T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

Summit will raise awareness and highlight the critical role of rapid diagnostics for bloodstream infections, sepsis and the COVID-19 virus

| Source: T2 Biosystems, Inc.

LEXINGTON, Mass., Sept. 16, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- T2 Biosystems, Inc. (NASDAQ:TTOO), a leader in the rapid detection of sepsis-causing pathogens, today announced that it is participating in the virtual, inaugural Sepsis Alliance Summit taking place September 16-17, 2020, through a sponsorship and virtual booth in honor of Sepsis Awareness Month (September).

The Summit was designed by the Sepsis Alliance, the leading sepsis organization in the U.S. and working in all 50 states to save lives and reduce suffering from sepsis, to explore an array of sepsis-related topics in health care as well as highlight the needs for more sensitive and rapid diagnostics tests for COVID-19. T2 Biosystems’ virtual booth will feature information on the Company’s products for the rapid detection of sepsis-causing pathogens – directly from whole blood and without the need to wait for blood culture – as well as for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19 infections.

“Sepsis Awareness Month helps to save lives by raising awareness of sepsis, the leading cause of death in U.S. hospitals. Sepsis costs the U.S. healthcare system nearly $41 billion annually and results in the death of approximately 270,000 Americans each year,” said John Sperzel, President and Chief Executive Officer of T2 Biosystems. “We are proud to join the Sepsis Alliance and industry members in critical discussions about the importance of rapid diagnostic technology, which holds the key to improving outcomes for patients with bloodstream infections, sepsis, and the COVID-19 virus which can lead to sepsis.”

Weeks prior, T2 Biosystems received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its COVID-19 molecular diagnostic test, the T2SARS-CoV-2™ Panel. The panel runs on the Company’s FDA-cleared and fully-automated T2Dx® Instrument, which is capable of performing seven tests simultaneously.

The T2Dx Instrument can also run the Company’s FDA-cleared T2Bacteria® Panel and T2Candida® Panel. These panels are the only FDA-cleared assays for the detection of sepsis-causing bacterial and fungal pathogens directly from whole blood in three to five hours, without the need to wait days for blood culture results. By providing quicker results, the panels enable clinicians to target therapy faster for their patients suspected of sepsis, often before the second dose of antimicrobial is administered, leading to better patient outcomes, improved antimicrobial stewardship, and reductions in length of stay in the hospital.

About T2 Biosystems
T2 Biosystems, a leader in the rapid detection of sepsis-causing pathogens, is dedicated to improving patient care and reducing the cost of care by helping clinicians effectively treat patients faster than ever before. T2 Biosystems’ products include the T2Dx® Instrument, T2Candida® Panel, the T2Bacteria® Panel, the T2ResistanceTM Panel, and the T2SARS-CoV-2™ Panel and are powered by the proprietary T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2MR®) technology. T2 Biosystems has an active pipeline of future products, including the T2CaurisTM Panel, and T2Lyme TM Panel, as well as additional products for the detection of bacterial and fungal pathogens and associated antimicrobial resistance markers, as well as biothreat pathogens.

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding the potential impact of rapid diagnostics on outcomes for patients with bloodstream infections, sepsis and the COVID-19 virus,the T2Dx® Instrument’s simultaneous testing capacity, the benefit of early identification of bacterial or fungal infections, as well as statements that include the words “expect,” “intend,” “plan”, “believe”, “project”, “forecast”, “estimate,” “may,” “should,” “anticipate,” and similar statements of a future or forward looking nature. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, (i) any inability to (a) realize anticipated benefits from commitments, contracts or products; (b) successfully execute strategic priorities; (c) bring products to market; (d) expand product usage or adoption; (e) obtain customer testimonials;  (f) accurately predict growth assumptions; (g) realize anticipated revenues; (h) incur expected levels of operating expenses; or (i) increase the number of high-risk patients at customer facilities; (ii) failure of early data to predict eventual outcomes;  (iii) failure to make or obtain anticipated FDA filings or clearances within expected time frames or at all; or (iv) the factors discussed under Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 16, 2020, and other filings the Company makes with the SEC from time to time.  These and other important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this press release. Any such forward-looking statements represent management's estimates as of the date of this press release. While the Company may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, unless required by law, it disclaims any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause its views to change. Thus, no one should assume that the Company’s silence over time means that actual events are bearing out as expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing the Company's views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release.

Media Contact:
Gina Kent, Vault Communications
gkent@vaultcommunications.com  
610-455-2763

Investor Contact:
Philip Trip Taylor, Gilmartin Group
philip@gilmartinIR.com415-937-5406


Profile

T2 Biosystems, Inc.

  Subscribe via RSS


 Subscribe via ATOM


 Javascript

Lexington, Massachusetts, UNITED STATES

Media Files

T2Biosystems_Logo.jpg

LOGO URL | Copy the link below
T2Biosystems_Logo.jpg

Formats available:

T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

Top GOP Senator Says Fed Nominee Judy Shelton Short On Votes
1-MIN READ

Top GOP Senator Says Fed Nominee Judy Shelton Short On Votes

Top GOP Senator Says Fed Nominee Judy Shelton Short On Votes

A top Senate Republican on Tuesday said conservative economist Judy Shelton does not have the votes to be confirmed to one of two vacancies on the Federal Reserve board.

  • Last Updated: September 16, 2020, 4:03 AM IST

WASHINGTON: A top Senate Republican on Tuesday said conservative economist Judy Shelton does not have the votes to be confirmed to one of two vacancies on the Federal Reserve board.

Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, who holds the No. 2 spot in the Senate Republican leadership, said Shelton’s nomination will not be brought up until the votes are there.

We’re still working it, he told reporters after a weekly Republican lunch. She’s a priority for the White House. It’s the Federal Reserve. It’s important, so obviously we want to get it done. But we’re not going to bring it up until we have the votes to confirm her.”

Shelton’s nomination cleared the Senate Banking Committee earlier this year on a straight party-line vote of 13-12, with Democrats opposing the nomination. They contend that her views are too far out of the mainstream for the seven-member Fed board, which currently has two vacancies.

President Donald Trump nominated Shelton and Christopher Waller, the research director at the Federal Reserve’s regional bank in St. Louis, for two vacancies. If both win confirmation, the president will have installed six of the seven board members including elevating Republican Jerome Powell, originally an Obama selection, to be Fed chairman.

While Waller is viewed as a credible choice, Shelton has proven controversial because of her past views, including advocating a return to the gold standard, which most mainstream economists see as unworkable.

At her confirmation hearing, Shelton said she supports the Fed’s independence from political meddling but she defended the sharp attacks Trump has frequently launched against the central bank and Powell for the Fed’s handling of interest rates.

Trump has had trouble filling recent vacancies on the Fed board, with conservative economist Stephen Moore and the late Herman Cain, a former GOP presidential candidate, withdrawing from consideration after opposition surfaced.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Next Story
Loading

T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

Swinton commuter uses live snake as bus face mask - BBC News

Swinton commuter uses live snake as bus face mask

Published
Related Topics
image copyrightPA Media
image captionOne passenger thought the snake was a "funky mask" before she saw it move
A man boarded a bus using a snake as a face covering.
The commuter and his reptilian mask, which was wrapped around his neck and mouth, were seen on a bus from Swinton to Manchester on Monday.
One passenger, said she thought the passenger was wearing a "funky mask" until she spotted it slithering over hand rails.
Transport bosses in Greater Manchester confirmed a snake was not a valid face covering.
The eyewitness, who asked to remain anonymous, said she found the incident "really funny", adding the animal did not seem to be bothering any of her fellow passengers.
She said: "No-one batted an eyelid."
image copyrightPA Media
image captionTransport for Greater Manchester said a snake was not a valid face covering
Using a face covering on public transport is mandatory, except for children under the age of 11 or those who are exempt for health or disability reasons.
A Transport for Greater Manchester spokesperson said: "Government guidance clearly states that this needn't be a surgical mask, and that passengers can make their own or wear something suitable, such as a scarf or bandana.
"While there is a small degree of interpretation that can be applied to this, we do not believe it extends to the use of snakeskin - especially when still attached to the snake."
Why not follow BBC North West on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram? You can also send story ideas to northwest.newsonline@bbc.co.uk

Related Topics

More on this story

T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

Mi Smart Band 5 Launch in India Set for September 29 | Technology News

Mi Smart Band 5 Launch in India Set for September 29

Mi Smart Band 5 is likely to debut in India alongside Xiaomi’s IoT devices at the Smart Living virtual event.

Share on Facebook Tweet Snapchat Share Reddit Comment
Mi Smart Band 5 Launch in India Set for September 29

Mi Smart Band 5 was launched in China as Mi Band 5 in June

Highlights
  • Mi Smart Band 5 comes with a larger display over Mi Smart Band 4
  • The smart fitness band will go on sale through Amazon, Mi.com
  • Mi Smart Band 5 is touted to deliver up to 14 days of battery life

Mi Smart Band 5 is set to launch in India on September 29, Amazon revealed through a microsite. The new Mi Smart Band model that is the successor to the Mi Smart Band 4 debuted in China in June as the Mi Band 5. The Mi Smart Band 5 comes with a larger, 1.1-inch colour AMOLED display over the 0.95-inch screen available on the Mi Smart Band 4. Xiaomi has also bundled a magnetic charging dock with the Mi Smart Band 5 for a convenient experience. The smart fitness band also includes an upgraded set of fitness-focussed features, including a dedicated women's health mode.

Mi Smart Band 5 India launch details

Mi Smart Band 5 launch in India will take place at 12pm (noon) IST on September 29. Amazon has already created the microsite to suggest the availability of the fitness band through its online marketplace. Additionally, you can expect it to go on sale shortly after the launch through Mi.com as well as Mi Home stores in the country.

The Mi Smart Band 5 launch will be a part of Xiaomi's Smarter Living virtual event in the country. It is expected to bring some new Internet of Things (IoT) devices, alongside the latest Mi Smart Band model. One of those devices could be the Mi Watch Revolve, which was tipped to be a rebranded model of the Mi Watch Colour that was launched in China earlier this year.

Mi Smart Band 5 price in India (expected)

The Mi Smart Band 5 price in India will be announced at its launch. Nevertheless, it is likely to be in line with the China pricing that comes at CNY 189 (roughly Rs. 2,000) for the regular variant. An NFC model of the Mi Smart Band 5, on the other hand, is available in the Chinese market at CNY 229 (roughly Rs. 2,500) but it is unlikely to make its way to India. The band comes along with Black, Blue, Green, Pink, Purple, Orange, and Yellow strap options.

Mi Smart Band 5 specifications

The Mi Smart Band 5 features a 1.1-inch colour AMOLED display that has a resolution of 126x294 pixels and supports over 100 new animated faces. Xiaomi offers 11 sports modes on the fitness band that use a built-in, six-axis accelerometer sensor to track exercises. There is also a PPG sensor for heart rate monitoring. Further, the Mi Smart Band 5 offers sleep monitoring.

Specifically for female users, the Mi Smart Band 5 comes with a women's health mode that helps them track their menstrual cycle. The fitness band also provides social media notifications and weather updates. It also lets users capture photos from their smartphone remotely. Further, the Mi Smart Band 5 comes with a built-in microphone for understanding voice commands.

The Mi Smart Band 5 supports Bluetooth v5.0 connectivity. It comes with 50-meter water resistance and can be worn at the time of taking shower or while swimming. Besides, the Mi Smart Band 5 packs a 125mAh battery that is touted to deliver up to 14 days of power on a single charge.


Which are the best truly wireless earphones under Rs. 10,000? We discussed this on Orbital, our weekly technology podcast, which you can subscribe to via Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, or RSS, download the episode, or just hit the play button below.

Affiliate links may be automatically generated - see our ethics statement for details.
Display Type AMOLED
Water Resistant Yes
Heart Rate Monitor Yes
Compatible Devices Android
Battery Life (Days) 14
Comments

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on Twitter, Facebook, and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Jagmeet Singh Jagmeet Singh writes about consumer technology for Gadgets 360, out of New Delhi. Jagmeet is a senior reporter for Gadgets 360, and has frequently written about apps, computer security, Internet services, and telecom developments. Jagmeet is available on Twitter at @JagmeetS13 or Email at jagmeets@ndtv.com. Please send in your leads and tips. More
Snowflake IPO Raises $3.36 Billion in Year's Biggest US Listing

Related Stories

    Popular Mobiles
    In Mobiles and Tablets
    Popular Brands
    #Trending Stories
    #Latest Stories
    Gadgets 360 is available in
    Follow Us
    Download Our Apps
    App Store App Store
    Available in Hindi
    App Store
    © Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2020. All rights reserved.
    Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com

    T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

    More Stringent Punishment For Dowry Deaths, Stalking In State: K Palaniswami

    More Stringent Punishment For Dowry Deaths, Stalking In State: K Palaniswami

    The proposed move is to ensure better safety and security for women and children, the chief minister said in the House.

    More Stringent Punishment For Dowry Deaths, Stalking In State: K Palaniswami

    Minimum punishment for dowry deaths will be 10 years, K Palaniswami said (File)

    Chennai:

    Punishment for offences against women and children, including causing deaths by demanding dowry, stalking and selling minors for prostitution, will be made more stringent in Tamil Nadu, Chief Minister K Palaniswami announced in the Assembly on Wednesday.

    Steps will be taken to bring amendments to the Indian Penal Code by taking the Centre's nod to provide a higher level of punishment for offences against women and children, he said.

    The proposed move is to ensure better safety and security for women and children, he said while making a statement in the House.

    As per the proposal, the minimum punishment for dowry deaths will be 10 years from the present seven and for disrobing, the minimum sentence will be enhanced to five years from three now and the maximum punishment, ten years from seven.

    Similarly, stalking, on a second or subsequent conviction will see a maximum of seven years imprisonment from the present five, Mr Palaniswami said.

    Recommendation will be made to the Union government to enhance the maximum punishment for selling and buying minors for prostitution to life imprisonment from 10 years now and for insertion of a minimum sentence of seven years, he said.

    "I would like to resolutely say that Amma's government will always be a fortress of protection to women and children," he said.

    Explaining the ongoing initiatives, he said those continuously involved in crimes against women and children were being detained under the Goondas Act.

    A separate 'Crimes against women and children unit' was created in the Tamil Nadu police for the first time in the country on March 6, 2019 and it continued to function efficiently, he said.

    (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

    T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

    US President Donald Trump Accuses Democratic Opponent Joe Biden Of Using Drugs

    "He's Taking Something": Donald Trump Accuses Joe Biden Of Using Drugs

    Donald Trump repeated his demand that his Democratic opponent Joe Biden should undergo a drug test before their first of three presidential debates scheduled for September 29.

    'He's Taking Something': Donald Trump Accuses Joe Biden Of Using Drugs

    Donald Trump's comments are just foolish, says US Democratic candidate Joe Biden. (File)

    Washington:

    US President Donald Trump, in his latest shredding of political niceties, suggested Tuesday that his Democratic opponent Joe Biden has taken drugs to improve his performance in debates.

    The Republican, who is well behind in national polls, initially insinuated during a Fox News interview that "something was strange" with what he saw as Biden's improvement during the Democratic primary season debates.

    Early on, when there were multiple Democratic candidates lined up on stage, Biden was "a disaster" and "grossly incompetent," Trump said. But at a later debate where Biden was one-on-one with leftist rival Bernie Sanders, "he was OK."

    Trump told Fox he didn't want to say what he thought was the reason for the improvement.

    Seconds later, he did.

    "He's taking something (that) you know, gives him some clarity, or whatever," he said.

    Trump repeated his demand that Biden should undergo a drug test before their first of three presidential debates scheduled for September 29.

    "I would take one too," he said.

    Biden responded by telling a Florida radio station "I'm looking forward to the debate and he's a fool. The comments are just foolish."

    Trump, 74, has for months tried to persuade voters that Biden, 77, is suffering from mental decline.

    The former businessman cites Biden's penchant for gaffes -- which some believe to be linked to the Democrat's lifelong struggle with stuttering -- and his reluctance to face unscripted questioning from reporters.

    Trump -- who takes questions from reporters almost daily but is known for his own frequently garbled and baffling statements -- said, "Joe is lost. We can't have a president that is mentally lost."

    Trump told Fox that, with attacks from the Democrat side gaining intensity, he will now "take the gloves off."

    (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

    T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

    Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie pro Review

    Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie pro Review

    By Prasid Banerjee | Updated May 22 2019
    Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie pro Review
    DIGIT RATING
    66 /100
    • design

      80

    • performance

      63

    • value for money

      50

    • features

      66

    • PROS
    • Premium, attractive design
    • Smooth performance
    • 4K selfie videos
    • CONS
    • 24MP selfies are disappointing
    • Wide angle front camera lacks quality

    Verdict

    The Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro makes a big promise with its 24MP "duopixel" feature, but it's actually not very useful. That makes it an unfavourable choice for selfie lovers, and there are better options out there. Vloggers will probably like the 4K selfie videos feature, but there's not much more worth recommending this phone for.

    BUY Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie pro
    Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 25999

    Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie pro detailed review

    I review so many phones on a daily basis that sometimes it’s almost too easy to question a company’s strategy, plan or vision. However, every so often a phone comes around that tells me that product managers are probably not always thinking what we consumers do. The Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro is one such device. While selfies is certainly a trend, characteristics of the Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro are far behind what I thought they would be. If you’ve read my first impressions of this phone, you would know that I was fairly impressed with Asus’ implementation of a dual-pixel sensor. Unfortunately, the magic is only in theory for the Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro.


    24MP selfies and dual-front camera

    No, the Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro doesn’t actually have a 24 megapixel sensor on the front. As I mentioned before, Asus takes the two pixels on Sony’s dual-pixel sensor (usually used for faster focus) to shoot two frames simultaneously and use software to bring them together as one 24 MP “duopixel” photo. The IMX362 used here is actually a 12MP sensor, which Moto G5 Plus users will be all too familiar with.

    I have often written in my reviews, that while Asus does compromise on hardware specs, where the company truly fails is software. Unfortunately, that problem rears its ugly head on the Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro.

    You see, the phone uses software to make the “duopixel” photos and I constantly found the 12MP mode to be much better than the 24MP version, especially in low light. If you’re shooting in the 24MP mode, details are routinely lost and photos come out looking soft and unnatural all too often. All this increases in low light. I gave the phone to many of my lesser tech educated friends, all of whom found the noisy photographs to be “blurry”. In fact, I even gave the phone to a professional fashion blogger friend, who dissed the camera unequivocally.

    Lit areas are easily blown out often

    Low light sample, taken on 24MP mode

    100% crop

    Low light, shot using 24MP mode

    100% crop

    Daylight selfie, 24MP mode

    12MP selfie, outdoor daylight

    With f/1.8 aperture, the front camera takes in a lot of light when shooting. And with two images put together, it’s just too easy to blow out brightly lit areas, which often includes your face because of how light’s falling on it.

    It turns out that the IMX362 actually doesn’t need additional software. While 12MP photos did look a tad dull compared to the 24MP photos, they are much more detailed and natural. If you do want them to be brighter, a slight tweak or filter is readily available on almost every social sharing application. I preferred Facebook and Instagram’s pre-decided filters to the 24MP duopixel mode almost always.

    So, we’ve established that Asus’ phone can still take decent selfies, just not with the feature it markets. That’s not the problem though. The problem is that I’ve seen much better selfies from other smartphones. We’ll get to that in the how it compares section at the bottom of this review.

    The Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro also has an 5MP sensor attached alongside the dual-pixel sensor. This one’s a wide angle shooter, which truth be told, seems like a much better implementation of dual-cameras than bokehs or monochrome+RGB. You can quickly switch to the wide angle mode, through the button provided on the viewfinder. The phone does this without lags or stutters, which is encouraging. The wide angle camera is set to 4MP by default, but you can change to 5MP from settings.

    The downside though is that the second sensor is decidedly inferior to the first one. It has narrower aperture and lower pixel size. That results in unfavourable photos in low light, like in parties and clubs. That’s probably when you will need the wide angle mode most, when you’re out with friends. It’s a decent companion in regular light though, though it still doesn’t produce very high details, and photos are a tad dull.

    Overall, the Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro is a disappointment in my opinion. At Rs. 23,999, I can’t recommend this to anyone in good conscience. The only real upside is that Asus’ software is tuned to process images fast (though they’re a tad slow in low light) and you don’t get blurry shots due to lack of focus. That’s all thanks to Asus’ self-made SuperPixel engine that handles processing and software aspects of the camera, offloading to the Snapdragon 625’s Spectra ISP only for the final jpeg conversion. The phone also shoots in auto-HDR mode without lags, which is impressive.

    By the way, the duopixel feature is turned off by default, which is a baffling choice for a phone that’s sold specifically for that feature. Did Asus know it's not the best way to click selfies?

    4K recording using front camera

    There’s one last gimmick here, and that’s 4K video recording with the front camera. It’s a feature vloggers will certainly appreciate, although I personally don’t know many Indian vloggers who record in 4K resolution. Either way, it’s always good to be ahead of what your user’s technologies support, so this is a useful feature for a niche audience. Also, unlike the camera’s picture taking capabilities, I found videos to be more favourable. You will probably want some kind of stabilisation, but video quality is good otherwise.

    Rear Camera

    I’m more impressed with the rear 16MP sensor on this phone. While it’s not what the company focuses on, the camera is actually capable of some great shots in well lit conditions, and manages low light reasonably too. It’s not an out and out performer to be sure, but it’ll do the job for social posting and sharing. It’s also fast enough to focus and doesn’t take very long to process photos. You can expect decent amount of details in daylight, while night shots won’t be completely spoiled by noise, and filters can still do wonders with them. Like the front camera, the rear camera shoots on auto-HDR without lag, and HDR's impact is quite impressive.

    Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro

    Performance

    By now we all know that the Snapdragon 625 is an incredibly efficient, yet fast chipset. That works in favour of the Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro. Asus has also tuned ZenUI 4.0 to avoid the usual lags and stutters we have seen on its devices. You shouldn’t expect flagship class performance here, but there’s nothing much to complain about in real world usage. Benchmarks scores are obviously lower than 652s or 820s, but your games will routinely run at playable 30fps frame rates and app load or usability is favourably snappy.

    While I’m not impressed by Asus’ camera software, I have to commend the company for tuning ZenUI to this extent. Asus phones have used the Snapdragon 625 before, but they’ve never quite been smooth or fluid enough to match competition. The Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro does, and you won’t question the chipset choice unless you’re really specs conscious.

    Battery

    The PC Mark battery test takes 9 hours and 32 minutes to drain this phone’s battery from 80% to 20%. In my experience, that’s a decent but not an extremely high score for any phone. I tested this with general usage as well, so I can attest that the Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro will last you a work day, like almost every other smartphone today. 10-12 hours of usage should be achievable easily, even with a fair amount of gaming.

    Display

    Another improvement here is the display. The Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro has a 5.5 inch display and it looks much more colourful, warm and vibrant as compared to older Asus displays. This is something I saw on the Zenfone Zoom S as well, which makes sense since both phones have AMOLED panels. The touch performance is also great, thanks to Corning’s Gorilla Glass (version unspecified), and if it matters to you, it’s 2.5D curved as well.

    The only downside of the display is that it’s not great under direct sunlight, even with the brightness turned to maximum.

    Build and Design

    Finally, what I like the most about the Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro is its design. While Asus hasn’t adopted the new 18:9 aspect ratio, and doesn’t push the boundaries with screen to body ratio, the phone does feel premium. Its metallic body is quite slim and the phone is very light as well. Weight is evenly distributed and the back has a polished finish that can be slightly slippery at times.

    The square camera sensor on the back looks nice to me, and Asus’ concentric circles design shines whenever light falls on it. It’s also solidly built, though doesn’t feel extremely sturdy. I’m still happy to carry this around in my pocket though, even though it doesn’t meet modern design standards to the T.

    Bottomline

    While there are certainly some favourable features on the Zenfone 4 Selfie Pro, it doesn’t make for a very value for money phone. In fact, it fails at its primary promise, which is never a good thing, and that somewhat brings down the entire value proposition for selfie lovers. I wouldn’t recommend this phone to you.

    How it compares

    If good selfies is what you want, the Oppo F3 (review) does a better job than this device, and if you can increase your budget by about 4K, the Oppo F3 Plus (review) remains our pick for selfie-centric smartphones. The Asus Zenfone 3 Selfie Pro makes a promise that looks good on paper, but doesn’t actually deliver.

    You’re probably not buying this is selfies don’t matter to you, but if it is amongst your considered phones, the OnePlus 3T (review) would be our pick of the lot in this price range. The Moto Z2 Play (review) also makes for a more value for money purchase.

    Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie pro Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

    Price:
    Release Date: 10 Aug 2017
    Variant: 64GB
    Market Status: Launched

    Key Specs

    • Screen Size Screen Size
      5.5" (1920 x 1080)
    • Camera Camera
      16 | 24 & 5 MP
    • Memory Memory
      64 GB/4 GB
    • Battery Battery
      3000 mAh

    Related Reviews

    Nokia 5.3 Review

    Realme 6 Pro Review

    Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

    Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

    OnePlus 8 Pro Review

    logo
    Prasid Banerjee

    Trying to explain technology to my parents. Failing miserably.

    Advertisements

    Trending Articles

    Latest Reviews

    view all
    Advertisements

    Popular Reviews

    View All

    Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie pro

    Buy now on flipkart 25999

    Asus Zenfone 4 Selfie pro

    Buy now on flipkart 25999

    Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

    We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

    DMCA.com Protection Status

    T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

    Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Review
    Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Review

    Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Review

    Vignesh Giridharan   |  03 Dec 2019
    DIGIT RATING
    73 /100
    • design

      69

    • performance

      80

    • value for money

      62

    • features

      82

    • PROS
    • Solid build, neat design
    • Hidden USB port for tiny dongles
    • One-touch power and unlock
    • CONS
    • Unforgivably bad display
    • Lacks precision touchpad
    • Feeble, dull audio

    Verdict

    The Lenovo ThinkBook 14 comes with ample computing power and a few nifty features that'll prove to be useful in the average office environment but fails to get the basics right, such as display, audio, and touchpad.

    BUY Lenovo ThinkBook 14
    Price 81999

    Lenovo ThinkBook 14 detailed review

    Since its inception in the early 1990s by IBM, the ThinkPad brand has been associated with high-end enterprise-grade computing. ThinkPad models, usually sold in an all-black paint scheme with red accents, have generally never come cheap, except the relatively newer E- and L-series ones. Lenovo, the ThinkPad brand’s second owner, launched the IdeaPad brand in early 2008 to cater to everyday consumers. These models are generally more colourful and stylish. Since then, both brands have had distinct definitions and co-existed independently. Now, however, Lenovo is throwing a new name into the mix.

    ThinkBook sits between the ThinkPad and IdeaPad

    Called ThinkBook, the new sub-brand from Lenovo finds itself straddling the space between the ThinkPad and IdeaPad in terms of features, looks, and even price. This space in between is designed to cater to working professionals in small and medium businesses (SMBs). At least, that’s how Lenovo sees it. The ThinkBook is designed to carry over all the essential features of the ThinkPad (data encryption support, etc.) while infusing the IdeaPad’s DNA (style, friendliness, etc.) Now, let’s see if all of that has gone according to plan in the Lenovo ThinkBook 14, which is expected to go on sale this month starting at a rather steep price of Rs 80,000+.

    Performance

    The Lenovo ThinkBook 14 can be configured with up to an Intel 10th Gen Core i7 CPU with six cores along with 24GB of RAM and 2TB of storage on a hard drive (or 1TB on a solid-state drive). Our review unit came with the Intel Core i7-10510U chip, a quad-core variant of the top-end processor. It was complemented by 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage on a Samsung PCIe NVMe M.2 solid-state drive. The ThinkBook 14 can be bought with discrete graphics in the form of an AMD Radeon 625 graphics card but our review unit employed internal Intel UHD Graphics.

    10th Gen Core i7 CPU from Intel

    The review unit bagged decent scores on our CPU and GPU benchmark tests. On PCMark 8’s Accelerated Creative test, the review unit scored 3843 points. The IdeaPad S540, by contrast, scored a slightly lower 3584 on the same test. The Asus VivoBook X403, which costs about Rs 54,610 at the time of writing this review, also scored a marginally lower 3724 on the same test. On 3DMark’s Fire Strike and Cloud Gate, the review unit scored 1192 and 9079 points, respectively. I was happy to note that our review unit had fared splendidly on our storage test.

    Everyday performance of the review unit was pretty good except for one minor glitch, which we’ll address in a minute. I was able to use everyday applications such as Word, Excel, OneNote, Chrome, File Explorer, Photos, and WhatsApp for PC independently without having to wait a long time for any of them to open. All of these apps behaved well and responded quickly. File open times were especially fast. But it was while switching between these applications (multitasking) that I noticed an anomaly. The window switcher showed a noticeable amount of lag almost every time I hit Alt + Tab. The switcher often remained on the screen for over one whole second after I had released the combination keys for switching windows.

    Lenovo.Modern.ImController.PluginHost.exe ran rampant on the ThinkBook 14 review unit, making it slow in window switching

    I observed that killing the process titled ‘Lenovo.Modern.ImController.PluginHost (32 bit)’ in Task Manager made the lag in window switching go away completely. By my understanding, it was an errant process sprouting from Lenovo’s System Interface Foundation package, which helps the bundled Lenovo Vantage app do its hardware scans. If this lag issue is persistent across Lenovo's current laptops, then the Chinese electronics manufacturer ought to do something to fix it. At any rate, we reached out to Lenovo India about the issue. The company has still yet to acknowledge it as a software issue. Performance otherwise, on the ThinkBook 14, was quite good.

    Battery

    The ThinkBook 14 comes equipped with a 45Wh non-removable lithium-ion battery. On our standard battery benchmark test, our review unit scored an unexpectedly low 2 hours, 50 minutes. That’s lower than the score bagged by all the other IdeaPad models launched earlier in the year, including the entry-level IdeaPad S145 (3 hours, 16 minutes). Even the power-hungry ThinkPad X1 Extreme from January managed to hold on for 3 hours, 35 minutes on battery power.

    In everyday use scenarios, the review unit performed much better. With the screen brightness set to 80 per cent, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth enabled, the review unit’s battery level fell from 100 to 88 per cent in a little over an hour. During that time, the laptop was tasked with heavy browsing and background music playback through USB headphones. When the screen brightness was pushed to full, the battery’s drain rate increased noticeably. The review unit lost over 16 per cent of its full charge in about 45 minutes. In summary, the ThinkBook 14 should last you up to six hours on battery power if your play your cards, which is decent but nowhere close to great.

    Display, Audio, and IO

    Our review unit of the ThinkBook 14 came with a 14-inch TN panel with an anti-glare finish and Full HD resolution. After just a day’s use it was easy to tell that the panel sorely lacked contrast, brightness, and colour. Text appeared grainy and almost completely unreadable when the lid was pushed forward. Colours on the whole were dull and washed out, making even spreadsheet and document work a proper pain. Owing to the panel’s low contrast ratio, there was what appeared to be a consistent layer of white haze across all the regions of the screen when the brightness was set to max. It was like viewing a post-Diwali Delhi sky on a laptop’s screen. The ThinkBook 14's display is honestly amongst the worst I have ever come across on a laptop of its price.

    14-inch screen sorely lacks brightness, colour, and contrast

    The sound from the review unit’s two down-firing speakers was flat and unexciting, even with the bundled Dolby Audio app set to Music mode. In a popular tune like The Weeknd’s Starboy, highs and mids sounded mostly distorted, while lows were completely absent. The two weak bottom-facing units on the ThinkBook 14 are thus best saved for simple speeches and unplanned video calls. At any rate, you might want to get yourself a good headset for VoIP calls because the max volume isn’t all that much. The drivers on the review unit failed to fill a small, empty conference room.

    Weak audio

    The ThinkBook 14 comes with plenty of ports for connectivity. On the left side of its 0.7-inch-thick body, we see a LAN port, a USB-A 3.1 port (with ‘Always On’ function to charge mobile phones), two USB-C 3.1 ports (one of which is Gen 2 with support for DisplayPort and Power Delivery), and a 3.5mm jack for headsets. On the right side, we see a proprietary power port, a USB-A 3.1 port, a full-size SD Card reader, and a ‘Lenovo Hidden Port’. That’s basically a USB-A 2.0 port that’s tucked away deep inside a tethered flap with enough space to accommodate a wireless mouse’ dongle. This nifty little parking space for dongles is easily the most intelligent feature I’ve seen on a laptop in recent times. If you’ve bought many new mice over lost dongles, you’ll come to appreciate this little innovation.

    Plenty of ports

    Full-size SD Card slot is appreciated

    A dedicated parking space...

    ...for your mouse's wireless dongle

    Like the other 2019 IdeaPad models (except the entry-level IdeaPad S145), the ThinkBook 14 features a physical sliding shutter for its webcam. This means you no longer have to go around taping that camera shut with sticky notes that peel off easily. The ThinkBook 14 has one more trick up its sleeve: its large, circular power button doubles as a fingerprint scanner. This means that if you push the button with a registered fingerprint, Windows 10 will boot up and log you right in without asking for authentication a second time. This thoughtful feature is bound to save you some time and energy when you’re hurriedly getting set up for a meeting or presentation. Good job there, Lenovo!

    Physical shutter for webcam

    Press just once for boot and unlock

    The ThinkBook 14’s biggest biological link to the ThinkPad is possibly the presence of on-board data encryption. Like most enterprise-ready machines, the ThinkBook 14 is equipped with Discrete TPM (Trusted Platform Module) 2.0, which is a dedicated cryptographic coprocessor for data encryption. In Microsoft’s books, it is capable of random number generation and secure generation (and limitation) of cryptographic keys.

    Keyboard and Touchpad

    The ThinkPad has arguably one of the most comfortable keyboard setups out there but it would be unfair to compare that with the IdeaPad-style unit on the ThinkBook 14. The keys on it look the same as those on say, the IdeaPad S340 but they’re far more easy to press. Compared to the keys on the other 2019 IdeaPad laptops, these offer more travel and much better feedback, making them suitable for long documents and emails. What’s more, they come with dedicated keys for call answer/end. These keys are programmed to work with calling apps such as Skype on Windows.

    Comfier typing setup than IdeaPad series'

    Like the display and battery benchmark score, the touchpad on the ThinkBook 14 is an unexpected disappointment. The touchpad has a large and smooth surface but is simply not a modern Windows 10-recognised precision unit. In other words, the pointer movement isn't very linear and the touchpad doesn’t support multi-finger taps and swipes natively. Settings for these gestures won’t be found in Windows Settings. We wrote to Lenovo India asking why the ThinkBook 14 is an exception to the industry-standard precision unit, only to receive the following response: “Current Thinkbook 14/15 generation doesn’t support Precision Touchpad. Our global team is working on including this in future generations of ThinkBooks.” The only consolation is that the click keys under the touchpad’s surface are very easy to press.

    No precision touchpad on a modern laptop that costs upwards of Rs 80,000

    Build and Design

    The ThinkBook 14 takes after the IdeaPad more than it does the ThinkPad. In fact, in its plain silver colour option it looks like a slightly beefed up IdeaPad S340. And that’s not a bad thing at all. The top and bottom covers are made of anodised aluminium and the laptop offers sufficient grip when it’s being pulled out of a bag or carried around between conference rooms. Though it weighs an industry-accepted 1.5 kilogrammes, the ThinkBook 14 feels heavier than most other 14-inchers in the same price range. A large but dull ThinkBook badge adorns the lower right corner of the top cover, giving the laptop its identity.

    Solid build and design

    Opening the lid reveals a 14-inch display with a matte finish. It’s surrounded by fairly thick horizontal bezels. Like almost every other Lenovo out there, the ThinkBook 14 has a display that folds all the way back to 180 degrees, which is convenient if you’re working from the bed. Lenovo says the laptop’s keyboard is designed to withstand minor liquid spills (up to 60cc), which means if you knock your lime mint cooler over you should turn the laptop over immediately to drain it. Because it’s not a pure-blooded ThinkPad, it doesn’t get drain holes at the bottom. Oh, and it also doesn’t get the famous TrackPoint and dedicated click keys. That’s only fair, right?

    180-degree hinge, spill-resistant keyboard

    Bottom Line

    It's hard to form a clear opinion on the Lenovo ThinkBook 14. On the one hand, it features these tiny but nifty innovations that can make office life considerably easier, like that one-touch ‘power and unlock’ button, physical webcam shutter, and hidden USB-A port for dongles. On the other hand, it fails to get the basics right. Its display lacks colour and contrast to a point where simple spreadsheet work becomes painful to the eyes. What's more, it lacks a precision touchpad and its speakers are no good even for voice calls.

    The Lenovo ThinkBook 14 is essentially an IdeaPad model with a couple of essential enterprise features thrown in, such as support for user data encryption and a wide choice of full-size IO ports. CPU and storage performance is in line with what's expected but the same can't be said of its display and touchpad. If you're willing to live with these glaring issues, you consider the Lenovo ThinBook 14 as your machine of choice at your small or medium business.

    Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

    Price: ₹81999
    Release Date: 26 Nov 2019
    Variant: None
    Market Status: Launched

    Key Specs

    • OS OS
      Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
    • Display Display
      14" MP | NA
    • Processor Processor
      Intel® 10th gen CoreTM i7 processor | NA

    Related Reviews

    Asus TUF Gaming A15 Review

    Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Review

    HP OMEN 15 2020 Review

    Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 Review

    HP Envy 15 Review

    logo
    Vignesh Giridharan

    Progressively identifies more with the term ‘legacy device’ as time marches on.

    Advertisements

    Trending Articles

    Latest Reviews

    view all
    Advertisements

    Popular Reviews

    View All

    Lenovo ThinkBook 14

    Price : ₹81999

    Lenovo ThinkBook 14

    Price : ₹81999

    Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

    We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

    DMCA.com Protection Status

    T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

    Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus 2018 Review

    Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus 2018 Review

    By Hardik Singh | Updated May 22 2019
    Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus 2018 Review
    DIGIT RATING
    72 /100
    • design

      82

    • performance

      63

    • value for money

      66

    • features

      76

    • PROS
    • Excellent build quality
    • IP68 certified
    • Good battery life
    • CONS
    • Sub-par camera quality
    • Average performer

    Verdict

    The Samsung Galaxy A8+ looks good, delivers on battery life, has an excellent build quality and offers IP68 certification. If these aspects score higher over core performance and camera quality, you can consider the Samsung Galaxy A8+. However, if butter smooth performance and sharp camera performance is what you expect at its price point, the Samsung Galaxy A8+ falls short in comparison to the OnePlus 5T and Honor View 10, both of which are well rounded and offer much better value of the Samsung Galaxy A8+. 

    BUY Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus 2018
    Buy now on amazon Available 19990

    Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus 2018 detailed review

    Last year’s Samsung Galaxy A-series, was in some ways a cut-down version of its flagship S-series of the phones. For this year’s first A-series phone, Samsung has kept the core recipe pretty similar to its current flagship (Galaxy S8+). The phone is just as tall, runs on a similar software, is IP68 certified and the infinity display is also here, albeit without the curved front glass. That said, the rest of the smartphone is new and on paper does seem like a really serious competitor for the price. The phone packs an all-new SoC from Samsung’s Exynos range, you get 6GB RAM (which seems plenty) and 64GB storage is still big enough to keep even heavy users happy. So, does the Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus give you enough reasons to consider it in the 30-35K segment? The territory that is currently being heavily contested by the likes of OnePlus 5T and Honor View 10. Let’s find out.


    Build and Design: Looks good, offers premium finish

    The very first thing you notice about the Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus is the similarity in terms of design and overall build quality to the flagship smartphones from the Samsung stable. Namely the Galaxy S8+ and Note 8. Samsung’s Galaxy A series is about offering flagship class “feel” at lower price points and the Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus does do that very effectively. The phone looks pretty, even though it does not have the same curves we so admire on Samsung’s S-series. It is more grippy than some of its all metal clad counterparts, but the glass back, which gives it the premium feel, can also be a worry in terms of the fragile nature of glass back smartphones. The exterior has no rough edges and the whole device feels quite premium. Samsung has thrown in an IP68 certification as well, which makes the phone dust and water resistant, which makes it one of the few phones at its price to offer that.

    We also like the fingerprint position on this phone, which is definitely more convenient then what we got on the S8+. However, the Galaxy A8+ is a tall phone and if you have smaller hands, you will be shuffling the phone to reach it. The larger size and the bigger battery has nudged the weight towards 200 grams (191gm to be exact) and with an 8.3mm thickness, the phone feels heavy and is not the most comfortable for one-handed usage. Samsung has carried forward the side mounted the single speaker. It may look like an odd design choice at first but is actually a clever idea as it avoids the sound from getting muffled. 

    Display and UI: Vivid

    The 6-inch Super AMOLED panel on the device has an 18.5:9 aspect ratio which offers a resolution of 2220 x 1080 (FHD+). It is a vibrant display, offering good colour saturation, superb contrast ratios with decent sunlight legibility. Being a super AMOLED panel, you get deep blacks and that extra touch of vibrancy that makes colors “pop”. However, you can choose to tone down and tweak the intensity of color via the display settings. The touch response is quite good and the corning gorilla glass provides adequate protection. All-in-all, the display performance is one of the strengths of the device. Having said that, the rather thick side bezels does stick out like a sore thumb, especially when you compare it to the Samsung Galaxy S8 or Note 8. Not a deal breaker, but we just wish the bezels were a wee bit less prominent.

    On the A8+ Samsung uses a familiar yet newer version of its ‘Experience” UI. The functionality, tweaks, and tricks are almost identical to what we saw on Samsung's flagship smartphones (S8 and Note 8) last year. Hence, with the Galaxy A8+, you get the premium software layer, which adds to the overall appeal of the smartphone while clearly distinguishing the A series from the lower ‘J’ and ‘ON’ series of Samsung Galaxy smartphones. When it comes to UI, Samsung has merged its own ecosystem (apps, themes, wallpapers, and services) intertwined with Android 7.1 Nougat, which does add to the overall number of apps that come pre-installed on the phone. Apart from heavy lacing of Samsung apps and services, the fact that the Galaxy A8+ runs on Android Nougat and not the latest Android Oreo, dials down the appeal of the Samsung Galaxy A8+ from a software perspective.

    On the brighter side, it is an eye-pleasing UI and equally easy to work with. In addition, the UI does give small tutorials wherever required. You also get ‘Bixby’, Samsung’s own version of a voice assistant. It is available via a swipe from the left, but the whole point of having voice assistant is completely moot here. You can’t talk to Bixby and all it does is to show you cards of some relevant stuff, which you may or may not follow. Besides this, you also get the infamous ‘Face Unlock’ feature, which can only recognise the user in ample lighting and in the same state as the one you registered in. This means, if you registered your image with reading glasses, it won’t recognise you without them.

    Core Performance: Not the speediest phone around

    On the Samsung Galaxy A8+, you are getting Samsung’s latest Exynos 7885 SoC. This is an octa-core SoC which is running in a 6 core + 2 core setup. It has 2 x ARM Cortex A73 cores running at 2.1GHz and then you have 6 x ARM Cortex A53 cores clocked at 1.6GHz. Here the A53 cores are for efficiency and to take care of all the trivial tasks, the A73 cores are there to take care of the heavy lifting. Based on the 14nm FinFET manufacturing process, the chip is just as power efficient as the last gen Exynos 7880 used on the 2017 Samsung Galaxy A7 and A5 smartphones. It is a good SoC and the phone doesn’t seem slow in terms of daily usage, it’s just that when taxed with a lot of tasks, you might encounter occasional stutter and lag. 

    The 8 compute units are accompanied by the Mali-G71 GPU, which has been around for quite some now and was also seen on last year’s Kirin 960 SoC, which powers the Honor 8 Pro. You do get 6GB of RAM on this phone which comes in handy if you are a heavy user.

    All-in-all the performance is good, but not great and that is where we think the question lies. Do you as a user are okay with just a good enough performance from a phone priced at Rs.32,999? Especially, when Samsung’s own two-year-old Samsung Galaxy S7 beats the A8+ in terms of pure performance. Yes, you get the larger display on the A8+, but the Galaxy S7 has a higher quality 2K Super AMOLED display at its disposal and is now available around the same price. 

    The phone does not heat up as such but while shooting a video or playing games on it, the back of the phone does get a little warm. The single side-mounted speaker seems fairly loud and the audio quality via the headphones is at par with Samsung’s flagship offerings. You also get the customize the audio output according to your listening tastes from the settings menu.

    Battery life: For a day

    Regardless of the performance, we are happy with the battery life the phone provides. The 3500mAh battery goes on for a full day quite easily, even if you are a heavy user and like to stream video content for a couple of hours each day. The battery life, however, does deplete quicker when you are gaming on the machine, but that is a given with most phones. We have been using the phone for quite some time now and thus far we have juggled between light and heavy workloads at days, but the phone never died on us. It essentially has a better battery life than any of its primary competitors at the moment.

    Camera: Missed opportunity

    Talking about competition, THE prime differentiating factor between this phone and its competitors are the cameras. You get a 16MP primary snapper on this phone which is enabled by a f/1.7 aperture. The camera takes good images under ample lighting conditions, with tweaked contrast ratios and higher saturation levels (than normal) to make the image more pleasing. This is a signature trick we have seen on previous Samsung phones as well. At the same time, the camera software has a tendency of over sharpening the image. All of this comes in handy if you are taking a macro shot in bright conditions. The f/1.7 aperture further ensures that you will get a good ‘bokeh’ effect while taking those macro shots.

    But when shooting regular images (non-macro), we observed highlight clipping and aggressive oversharpening in some of the images we clicked. Things become worse during the night as the images captured showcase a posterization effect. To remove noise, the camera software uses aggressive noise reduction algorithms, which impacts details and definition. The lack of an OIS is also felt in low light images and you end up taking multiple shots to get that good usable snap.

    If you were thinking of getting that shot right in pro mode, you will be disappointed to know that the pro mode on the camera is also quite lackluster. You cannot toggle focus distance or play with aperture settings. The camera software also leaves out filters and a slow-motion mode, which is fast becoming a staple feature for premium smartphones.

    The front-facing camera, on the other hand, offers a better image quality in both low and ample lighting conditions. You get two cameras at the front, a 16MP primary unit, which is accompanied by an 8MP unit. The camera captures a decent amount of details in all lighting conditions. The secondary camera is there for Samsung’s Live Focus mode to add the desired amount of background blur (bokeh) to the image.  

     

    Bottomline

    When we first started using the Samsung Galaxy A8+ (first impressions), we instantly fell for the device. However, as we used it extensively for this review, the notion of it being the more affordable version of the Galaxy A8+ wore off. Don’t get us wrong, the phone looks good, performs well (enough), has good battery life and is well built. However, the sub-par camera quality and the fact that you can get much better phones at the same price, that too even from Samsung itself (the Samsung Galaxy S7) does not help the case. All this puts the Samsung Galaxy A8+ in an awkward situation.

    Hence, if you are a Samsung loyalist, the Samsung Galaxy S7 is still a better phone to buy or you can wait for a bit as after the impending launch of the Galaxy S9, prices for the Galaxy S8 and S8+ will eventually drop. And, if you are looking for just a good phone in the 30K to 40K price bracket, the OnePlus 5T or the new Honor V10 are really hard to look past.

    Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus 2018 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

    Price:
    Release Date: 20 Jan 2018
    Variant: 32GB , 64GB
    Market Status: Launched

    Key Specs

    • Screen Size Screen Size
      6" (1080 x 2220)
    • Camera Camera
      16 | 16 + 8 MP
    • Memory Memory
      64 GB/6 GB
    • Battery Battery
      3500 mAh

    Related Reviews

    Nokia 5.3 Review

    Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

    Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

    OnePlus Nord Review

    OnePlus 8 Pro Review

    logo
    Hardik Singh

    Light at the top, this odd looking creature lives under the heavy medication of video games.

    Advertisements

    Trending Articles

    Latest Reviews

    view all
    Advertisements

    Popular Reviews

    View All

    Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus 2018

    Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus 2018

    Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

    We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

    DMCA.com Protection Status

    T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

    Delivery of huge transformer at Gwynedd beach - times, location and route - North Wales Live
    Load mobile navigation
    News

    Delivery of huge transformer at Gwynedd beach - times, location and route

    The 128-tonne equipment will land at Black Rock Sands on Wednesday

    Black Rock Sands in Gwynedd

    A huge electricity transformer will land at a North Wales beach on Wednesday.

    The 128-tonne piece of equipment will be delivered by barge to Black Rock Sands in Gwynedd before being unloaded onto the beach.

    The 80-foot boat is set to arrive off the coast at around 8am before the equipment is unloaded at around 12.30pm.

    The massive load will then be stored on the beach until Friday before being taken by road to Trawsfynydd Substation.

    A 330m temporary trackway has been laid on the beach in preparation for the delivery, and a 10m wide cordon will be in place around the transformer.

    Get the North Wales Live newsletter delivered to your inbox every day for FREE - sign up here

    The beach will remain open.

    National Grid said that there will be rolling road closures on Friday to ensure the safe delivery of the unit.

    The route is as follows:

    •            Depart Black Rock Sands

    •            Turn right onto High Street

    •            Continue onto Britannia Terrace

    •            Continue onto A487

    •            Continue onto A470

    •            Arrive at Trawsfynydd Substation

    Wendy Williams, project manager said: “National Grid has been planning the transformer delivery for months, taking into account potential delays to the schedule due to adverse weather conditions."

    National Grid and North Wales Police recommend anyone planning to use the roads mentioned above should try to find alternative routes or allow additional time for their journey.

    For all the latest updates on the delivery, follow our live blog here.

    A broadcast text service will be available to keep motorists and residents updated on the morning of the transformer movement.

    To subscribe to this text messaging service, please text INFO to 07860 027 842.

    More On

    T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Review

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Review

    By Mithun Mohandas | Updated Nov 04 2019
    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Review

    Verdict

    AMD’s Navi seems to be off on a good start. The new architecture is not only performing better than competing solutions but is also better priced and thus offering better value for money in the Indian market. Having proven itself to be competitive, we should start to see more gamers picking up the RX cards for mid-range configurations unless NVIDIA responds with price cuts on their RTX 20-series and RTX Super cards. As AMD inches towards the top of the stack, we are excitedly waiting to see how the GPU landscape evolves over the coming year. AMD’s 7nm+ cards, Intel’s new discrete GPUs and NVIDIA’s Turing-refresh are all slated to be launched in 2020. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and RX 5700 with their new RDNA architecture are poised to carve a good share of the GPU market for now.

    BUY AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
    Price 36568

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT detailed review

    AMD finally unveiled their Navi-based graphics cards at COMPUTEX 2019 earlier this year to much excitement for gamers worldwide. It had been a while since AMD had a proper graphics card in the high-end segment. The Radeon Vega 64 and Vega 56, followed by the Radeon VII that was announced at CES 2019, had all been good attempts at grabbing the GPU crown from NVIDIA but AMD’s recent GPU launches have all fallen short. However, AMD has been the favourite when it comes to providing gamers value for their hard-earned money. NVIDIA’s pricing has always been way higher because that’s what brands do when there is no competition. AMD’s continued attempts at providing a high-end graphics cards have helped keep NVIDIA’s high-pricing in check. That trend has continued with these new cards as well, as you’ll see later on.

    That said, NVIDIA still has the advantage because of the hardware-accelerated real-time ray-tracing capabilities, a feature that continues to see little adoption. At E3 this year, several major game developers and publishers, and even console manufacturers announced that their next titles would start incorporating ray-tracing. Cyberpunk 2077 is the biggest of the lot. The key difference here is that all graphics cards can perform ray-tracing, NVIDIA RTX cards have dedicated hardware elements to perform ray-tracing whereas the rest of the GPUs use their normal shaders to do the same. Essentially, it’s an advantage that rarely is ever used.

    Coming to the Radeon RX 5700 XT and RX 5700, these cards feature AMD’s new RDNA architecture. A design that’s primarily GCN with some elements of RDNA. Think of Navi as an augmented version of GCN which takes the best of GCN and compensates for its shortcomings with new Compute Units (CU), improved graphics pipeline and a multi-level cache hierarchy. We can take a closer look at the specifications below.

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT / 5700 Specifications

    We’re not looking at the Radeon VII but the two Vega cards right before it -- Radeon RX Vega 64 and Vega 56. Having moved to a 7nm manufacturing process, Navi allows for higher clocks while saving power as well. Thanks to the smaller transistors, we can also see that with the Navi 10 GPU, AMD has managed to squeeze 10.3 billion transistors onto a die that’s roughly half the size of the Vega 10 GPUs. The Compute Units still feature the same number of Stream Processors i.e. 64 but there have been other improvements by means of an additional scheduler which allows it to queue a lot more instructions and there’s an additional scalar unit as well which helps with increasing math performance. 

     

    RX 5700 XT

    RX 5700

    RX Vega 64

    RX Vega 56

    Architecture

    Navi

    Navi

    Vega 10

    Vega 10

    Process

    7nm

    7nm

    14nm

    14nm

    Transistor Count

    10.3 billion

    10.3 billion

    12.5 billion

    12.5 billion

    Die Size

    251 mm2

    251 mm2

    495 mm2

    486 mm2

    Compute Units

    40

    36

    64

    56

    Stream Processors

    2560

    2304

    4096

    3584

    Base Clock

    1605 MHz

    1465 MHz

    1274 MHz

    1156 MHz

    Game Clock

    1755 MHz

    1625 MHz

    n/a

    n/a

    Boost Clock

    1905 MHz

    1725 MHz

    1546 MHz

    1471 MHz

    Peak Engine Clock

    n/a

    n/a

    1630MHz

    1590MHz

    TFLOPs SP

    9.75

    7.95 TFLOPS

    12.7 TFLOPS

    10.5 TFLOPS

    TFLOPs Half Precision

    19.5

    15.9 TFLOPS

    25.3 TFLOPS

    21.0 TFLOPS

    Texture Fill-rate

    304.8 GT/s

    248.4 GT/s

    395.8 GT/s

    330.0 GT/s

    ROPs

    64

    64

    64

    64

    Pixel Fill-rate

    121.9 GP/s

    110.4 GP/s

    98.9 GP/s

    94.0 GP/s

    Memory Capacity

    8GB

    8GB

    8GB

    8GB

    Memory Type

    GDDR6

    GDDR6

    HBM2

    HBM2

    Memory Bandwidth

    448 GB/s

    448 GB/s

    483.8 GB/s

    410 GB/s

    Memory Bus-width

    256-bit

    256-bit

    2048 bit

    2048 bit

    TBP

    225W

    185W

    295W

    210W

    The improvement with the clock speeds are quite considerable. The peak boost now goes all the way up to 1905 MHz with the total board power scaling up to 225W as per the specs. If there had been more CUs, then we’d have seen clock speeds closer but better than the Vega 10 based GPUs. The other major switch happens to be the memory type which is now GDDR6 instead of HBM2. GDDR6 is way cheaper than HBM2 and has reduced bandwidth per chip, so you have to use more chips to get the same bandwidth but the overall cost savings make it easier for AMD to price the cards better. The higher bandwidth of HBM2 is useful in very few scenarios such as super high-resolution gaming, AI workloads involving massive datasets, etc. We used the word super to qualify a much higher resolution than the current 1440p and 2160p resolutions that are increasingly becoming common with gamers. The current trend is to opt for high refresh-rate monitors with resolutions around the 1080p-1440p mark since good 4K high refresh-rate monitors are still expensive here.

    Performance

    Our test rig has been upgraded to keep up with the times and the new Windows releases. This means all our legacy scores are not comparable, especially given the fact that CPU performance has gone up by a significant margin. Here’s what we’re running at the moment. 

    Processor - Intel Core i9 9900K
    CPU Cooler - Corsair H115i RGB PLATINUM
    Motherboard - ASUS ROG MAXIMUS X HERO
    RAM - 2x 8 GB G.Skill Trident Z Royal 3600 MHz
    SSD - AORUS NVMe Gen4 SSD
    PSU - Corsair HX1050

    Graphics cards:
    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
    AMD Radeon RX 5700
    AMD Radeon VII
    NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti
    NVIDIA RTX 2080
    NVIDIA RTX 2070
    NVIDIA RTX 2060
    AMD Radeon RX 590 (Legacy Scores)
    AMD Radeon Vega 64 (Legacy Scores)

    Please note, the scores for the Vega 64 and RX 590 are not freshly tested but older scores obtained when we had received the graphics cards. The rest have been re-tested since we have those cards with us.

    3D Mark

    We start with the synthetic benchmarks within 3D Mark to see how the new Radeon RX 5700 XT and 5700 fare against the other cards in the market. 

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 3D Mark

    We can see that the Radeon VII is still better than both new cards but not by a vast margin. The Radeon VII launched at $699 whereas the RX 5700 XT costs $399 and the RX 5700 costs $349. So for the new cards to come this close at a much lower price point shows how much more efficient and performant the new Navi architecture is. 

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 3D Mark Time Spy

    Even in Time Spy and Time Spy Extreme, we see a similar pattern but the Radeon VII has slightly lower scores in Time Spy whereas in the Extreme preset it scores better. Compared to the competition, the Radeon RX 5700 XT is still better than the NVIDIA RTX 2070 and the RX 5700 scores lower than the 2070.

    Gaming

    Moving on to our game benchmarks, we get to see a real-world representation of how these new graphics cards perform compared to the competition. 

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Battlefield V

    In Battlefield V, the RX 5700 XT did better than even the RTX 2080 across all tested resolutions which felt like a bit of an anomaly. Even the slightly older Radeon VII performed better than most of the cards in the test except at 4K resolution. On the other hand, the RX 5700 performed better than the Vega 64, RTX 2060 and even the older RX 590.

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Far Cry 5

    It seems the good folks over at Ubisoft haven’t made much of an improvement with the game engine between Far Cry 5 and Far Cry New Dawn. We found both benchmarks to follow the same curve. Far Cry New Dawn’s scores were well within the margin of error for even run. Here we see a trend that seems more in line with most of the benchmarks we ran. The RX 5700 XT performed better than the RTX 2070 and even the older Vega 64. The RX 5700 equalled the RTX 2070 at 4K resolution but the differences became more apparent at lower resolutions as the RTX 2070 creeped ahead. Even here, we see the RX 5700 coming ahead of the RTX 2060. 

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Shadow of the Tomb Raider

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider sees the same curve yet again but this time, the RX 5700 XT is ahead of the RTX 2070 across all resolutions. The same goes for the RX 5700 when compared against the RTX 2060.

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Strange Brigade

     

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT The Witcher 3

    The Witcher 3 was the only game wherein we saw the RTX 2070 perform better than the RX 5700 XT with the latest driver update. The RX 5700 XT did perform better with the previous driver that was initially seeded during the review process. Only at lower resolutions did the RX 5700 XT get the better of the RTX 2070. The same can be said of the RX 5700 and the RTX 2060.

    Overclocking

    We only had a few hours to overclock the RX 5700 XT and RX 5700 because the first set of drivers provided had issues if any of the power and frequency settings were tweaked. So we might have another go at getting slightly better scores than what we have thus far. We tried the Auto OC settings within WattMan and we tried messing around with the OC manually to extract whatever we could. Here are the results for the 5700 XT while we continue to work on the 5700:

     

    GPU

    Mem

    Result

    Peak Individual

    2130

    935

    Crash

     

    2100

    935

    Crash

     

    2100

    930

    Bench Fail

     

    2100

    925

    9598

     

    Stock

    Stock

    9193

    Individually, the GPU clock and the Mem clock were bumped up to find out their peak values. The base clock could go all the way up to 2130 MHz whereas the memory could go up till 935 MHz without crashing the OS or failing the benchmark. With both parameters set to their individual peak values we couldn’t get a proper run and there would be a crash every single time we tried. We then tried lowering the base clock all the way down to 1950 MHz but the benchmark would still crash. So we set the base clock to 2100 and then started lowering the memory clock. At 930 MHz memory clock, the OS had stopped crashing but the benchmark was still failing towards the 3rd or 4th leg. So after having dropped the memory clock to 925 MHz, we finally ended up with the first successful run of Time Spy with a score of 9598. Compared to the highest score we’ve obtained thus far at stock clocks, which is 9193, this OC attempt got us a 4.41% improvement in performance. We still have some more experimenting to do with the base clocks and the board power to see if we can get more synthetic and gaming performance.

    Pricing

    The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is priced at Rs.30,990 + Taxes and the RX 5700 is priced at Rs.26990 + Taxes. With 18% GST, that works out to be Rs.36,568 for the Radeon RX 5700 XT and Rs.31,848 for the RX 5700. For the NVIDIA cards we picked the official prices from the NVIDIA website and wherever we couldn’t find any official pricing, we picked the lowest priced partner card. An aggregate benchmark score was used to figure out the value for money factor for all the cards. 

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Value for Money

    This calculation is done without considering the game bundles that both companies provide with their partner cards. NVIDIA’s offering Wolfenstein: Youngblood which retails for Rs.1,999 on Steam and AMD is offering the XBOX Game Pass (PC) for three months which would cost about Rs.1024 for that time period. If we are to compare the two offers, then the Xbox Game Pass provided by AMD gives you access to 113 titles including Metro Exodus and several other AAA titles with more to be added every month. NVIDIA’s Game Bundle just gives you one game.

     

    AMD Radeon RX 5700

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

    Price

    26990

    30990

    Price w/ Tax

    31848.2

    36568.2

    Keeping the offer aside, all these cards provide more than 60 FPS at 1440p resolution. So all the cards here are more than capable of running the latest AAA titles without worry. The 2-year-old Vega 64 leads the pack followed by the Navi-based RX 5700 XT and RX 5700. We also wanted to include the older gen Pascal cards -- GTX 1080 Ti, GTX 1080 and GTX 1070 Ti -- but they are all out of stock whereas the ASUS branded Vega 64 are still in stock across multiple cities. With the performance of the RX 5700 XT being better than the RTX 2070 in most of our benchmarks, the AMD card is obviously the better choice. However, if you are undecided between the RX 5700 and the RTX 2060, then the RX 5700 not only scores high in terms of performance but also better priced. Overall, the AMD RX 5700 XT and the AMD RX 5700 displace the RTX 2070 and the RTX 2060 from the sweet spot. The only reason you would go with the NVIDIA cards would be to avail hardware-accelerated real-time ray-tracing which barely any games have properly incorporated. 

    NVIDIA’s recent Super launch was aimed at ensuring that NVIDIA retains the mid-range, however, a last-minute price drop by AMD has foiled NVIDIA’s plans. Whether the entire last-minute price drop was planned from the very beginning is something we’ll never know but it certainly seems to have miffed NVIDIA.


    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

    Price: ₹36568
    Release Date: 07 Jul 2019
    Variant: None
    Market Status: Launched

    Related Reviews

    AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Desktop Processor Review

    MSI MEG Z490 ACE Motherboard Review

    logo
    Mithun Mohandas

    While not dishing out lethal doses of sarcasm, this curious creature can often be found tinkering with tech, playing 'vidya' games or exploring the darkest corners of the Internets. #PCMasterRace https://www.linkedin.com/in/mithunmohandas/

    Advertisements

    Trending Articles

    Latest Reviews

    view all
    Advertisements

    Popular Reviews

    View All

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

    Price : ₹36568

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

    Price : ₹36568

    Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

    We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

    DMCA.com Protection Status

    T2 Biosystems to Participate in Sepsis Alliance Summit

    Selective action in PDS Scam By Shivraj Singh Chauhan Government - NDTV की खबर के बाद हरकत में शिवराज सरकार, कांग्रेसी नेता के घर छापा डालकर किया दावा- 50 करोड़ का हुआ राशन घोटाला

    NDTV की खबर के बाद हरकत में शिवराज सरकार, कांग्रेसी नेता के घर छापा डालकर किया दावा- 50 करोड़ का हुआ राशन घोटाला

    मध्यप्रदेश में सार्वजनिक वितरण प्रणाली के तहत आदिवासी बहुल बालाघाट, मंडला जैसे जिलों में जो चावल बांटा जा रहा है वो भेड़-बकरियों के खाने लायक है.

    NDTV की खबर के बाद हरकत में शिवराज सरकार, कांग्रेसी नेता के घर छापा डालकर किया दावा- 50 करोड़ का हुआ राशन घोटाला

    NDTV की खबर के बाद प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय ने राज्य सरकार से रिपोर्ट मांगी

    भोपाल:

    मध्यप्रदेश में सार्वजनिक वितरण प्रणाली के तहत आदिवासी बहुल बालाघाट, मंडला जैसे जिलों में जो चावल बांटा जा रहा है वो भेड़-बकरियों के खाने लायक है. NDTV की इस खबर के बाद प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय ने राज्य सरकार से रिपोर्ट मांगी, जिसके बाद सरकार हरकत में आई कार्रवाई शुरू हुई- महू में एक कांग्रेस नेता और कारोबारी पर छापा मारकर दावा किया गया कि 50 करोड़ का राशन घोटाला हुआ है, लेकिन वहीं अनूपपुर जहां 2253 क्विंटल चावल एक गोदाम से "गायब" हो गया, वहां साल भर बाद भी सरकारी अनुशंसा के बावजूद एफआईआर नहीं लिखी गई है. अनूपपुर खाद्य और नागरिक आपूर्ति मंत्री बिसाहूलाल सिंह का निर्वाचन क्षेत्र है. 

    यह भी पढ़ें

    यह भी देखें: सीएजी ने 50 हजार करोड़ के धान खरीद-मिलिंग अनियमितता का किया खुलासा

    महू में मोहित अग्रवाल के स्वामित्व वाले हर्षित ट्रेडर्स के गोदाम पर छापा मारा गया, जिनके पिता मोहनलाल अग्रवाल महू जिला कांग्रेस के कार्यकारी अध्यक्ष हैं और राज्य में नागरिक आपूर्ति निगम के एक पंजीकृत ट्रांसपोर्टर रहे हैं. जांच में पता लगा कि परिवहन कर्ता की हैसियत से मोहन अग्रवाल जहां राशन की दुकानों में अनाज पहुंचाता था वहीं हर बार 8-10 क्विंटल वापस ले लेता था और फिर अपने बेटे मोहित अग्रवाल की फर्म पर फर्जी बिल बनवाकर उसे खपाता था। इसमें उसकी मदद उसके रिश्तेदार जो स्थानीय व्यापारी भी हैं वे भी करते थे. 

    इंदौर के जिला कलेक्टर मनीष सिंह के अनुसार, प्राथमिक जांच के निष्कर्षों से पता चलता है कि चुराया हुआ पीडीएस खाद्यान्न और मिट्टी का तेल लगभग 50 करोड़ रुपये हो सकता है। लेकिन मोहनलाल अग्रवाल 15-20 साल से टीपीडीएस के तहत एक पंजीकृत ट्रांसपोर्टर हैं, इसलिए वास्तविक मात्रा वास्तव में बहुत अधिक हो सकती है। सिंह ने कहा, "राज्य नागरिक आपूर्ति निगम के कर्मचारी की संलिप्तता भी जांच के दौरान सामने आई है, जिनके खिलाफ पुलिस ने अन्य लोगों के साथ मामला दर्ज किया है." मामले में कांग्रेस के नेता और पूर्व पार्षद मोहन लाल अग्रवाल और उनके बेटे मोहित अग्रवाल, तरुण अग्रवाल सहित सहित कुल 5लोगों पर एफआईआर फिलहाल दर्ज की गई है. 

    Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com

    यह भी देखें: एनडीटीवी इंडिया की ख़बर का असर : नमक घोटाले में दो आईएएस अधिकारी हटाए गए

    हालांकि इतनी फुर्ति अनूपपुर में नहीं दिखाई गई. मध्यप्रदेश सरकार में खाद्य एवं नागरिक आपूर्ति मंत्री बिसाहूलाल सिंह के जिले अनूपपुर में एक सरकारी गोदाम से स्टॉक में 22573 क्विंटल चावल गायब मिला, साल भर पहले नागरिक आपूर्ति निगम के  प्रबंध संचालक अभिजीत अग्रवाल ने क्षेत्रीय प्रबंधक रवि सिंह को खत लिखकर दोषियों के खिलाफ एफआईआर कराने और चावल की राशि वसूल करने के निर्देश दिए। लेकिन लगभग एक साल बीत जाने के बाद भी एफआईआर दर्ज नहीं हुई. सूत्रों के मुताबिक जिले में सरकारी राशन वितरण से जुड़े लोग मंत्रीजी के करीबी हैं, अनूपपुर उन 27 सीटों में से एक है जहां उपचुनाव होना है. एनडीटीवी ने बताया था कि कैसे इस साल 30 जुलाई से 2 अगस्त तक बालाघाट और मंडला में 32 सैंपल एकत्र किए गये —31 डिपो से, और एक राशन की दुकान से - CGAL लैब में परीक्षण के बाद पाया गये कि सारे नमूने ना सिर्फ मानकों से खराब थे, बल्कि वो फीड-1 की श्रेणी में हैं जो बकरी, घोड़े, भेड़ और मुर्गे जैसे पशुधन के लिए उपयुक्त है. एनडीटीवी की खबर के बाद 3 सितंबर को सीएम शिवराज सिंह चौहान ने पूरे मामले की जांच आर्थिक अपराध शाखा को सौंप दी थी. 

    अन्य खबरें