "we are in a slightly better position, there is a limit to how much you can keep jockeying" on that ridgeline, and that the Chinese would not be able to sustain themselves at a point higher on the ridge than where the Indian soldiers are.

Some U.S. college students are doing the once-improbable: blowing the whistle on classmates who break rules aimed at stemming the spread of the coronavirus.

At the University of Missouri, one senior is posting photos and videos on a “University of Misery” Twitter account that shows students gathered in large groups at pools, outside bars and other places – few of them wearing masks.

The university has a form on its website where violations of the school’s COVID-19 guidelines can be anonymously reported, but posting on Twitter “adds a different level of accountability,” said the student.

“When it’s up there publicly and people are retweeting it, and the university’s getting tagged over and over – then they have to reply,” said the student, who sometimes posts videos and photos of non-compliance sent by other students and asked for anonymity to avoid backlash.

Christian Basi, spokesman for the University of Missouri, which has about 30,000 students, said there has been good compliance on campus during daytime hours but problems arise once students leave campus.

“Where we’re seeing our issues have been off campus, when individuals go home to their private residences,” Basi said.

The University of Missouri on Tuesday said in a statement that it had expelled two students and suspended three following “flagrant violations” of the school’s coronavirus-related rules.

The county where the school is located saw a sharp rise in COVID-19 cases in August and early September, according to data on the city of Columbia’s website.

To avoid shaming individuals, the student who runs the University of Misery account has sent content that shows smaller groups of people violating COVID-19 guidelines to the vice chancellor for student affairs rather than posting it online.

Still, the student has faced pushback from other students.

In one instance, the student said they heard from a sorority within an hour of posting a video of some of its members lined up outside of a bar, many of them not wearing masks.

“‘This needs to be deleted now. We’re dealing with this internally. This does not need to be up online,'” the student said the message read.

‘LUDICROUS’ EXPECTATIONS

Some schools like the University of Miami are actually paying students to enforce COVID-19 rules.

At Miami, 75 “public health ambassadors” are making $10 an hour to walk around campus and make sure that people wear masks and socially distance. Serious infractions can be flagged to university administrators.

Austin Pert, an ambassador and Miami senior, said that people generally comply with his requests. But Pert acknowledged the program has limitations: most violations do not take place during the day on university grounds.

“If people want to flout the rules and put social distancing aside for a night to go party, it’s not happening on campus,” Pert said.

Critics say having in-person learning during a pandemic was a mistake to begin with.

“The notion that this population will comply with social distancing and masking requirements is just ludicrous,” said Ryan Craig, a higher education investor and consultant. “These are college students. They are going to do what they want to do.”

At Northeastern University in Boston, administrators came across an Instagram poll last month in which more than 100 incoming freshman indicated that they planned to party. After the student running the account voluntarily turned over the identities of respondents, they received a letter warning that partying could result in punishment up to expulsion, a university spokeswoman said.

Nearby Boston University has received about 125 anonymous tips about violations, ranging from partying to breaking quarantine. Most have come from students rather than faculty and staff, Dean of Students Kenneth Elmore said.

Ed Kellerman, a BU senior, said he would not hesitate to anonymously report a party, calling it a matter of “life or death” for Boston residents near campus.

Kellerman said reporting parties also increases the odds of completing the academic year on campus.

“We’re all very pro-snitch right now,” Kellerman said. “No one wants to get sent home.”