Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Product launches will be critical for companies to sustain the momentum this financial year, especially in the term-protection segment

Topics
life insurance policy | life insurance industry | insurance plans

Hamsini Karthik  |  Mumbai 

The data for August life insurance premium collection, released recently, may have brought some optimism, but it has also given reasons to remain cautious. The 8-per cent decline in August seems better when compared to the lockdown period, when premia collected declined 23-28 per cent year-on-year (YoY).

However, it is important to dissect the data before turning optimistic. Consider this: Much of this rebound has come from group insurance premium (up 30 per cent YoY) and single premium products (up 60 per cent) for private insurers, and less from the retail (individual) business. ...

First Published: Wed, September 16 2020. 06:01 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Huawei Honor 7S Review

Huawei Honor 7S Review

By Subhrojit Mallick | Updated May 22 2019
Huawei Honor 7S Review
DIGIT RATING
62 /100
  • design

    62

  • performance

    40

  • value for money

    85

  • features

    69

User Rating : 4/5 Out of 3 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Tall 18:9 display
  • Long battery life
  • CONS
  • Inadequate RAM
  • 16GB storage is not enough in 2018

Verdict

The Honor 7s comes out as just another budget smartphone with nothing really special about it. The taller display is surely one of those things that are trickling down to the entry-level segment, but the inadequate memory and storage is an instant deal-breaker. OEMs should realise that running a full-fledged version of Android (that too with a customised skin on top) with 2GB RAM and 16GB storage isn’t a pleasurable experience. Perhaps if this was powered by Google’s Android Oreo (Go Edition), the experience wouldn’t have been so sluggish. Either way, it would be difficult to recommend this phone to anyone. Instead, I’d suggest to spend a bit more and get the Honor 7A or the Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro.

BUY Huawei Honor 7S
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 4990
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 6499

Huawei Honor 7S detailed review

Honor’s tirades in the smartphone market in India is akin to that of Xiaomi’s — Inundate the market with phones at as many price points as possible under the guise of offering more choice to the consumer. With the Honor 7s, the company now has at least one device for almost every price range. The Honor 7s is the most affordable of them all and with a tall 18:9 display, does it have enough to make your money’s worth? Let’s find out.


Design

The Honor 7s, like most other entry-level phones has a generic design — An aluminium body with distinct antenna lines, rounded corners and curved edges, and a bezel-heavy display. Expecting anything more than this is unrealistic for the price of Rs 6,999. It doesn’t have a fingerprint sensor and relies on the front camera to authenticate using face unlock. That works pretty fast, but how secure is the implementation can be questioned. It’s also quite compact. The Honor 7s fits a 5.45-inch display in a 5.7-inch body. That’s almost the same dimensions as the newly launched Xiaomi Redmi 6A. The compact nature makes the 18:9 panel easy to use and operate and is quite ergonomic to hold. Down below is the micro-USB port, while on top of the display is the speaker, integrated into the earpiece. I like this implementation more as holding the phone up in landscape mode doesn’t muffle the sound. Overall, there is nothing to write home about the design of the Honor 7s. It’s bland, but perfectly functional. Just what a user needs in a budget smartphone.

Display

The Honor 7s touts a 5.45-inch IPS LCD display of 720x1440p resolution. Expecting a fullHD+ display in this range isn’t fair and this one does the job quite well. The effective pixel density is around 295 ppi, same as the Redmi 6A. In a lot of ways, the two displays are more or less similar. They are sufficiently bring to view content indoors and while out in the sun, the colours do get washed out and text becomes difficult to read. The touch is a bit sluggish and there’s a definite lag in the phone responding to your finger. There are options to turn on the blue light filter and to adjust the colour temperature as well as to force apps to scale up to the 18:9 aspect ratio. Videos from YouTube and the likes look decent, but playing a high resolution video file will slow the phone down considerably. There is also visible banding in areas like blue skies or a space scene. Once again, the Honor 7s’ display isn’t the best part of the phone, but is perfectly functional.

Performance and Software  

The Honor 7s uses the MediaTek 6739 SoC to power the smartphone. That is paired with a meagre 2GB RAM and 16GB storage and is the primary cause of the performance bottleneck. Because of the low RAM, available memory is usually just around 300-400 MB and stressing the phone even by little is enough to slow it down or simply crash and restart.You won’t be able to install a lot of apps on this one either. You only get around 10GB of space for your apps and I was left with only 5GB of free space after installing just the basic apps like Facebook, Instagram and the likes. I’d recommend using Google’s Go suite of apps for the phone. They are designed to run on Android Oreo (Go Edition) phones, but it’s also helpful in this case. They take up less storage space and use less RAM as well. You do get a dedicated microSD card slot that allows the storage to expand to up to 256GB and it’s a good option to store music and videos and keep the onboard storage free for apps. The phone also offers Dual SIM Dual Standby that allows one to use mobile data from the second  SIM while on a call on the first SIM. It’s quite handy.

Benchmark reports pegs the phone in the same league as the Xiaomi Redmi 6A. On AnTuTu, it got a score of 46416 while on Geekbench Single and Multi Core tests, it scored 661 and 1797 respectively. On 3DMark’s Slingshot test, it scored a meagre 150. Most other benchmarks like the 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme and the PCMark Work 2.0 failed to work. Needless to say, this isn’t the ideal device to play games like PubG Mobile. You can still play lighter games like Subway Surfer but even there, there will be frame drops.

The Honor 7s is powered by EMUI 8.0. While the OS works without a hitch in more expensive phones, the inadequate hardware on this smartphone makes the experience quite sluggish. There are visible lags in operating the phone. The camera takes ages to launch from the lock screen and even the screen unlocks after a good 3-4 seconds. But all that is expected in a budget phone, and it’s the same case across other smartphones in that price range. We reviewed the Xiaomi Redmi 6A recently and there too the experience is quite sluggish.

Camera

The Honor 7s sports a 13MP camera at the back while on the front there is a 5MP selfie shooter paired with a LED flash. The camera, quite expectedly, isn’t going to impress the photographer in you, but it’s capable enough to take well-exposed shots under optimal lighting. The photos are, however, good enough for social media.

In the day, the photos come out well-exposed, but with overly saturated colours. There’s little dynamic range and most of the details gets lost in the shadows. Having said that, I quite like the resulting shots I managed to shoot from this phone, even more the Xiaomi Redmi 5A. The extra saturation does the trick for me. Saturated photos tend to look more eye-pleasing and for some, that’s better than photos that are more or less neutral in colour.

Indoors, though, the camera isn’t much of use. There is a significant shutter lag and the photo takes quite some time to process, and you’ll have to wait a good 2-3 seconds before shooting the next photo.

The camera quality deteriorates further when shooting in low-light. It struggles to focus and there is a hazy effect in the overall photo.

Battery

The Honor 7s relies on a 3,020mAh battery for power and it surely lasts long considering the display and the hardware aren’t that power-hungry. While PCMark 3.0 couldn’t run on the  phone, based on my usage, it’s easy to get around 8 hours of screen-on time which easily converts to over a day’s usage. I used the phone to take photos and browse social media and open a few websites. Honor claims the phone uses smart algorithms to optimise power draw. It seems to work and the battery drain is quite slow in this phone. There is no fast charging support though, and you’ll have spend at least two hours to top up the phone.

Bottomline

The Honor 7s comes out as just another budget smartphone with nothing really special about it. The taller display is surely one of those things that are trickling down to the entry-level segment, but the inadequate memory and storage is an instant deal-breaker. OEMs should realise that running a full-fledged version of Android (that too with a customised skin on top) with 2GB RAM and 16GB storage isn’t a pleasurable experience. Perhaps if this was powered by Google’s Android Oreo (Go Edition), the experience wouldn’t have been so sluggish. Either way, it would be difficult to recommend this phone to anyone. Instead, I’d suggest to spend a bit more and get the Honor 7A or the Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro.

Huawei Honor 7S Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 30 Aug 2018
Variant: 16GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5.45" (720 X 1440)
  • Camera Camera
    13 | 5 MP
  • Memory Memory
    16 GB/2 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3020 mAh
logo
Subhrojit Mallick

Eats smartphones for breakfast.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Huawei Honor 7S

Buy now on amazon 4990

Huawei Honor 7S

Buy now on amazon 4990

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305 Review

Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305 Review

By Arnab Mukherjee | Updated Nov 04 2019
Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305 Review
DIGIT RATING
71 /100
  • design

    78

  • performance

    70

  • value for money

    75

  • features

    66

  • PROS
  • Great build
  • 7+ hour battery
  • CONS
  • Weak bass
  • Big control module

Verdict

Catering to the ever-growing audience of sports enthusiasts, the BackBeat FIT 305 features a rugged build and design that is not too common at its price point. However, weak audio performance, and a couple of snags in the build area too, bring its overall appeal down.

BUY Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305
Buy now on amazon Available 2499
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 4090

Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305 detailed review

Due to the evolution of user behaviour and demands, a particular informal sub-category of earphones has made its presence increasingly felt in recent times. That category is of wireless sports earphones, designed and built to cater to a gym-going, fitness enthusiast audience that prioritises features like a good build, ruggedness, noise isolation over fidelity. The BackBeat FIT 305 is meant for that exact demographic through and through. How well does it satisfy its requirements? Let’s find out.


Design and Build

As always, this is where sports headphones have to truly shine. We’re not saying that audio doesn’t matter for them, however, if the build doesn’t suit active usage, they’re likely to be rejected right out of the box. It’s safe to say that the BackBeat FIT 305 is unlikely to suffer this fate due to its sports-oriented design and build. 

The design is IPX5 rated and features P2i coating so you’re safe against sweat damage, rain and spills. The cable is a nylon braided piece, with reflective material weaved into it, making it easily identifiable at night. Due to the nature of the fabric, it also doesn’t cause as much friction against the skin as a rubber coating. We’re not entirely sure if it is due to the coating, but the earbuds on the FIT 305 are highly prone to attracting dust.

The control module is located a couple of inches below the right earbud, which felt like the perfect place for it to be except for when you start running. Make sure to use the included clip to keep the 305 in place. The only complaint with the module is that the buttons, despite the particular + and - shapes, are a bit hard to detect by touch alone. Perhaps raised platforms for all three buttons would have been a better choice.

Plantronics has made a weird choice on the 305 by making the buds themselves have integrated silicon ear tips and wings. While they’re quite robust, if you have the tendency to wear your earbuds out frequently, this could be an issue as it won’t be easy to replace it with similar buds for the 305. Additionally, due to the same reason, you do not have the option of not using the wings. Another problem with the FIT 305’s build is that residual noise from the wire brushing up against anything is carried straight to the ear. While it isn’t too apparent during music playback, it’s a bit too loud for us during other times.

The added clip is handy and essential during workouts if you wish to ignore the presence of the cable and the control module around your neck. While passive isolation isn’t great, it is not half bad either. Just make sure you get the right earbuds for your fit. We blame the odd design of the earbud sleeves. Also, don’t expect these to blend well in a work environment - these are evidently workout headphones with bright colours meant for the gym and the jogging tracks.

Performance

In the audio performance department, the BackBeat FIT 305 ticks certain unintentional boxes. In any sports-oriented headphones, the lows are expected to be the most formidable aspect of the sound signature. However, the FIT 305 doesn’t handle those well. The bass sounds muddy and flat, which is especially evident when you push the volume to higher levels. Listening to Uptown Funk from Bruno Mars, the ‘duh-doh’ loop in the background sounded too recessed.

The mids are handled quite well, which benefits vocals and hands-free performance. Adele’s vocals in Hello sounds powerful and clear. The metal instrument density of Selkies by Between the Buried and Me doesn’t cause the 305 any trouble either. Even in noisy environments like a public bus, the FIT 305 managed to block out most external sound during our experience.

Call quality on the FIT 305 is great, and you have the wideband-enabled mic to thank for that. In our usage, after a full charge of approximately 90 minutes, the headphones lasted a bit north of 7 hours, which is quite good considering that they weight a measly 14grams. We did not expect any disconnection even at 50 feet, so you’re well provided for in the range department as well.

Verdict

Wireless earphones aimed at the gym are a dime a dozen today. However, in that pile, to find something that hits the right balance of features, pricing, build quality and audio performance is also quite a task. No, the BackBeat FIT 305 doesn’t hit that balance, but it comes significantly close to doing so. If only its audio performance could match up to some of its more capable brethren, it would be a no brainer to recommend the FIT 305, thanks to its already great build quality and gym-friendly design. However, if that isn’t a big issue for you, the FIT 305 does actually provide great overall performance and at the current price of Rs. 3999/- online, is not a bad deal at all. 

Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 18 Feb 2019
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Playback Time Playback Time
    NA
  • Frequency Range Frequency Range
    NA
  • Channels Channels
    NA
  • Dimensions Dimensions
    NA

Related Reviews

Jabra Elite 45H Review

Sony WI-SP510 Review

Sennheiser CX 150BT Wireless Review

JBL Tune 125TWS Review

PlayGo T44 Review

logo
Arnab Mukherjee

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305

Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Lenovo Z2 Plus 64GB Review

Lenovo Z2 Plus 64GB Review

By Hardik Singh | Updated May 22 2019
Lenovo Z2 Plus 64GB Review
DIGIT RATING
82 /100
  • design

    87

  • performance

    82

  • value for money

    90

  • features

    62

User Rating : 2.8181818181818/5 Out of 11 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Excellent performance
  • Good display
  • Day's worth of battery life
  • CONS
  • Camera could have been better

Verdict

The Lenovo Z2 Plus is the best smartphone to buy in the sub-20K smartphone category. Period.

BUY Lenovo Z2 Plus 64GB
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 10500
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 19999

Lenovo Z2 Plus 64GB detailed review

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 is undoubtedly one of the most powerful mobile processors out there today. This SoC had already shown its prowess in the LG G5, HTC 10, OnePlus 3, Xiaomi Mi 5, LeEco Le Max 2, and basically every flagship phone available today. However, no one expected it on a sub-20k smartphone, but here we are with the Lenovo Z2 Plus. 


It starts at a mere Rs. 18,000, and just the presence of the Snapdragon 820 makes it seem like a bargain. But is it? Let’s break it down. 

Build and Design
The Lenovo Z2 Plus has a generic design, but with the metal and glass treatment. The candy-bar design works, but it doesn’t really give the phone a personality of its own. You may still find it attractive, but I think a Moto X Play, with its plastic body looked more original.

That said, the design is definitely functional. It has a small footprint, making it really ergonomic. That being said, the fiberglass back is a fingerprint magnet and catches scratches very easily. Lenovo does provide a cover in the box, though.

The build quality is good, and not as prone to bumps as you think. I don’t like how slippery the body is, though the cover makes up for it. Overall, the Z2 Plus has a functional design, which many would like, and I wouldn’t question it given the price.

Display and UI
The phone sports a 5-inch IPS display. It is adequately bright and has good legibility in all lighting conditions. To make the screen more likeable and ward off fingerprints, the pre-installed matte screen protector does a fantastic job. Before you roll your eyes at the resolution, consider that the 1080p screen actually helps battery life, and looks good enough on the 5-inch panel. It has a maximum brightness of 547 Lux.

The Z2 Plus runs on a custom ROM called ZUI 2.0 by Lenovo. It is based on Android Marshmallow and is a very light and non-intrusive for the most part. The only menu, which you will be using often is an iOS-like control centre, which requires some getting used to. The appearance is mostly like the Google Launcher and the UI is quite smooth. 

The most interesting part, however, is the implementation of the fingerprint scanner. It can jump directly to the home screen when the screen is off. It’s not as fast as Pixel Imprint, but still fast enough and quite accurate. You can also set the button for tasks, like swiping left to right for switching apps, double tapping for camera or Google voice etc. Further, It's totally up to you whether you want to use a single button for Android navigation or opt for the on-screen keys. The UI is created in this way so you never have to reach for the top of the screen.

Performance: The new sub-20K champ
No other phone, except the now discounted LeEco Le Max2 comes even lose to the Lenovo Z2 Plus in terms of specs. The phone is an absolute beast where performance is concerned and kills the competition by a large margin. Even the similarly specced Le Max 2 is a little slower compared to this phone.

The lower 1080p resolution keeps performance to its optimum and even with demanding games on the screen, the temperatures never went above 40 degree celcius. However, the performance of this device is weak compared to the OnePlus 3, but then again, the OnePlus 3 costs Rs. 8,000 more than the Z2 Plus. Still, the performance of the Z2 Plus is quite smooth, no matter what you throw at it. Heavy gaming titles such as Need for Speed no limits, Hitman Sniper or Vainglory don't seem to slow down the phone either and I was able to switch between the three with utmost ease. 

Call quality and reception on the phone is quite good as well. Even in areas where the connection was spotty, I never encountered a call drop. The bottom mounted single speaker is loud, but the audio does distort at higher volumes. Audio quality via the headphones on the other hand is quite crisp and clear.

Battery: A day’s worth
A small display with 1080p resolution and a large battery means good battery life, and that is exactly the case here. The 3500mAh battery on the Z2 Plus easily lasted me a work day, during the test period. On a full charge, the phone runs for about 7 to 7.5 hours on the PC Mark battery test. As on every phone, gaming depletes battery life, but even with an hour of gaming every day the Z2 Plus can withstand a full work day's worth of usage.

Camera: Could have been better
The only thing missing from the phone is a good camera. Don't get me wrong, this 13MP rear camera on the Z2 Plus is not bad. In fact,  it is actually one of the top ten cameras in its category, but it is not its best suit. Images taken in normal lighting conditions have good colour reproduction and respectable dynamic range. However, as soon as the light starts to go dim, the images tend to show more noise. 

The HDR mode does help but it takes a second or two to capture the image properly and a very steady hand. The camera also lets you shoot videos in 4K, but the lack of OIS (optical image stabilisation) and a slower autofocus during videos add up to a sub-optimal experience. On the other hand, the front facing camera is quite good and takes decent selfies even in low light. 

Images taken from Lenovo Z2 Plus

Bottomline: Buy it!
The Lenovo Z2 Plus is hands down the best smartphone to buy under Rs. 20,000. It performs well, features a good display, has a functional design and a day’s worth of battery life. The only area where it lags behind is the camera performance, but all things considered, it is still recommendable. All in all, if you are investing on a 20k phone, get the Lenovo Z2 Plus.

Lenovo Z2 Plus 64GB Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 16 Jan 2017
Variant: 64GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5" (1080 x 1920)
  • Camera Camera
    13 | 8 MP
  • Memory Memory
    64 GB/4 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3500 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Hardik Singh

Light at the top, this odd looking creature lives under the heavy medication of video games.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Lenovo Z2 Plus 64GB

Buy now on amazon 10500

Lenovo Z2 Plus 64GB

Buy now on amazon 10500

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

HIFIMAN TWS600 Review
HIFIMAN TWS600 Review

HIFIMAN TWS600 Review

Dhriti Datta   |  14 Feb 2020
DIGIT RATING
73 /100
  • design

    69

  • performance

    77

  • value for money

    69

  • features

    76

  • PROS
  • Detailed mids and highs
  • Comfortable and secure fit
  • Expansive soundstage
  • CONS
  • Underwhelming bass response
  • On-ear controls cause discomfort when pushed
  • Pretty pricey

Verdict

The HIFIMAN TWS600 is a competent audiophile-grade true wireless pair of earphones that boast sonic accuracy and an uncommon A-shaped sound signature. It also features an alleged wireless range of 150m in an open space and over 38 hours of battery life along with the charging case. Although they aren’t the most aesthetic or premium-looking pair of earphones, the HIFIMAN TWS600 sports a snug fit inside the ear. They are comfortable to wear over extended periods of usage without feeling overly fatigued. Overall, these earphones are geared towards audiophiles, individuals who prefer a more bass-forward approach might be slightly disappointed with these. 

BUY HIFIMAN TWS600

HIFIMAN TWS600 detailed review

HIFIMAN, a Chinese headphone and audio equipment manufacturer, cemented its status as a brand catering to audiophiles with products such as the HIFIMAN Sundara, and their flagship, Shangri-La, which is priced at a whopping Rs 35,99,900. Known for delivering some of the best planar magnetic tech in headphones, the company has garnered a fair bit of attention from audiophiles. While the company largely specialises in wired, high-end headphones, they have also begun testing the waters when it comes to wireless in-ears. The HIFIMAN TWS600 is a high fidelity true wireless offering from the company. These feature the company’s proprietary Topology Diaphragm drivers which promise sonic accuracy despite being wireless. Let’s see how they fared.

Build and design

Putting it mildly, the HIFIMAN TWS600 earphones have an odd design characteristic. While most manufacturers are attempting to make their true wireless offerings look sleek and streamlined, the HIFIMAN TWS600 looks excessively “bulge-y”. The charging case resembles an elongated egg, sports a metallic grey sheen and the HIFIMAN logo, while the earphones themselves are shaped like kidney beans with odd bulging protrusions. 

The protrusion we mentioned actually leads to the earbuds’ angled nozzles. The purpose for the, frankly, ugly protrusion could be the way the patented Topology Diaphragm drivers are placed inside the earphones and their dimensions. However, this is just speculation. In addition to the bulge, the outer portion of the earphones houses the physical buttons. There are transparent patterns around the buttons which allow the LEDs inside the earbuds to shine through. There are also tiny HIFIMAN logos on the side of the earphones.

Coming back to the charging case, upon opening it, you will discover a battery indicator with four LEDs that relay the amount of battery life the case has remaining. The LED on the earphones also glows, quite brightly, when they are tucked within the case to signify that they’re charging. The case houses a USB Type-C charging port on the rear, towards the right side. 

Design aside, the charging case refuses to open up using only one hand, at least for us. The best way to do it is by prying it apart using two thumbs, however, it still takes some force. It is relatively pocketable but will bulge out considerably if your pants are form-fitting. 

The HIFIMAN TWS600 also comes with a USB Type-C charging cable and not 2 or 3, but 8 additional pairs of silicone tips including double-flanged, triple-flanged, wide-bore and more options. The result? The earphones fit inside most ears extremely securely and feel comfortable to wear even over extended periods of usage. 

Unfortunately, the control buttons on these earphones were a major pain point for us. Literally, painful… Since the buttons are relatively small in size and quite hard to press, they cause the earbuds to dig further into your ear when you press them. We found that using multiple fingers to secure the earbud’s position and then pressing the button was slightly more comfortable. 

You can control music playback (pause/play) and answer/reject calls by tapping the button on either side once. A double-tap on the right increases the volume while double-tapping the left decreases it. Triple taps help you seek tracks, with the right going forward a song while the left taking you to the previous one. Holding either button down for two seconds summons your phone’s voice assistant. Not really standard controls, but they work for the most part.

Overall, the HIFIMAN TWS600 is quite unusual-looking, especially the earphones themselves with the unsightly bulges. The comfort and fit, nevertheless, is phenomenal. Unfortunately, the comfortable fit was counteracted with some discomfort due to the physical controls and their tendency to make you push the earphones deep inside your ears. 

Features


Source: HIFIMAN website

HIFIMAN claims that the TWS600 has an absurdly-long Bluetooth range of up to 490 feet (150m)! Sporting Bluetooth v5.0, the box, however, makes a more conservative claim of 10m - 50m (33 feet - 164 feet) Bluetooth range. On the website, HIFIMAN claims to have achieved the astounding 150m of Bluetooth range in an open field. While we couldn’t test the lofty claims of 150m (finding 490 feet of open area in Mumbai is a chore, guys), we did manage to achieve around 80 feet in a large parking area without any lags in the connection. However, put a few barriers between this and you’ll start to hear drops and skips. 

Additionally, the HIFIMAN TWS600 also features a total battery life of 38.5 hours. According to the company, you get about 5.5 hours in the buds and 33 hours through the charging case. In our tests, the buds lasted about 6 hours with the volume at 40 per cent (these earphones are inordinately loud!) and the case lasted well over a week’s worth of usage as well, which is pretty impressive. The charging time is fairly brief as well, with the buds needing about an hour to charge fully, while the case charges up to full in 1.5 hours. 

Despite being audiophile-grade earphones, the HIFIMAN TWS600 only supports SBC and AAC audio codecs. Unfortunately, there’s no aptX support. The company claims that the earphones are tuned in a manner to ensure low latency, and their claims were proven right in our tests. While watching content on YouTube, Netflix and Prime Video, there was a very negligible delay between the video and audio. It was almost unnoticeable.

The earphones sport an IPX4 dust and sweat resistant rating as well. So, they are well equipped to deal with light splashes and sweat when you’re exercising. However, it is not safe to go swimming with.

Performance

The sound signature of the HIFIMAN TWS600 is peculiar in comparison to most other competing products in the true wireless segment. It features an ‘A-shaped’ sound graph, with a higher emphasis on the mids and upper mids that makes the lows and highs sound recessed in comparison. However, the lows and bass response seems a tad more recessed than the highs. 

The bass response on these earphones, while controlled and detailed, ends up sounding quite lethargic since it lacks drive. It takes a backseat to the mids and upper-mids. In the track Around the World by Kings of Leon, the shakers in the background sound listless since the mid-range guitar simply overpowers them. 

The vocals are clear and well-articulated as seen in tracks such as Rescue Me by OneRepublic. Female vocals can sometimes have a bit of sibilance, but only if you push the volume past 50 per cent. The earphones get extremely loud, so it’s best to listen to these earphones at the 40 - 50 per cent volume range. The highs, while slightly overpowered by the impactful mids, sound sonically accurate. They also have a shine and brilliance to them all without sounding too fatiguing. Whether this is the result of HIFIMAN’s unique tuning or their Topology Diaphragm tech or both, we can’t judge. 

HIFIMAN has done a great job making a mids and upper-mids focused sound signature sound almost flat. The detail retention across frequencies is extremely commendable. However, the bass could have been slightly boosted to make it energetic.

The soundstage is where these earphones blow past most of their competitors. It is ridiculously expansive, featuring impressive width, and even some height. The music fills inside your head and appears to extend beyond it, which is something you usually see in open-back headphones. Given that these are closed-back, in-ears, the soundstage is truly remarkable. The only other true wireless pair of earphones that comes close to this is the Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless. 

Imaging is excellent as well with each instrument being easily placeable in the soundscape and instrument separation is quite decent too, which instances of overlap being uncommon. Call quality is pretty decent. On both ends, the quality is manageable. In our microphone test, the live transcribing app was able to pick up most of the words we spoke accurately as well.

Overall, the HIFIMAN TWS600 true wireless earphones offer a largely atypical sound profile. However, it manages to retain details across frequencies. The bass lacks drive but still sounds very intricate and precise. In addition to maintaining clarity and detail across frequencies, it manages to sound pretty euphonic as well. Except for maybe the highs on loud volume levels which tends to sound a bit too bright.

Bottomline

The HIFIMAN TWS600 is a competent audiophile-grade true wireless pair of earphones that boast sonic accuracy and an uncommon A-shaped sound signature. It also features an alleged wireless range of 150m in an open space and over 38 hours of battery life along with the charging case. Although they aren’t the most aesthetic or premium-looking pair of earphones, the HIFIMAN TWS600 sports a snug fit inside the ear. They are comfortable to wear over extended periods of usage without feeling overly fatigued. Overall, these earphones are geared towards audiophiles, individuals who prefer a more bass-forward approach might be slightly disappointed with these. 

HIFIMAN TWS600 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Release Date: 30 Oct 2019
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Playback Time Playback Time
    NA
  • Frequency Range Frequency Range
    NA
  • Channels Channels
    NA
  • Dimensions Dimensions
    NA

Related Reviews

Jabra Elite 45H Review

Sony WI-SP510 Review

Sennheiser CX 150BT Wireless Review

JBL Tune 125TWS Review

PlayGo T44 Review

logo
Dhriti Datta

Perpetually sporting a death stare, this one can be seen tinkering around with her smartphone which she holds more dear than life itself and stuffing her face with copious amounts of bacon.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

HIFIMAN TWS600

HIFIMAN TWS600

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Blackberry Passport Review

Blackberry Passport Review

By Nikhil Pradhan | Updated May 22 2019
Blackberry Passport Review
DIGIT RATING
69 /100
  • design

    59

  • performance

    81

  • value for money

    60

  • features

    84

User Rating : 3/5 Out of 1 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Top end specs
  • Solid build quality
  • Good real world performance
  • Very powerful battery
  • Great call quality
  • CONS
  • Shape & size make it an ergonomic nightmare
  • Keyboard is uncomfortable to use
  • Uncommon screen aspect ratio
  • Heats up during gaming

Verdict

The Blackberry Passport has great specs, a display of fantastic quality and solid build quality but it feels like a novelty device and not one for mainstream consumption. The Passport is uncomfortable to use and not meant for anyone apart from hardcore Blackberry fans.

BUY Blackberry Passport
Buy now on amazon Available 22999
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 33000

Blackberry Passport detailed review

It will be very difficult to find someone who’s envious of Blackberry’s current state in the market. The former mobility giant is a shadow of its former self and has seen its market share erode almost continuously since the advent of touchscreen smartphones. However, one thing you can’t blame Blackberry of being is complacent. The Canadian phone manufacturer has constantly tried to innovate and experiment with device types, form factors and operating systems that try their very best to marry the best of the productivity world with the touchscreen world.


The Blackberry Passport is emblematic of the ‘new’ Blackberry’s strategy to pivot back to focusing on productivity users and to be ‘unconventional’ and ‘disruptive’. The Passport ignores what is now considered standard for smartphones- a candy bar design, a large 16:9 screen and no physical keyboard. As a result, the Passport is unlike any smartphone in the market both in terms of looks and usability.

Let’s see if the changes make sense.

The Design and Build

In an ocean of similar looking touchscreen smartphones, the Blackberry Passport stands out. As is evident from its photos, the Passport is not shaped like a candy bar but instead is almost a perfect square and emulates a real-world Passport. Blackberry’s explanation for this unorthodox design is that most business users are happy placing their phones and passports in their front jacket/blazer/coat pocket, so the Passport is perfectly suited for that. On that count, Blackberry is correct. The Passport fits snugly in the front pocket of both my jacket and shirt. The fit is very snug and there’s no way you’ll be able to ignore the phone as it sits against your chest but at least it’s comfortable. That comfort level drops when you put the Passport in your pants pocket, especially if you’re wearing trousers or jeans that themselves are a little tight.

The Passport is not slim and measures 9.3 mm in thickness which would be manageable if it wasn’t such a broad phone to begin with (3.56 inches across). In comparison, the Sony Xperia Z3 is 7.3 mm thick and 2.83 inches wide, the massive Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is 8.5 mm thick and 3.09 inches wide while the iPhone 6 Plus is a mere 7.1 mm thick and just over 3-inches wide. As a result, the Passport immediately culls a large portion of the prospective buyers market. While older Blackberry smartphones, still meant for business users, didn’t outright turn off non-business users, the Passport appears like it was built with the express intent to do so. The Passport also tilts the scales at 196 grams which is on the higher side when compared to modern high-end smartphones.

On the other hand, as we’ve come to expect from Blackberry, the Passport’s build quality is uniformly excellent. The smartphone is very solid and the materials used in its construction are very premium. The front of the phone is encased in glass and the bottom 1/4th has the plastic keyboard (which I’ll talk about below). The sides sport solid metal bands while the back is made up of a soft touch rubberized material with a matte finish.

Overall, the Passport is a very well built device but in terms of aesthetics, it will please only a few.

The Keyboard

What is a Blackberry phone without a keyboard? In the smartphone world that almost qualifies as a theological question and the Passport reaffirms Blackberry’s belief in the physical keyboard. The Passport’s three row keyboard, not exactly a classic smartphone keyboard, is very wide and doesn’t have any keys for numbers or symbols. For those keys, the Blackberry exploits its 4.5-in touchscreen to add virtual rows. This immediately becomes a problem especially if you’re used to typing at hypersonic speeds on a Blackberry keyboard because moving between virtual keys and physical ones is not a seamless affair and hampers speed. Also, I felt that the vertical space occupied by the physical keyboard was too little to afford typing comfortably. Whenever I used the Passport’s keyboard, my fingers felt too cramped and I ended up missing a taller touchscreen keyboard. To type comfortably, the Passport forces you to hold it closer to the bottom edge than near the middle which again does not let you do things quickly if you want to use the touchscreen.

The Passport’s keyboard is unique in the sense that it recognizes gestures. You can scroll through pages by swiping up or down on the keyboard, you can close any app by swiping up from the keyboard to the touchscreen and you can also select any word that the phone’s auto-correct dictionary suggests by swiping up on the keyboard under the word. However, chances are that the only reason you will use the gestures on the keyboard is because it’s a hassle to shift your grip to make the touchscreen accessible, and not because the keyboard gestures actually improve usability.

I realise that usability is a highly subjective matter and that others may have a different experience with the way Passport has been designed and can be used. However, in my opinion, ergonomics on the Passport is a big miss and the device does not make it comfortable for me to use either the touchscreen or the physical keyboard. I shudder to think how uncomfortable the phone will be for users with smaller hands than mine.

The Screen

Moving on to sunnier climes, the Passport’s 4.5-inch IPS display is very sharp and boasts of a resolution of 1440 x 1440 pixels and pixel density of 453 ppi. The display has excellent viewing angles and accurate colour reproduction. Outdoor visibility is also very good and at full brightness you will have no problems using the phone under bright sunlight. The sharpness also means that the Passport excels (no pun intended) at reproducing spreadsheets and word documents.

Unfortunately, the Passport’s unorthodox form factor again attempts to play spoilsport here. The screen’s 1:1 aspect ratio (something we saw in Blackberry’s Q5 and Q10 as well) means that black bars take up real estate when playing videos. This is particularly frustrating in the case of HD or full HD videos, both of which are in 16:9 aspect ratio. If you like watching videos and movies on your phone, you will feel disappointed by the fact that you can’t make optimal use of the Passport’s hi-res display.

Overall, the Passport’s screen is ideal for working on office docs and spreadsheets or browsing the Web but not so much for watching videos.

The Software

The Passport runs on Blackberry 10.3 OS which brings in some changes to BB10 but nothing that can be categorized as revolutionary. BB 10.3 still uses a combination of swipes and gestures to navigate the interface and includes the very useful Blackberry Hub, which is a central repository of all ‘communication’ on your phone including messages, social media updates, chats and emails. To get a better idea of how BB10 works, head on over to my Blackberry Z30 review.

 


The Blackberry Hub

 

 

With BB 10.3, BB OS is now able to run Android 4.3 apps. The Amazon App Store comes pre-installed and you can also install some third party app stores like SlideME or AppBrain to get access to a larger collection of Android apps. While it’s great that you can install apps from both the Blackberry World App Store and Android stores, you should keep in mind that the Passport doesn’t get access to all Android apps. Popular games like Dead Trigger 2 are unavailable on the Passport. However, not finding a popular app to download is relatively rare and even if you don’t, there are quality alternatives available.

BB OS 10.3 also comes with some UI tweaks including the ability to pull down the quick settings menu from any screen (swipe down from the top of the screen with two fingers) and the presence of a permanent homescreen, which is essentially the multitasking window. The entire interface also features a flatter design which is in line with modern UI design principles.

Then there’s Blackberry Blend, a feature that lets you work on and access documents, emails, messages, notes and calendar entries synced to your Blackberry account on your PC. Once you install Blend on your PC you can reply to emails or continue drafting one from your phone on your PC and you will also get notifications on your PC. Blend is a handy feature especially if you get a lot of emails and don’t want to constantly check your phone. The Passport also comes pre-installed with the Docs to Go app.


Blackberry Blend

The Performance

Although the Passport can run Android benchmarks, the fact that it runs them in a runtime environment means that the numbers don’t really represent accurate performance. However, just for comparison sake, take a look below at how the Passport did in some standard Android benchmarks:

 

 

In terms of real world performance, the Passport gave me nothing to complain about. Performance was smooth and lag-free and apps opened quickly. Browsing was also a good experience thanks to both the phone’s speed and the sharp screen.

Gaming on the Passport is a less than ideal experience mainly because of the display’s unorthodox aspect ratio. As a result, I saw parts of a game’s HUD getting cut off, or the entire game being stretched to fit the screen. Also, there was a clear performance difference between games downloaded from the Blackberry App World store and the Android games. Finally, the metal elements on the Passport (the sides, the BB logo at the back) heat up substantially after only a few minutes of gaming which is alarming.

Call quality on the Passport is undeniably fantastic. Voices during a call sounded crisp and clear without any static or echoing. The loudspeaker lives up to its name and delivers good volume without distortion.

The Passport has one of the most powerful batteries we’ve seen in a smartphone. In our test we played a full HD video on the phone with Wi-Fi on and brightness at max and the battery just dropped by 6% in an hour. This means that the phone will easily last more than a day of normal use on a single charge, which is exceptional.

The Passport is great at playing both music and video. Audio playback over earphones and the loudspeaker was very good and the quality was at par with any top of the line smartphone. Video playback was also really good and the Passport played all our 1080p and 720p test videos including popular formats such as MP4 and MKV. Of course, the 1:1 aspect ratio means that almost any new movie or TV show or Internet video will run with big black bars running on both the top and bottom of the screen.

The Camera

The Passport entered our labs with a reputation as the best Blackberry with respect to camera quality. I’m happy to report that the Passport lived up to the reputation. Unfortunately, since Blackberry phones haven’t exactly set the world on fire in the past with their imaging prowess, the Passport doesn’t need to do all that much to jump to top of the pile.

 

 

The Passport’s 13MP camera is good at shooting photos under good light both indoors and outdoors and the photos have decent sharpness and good colour levels. However, even under good lighting, the resulting photos have more than average noise. The Passport’s camera takes a good amount of time to focus as well and when shooting photos under poor light it was just unable to hold proper focus. The photos also showed overexposure issues especially in the white areas in scenes.


Click on the gear icon in the top right corner to view photos in full resolution

Videos shot with the Passport also exhibited the overexposure issues but on the whole, the videos looked good. The ‘Continuous Focus’ mode worked well and the sound recording was also up to the mark.

So, the Passport may be the best Blackberry yet for shooting photos but if you look at the universe outside Blackberry smartphones, it doesn’t really stand out.

The Bottomline

The Blackberry Passport has great specs, a display of fantastic quality and solid build quality but it feels like a novelty device and not one for mainstream consumption. The Passport’s design and size puts it alongside the many ‘Porsche’ branded smartphones or those made by Vertu as a device that’s too caught up with its own ‘uniqueness’ to actually want to please mainstream users.

It’s clear that Blackberry wants business users to buy the Passport but gone are the days when phone manufacturers could put consumers into neat little buckets like that. Chances are even if you like to wear a suit to work, you will change into more comfortable clothing at the end of the day but the Passport is a device that’s not made to follow your example. Instead it feels like it wants to only cater to you for only half of the day and in this day and age, and for a price of Rs. 49,990, that’s simply not enough.

Blackberry Passport Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 06 Oct 2014
Variant: 32GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    4.5" (1440 x 1440)
  • Camera Camera
    13 | 2 MP
  • Memory Memory
    32 GB/3 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3450 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Nikhil Pradhan

https://plus.google.com/u/0/101379756352447467333

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Blackberry Passport

Blackberry Passport

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q Review

Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q Review

By Anirudh Regidi | Updated Nov 04 2019
Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q Review
DIGIT RATING
70 /100
  • design

    85

  • performance

    79

  • value for money

    60

  • features

    57

User Rating : 3.6666666666667/5 Out of 6 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Nice brightness, contrast
  • Exceptionally well built
  • Easy to use on-screen display (OSD)
  • CONS
  • Monitor doesn't "wake up" from sleep consistently

Verdict

Throughout our performance tests and subjective use, the Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q monitor performed admirably well on all counts, and it's very well built. If you’re looking for a 4K monitor for work or pleasure, it's really one of the best ones out there, no questions about that.  If you can afford it, just close your eyes and buy it.

BUY Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q
Price 132000

Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q detailed review

Screen resolution is a curious thing; the Internet abounds with arguments both for and against 4K, but our experience with superlative Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q puts us very firmly in the court that says that 4K should be as compulsory as a fundamental right (only for PC users, in this context) and those who argue otherwise, really don’t know what they’re on about.

The Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q is the first IGZO display to grace our test centre and it created a bit of a stir when it arrived. For those not in the know, IGZO stands for Indium-Gallium-Zinc-Oxide, a semi-conducting compound “used in the TFT backplane” of flat-panel displays. Without going into technical details, this semi-conductor allows for a faster transmission of electric current and this matters as it allows manufacturers to build displays with higher pixel densities (or better refresh rates).



Ignoring use case for the moment, the monitor itself performs at par with any IPS panel in its class. As measured by our Spyder 3 calibration too, the contrast ratio came in at a very decent 545:1, the brightness was also good at about 300cd/m2. In fact, the monitor scored quite well in just about all our monitor tests, managing to score well above average in everything. 

One area where the monitor does stand out is with regards to build quality. It’s a very large and somewhat heavy monitor, but it’s exceptionally well built and very stable for its 32-inch frame. The Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q's OSD is also the easiest we’ve come across and was a joy to use (the buttons are touch sensitive). All the connectivity ports are neatly stacked on its back panel and hooking or unhooking wires to any of its peripheral ports isn't too cumbersome. One thing we did note is that the top of the monitor tends to get extremely hot but the screen itself doesn’t generate too much heat, which makes for a more pleasant viewing experience.



What we’re basically saying is that this monitor is great and if you’re looking for a 4K monitor for work or pleasure, it's really one of the best ones out there, no questions about that.  If you can afford it, buy it.

However, there are some serious issues with the technology that’s built around 4K that makes using it a bit of a pain if you’re the type who plays a lot of games or generally just switches resolution a lot. Our test rig consisted of an Intel Core i7 3960x, 32GB of DDR3 RAM running at 2400MHz and a GTX760 GPU. This rig was specifically chosen with the GPU as a bottleneck to showcase the effect of 4K on a very capable mid-range GPU. From our tests we observed that many games were playable (at about 25-35fps in games like Bioshock Infinite) but we had to drop settings to medium or lower to hit that holy grail of 60fps. Obviously you need a beefy rig if you’re going to game on this display.


While someone with a more powerful GPU (or multiple GPUs) would be able to work around this, the more important problem we faced was with regards to the way 4K is handled by Windows 8.1, the software on your PC and your GPU drivers. Firstly, you need a DisplayPort 1.2 ready GPU and cable if you want to have your display running at 60Hz (otherwise it defaults to 30Hz, which is painful). Secondly, almost every time your PC goes to sleep, half the panel doesn’t wake up and you’ll either be stuck with half the panel at one resolution and the other half at another, or half the panel switched off and the other, on (an artefact of the 4K manufacturing process).

Either way, it’s mighty frustrating to use a PC like that, especially if you have to spend a couple of minutes resetting your monitor every time your PC goes to sleep. The troubles don’t end here. Considering that most apps are designed for 1080p at most, font and graphics scaling doesn’t happen properly on a lot of third-party apps including uTorrent and even Chrome (till update 36).

Obviously, all the above “issues” are software issues that will be ironed out over time, but at the moment, these issues are a little frustrating to deal with when they pop up. That said, when it comes to doing real work, the true joy of a 4K display needs to be experienced to be believed.

Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price: ₹132000
Release Date: 04 Sep 2014
Market Status: Launched
logo
Anirudh Regidi

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q

Price : ₹132000

Dell UltraSharp UP3214Q

Price : ₹132000

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Vivo Y55S Review

Vivo Y55S Review

By Hardik Singh | Updated May 22 2019
Vivo Y55S Review
DIGIT RATING
55 /100
  • design

    67

  • performance

    50

  • value for money

    46

  • features

    52

  • PROS
  • Well built
  • Dependable performance
  • Nice Display
  • CONS
  • Camera is below average
  • No fingerprint sensor

Verdict

The Vivo Y55s is a depandable smartphone, and it'll reach more people, being sold offline. It's good to know that offline buyers have a dependable phone to buy, but in the market at large, the Y55s is simply not up to its competition. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 costs about the same and is faster, with better battery life and faster performance. On the other hand, the Moto G5 Plus costs much more, but has a vastly better camera, faster performance and better battery life too. The Vivo Y55s is appreciable, but not what we would recommend.

BUY Vivo Y55S
Buy now on amazon Available 11900
Buy now on flipkart Available 13995

Vivo Y55S detailed review

The performance gap between a sub-15K smartphone and a flagship device is thinning with each passing year. However, there are often devices that don’t look powerful on paper, but still perform well. The Vivo Y55s is a good example of the same. The device looks, feels and functions like a budget smartphone and makes one wonder whether benchmarks are really the proof of performance.


Build and Design
Vivo's smartphones have resembled Apple's iPhones in the past, and so does this one. However, that also means its a good looking phone, or at least that's what I think. The metal back feels nice and the rounded edges help provide comfortable grip. A thin metal strip runs around the phone, separating the front from the metal back, adding an unique feel to a phone that otherwise looks pretty much like all of Vivo's other devices. Both the power key and volume rocker are on the right, you get a dual SIM card slot on the left and a dedicated microSD slot on the top.

The build quality, on the other hand, is pretty much the industry average for budget smartphones. I've travelled with this in my pocket and inadvertently put my keys and coins in the same pocket, but the Vivo Y55s came out scratch free. Now, I don't recommend that you do this, but it's good to escape unscathed. At least the metal back seems resistant to scratches, while tempered glass comes installed on the display out-of-the-box.

Display and UI
Displays on budget devices have evolved over the years, but there are many that lack quality. The Vivo Y55s is amongst the former, though. Colour saturation and viewing angles are good and at par with the likes of Honor 6X and Coolpad Cool 1. Touch response is also decent and I didn't find the experience lacking in any way.

That said, it isn't without flaws. I definitely felt the low pixel density on the display, as the 5.2-inch panel only has 720p resolution. Moreover, it's quite dim. In fact, at 220 lux luminance, it's one of the dimmest panels I have seen on any device. This affects sunlight visibility too, which could have been better.

Vivo has not changed the UI from what we saw on the V5 Plus some months back. In fact, it adheres to the same iOS-themed interface it has been using since launch. The UI is more refined now, though, and doesn't tax the memory as much, which in a way is a good thing. It caters all the features you would expect from a Chinese UI, including, but not limited to, themes, a phone manager, a third party app store (V-App store), a pre-installed keyboard, and more. There are a few gesture-based features, such as smart split that basically is a split screen mode, and a dedicated one handed-mode that shrinks the UI to be used in one hand.

Performance
Setting aside the iOS-like UI, the phone really surprises with its performance. Powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 SoC and bundled with 3GB of RAM, the phone does a fine job, providing dependable experience. Using it as a daily driver with all the basic apps, including Facebook, Whatsapp, Youtube, Gmail, Maps, Wynk, Pocket, Chrome and more, I had no issues with performance. Even when I tested games like Asphalt 8 and Marvel’s Contest of Champions, the phone was able to provide stable frame rates of 29 fps, which is reasonable for the price. However, synthetic benchmarks don't really reflect the same.

Here's the thing though. While this kind of performance is good, it's available at much cheaper prices as well. At Rs. 12,490, there are better performers out there. The Vivo Y55s isn't meant for those who multitask a lot, neither is it meant for avid gamers. It does the job, but only reasonably so. Given that you can get more, it's tough to justify the Snapdragon 425 and HD display. 

During gaming and even while shooting video (it can do FHD at best), the phone does heat up. I recorded max temperatures of about 41 degree celsius under ideal outdoor conditions, in the middle of the day. This, though, may be tougher to manage during the summers.

As for the audio, the bottom firing speaker isn't the best. It is loud enough to be heard in on roads, but you'd want headphones for listening to music. It's not the best for calling, either. The Vivo Y55s often dropped connections in areas where most other phones were performing well, while on the same network. For call quality, the earpiece volume is lower than most phones.

Battery 
This brings us to the battery, which is just good enough for a work-day’s worth of usage. The phone lasted 5 hours and 31 minutes on the PCMark Work 2.0 Battery Test, which is definitely not in the Redmi Note 4 territory, but not bad either. The 2730mAh battery seems well optimised as well and there are no worrisome drops even if you are playing video games, recordings videos or just using navigation. In my test period, I did not find the battery life insufficient on a day-to-day basis, even with half an hour of gaming and at least an hour of music streaming.

Camera
The camera, however, is a hit or miss. Photos shot in bright outdoor conditions by the 8MP rear camera produce sharp colours that are noticeably oversaturated, along with soft details. The sharpness levels are fairly decent, but object edges are compromised because of the lack of fine details. Most photographs tend to produce noise, which still remain limited in brightly lit conditions.

 

Colour details are fairly decent for its price, but the dynamic range is not exemplary. Things change for the worse as the light diminishes, with photographs getting expectedly noisier and more pixelated details. The camera spikes ISO to high levels which leads to the soft noise that mars details, and in all of this, the focusing is also slower than other phones in contention.

The Vivo Y55s can shoot 1080p videos with autofocus, which for the most part, looks good. In addition, there are slow motion and time-lapse modes as well, which work as intended.

The front-facing camera is only average at best, and the beauty mode noticeably softens skin tones, that we saw on the Vivo V5 lineup.

Bottomline
The Vivo Y55s is in many ways is a good budget device. It ignored the specs war, but manages to do most things right. It looks good, performs well, has a functional UI, along with a day's worth of battery life. A good camera would have completed the package, but I guess you still can't have everything on a budget. However, there are far better smartphones available in this price range. For example, the Moto G5 Plus may be more expensive, but it is much faster and has a vastly better camera. On the other hand, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 can do everything the Vivo V5 can, but better. It is also noticeably faster, making the V5's optimised performance look weak. While the Snapdragon 425 has been used well here, the 625s and 650s in this price range are just too fast to overcome with simple software optimisations.

The Vivo Y55s will reach more, being sold offline, and it's good to know that they have a dependable phone for themselves. However, in the market at large, this phone pales in comparison to its competitors.

Vivo Y55S Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 24 Feb 2017
Variant: 16GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5.2" (720 x 1280)
  • Camera Camera
    13 | 5 MP
  • Memory Memory
    16 GB/3 GB
  • Battery Battery
    2730 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Hardik Singh

Light at the top, this odd looking creature lives under the heavy medication of video games.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Vivo Y55S

Vivo Y55S

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV Review

Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV Review

By Sameer Mitha | Updated Nov 04 2019
Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV Review
DIGIT RATING
65 /100
  • design

    68

  • performance

    67

  • value for money

    65

  • features

    62

  • PROS
  • Good display
  • Well build
  • QWERTY + traditional remote is nice
  • CONS
  • AOSP is cumbersome for content consumption
  • Audio output could be better

Verdict

The 43-inch Daiwa 4K HDR TV has a good panel for 4K and 1080p content consumption considering the price point. HDR content is acceptable. The smart experience is frustrating especially if you are one looking to take advantage of streaming services. If you are looking to invest in a new 43-inch TV or want to dip a toe in the 4K arena, then you can consider it. Just know that the smart experience for content consumption isn’t great.

 

BUY Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 26490

Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV detailed review

A 4K HDR TV is no longer one for just the premium customer. There are 4K TVs available in every budget. Today we have with us a 4K HDR TV from the house of Daiwa. The TV boasts of 4K resolution along with support for HDR. The TV is available in screen sizes starting at 43-inches going up to 65-inches but the one we have with us today is the 43-inch variant priced at just Rs 26,490. The size of the TV is ideal for a small bedroom but is one to consider?


Key specifications at a glance

Panel Size: 43-inch
Panel Type: IPS 
Panel Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - 4K
Panel Refresh Rate: 60Hz
HDR 10 support: Yes
Dolby Vision Support: No
HDMI Ports: 3
USB Ports: 2
Bluetooth: No
Wi-Fi: Yes
Ethernet: Yes
Speakers: 2 x 10W
CPU: Cortex A73 Dual Core 800MHz
GPU: Dual Core Mali450-540MHz
RAM: 1GB
Built-in storage: 8GB
OS: Android 7 (AOSP)
Price: Rs 26,490

Build and design

Kicking things off with the build of the Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV, it isn’t the slimmest which is okay. What you will notice at the back of the TV are 2 protrusions for the wall mount. They are not a hindrance in any way, just that their presence isn't something that we have seen on other TVs. 

The TV has a plastic shell, something we have seen on a large number of budget TVs. The borders of the TV surrounding the display are black and plastic. Since they have a matte finish, they don't really interfere with the viewing experience. Considering the price, the borders are relatively slim and the logo at the bottom bezel is small and minimal. You can choose to either wall mount the TV or put it on a table top. We put the TV on a table top using the two feet that come in the box, which are also made of metal. The metal feet are extremely well built, hold the TV in place firmly and are quite slim.The space between the table and the bottom bezel is just enough to place a set-top-box or a PS4. If you have a PS4 Pro or the Xbox One X, then you may want to move things around as it will not fit under the TV.

Overall, the build of the TV is sturdy, especially the table top stand that comes in the box. It’s design is minimalistic. Considering the price of the TV, the build and design is good.

Ports and connectivity

When it comes to connectivity, the Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV has three HDMI ports of which HDMI 3 is ARC enabled, and two USB ports. All these ports are placed on the side of the TV for easy access. If you want to use the keyboard feature on the remote control, you will have to use the supplied dongle which will take up one USB port, so keep that in mind. At the back, the TV has an ethernet port, optical audio out port, 2 AV inputs, an RF input for good old antenna and a 3.5mm out in case you want to connect a pair of headphones. The TV also boasts of Wi-Fi but sadly, no bluetooth. 

 

Once again we are happy with the selection of ports on the TV. There is ARC and 3.5mm for your audio options. There are 3 HDMI ports which at this price are enough and 2 RCA inputs for your old PS2 or DVD player or set-top-box.

Display and picture quality

The Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV has a 10-bit IPS panel that is made by LG. Thanks to the 10-bit panel, the TV boasts of 4K capabilities along with HDR 10 support. A 10-bit panel will help the TV output more colours which is needed for HDR content. To make the most of HDR content the TV needs to be bright as well. Daiwa tells us that the TV has a peak brightness of 350 nits which isn't a lot especially when you consider that the HDR10 standard requires a brightness of 1000 nits. How the TV performs is something we will touch upon in the following sections. Below we will highlight the performance of the TV using three types of content - 4K HDR, 1080p and gaming content. 

The above Netflix UI is from the Xbox One X

4K and HDR playback

For 4K HDR content we played our standard slew of clips from Netflix which included DareDevil, Star Trek and more. Daiwa did tell us that the brightness of the TV is 350 nits which is a lot less than the requirement for HDR but is in line with what we’ve seen on other TVs in this price segment. The good news is that content is well viewable even in a lit room with the downside being that sequences in the dark seem dimmer than they should when watching HDR content. You can switch off the HDR playback via the settings of the TV to get SDR playback and that may help with some content in dimly lit situations. Having said that, the HDR performance of the TV is slightly better than the Mi TV 4A Pro that we reviewed. The Mi TV is a Full HD TV with HDR capabilities sporing an 8-bit panel whereas the Daiwa we have here is a 10-bit panel. So yes, the colours in comparison do look better on the Daiwa along with the HDR performance.

The HDMI source recognises when HDR content is playing

1080p content

When it comes to Full HD content from sources like Netflix, Prime Videos, Hotstar and YouTube, the Daiwa TV shines. It produces bright images that are easy to view even in a lit room. Movies like Blade Runner 2049 and Spider-Man-Homecom play back with vibrant colours. There is some blooming here and there, especially during the night sequences in Spider-Man Homecoming but it can be attributed to the internet connection at the time. However, it doesnt change the fact that you may notice it when streaming content. 

For TV viewing from your set-top-box or even streaming services, the Daiwa 43-inch TV is value for money for the picture quality. The colours are good, brightness is, well, bright and the preset modes are easy to control.

Speaking of modes, be it for 4K HDR content or for Full HD content, you may want to stick with the dynamic or vivid preset as these two are the ones that give the best results. There is a ‘soft’ and ‘eco’ mode available as well but they reduce the backlight too much to have an enjoyable experience. One downside is that there are very few picture settings for you to tinker with manually incase you are one looking to set the picture yourself.

Gaming

When it comes to gaming, we played Doom in 4K SDR. For indoors sequences, the visuals of the game look detailed and the grey and silver techie interiors mixed with the demonic presence is immersive. However, shift outdoors into the wasteland of Mars and you will see that the saturation on the TV feels off. The orange planet of Mars needs to have a bit more red thrown into the mix to get the colour right. 

For 4K HDR gaming, we turned to Gears of War 4, which has vast stormy skies which exhibit a lot of dark shades of red, with bright lightning strikes thrown into the mix. While playing the game, the visual fidelity of the bright and dark areas are maintained decently well and while it isn’t quite as good as a TV three times the price, most people will still feel like this is an upgrade over their SDR gaming experience.

Overall, gaming on the TV is fun. There are a lot of games that give you in game brightness and HDR settings to tinker with and I recommend keeping the TV in Vivid mode. Only tinker with the display settings in the game if you absolutely must. 

Audio

The Daiwa 43-inch 4K HDR TV has 2 down firing 10W speakers. I am generally not a fan of the speakers on a TV but the ones on the Daiwa are decent and get the job done for everyday viewing. Watch the Cyberpunk 2077 E3 2018 trailer on YouTube and you will notice that at 60 percent volume, it sounds loud and room filling. If you watch news via your set top box or shows like Young Sheldon or Big Bang Theory or anything where the vocals are more important than the background score you should be just fine. There is a ‘news mode’ which enhances the vocals of the content you are watching. This works well for soap operas and news content but removes the joy from movies. By using modes like ‘Standard’ and ‘theatre’, you can enjoy the occasional movie but for a good immersive experience, you will need to invest in a soundbar like the Xiaomi Mi Soundbar. You can read our review of the soundbar here

UI 

The Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV runs on Android 7 out of the box but this isn’t an Android TV. It is AOSP. We have reviewed a few AOSP TVs in the past with their own custom launcher and the UI experience has been acceptable with the source of  frustration coming from the apps. Apps like Netflix and Prime Videos are only able to run their mobile versions and not the proper Android TV version. This makes navigating the UI of the app more cumbersome and also reduces the quality of the content playback. You can log into your Google account if you like but updating and downloading new apps is more seamless through the Aptoide app store, especially for streaming services. 

The TV also has Sensy Remote. The Sensy UI reminds me of a baby version of PatchWall running on Xiaomi’s TVs. You have access to TV channels in the UI itself and the UI shows you what's playing on each channel and time remaining for the content to finish. So if you see that Game of Thrones is playing on HBO, you will also see the duration left for the episode to finish. Sensy also gives you access to a celebrity database and clicking on a celebrity will bring up information about him/her along with showing you content about him/her that is about to begin or is currently playing on a TV channel.

Overall, Sensy is nice for those that want an internet enabled experience using their set-top-box as the source of content. However, if you are looking to stream content from services like Netflix and Prime Videos, you are better off investing in a device like a Fire TV stick or a gaming console. 

Remote Control

Speaking of the remote control, it has functions on both sides. On one side you have a traditional remote control with functions like power, number pad, source, settings along with shortcuts for YouTube and Netflix. The other side of the remote is a full QWERTY keypad. This is extremely helpful when logging into services like Netflix or Prime Videos (the native apps on the TVs OS). As mentioned above, those services are the mobile version because the TV runs on AOSP so the login process can get quite cumbersome. The QWERTY setup of the remote control is a little wider than I’d like but that’s the compromise of having a 2-in-1 setup. The buttons are rubbery and require you to press them down with some force which is a good thing. This ensures you don’t accidently press the wrong key when using the other side of the remote control.

 

Speaking of the other side, the traditional controls are easy to use with one hand and the buttons are equally rubbery and clicky as the other (QWERTY) side.

One thing to note is that to use the traditional side of the remote control, you need to point the remote at the TV. However, since the QWERTY side works the USB dongle at the back, you don’t need to point it at the TV which is nice. 

Overall, the remote control is functional. The remote adds functions like a mouse pointer and the QWERTY keypad which really help in navigating the UI which can get frustrating at times. 

Bottom Line

There are a bunch of 4K TV’s available around the Rs 25,000 price point. We have a few 43-inch 4K TVs from Thompson and Kodak. The Thompson UD9 runs on AOSP and the experience is similar to what we had on this TV as far as the UI is concerned. We are yet to review the new Kodak 43-inch 4K so stay tuned for that if you want to know when one to get. As far as the Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV is concerned, it has a good panel for Full HD and 4K content consumption and is average for HDR content. If you want to watch content from  your set-top-box, then this TV should do fine. If you want to delve into the world of smart TV capabilities, I suggest investing in a device like the Fire TV stick to get a good smart TV experience. TCL has a 43-inch 1080p Android TV that works on the Google certified Android TV OS.

Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 12 Feb 2019
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size (inch) Screen Size (inch)
    43
  • Display Type Display Type
    4K
  • Smart Tv Smart Tv
    Smart TV
  • Screen Resolution Screen Resolution
    3840 x 2160

Related Reviews

TCL 65 inches 4K QLED ANDROID TV (C715) Review

OnePlus U1 55-inch 4K HDR TV Review

Realme 43 inch Full HD LED Smart Android TV (TV 43) Review

Nokia 43-inch Smart TV Review

logo
Sameer Mitha

Sameer Mitha lives for gaming and technology is his muse. When he isn’t busy playing with gadgets or video games he delves into the world of fantasy novels.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV

Buy now on amazon 26490

Daiwa 43-inch 4K TV

Buy now on amazon 26490

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Lenovo Legion Y520 Review

Lenovo Legion Y520 Review

By Hardik Singh | Updated Nov 01 2019
Lenovo Legion Y520 Review
DIGIT RATING
70 /100
  • design

    79

  • performance

    72

  • value for money

    76

  • features

    54

  • PROS
  • Good for 1080p gaming
  • Well built
  • Good Speakers
  • CONS
  • Software issue

Verdict

The Lenovo Legion Y520 can be recommended to anyone who is looking to play games in 1080p. It has some drawbacks, but none of those are real deal breakers.

BUY Lenovo Legion Y520
Buy now on amazon Available 107990
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 58990

Lenovo Legion Y520 detailed review

If you’ve been following Digit for long, you may know that the Lenovo Y700 won our Zero1 award for “Best Mainstream Gaming Laptop” in 2016. This year the company is pushing the envelope a little further, with the Legion Y520, which is the replacement for the last year's machine. The design has been tweaked, the guts have been upgraded, weight and dimensions lowered, and the machine is now part of Lenovo's Legion sub-brand. On paper, it looks quite interesting and somewhat similar to the Dell inspiron 7567 I reviewed recently, which means there is plenty of 1080p performance to exploit. Exploit I did, the Legion Y520 has been a good gaming partner in the past two weeks. But not everything is up to the mark either.


Tech specs of our test machine:

Display: 15.6-inch, 1080P, IPS Panel

CPU: Intel Core i7-7700HQ

RAM: 16GB GB

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Storage 1: 128GB Samsung NVMe SSD

Storage 2: 1TB Seagate 5400RPM

Battery: 45 Wr

Price: Rs. 1,05,101

Design and Build: New and refined

Like its predecessor, the Legion Y520 continues the red-and-black gaming theme. It’s made primarily of plastic, but it is a sturdy machine and easily comparable to entry level Thinkpads. The use of red accents in places gives the machine a more attractive look, and the angular front lip makes it distinctive among a horde of rectangular designs. The orange exhaust at the back and the shoulder mounted speakers not only look appealing, but enhance the aesthetics too.

The Y520 uses a similar middle mounted single-hinge mechanism as the Dell Inspiron 7567 gaming, but here the flex in the display is noticeably lesser, albeit not completely missing. The keyboard deck offers ample space for both hands and the use of matte-ish paint feels good. The laptop is fairly thin and has amply rounded edges, making it easier to reach the keyboard and use it for a longer period.

I/O: All you need

I am pretty satisfied with the I/O selection on the Legion Y520, as it covers all the basics. On the left, you get a USB 2.0 port, a Gigabit ethernet jack, microphone/headphone combo and the proprietary power port taken directly from the Thinkpad lineup. On the right, you have two USB 3.0 ports, an SD card reader, a USB 3.0 Type-C port and an HDMI out.

At this point, I should say that the laptop misses out on a Thunderbolt port, but limited compatibility of third party graphic amplifiers and the lack of 4K gaming performance on the NVIDIA 1050 Ti makes it a moot point. That being said, I would have preferred a third USB 3.0 port with fast charging capabilities.

Display: Good not great

While the 4K capabilities of the 1050 Ti are limited to video playback and some non-graphic intensive games, it does justice to the 1080p display here. The matte 15.6-inch panel, is one of the best I have seen in the category, although it is not as bright as I hoped. Producing 260 lux at the centre, it is definitely better in terms of quality and viewing angles than the Dell Inspiron 7567 and most other laptops, but it leaves me wanting for more. Colour reproduction is decent, but as long as you are not using this machine for Photoshop, it will serve you well.

Keyboard and touchpad: Good enough
The Lenovo Legion Y520 features a similar island style keyboard we have seen from the company in the past. It has large keys, is quite tactile and offers good feedback. The red backlighting on it matches the whole gaming theme of the laptop. Moreover, this time it uses a two step backlighting, which means it has two intensity settings. The addition of dedicated screen record button is also appreciated. 

The synaptics touchpad is also quite good and responsive. Compared to the Dell, it certainly feels more smooth, but the precision is almost at par. The two cursor keys are glossy and somewhat raised, which may give the appearance that they might have more depth, but in reality the depression is quite small and both buttons are a little stiff to press.

Performance: At par with competition

The Lenovo Legion Y520 packs a similar hardware setup as the Dell Inspiron 7567 Gaming and the performance is pretty much at par as well. The Intel Core i7-7700HQ is a good performer through and through and offers unthrottled performance whether you are converting a video or playing rigorous games. It was really impressive to see the smallest GTX GPU from Nvidia putting out more than 65fps consistently on Doom, running at Ultra settings.

Graphic intensive titles like Battlefield 1 maintained more than 45fps at ultra settings with occasional screen tearing. I did get better frame rates once I dialled down the graphics quality to high, producing more than 50fps easily. Less graphic intensive tiles like Dota 2 ran comfortably, at over 120fps on ultra settings.

While the gaming performance is fine, I faced an odd issue which prompted me to connect an external keyboard. The thing is, the Lenovo Y520 locks the Windows key when in game, which is actually a good thing, but if you press it accidentally, the keyboard occasionally locks itself in (Windows key + X) format. This means, after you accidently pressed the Windows key, pressing just Q opens Cortana, or if you press E for instance, a new explorer window will open, and so on. It happened to me during Dota 2 and I can tell you it was way more infuriating than the slight heating issue the machine has.

Speaking of heating, I found traces on the right side of the keyboard and felt it only if while gaming in a non-airconditioned room. It is not uncomfortable, nor does it affect performance in any way, but it is there and your palms are bound to get sweaty at least. 

The 16GB of RAM on our test machine coped up well on the variety of workloads we threw at it. Moreover, the 128GB SSD + 1TB HDD storage solution is one of the fastest amongst its peers. Although, I would have preferred a 256GB SSD on this higher variant of the Y520.

Audio quality via the two shoulder mounted speakers is also nothing short of amazing and while audiophiles won’t agree with me, the machine does a really good job for its price. There’s little bass to speak of, but it doesn’t seem like laptop makers will ever get that right. Still, the speakers try to keep things immersive when you’re gaming, but they’re nothing worth writing home about. They are loud though.

Battery Life: Just Enough

As for the battery, the Dell Inspiron 7567 Gaming has set up a new benchmark, which is tough to outperform. The Lenovo Legion Y520 tries, but manages only half of what the Inspiron achieved on the battery test. It lasts for two hours and two minutes on our battery test. You can game on the go, without the GPU and processor being throttled, but just for about an hour or so. Video playback time is still good and you can finish a movie or two on a single charge.

Bottomline

The Lenovo Legion Y520 is a good gaming laptop, with a very severe issue. Although the Windows key issue is not persistent, if you look past that, the design looks good, build is sturdy and performance is impressive. In addition, battery life is dependable and having an IPS display certainly helps enhance the visual experience. 

On the other hand, I believe it would have been a more complete package, with a larger SSD option. Overall, I would easily recommend this machine to whomsoever is looking to invest on a sub-one-lakh laptop, capable of 1080p gaming.

Lenovo Legion Y520 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 19 May 2017
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • OS OS
    Windows 10 Home
  • Display Display
    15.6" (1920 x 1080)
  • Processor Processor
    Intel Core i7 (7th generation) | 2.8 GHz with Turbo Boost Upto 3.8 GHz
  • Memory Memory
    1 TB with 128GB SSD support N/A/8GB DDR4

Related Reviews

Asus TUF Gaming A15 Review

Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Review

HP OMEN 15 2020 Review

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 Review

HP Envy 15 Review

logo
Hardik Singh

Light at the top, this odd looking creature lives under the heavy medication of video games.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Lenovo Legion Y520

Lenovo Legion Y520

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review
Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Subhrojit Mallick   |  13 Aug 2020
DIGIT RATING
61 /100
  • design

    58

  • performance

    71

  • value for money

    38

  • features

    64

  • PROS
  • Lightweight, ergonomic design.
  • Full charge in 30 minutes
  • CONS
  • Cannot match the performance of its peers.
  • Strictly average camera output

Verdict

Buy the Reno4 Pro if all you want from a smartphone is a lightweight, ergonomic design and hyper-fast charging. For everything else, there are better alternatives like the OnePlus Nord, iQOO 3 and the Realme X3 SuperZoom.

BUY Oppo Reno4 Pro
Buy now on amazon Available 34990

Oppo Reno4 Pro detailed review

For a performance enthusiast or a gamer, the Reno4 Pro is easy to write off looking at the spec sheet. But for the general user, the Reno4 Pro may still offer a few compelling features, enough to make it a smartphone of choice, provided you have the budget for this smartphone. The Reno4 Pro is rather expensive for the core hardware under the hood, but then, it’s not as much about the specs than it is the experience that makes a smartphone worthy of recommending. Is the Reno4 Pro worth buying? We find out —

Performance

The Oppo Reno4 Pro is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, the same chipset that powers a bunch of smartphones under Rs 20,000, and can arguably be called a popular mid-range chipset. The price of the smartphone, however, is in the high-end flagship territory. It’s hard to justify that choice for power users, but for someone looking for an affordable good-looking smartphone for the basics, the Reno4 Pro should work just fine. Options like the OnePlus Nord, Realme X3 SuperZoom and the iQOO 3 outshine the Reno4 Pro in nearly every way except for the design, may be. But that's subjective. However, the gap in performance is not something one would really know unless they're constantly switching between apps, or gaming or running benchmarks.

The benchmark results clearly state how far behind the Reno4 Pro really is, as compared to its peers in this price range.

The performance gap that we see on benchmarks is barely noticeable in daily use though. Of course, it’s not the butter smooth experience you get from a Snapdragon 855 or an 865 processor, but it’s not easy for an average user to gauge that. I picked up the Reno4 Pro after using the OnePlus Nord for a week, and while the usual operations seemed just as smooth, minor things like a small delay in launching apps, or switching cameras, or unlocking the screen became evident. Things that won’t really bother the vanilla smartphone user, habitual to mid-range performance.

The Reno4 Pro isn’t going to impress gamers either. The Snapdragon 720G can only run the popular games with medium graphics. We played a few rounds of PUBG Mobile and COD: Mobile and neither of them allowed the Reno4 Pro to run at the highest graphics settings. However, CoD Mobile did manage to hit 60 FPS like we have noted in the Realme 6 Pro and the Redmi Note 9 Pro, both of which run the game at 60 FPS as well. Most likely, the Adreno 618 gets maxed out running games at low graphics, because CPU usage is just around 20 per cent during gaming.

PUBG Mobile also only hit 30 FPS on GameBench, and that too at HD graphics. So the draw distance, textures, and other details are far lesser than smartphones the Reno4 Pro competes with. Having said that, the gameplay on both PUBG Mobile and COD: Mobile is quite smooth, but no perceivable frame drops. The touch response are nothing like the flagships, and the 90Hz screen doesn’t really come into play here, but you do get a dedicated gaming mode where you can set individual profiles for each games, and enable what Oppo calls “Tournament Mode” which apparently boosts the performance.

Software

Part of what makes this mid-range smartphone usable enough, is the ColorOS 7 software. Oppo smartphones were not known for smooth, minimalist UI until recently with the rollout of ColorOS 7 —  One which manages to offer both personalisation and minimalism in the Reno4 Pro. You can choose how your icons will look, the wallpaper and app layout and more from the Settings, and even apply various pre-built themes available in the theme store. There’s also a capable dark mode and a nifty always-on display as well with cool clock styles.

Annoyingly enough, the Reno4 Pro still has some of the apps that was banned by the Indian Government. It’s still harmless because they don’t work and can be uninstalled.  What irked me was the fact that despite paying Rs 34,999, there isn’t anything special in the software to write about. Almost all the features are the same as what you’d get any other Oppo smartphone priced much less.

Camera

The Reno series started off with a nicely tuned camera in the Reno 10X Zoom, but over the past few iterations, the camera has been quite disappointing. The Reno4 Pro’s quad camera setup also evoked the same feeling. The 48+8+2+2 MP setup is common for mid-range smartphones priced under Rs 20,000, and it's natural to expect some level of differentiation to motivate the buyer to consider paying more. The camera is how most OEMs differentiate, but not the Reno4 Pro. It’s performance is strictly average, and a far cry from the images the Reno 10X Zoom took.

Daylight

Oppo Reno4 Pro vs Competition:

Shot on Oppo Reno4 Pro

Shot on iQOO 3 5G

In the daytime, the Reno4 Pro takes photos with good colours, and the right amount of saturation and vibrance. The dynamic range is on the lower side, and so is the details when compared against images taken from phones like the iQOO 3.

Lowlight

Oppo Reno4 Pro vs Competition:

Shot on Oppo Reno4 Pro

Shot on iQOO 3 5G

The Reno4 Pro comes with a Night Mode which takes a good few seconds to take a low-light photo. The result is an image that looks brighter, but doesn’t have much details when you zoom in.

Portraits

The portrait mode algorithm does the usual beautifying enhancements which smoothens the skin and makes faces appear fairer. The subject separation is accurate, however, and you get a sharp image with lots of filters to experiment with.  

Macro

Shot on Oppo Reno4 Pro

Shot on iQOO 3 5G

The 2MP macro is best left unused. Yes, you can go close to a subject up to 4cm, but the colour appear completely faded, and there’s no details whatsoever. The iQOO 3 beats the Reno4 Pro to the punch using a software-induced macro mode.

Videos

The video capabilities of the Reno4 Pro is limited to 4K at 30 FPS, and while the phone manages to maintain focus, the quality of videos are much sharper in smartphones like the iQOO 3 priced the same. The light weight of the phone does help in keeping the phone stable though, and there’s a software-assisted Ultra Steady mode, which is quite handy.

Battery

Here’s where things get interesting. While the Reno4 Pro is strictly average in performance and camera, it sure does last long. And even when it eventually dies, it comes right back up in less than 15 minutes of charging. It has the same 65W fast charger that the Realme X50 Pro already offers, and that’s quite a game changer on its own, even though this feature alone doesn’t justify the price you have to pay. The power draw is quite controlled thanks to the Snapdragon 720G largely, and Oppo’s own resource management algorithms working in the background. The latter might become an annoyance if you switch between apps a lot, because in my case, I had the BatteryLog app running to log the battery drain, and it kept dying every few hours.  

Design and Display

What really makes the Reno4 Pro compelling to consider is the design. The smartphone isn’t the most powerful, but it sure does look fantastic. That’s definitely a trait the Reno4 Pro has borrowed from the Reno 10X Zoom. The first thing you’ll notice picking up the phone is it's incredibly light weight and the frosted matte finish. In the way it feels in hand, the Reno4 Pro’s design is a lot like the special edition Realme X series, the ones named Onion and Garlic for some reason.

What works in case of the Reno4 Pro is the feather-light weight and the slim profile. It’s just 7.7mm thick and rocks a curved AMOLED display that blends in with the plastic body along the edges. As a result, the Reno4 Pro can be easily used one-handed. It’s really ergonomic, doesn’t slip and doesn’t attract the ugly smudges and fingerprints.

As for the display itself, it’s decent for the usual tasks but lacks features like HDR support for Netflix, and other streaming apps like its rivals offer. The 6.5-inch AMOLED panel is still HDR-rated though, and supports DCI-P3 colours in the apps and UI. There’s also the OSIE Vision Effect that’s present in nearly every Realme and Oppo smartphones. Turning it on adds a warm tinge to the screen when a video is playing. The brightness levels are ideal for indoor usage. Using it under direct sunlight will cause colours to fade and make reading text difficult.

Bottomline

Overall, the Oppo Reno4 Pro is a strictly average smartphone that looks good, and charges in an instant. The design and the battery life are the only two things that somewhat justifies the price tag, but without the performance to back it up, the Reno4 Pro feels like a half-done job. It feels like Oppo started off with making a premium smartphone —  it got the outer shell ready, but then pivoted to making a mid-range smartphone. As a result, the Reno4 Pro can be easily mistaken as a high-performing smartphone with premium camera performance, but in reality, it’s just average.

Buy the Reno4 Pro if all you want from a smartphone is an ergonomic design and hyper-fast charging. For everything else, there are better alternatives like the OnePlus Nord, iQOO 3 and the Realme X3 SuperZoom.

Oppo Reno4 Pro Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 31 Jul 2020
Variant: 128GB8GBRAM , 256GB12GBRAM
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    6.55" (1080 x 2400)
  • Camera Camera
    48 + 13 + 12 | 32 MP
  • Memory Memory
    128 GB/8 GB
  • Battery Battery
    4000 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Realme 6 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Subhrojit Mallick

Eats smartphones for breakfast.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Oppo Reno4 Pro

Oppo Reno4 Pro

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Review

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Review

By Mithun Mohandas | Updated Nov 04 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Review
DIGIT RATING
80 /100
  • design

    75

  • performance

    76

  • value for money

    90

  • features

    80

  • PROS
  • Value for money
  • Faster GDDR6 memory
  • CONS
  • Expensive for the Indian market

Verdict

The RTX 2060 gets the performance part right but is nowhere close to being affordable, not at all for the Indian market. Even NVIDIA knows that which is why we’re going to see the GTX 1660 Ti in roughly a month’s time without any of the fancy RT cores. Another distinction with this new generation is that the RTX 2060 is very much closer to the RTX 2070 in spec. Moreover, it has the best price-to-performance ratio at the moment. This makes the RTX 2060 an excellent gateway card for those interested in experiencing hardware accelerated ray-tracing. For gamers who want an affordable and powerful card can wait a month for the GTX 1660 Ti launch.

BUY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Price 31000

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 detailed review

The latest member of the new NVIDIA RTX family is the mid-tier RTX 2060. Having managed to incorporate a whole new paradigm with the hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing feature, the new Turing architecture based NVIDIA cards were marketed with a lot of emphasis on the ray tracing and DLSS features. While the graphics cards themselves were quite well received, the new features were most certainly not since no video games shipped with them at launch. Even now, it’s just Battlefield V that has ray tracing enabled while the others are yet to push the new feature out. Needless to say, ray tracing is seen purely as a luxury when it comes to your video gaming experience and that means most of the gamers are going to take the risk-averse approach and buy something in the 60-class or 50-class of graphics cards. It’s not just our opinion, even NVIDIA thinks so as is evidenced by the upcoming GTX 1660 Ti graphics card which will ship without the fancy RTX feature. Hopefully, with the second generation of RTX cards, the feature set will be better optimised and we’ll have more games that have RTX.


NVIDIA RTX 2060 Founders Edition specifications

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is based on the same TU106 GPU that powers the RTX 2070. Up until now, with all previous generation of NVIDIA graphics cards, the 60-class of graphics cards always had a different GPU. This time around, it seams that we’re getting a cut down variant of the RTX 2060’s bigger brother. Since this is an RTX card, we get 30 RT cores which is only six cores lesser than the RTX 2070.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Specification
Card RTX 2060 FE GTX 1060 6GB RTX 2070 GTX 1070
Architecture Turing Pascal Turing Pascal
GPU TU106 GP106 TU106 GP104
CUDA Cores 1920 1280 2304 1920
ROPs 48 48 64 64
Core Clock 1365 MHz 1506 MHz 1410 MHz 1506 MHz
Boost Clock 1680 MHz 1709 MHz 1710 MHz 1683 MHz
Memory Clock 14 Gbps 8 Gbps 14 Gbps 8 Gbps
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR5 GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 192-bit 192-bit 256-bit 256-bit
VRAM 6 GB 6 GB 8 GB 8 GB
Single Precision Perf. 6.5 TFLOPS 4.4 TFLOPs 7.9 TFLOPS 6.5 TFLOPS
"RTX-OPS" 37T N/A 45T N/A
SLI Support No No No Yes
Transistor Count 10.8B 4.4B 10.8B 7.2B
Manufacturing Process TSMC 12nm "FFN" TSMC 16nm TSMC 12nm "FFN" TSMC 16nm
TDP 160W 120W 185W 150W
Launch Price $349 $299 $599 $449

Another thing to note is the pricing, we are looking at a 60-class graphics card which is $150 dollars more expensive than its predecessor. That’s a huge jump especially given that the 60-class graphics cards are the sweet spot in NVIDIA’s lineup. This is why 15.39% of Steam users have the GTX 1060, a good 6% lead over the second most popular card. Suffice to say, the RTX 2060 is not going to end up as the favourite among gamers.

Given that the GPU is the same on the RTX 2060, it would be exciting to see if any of the new cards can be cross-flashed to unlock the disabled cores. This would only be possible if the disabled ones aren’t fused off. One can always hope.

Performance

Our test rig has been upgraded to keep up with the times and the new Windows releases. This means all our legacy scores are not comparable, specially given the fact that CPU performance has gone up by a significant margin. Here’s what we’re running at the moment.

Processor - Intel Core i9 9900K
CPU Cooler - Corsair H115i RGB PLATINUM
Motherboard - ASUS ROG MAXIMUS X HERO
RAM - 2x 8 GB G.Skill Trident Z Royal 3200 MHz
SSD - Corsair MP510
PSU - Corsair HX1050

Graphics cards:
RTX 2080 Ti
RTX 2080
RTX 2070
AMD RX 590

We ran the usual set of synthetics on the RTX 2060 which includes a host of benchmarks from 3DMark, Unigine, Compubench and a few others. Here's how the RTX 2060 fared.

The part that stands out about this graph is the relative performance within the family and how it has scaled since Maxwell. Our old benchmarks peg the FireStrike scores of the GTX 960 to that of the GTX 980 at a ratio of 1.95. Which meant that the 80-class card would be roughly 2x better than the 60-class card in performance. Now if we are to see how the RTX 2060 compares with the RTX 2080, then the same metric produces a factor of 1.26. Essentially, the RTX 2060 is a lot closer to the RTX 2080 than how the previous generation of graphics cards used to be. This should tell you why the RTX 2060 is priced so much. It's not just about the new Turing cards being expensive to begin with but the relative performance also plays into the high pricing. However, gamers don't spend days and nights comparing 3DMark scores, so let's see how this fares in gaming.

We see a very linear scaling of performance across the RTX family of graphics cards. Please note that the benchmarks for the 10-series cards are from our older test rig which had a different HEDT CPU. The performance difference isn't much but we don't use the same in our scoring mechanism for the sake of consistency. For 1080p gaming, the RTX 2060 just about equals the GTX 1070 Ti in practically all DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 video games. The same trend can be seen even when the resolution is scaled higher. With the 10-series cards, we see quite a bit of frame rate drops at higher resolutions. Don't bother looking at the Far Cry 5 numbers since it's one of the least scaling video games we've come across. It's the only game where the GTX 1080 Ti still scores more than the RTX 2080 Ti. You can also see how the RTX 2060 frame rates are closer to the RTX 2070's frame rates. With the 10-series cards, this delta is much higher. What we're looking at is simply not a 60-class card.

Pricing

The NVIDIA RTX 2060 Founders Edition is priced at Rs.31,000 and is bundled with a free game. You can pick either Anthem or Battlefield V if you get the RTX 2060 FE. All partner cards don’t get the free games from NVIDIA though they are absolutely free to offer bundles themselves. There have been multiple threads wherein confused buyers end up not receiving the bundled game because the retailer isn’t participating in the bundle program. Pricing for the card on NVIDIA’s own store is lower than what their board partners are offering at the moment. So NVIDIA has a clear advantage and there’s practically no reason to get a partner card unless they have a value proposition that’s better than what NVIDIA is offering.

To better understand this, we’ve plotted a graph to showcase value for money based on 3DMark Ultra scores for each of these cards vs their current India pricing. With or without the video game bundle, the RTX 2060 currently offers really good value for your money. The AMD RX 590 comes second after which it’s the previous gen GTX 1070 Ti and GTX 1070 that seem better purchases. We’ve added an overlay of the curve indicating the relative benchmark scores in red to show performance with respect to each other. The performance of the RTX 2060 being very close to the GTX 1070 makes it really good but the GTX 1070 has the advantage of having 8 GB VRAM against the 6 GB that the RTX 2060 has. If we offset the cost of the additional memory then the GTX 1070 Ti appears as the better option. However, the two cards use different memory technologies. The RTX 2060 has the faster GDDR6 memory with a cumulative bandwidth of 336 GB/s while the GTX 1070 Ti tops out at 256 GB/s which means the RTX 2060 has more overhead and thus, lesser chances of bottlenecking. Please don’t get us started on SLI. TL;DR - The RTX 2060 gives you the best bang for your buck.

Verdict

NVIDIA’s RTX 2060 is a welcome addition to the RTX family of graphics cards. It’s got quite the performance upgrade over the previous generation GTX 1060 and comes with a price tag to match. One could argue that the premium is for the RT cores and they’d be right but the 60-class of graphics cards have always been about catering to the intersection of affordability and performance. The RTX 2060 gets the performance part right but is nowhere close to being affordable, not at all for the Indian market. Even NVIDIA knows that which is why we’re going to see the GTX 1660 Ti in roughly a month’s time without any of the fancy RT cores. Another distinction with this new generation is that the RTX 2060 is very much closer to the RTX 2070 in spec. They also share the same GPU although the RTX 2060 has six SMs disabled.

This is why we see the performance that is much higher than what we’re used to seeing. It feels somewhat like the second coming of Maxwell, but the price tag is what keeps it at bay. Performance wise, we have a card that equals (and sometimes betters) the GTX 1070 Ti in 1080p as well as 1440p gaming benchmarks. It’s even faster than the Radeon Vega 56. However, we don’t see it selling well compared to previous 60-class graphics cards. It will most certainly match sales of 70-class graphics cards. All of this makes the RTX 2060 an excellent gateway card for those interested in experiencing hardware accelerated ray-tracing. For gamers who want an affordable and powerful card can wait a month for the GTX 1660 Ti launch

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price: ₹31000
Release Date: 22 Jan 2019
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Related Reviews

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Desktop Processor Review

MSI MEG Z490 ACE Motherboard Review

logo
Mithun Mohandas

While not dishing out lethal doses of sarcasm, this curious creature can often be found tinkering with tech, playing 'vidya' games or exploring the darkest corners of the Internets. #PCMasterRace https://www.linkedin.com/in/mithunmohandas/

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Price : ₹31000

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Price : ₹31000

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51 Review

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51 Review

By Mithun Mohandas | Updated Nov 01 2019
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51 Review
DIGIT RATING
81 /100
  • design

    80

  • performance

    77

  • value for money

    81

  • features

    86

User Rating : 4/5 Out of 1 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Cheaper than similar configurations from competition
  • NVIDIA GTX 1050 + Intel Core i7 7700HQ
  • CONS
  • SSD not replaceable without voiding warranty
  • Internal battery

Verdict

The Acer Nitro V AN515-51 offers the combination of an Intel Core i7 7700HQ with an NVIDIA GTX 1050 (4 GB) at a very attractive price point. It’s this configuration and Acer’s aggressive pricing that should see the Nitro V turning out to be one of the most popular gaming laptops under Rs.1 lakh. 

BUY Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51
Buy now on amazon Available 77250
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 89990

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51 detailed review

Acer’s been on a roll of late with a slew of gaming laptops being released under its many different sub-brands. We’ve seen the infamous Acer Predator 21 X at Computex and that laptop is a one of kind machine that’s only matched by the ASUS GX800 in terms of sheer overkill. For gaming, Acer has the premium lineup which falls under the Predator brand and then there are the more mainstream gaming laptops which come under the Aspire V/VX and Nitro brands. The Acer Nitro 5 gaming laptop which we’re looking at today is one such device which while being mainstream also gives you plenty of hardware to game with. This is attested by the NVIDIA GTX 1050 along with an Intel Core i7 7700HQ CPU that power this rather sleek looking device. 


We’re glad to see more brands jump onto the gaming bandwagon in India, especially in the form of gaming laptops which have had just a few players so far. Late 2016 and early 2017 has been really good for the PC industry in terms of technological gains and the Acer Nitro V uses two of these innovations – Intel Kaby Lake 7700HQ CPU and the NVIDIA GTX 1050. Now, as we’ve mentioned earlier, there are multiple brands selling gaming laptops in India, so we now have see who offers the right balance of gaming performance and affordability without cutting corners.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 Specifications

The Acer Nitro V AN515-51 (NH.Q2RSI.002) positions itself as more affordable compared to the competing brands. Let’s explore that by checking out the specifications of the review unit that we’ve received. The exact configuration can be seen selling on Flipkart for Rs.89,990.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 Specifications

Processor

7700HQ 2.8 GHz

Platform

HM175

RAM FSB

2400 MHz

RAM Capacity

16 GB

Screen Size

15.6–inches

Screen Size

1920x1080

GPU

1050 4 GB

SSD

Kingston SSDNow 128GB

HDD

WD Blue 1 TB 5400 RPM

Ethernet

Realtek RTL8168E

Wi-Fi

Qualcomm Atheros QCNFA344A

Audio

Realtek (4x 2W + 1x 3W Speakers)

Battery

3090mAh 46 Whr @17.2v

AC Adapter

135 W

Weight

2.7 Kg

These make for a fairly good feature set for the given pricing as most of the competition seems to charge a little extra, we need to have a look inside the Acer Nitro V AN515-51 to learn more about its build quality and to see if the reduced pricing has led to any corners cut.

Chassis Build

Let’s start off with the bottom assembly of the Acer Nitro V AN515-51. We see that Acer has given provision for two hatches, the one on the right opens up to the RAM DIMMs and the one of the left is for the hard drive. This particular unit also comes with an M.2 SSD from Kingston and that is inaccessible via either of these hatches. So if you wanted more SSD storage capacity, to say, shift some of your more games with massive levels, then upgrading to a higher capacity SSD will require you to void the warranty and open the entire base panel. 

There’s no dearth of intake vents on the bottom as we can see in the image below and the exhaust is towards the rear. In either case, this is a better approach to some of the other configurations that we’ve seen wherein the exhaust flows out via the sides and smacks you on your hands. Towards the lower end of the image you can see two sets of vents for the speakers, so we’re either looking at 2 or 4 speakers in total, we’ll see the actual configuration in a while. And lastly, the rubber feet are quite large to provide ample amount of grip and seem to be glued pretty well to the base.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 Underside bottom

Once we’ve opened the chassis, things get a lot clearer. Let’s begin with an overview. They Acer Nitro V AN515-51 uses a unified cooler consisting of two heatpipes to channel heat away from the GPU and the CPU. It’s not ideal as we prefer individual cooling for both components to prevent one heating the other unnecessarily. However, we can see why Acer has gone for the unified design owing to the lower price point. 

The mainboard doesn’t take up much space and the positioning of the CPU and GPU towards the top i.e. away from your hands is ideal to have a lower touch temperature. The lower left corner is occupied by the HDD which has been removed in this image. We feel that the access hatch for the RAM could have been widened to accommodate the SSD as well since they’re so close to each other. 

Towards the top left, we see the daughterboard for the USB and audio I/O. Since we’re operating off battery power, having the audio signal cables next to the power input seems fine. However, they could have been routed better in this case.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 bottom open

We see a fairly simple VRM circuitry on the laptop. With most of the heavy lifting taken care off by the voltage adapter and the lack of OC ability, a 3+1 phase VRM (OnSemi NCP81205) as we see here is sufficient. There’s an ENE KB9022Q D for the SIO which seems to be an upgrade over the KB9012Q that has been really common thus far. Right beside it is the HM175 PCH which appears to be naked without any sort of protection. While there is no need for protection as long as the laptop chassis remains closed, gaming laptops appeal to the enthusiast crowd who’re more likely to perform manual upgrades. With this in mind, a simple shield over the PCH would have been ideal. 

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 heatsink

Moving on to the exhaust vents for the heatsink, we find a fairly common high-density fin structure. The two fan system will certainly help with faster heat dissipation.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 CPU cooler

The hinge appears to be heavy duty with three screws to secure it on either end. The webcam I/O and display FRC cables are routed through either hinge with the FRC being rolled up to provide durability. Openly kept FRC often tends to crinkle and tear over years of usage and rolling it up and putting it within a sheath will certainly help. We noticed next to no wobbling of the display panel when opened up, so that speaks for the quality of the hinge. We can’t say what will happen in the long run but this is one of the better ones we’ve seen.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 hinge

The speakers on the other hand, do disappoint a little in terms of audio quality. What we liked was the down firing setup is better for maintaining an audible output when used on hard surfaces but keep it on your lap and there’s the obvious muffling that comes into play. To avoid this, we see grilles on the front which channel audio from the speakers should you place the laptop on your lap. Perhaps, adding an extra driver for the lower frequencies would have helped with the overall sound quality.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 speakers

Lastly, we have the battery pack which is rated for 3090 mAh which makes it 46 watt-hour at 17.2 volts. This happens to be pretty standard for all the laptops in this segment. Overall, we’ve seen that the Acer Nitro V AN515-51 has a pretty standard design that most laptops in this segment feature. 

Keyboard and Touchpad

The keys on the Acer Nitro V AN515-51 are chiclet with a convenient amount of spacing between them. This 19 mm standard is the optimal spacing that we look for as it results in a lot fewer mistakes creeping in while typing. The keys aren’t RGB and we really couldn’t care about RGB at this point. It brings a level of customisability that is appreaciated by quite a lot of people but a simple backlight like we see here is just fine.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 keyboard

As for the TouchPad, it’s 10.6 cms wide and 7.8 cms tall with no separate physical buttons. The texture is a smooth matte finish that doesn’t catch your skin should your finger get a little sweaty. The entire assembly is quite rigid with very little flexing. We’d say it’s just enough to ensure you don’t end up with a cracked chassis after a minor tumble. We experienced no issues while using different gestures on the TrackPad during our everyday testing.

I/O ports

It’s nice to see USB Type-C ports becoming more common on laptops these days regardless of the class or segment. On the left side of the Acer Nitro V AN515-51 we see a Gigabit Ethernet port with a spring hatch, the Type-C USB port, an HDMI port, USB 3.1 port and a card reader slot. On the other side are two USB ports, a 3.5 mm audio jack and the power input. 

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 I/O ports

We prefer I/O ports to be gold plated to avoid corrosion and most of the ports on the Nitro V aren’t, however, the audio jack is, which is a good thing to have since a corrosion on the audio jack becomes easily noticeable when you plug something in. Also, the SD card reader slot didn’t come with a cover in our review unit. We’re unaware if the retail unit comes with one.

Display

Like many Acer laptops, the Nitro V AN515-51 we have features a BOE Hydis panel (NV156FHM-N43). In this case, it’s an a-Si panel so we’re assuming it to be of similar calibre as we’ve seen earlier. Spec-wise, this means it’ll have a 800:1 contrast ratio and a 30 ms (Tr+Td) response time. As for the backlight, this particular panel uses a WLED lamp. It should be noted that not all AN515-51 will come with the same panel, we’ve observed that Acer also uses Chi Mei panels in the same model.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 display panel

The viewing angles are pretty good and the contrast levels make six of the topmost of the blocks in Lagom.nl’s Black Level test page appear the same. However, the White Saturation page had each and every block is clearly different from the others. It has a vertical stripe RGB sub-pixel layout and Acer’s default rendering ensures a smooth and crisp text across the screen. 

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 webcam

The OEM for the webcam is Chicony and we couldn’t get any more details regarding the specific model since it isn’t listed anywhere. All we can say is that it does capture 720p images and video with a 24-bit depth and a lot of noise as you can see from the image captured below.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 webcam test image

The display lid goes back quite a bit, we’d say it’s about 140 degrees. This adds a level of flexibility with usage scenarios as you can pretty much lay down with the laptop on your lap and still have the display panel remain upright. Perfect for a few casual gaming sessions on a lazy sunday when getting out of bed is least optimal. 

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 lid angle

The backside of the panel is supported by a layer of thick foam which aside from being sturdy also allows for a just about enough flex. There is no fancy illuminated logo on the back so we don’t see any extra wires running across the middle like we’ve seen with the Predator models.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 display disassembled

We didn’t see any bleeding across the panel, be it spots or a huge crescent creeping in from one of the sides. However, colour accuracy isn’t high enough that you’d end up using this for Adobe Photoshop or any other multimedia editing scenario. Overall, the panel is quite average for an IPS panel. It’s anyday better than most TN and VA panels but some of the more expensive models tend to have lower refresh rates than this one.

Performance

We’re looking at a very common configuration with the Acer Nitro V AN515-51. The Intel Core i7 7700HQ coupled with 16 GB of DDR4 RAM clocked at 2400 MHz ensure a pretty high headroom for most mundane tasks. Throw in an NVIDIA GTX 1050 (4 GB) and you have a gaming laptop that can crunch out upwards of 40 FPS at High settings in most AAA games. The more recent ones tend to bring the 1050 down to its knees but we always advise a little bit to tweaking to bring out the most of your hardware.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 CPU-Z

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 CPU-Z

We started off with CineBench R11.5 and R15 and the Acer Nitro V AN515-51 scored 8.13 and 733 in those benchmarks, respectively. WinRAR’s compression benchmark scored 7822 KB/s which is very similar to the MSI GE62 7RE that we’ve tested earlier. As for PCMark8, we used Accelerated to leverage the GPU and ended up with a score of 4985 on PCMark8 Creative (Acc.), 3988 in PCMark8 Home (Acc.) and 4917 in PCMark8 Work (Acc.). It should be noted that there was a validation issue with the drivers obtained from Acer’s website but the scores lined up with similar configuration from competing models, so all’s well. 

Storage

The Kingston SSDNow 128 GB managed to get 445.9 MB/s for read speeds and 361.9 MB/s for write speeds. Notably, 4K speeds were pretty good for a normal SSD. It’s nowhere close to NVMe speeds but in its class, you’re not going to find any NVMe SSDs anyways. Overall, we’d say that the SSD performs at par with most in its speed class.

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 Anvil benchmark

Also, 128 GB is enough for your OS and a few extra apps, but as we mentioned earlier, 256 GB is what we prefer as the minimum. The other drive is a 1 TB WD Blue rated for 5400 RPM and we aren't going to bother with it since there’s hardly ever any difference in performance between 5400 RPM SKUs. Almost all of them feature a similar cache capacity and exhibit similar performance characteristics across different file sizes.

SD Card Reader

For the SD card reader, we use a 32 GB Lexar 1000x UHS-II SD card which easily gives 135 MB/s read speeds and 55 MB/s write speeds on USB 3.0 SD card readers and on the Acer Nitro V AN515-51 we managed to get about 32 MB/s. Though not exceptional, it’s more than sufficient to get the job done.

Wi-Fi

For Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, the Acer Nitro V AN515-51 makes use of the Qualcom Atheros QCNFA344A. It’s a dual band 802.11ac adapter that has a peak throughput of 300 Mb/s on the ‘n’ band and 867 Mb/s on the ‘ac’ band. We used iPerf to see how well the add-on card fared over the ‘ac’ band. We managed to get 514 Mbps on the throughput and about 76 Mbps via a single stream which is more than sufficient for gaming or otherwise. 

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 QCNFA344A Wi-Fi

It doesn’t feature a separate QoS solution to prioritise traffic, but you can always install one yourself and get the job done.

Gaming

A combination of the Intel Core i7 7700HQ with the NVIDIA GTX 1050 is quite powerful, however, a better configuration would be to have the Core i5 7300HQ with an NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti. Surprisingly, Acer has that model available for Rs.74,999 which makes it the lowest priced laptop with an NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti. Coming back to what we have on hand, we started with the trusty 3DMark with the latest NVIDIA drivers (384.94). We managed to get 5514 in Fire Strike 1.1, 2659 in Fire Strike Extreme and 1228 in Fire Strike Ultra. With the NVIDIA GTX 1050 set to 1354 MHz, these scores are at par and sometimes even higher by a few points. 

Acer Nitro V AN515-51 Fire Strike

In TimeSpy, we scored 1790 and for the sake of reference, we also ran Ice Storm, Cloud Gate and Sky Diver. Our scores were 101023, 20261 and 17007, respectively. 

Moving on to games, Rise of the Tomb Raider had a pretty decent on both, high and medium settings. On high, we got 46.68 and on medium it was 50.84 FPS. With DOOM, we got 45 FPS in Ultra and in GTA V on High, we managed to get 66 FPS. 

Pricing

There are quite a few units in the market that provide a similar hardware configuration. There’s the MSI GP62 7RDX for Rs.112,990, the Dell Inspiron 7567 for Rs.115,469, ASUS ROG GL553VD for Rs.87,299, Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN at Rs.92,490 and HP Omen 15 AX250TX for Rs.106,990. All of these feature the Intel Core i7 7700HQ, NVIDIA GTX 1050 4 GB, 128 GB SSD and a 1 TB hard drive. The ASUS GL553VD is the closest that comes to this configuration but it has only 8 GB of RAM against the 16 GB that the Acer Nitro V AN515-51 has. The Legion Y520 has the same configuration as the ASUS SKU but it costs a little extra and almost every other competing laptop costs Rs.17,000 or more. Essentially, we’re hard pressed to find a better deal than the Acer Nitro V AN515-51 for its configuration. Moreover, the other Nitro V SKU has a 1050 Ti at 75K which was unbeatable in terms of pricing at the time of writing this review.

Verdict

The Acer Nitro V AN515-51 offers the combination of an Intel Core i7 7700HQ with an NVIDIA GTX 1050 (4 GB) at a very attractive price point. It’s this configuration and Acer’s aggressive pricing that should see the Nitro V turning out to be one of the most popular gaming laptops under Rs.1 lakh. Sure, most of the components perform at par with what the competition has, be it in terms of compute performance or gaming performance, and Acer could certainly have worked out on a few improvements to the build quality (such as widening the RAM access hatch and shielding the PCH) that we’ve mentioned throughout the review. But all those would be considered as nitpicking giving how low Acer is pricing the Nitro V AN515-51. In fact, we bid you the best of luck to find a better deal than the Acer Nitro V AN515-51 at Rs.89,990.

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 31 Jul 2017
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • OS OS
    Windows 10 Home
  • Display Display
    15.6" (1920 x 1080)
  • Processor Processor
    Intel Core i5 (7th Generation) | 2.5 GHz with Turbo Boost Upto 3.5 GHz
  • Memory Memory
    1 TB SATA/8GB DDR4

Related Reviews

Asus TUF Gaming A15 Review

Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Review

HP OMEN 15 2020 Review

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 Review

HP Envy 15 Review

logo
Mithun Mohandas

While not dishing out lethal doses of sarcasm, this curious creature can often be found tinkering with tech, playing 'vidya' games or exploring the darkest corners of the Internets. #PCMasterRace https://www.linkedin.com/in/mithunmohandas/

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Micromax Canvas Selfie Review

Micromax Canvas Selfie Review

By Hardik Singh | Updated May 22 2019
Micromax Canvas Selfie Review
DIGIT RATING
71 /100
  • design

    72

  • performance

    62

  • value for money

    69

  • features

    79

  • PROS
  • Distinctive designed
  • Sturdy build
  • Best selfie camera
  • CONS
  • Could have been priced lower
  • Screen is a bit dull
  • Only satisfactory performance
  • Poor battery

Verdict

A good option for selfie enthusiasts wanting a phone with high quality front camera along with a lot of tricks that make your selfies even better. For the rest, if selfie is not your ONLY requirement, there are better overall smartphones in the same price like the Samsung Grand Max or the Lumia 730

BUY Micromax Canvas Selfie
Buy now on amazon Available 13895

Micromax Canvas Selfie detailed review

The term Selfie can be defined as a self-photograph taken by a camera phone or any handheld camera. Today, ‘selfie’ has almost become a household term, with everyone posting selfies of almost every place they’ve been, the self obsession is very obviously an opportunity that smartphone makers are pouncing on. 


Micromax Canvas Selfie is their serious and focussed attempt on launching a selfie special smartphone. With 13 megapixel front camera, the Micromax Canvas Selfie is betting big on the megapixel way of judging a camera. And, the number play continues onto the processor as well, you get an Octa-core processor to support the 13MP camera. So, will more be merrier for the Micromax Canvas Selfie? Let’s find out! 

Build & Design

Micromax’s build quality has hugely improved over the years and the Canvas Selfie is a pretty good example of that. The presence of a Gorilla Glass 3, a non removable back adds up to the phone’s sturdy build. All three physical buttons, power, volume rocker and the camera button feel and look well machined and have a nice click to them.

Moving on to the design, the phone is definitely a looker. Unlike being a regular rectangular slab, the Canvas Selfie features a curved top and bottom. This gives a nice design touch, reminds me of an old Motorola phone, the ROKR E8. Saying that, the enormous bezels at the top and bottom of the phone could have been minimized.

The front the display is well hidden when unlit giving the Canvas Selfie a nice mirror like sheen. The large camera at the back along with the dual flash may not go down well with some people, but it does make the phone look different. Overall, the Micromax Canvas Selfie is a sturdily built phone with some interesting design choices that make the phone stand-out from the regular pack of mid-range smartphones.

Display & UI

The 720p, 4.7-inch display on the Micromax Canvas Selfie looks good on paper but I found the display to be dim. Even on full brightness the screen failed to pop in terms of color and vibrance. Viewing angles and outside legibility are okay and the display is more at par with phones that are a segment below.

UI is another area where the phone disappoints. The custom UI is a step back from the spartan stock Android Micromax was offering on its previous phones. The UI feels cluttered and could be disorienting for existing Micromax users.

Performance

The Micromax canvas Selfie has the same MediaTek 6592 SoC as the one we saw on the Micromax Canvas Nitro. They even perform almost at par, hence the performance is satisfactory for its price segment, though not class leading by any stretch of imagination. And with 2GB of RAM on board, the phone does not feel bogged down on heavy usage or multitasking, there is enough room in terms of a smooth user experience even after you fill it up with dozens of apps.

Check the synthetic benchmarks of the Micromax Canvas Selfie compared against Micromax Canvas Nitro and Huawei Honor 6

Benchmark Comparsion | Create infographics

 

Call quality is good and the sound quality via the built-in speakers is fairly loud. During my review period, the Micromax Canvas Selfie largely stayed manageable in terms of device temperature. Though prolonged gaming and camera usage can cause the device to quickly heat-up. An issue I also observed with the Micromax Canvas Nitro. 

Camera & Battery

The smartphone boasts a 13MP camera at the rear and a 13 MP camera at the front and both camera sensors are made by Sony. Bringing the focus back on the star of the show (for Micromax), the 13MP front facing shooter for capturing selfies. I found pictures taken by the camera in suitable lighting to be good. While details and sharpness levels were good and noise levels were kept in control on most occasions, the colours felt a bit oversaturated. Images taken in low-light came out well in terms of overall quality, though the noise level was on the higher side, a typical case of low-light pics from small sensors that invariably results in ISO levels being pushed to the max to maintain fast shutter response.. 

The Canvas Selfie features software tricks to ‘beautify’ faces. The software makes your eyes larger, whitens the skin, slims down the face, removes oiliness and more. There is a entire range of make-up (editing) options as well. All of these features are available on both cameras which can used or applied and they work to an extent only. So, Whether you see it as an advantage or stuff that you’d rather live without is an individual choice. Overall, inspite of having its fair share of negatives, given its price-point, the Micromax Canvas Selfie is a good phone for SELFIE ENTHUSIASTS. The Micromax phone is priced a lot lower than HTC Desire Eye, the current champion of ‘selfie phones’. At 1/3rd the price, the Canvas Selfie offers a lot of value for selfie lovers. Though, you also need to consider the fact that the other aspects of the device aren’t class leading for its category and keeping the selfie aspect aside, you will find better phones in this price range.

Images taken by the rear 13MP camera delivered a similar result to the front-facing camera but with slightly better images at times. Pictures looked warmer with slight oversaturation and the only down side to the camera is the low-light performance. The dual-LED flash does help in low light but use of flash is recommended for situations when the subject is at a reasonable distance from the lens, ensuring images don’t end-up being over-blown due to the excessive light

One thing to add is that the phone heats up like a pan while using the camera. This was odd since it didn’t heat up as much when I played games on it.

The battery is another low point of the phone. In my battery test the smartphone was able to last just over five hours. When I used the phone as a daily driver with normal usage, the battery was out of juice by evening, which is not good enough by any standards. 

Bottomline

The Micromax Canvas Selfie skimps on every other feature except the front-facing camera. So, if you want a “selfie” phone in a budget, this is your best choice but if you want more than that you should look elsewhere.

Micromax Canvas Selfie Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 19 Mar 2015
Variant: 16GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    4.7" (720 x 1280)
  • Camera Camera
    13 | 13 MP
  • Memory Memory
    16 GB/2 GB
  • Battery Battery
    2300 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Hardik Singh

Light at the top, this odd looking creature lives under the heavy medication of video games.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Micromax Canvas Selfie

Micromax Canvas Selfie

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

GoPro Max Review
GoPro Max Review

GoPro Max Review

Swapnil Mathur   |  30 Jan 2020
DIGIT RATING
80 /100
  • design

    85

  • performance

    80

  • value for money

    81

  • features

    74

  • PROS
  • Hypersmooth makes shooting stable 360-degree videos super easy
  • Smartphone app is easy to use and render final 360-degree videos
  • The 360-degree audio pickup is good
  • CONS
  • Battery life could be better
  • Lens repair is not possible
  • You'll need mounting accessories and they're expensive
BUY GoPro Max
Buy now on amazon Available 44490
Buy now on flipkart Available 44999

GoPro Max detailed review

GoPro has had an incredibly strong two years, putting out solid cameras once again. The company was once rumoured to be up for sale, but then they launched the Hero 7 with its brand new Hypersmooth image stabilization. This new image stabilization finally brought near-gimbal like stabilization to a class of camera that was designed to be used in the roughest of terrains. All of a sudden, GoPro was back on the map. While the normal GoPro was once again gaining popularity, their 360-degree GoPro Fusion was on nobody’s mind. This year, we have the GoPro Max, a new 360-degree camera that brings the best of GoPro and more to the 360-camera. We’ve had our review unit for a while and here’s how it fared in our review process.

Shooting 360 – Degree Video

The HERO feature of the GoPro Max is its 360-degree video capture. The Max allows you to capture a 5.5K 360-degree video stream using its dual 180-degree cameras, but for the first time, brings Hypersmooth stabilization to the footage. One of the biggest problems with shooting 360-degree video on the older GoPros has been that when you walk around has been the shake that comes from hand-holding the GoPro. We walked around the CES show floor for days using the new GoPro Hero Max and came away with footage that was incredibly smooth. You can see numerous 360-degree videos shot on the GoPro Max on our YouTube page, a few of which are embedded below.

Besides the stabilization, another notable area where the GoPro Max ended up surprising us was with regards to its low light performance.  Traditionally, we’ve come to expect poor low light performance from action cameras. Honestly, you didn’t have to be in poor lighting conditions for these cameras to develop lots of noise, forget being in low light. With the GoPro Max, we shot in very poor lighting and did notice some noise, but nothing that would deem the footage unusable. If you look at our Lenovo Booth walkthrough, you notice that the video has noise only in deep shadows, leaving the rest of the frame clean. The lighting at the Lenovo booth was incredibly dim, with most of the area being lit simply by the monitors that were on display.

Overall, the quality of the 360-degree footage is surprisingly good, but the story doesn't simply end at capturing the video, which brings us to our next section.

Post Production

Okay, so you’ve shot the 360-degree video, how do you get it out to the world? There’s the easy way, prescribed by GoPro and then there’s the hard way. GoPro’s method of getting your videos “online-ready” is surprisingly simple. You could just transfer the video from your GoPro to your smartphone using the GoPro Quik app, which allows you to do quick perspective edits and then render out the final video as an MP4 file. There is also a desktop version of the app called GoPro Max Explorer, but that only allows you to covert the .360 video file into an mp4 one. You can also choose to re-encode the files to a different resolution.

In case you’re going to exercise full control over the output, then you’re going to have to use the desktop application to convert the .360 files to mp4 and then pull them into Adobe Premiere or FCP for a proper perspective edit. The files are easy to work with in all editing environments and we faced no problems editing and colour grading them. However, do note that if you’re editing the original 5.5K resolution files, you’re going to need a powerful system.

Build and Design

The GoPro Max isn’t just a new camera on the inside, but also on the outside. GoPro has integrated the mounting mechanism into the GoPro’s body, eliminating the need for an external frame. The mounting pads fold out of the body and fit into whatever clamp or mount you want to mate the GoPro Max with. While this is great, we fear for the sturdiness of these two pads. Any kind of over tightening, especially if you’re trying to house an unused thumb screw, be very careful. We found our GoPro’s mounting pads to be overbent due to over-tightening, but thankfully, they didn’t snap.

The accessory mounting pads are now integrated into the body

The best way to tell which way is front is to look for the display, which is housed on the backside. Above the display, you find one of the 180-degree fisheye lenses, mounted alongside a microphone. The shutter button is on the top and easy to access and use while the power button is on the left. What has changed with this year’s GoPros is the battery door assembly, which seems to be using a robust mechanism to lock out unwanted materials like water or salt deposits.

While the GoPro Max is obviously built for action and designed to take abuse, we’re not sure just how sturdy the lenses are. They protrude notably from the body and if the camera was to ever fall, the lens is definitely going to make contact with the ground. You do get protective lenses for the GoPro Max in the box, which is great and we strongly advise using them as there is no replacing a shattered lens on a GoPro Max.

Conclusion

The GoPro Max addresses a huge concern that made 360-degree cameras not a very viable option; image stabilization. The Hypersmooth stabilization makes the GoPro Max extremely usable when hand-held, or even when mounted on a handlebar or a helmet. The battery life on the GoPro Max is also decent, giving you roughly 30-45 minutes of continuous shooting of 5.5K 360-degree video. In photo time-lapse mode, you can expect the camera to last anywhere between 4-6 hours. Carrying spare batteries can’t hurt, especially if you’re getting impressive results. For a price tag of Rs 44,990 on Amazon, the camera does offer good value, especially if you’re looking to start shooting 360-degree videos on a budget.

GoPro Max Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 30 Jan 2020
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Resolution Resolution
    NA
  • Shutter Speed Shutter Speed
    NA
  • ISO ISO
    NA
  • Optical Zoom Optical Zoom
    NA
logo
Swapnil Mathur

Digit's resident camera nerd, (un)official product photographer and the Reviews Editor

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

GoPro Max

GoPro Max

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro Review

Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro Review

By Prasid Banerjee | Updated May 22 2019
Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro Review
DIGIT RATING
74 /100
  • design

    86

  • performance

    72

  • value for money

    65

  • features

    73

  • PROS
  • Attractive, sturdy design
  • Excellent battery life
  • Decent camera
  • Good display
  • Seperate slots for SIMs and SD card
  • CONS
  • Only 3GB RAM
  • Performance is slow
  • Camera isn't dependable

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro has excellent battery life, has a good display, is well designed, and has a decent camera. If Samsung made this fast and snappy, this would have certainly been a no brainer. Instead, it’s a good phone that would have made much more sense at a slightly lower price.

BUY Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 14999
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 16490

Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro detailed review

Smartphones are revolutionary, powerful and life changing, but literally no one uses their full potential, companies and consumers alike. A company can only do business if it can make profits, while consumers will only buy the product that covers all their requirements. For that, companies conduct market research to identify what buyers want, and find a skew of specs that allow maximum profits.


If you look at the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max and Galaxy J7 Pro side-by-side, they’ll seem illogical. Why does the more expensive phone (J7 Pro) have lesser RAM and a smaller screen? The short answer is because it has higher storage, a bigger battery and an sAMOLED panel. Samsung cut costs on one spec to provide the other, and it’s looking to hit consumers with specific needs, rather than going for the entire bunch. The question is, whether all these specs are married right to create a tight and balanced product.

Build and Design: Pretty, suave, yet Samsung...

Step one in impressive buyers is to make a phone that’s impressive to look at. You know that feeling you get when a phone just looks too good to say no to? That’s what Samsung’s going for. The Galaxy J7 Pro has a metallic design, but what makes it singular is how the antenna bands are placed on the back. Most choose to put them in a straight line on the top and bottom, or around the edges, but Samsung chose to display them in a sort of rectangular pattern.

It can look odd to some, but I must confess that I personally do like it. There’s also a oval camera plus flash module on the back that looks unique and nice. And all of this when combined with the unibody metallic design makes for one good looking smartphone. It has the familiar rounded corners of Samsung phones and slightly curved rear edges. The aluminium feels thick, sturdy and anodized. It might take bumps if you drop it, but should protect internal hardware easily. The Galaxy J7 Pro isn’t a perfectly ergonomic phone, but it’s easier to use than most of its competition.

Lastly, Samsung has trimmed the bezels to some extent, although this doesn’t have the tall form factor of 18:9 phones. I suspect it will be some time before Samsung brings one of those in the budget range. Yet, the Galaxy J7 Pro is a uniquely designed, attractive and sturdy phone. If design was the sole criteria, this is certainly one of my top choices.

Display: Best in class...

When I travel in public transport, I often find people watching TV Shows, movies and videos on their phones. For that, you need a high resolution display with good viewing angles and good colour reproduction. Samsung achieves all that with its 1080p sAMOLED panel here. Unless you’re a purist, the slightly oversaturated (some call it vivid) colours do look inviting, while viewing angles would accommodate you and a few of your friends.

If you’re streaming, Netflix and Amazon Prime’s high resolution content look excellent on this display. What’s more satisfying is that Samsung’s display is good at managing sunlight and regular outdoor viewing well. While most budget displays pass this test nowadays, Samsung’s AMOLED panel is better at it than most others. You won’t have to squint, or even shield the display with your hands. In my experience, that’s a characteristic of flagship-class devices. Most budget phones are categorised as “just fine” when it comes to outdoor viewing. The display on the Galaxy J7 Pro is bright, vivid and premium, and it’s certainly more advanced than the TFT panel on the Galaxy J7 Pro.

Samsung Pay: Future facing, but efficient...

I’m skipping the software part here, since I’ll just be repeating everything I wrote in the Galaxy J7 Max review. You get Samsung’s new social camera feature and the full version of Samsung Pay (the J7 Max has Samsung Pay Mini). The phone is obviously NFC-enabled, so you can use Samsung Pay to make contactless payments with this phone. It’s one of the few budget phones that have the feature, and though it’s hardly usable right now, it makes the phone future facing. I’ve been using the Galaxy S8+ and Note 8 for almost half a year now, but I’ve had only two opportunities to use Samsung Pay in my day-to-day activities.

Performance: Slow, but steady...

This is where things get tricky. The Galaxy J7 Pro has 64GB storage, which is plenty for almost everyone. That said, to provide that storage and some of the other specs, Samsung has compromised raw speed. The Exynos 7870 chipset on this one is an octa-core chipset with eight Cortex A53 cores, clocked at 1.6GHz. It also has 3GB RAM and all this doesn’t impress, neither on paper, nor practically.

The phone’s performance is enough for day-to-day stuff, but you can feel the sloth here. For instance, the fingerprint sensor takes a noticeable moment to register, while apps will also take slightly longer to load. The phone doesn’t qualify as snappy, though it will certainly do the job. Samsung uses lower bandwidth memory here, which does make a noticeable difference.

Overall, the Galaxy J7 Pro will not disappoint right away, but you can expect it to slow down after a few months. To be clear, that’s true for most Android phones, just that this one starts off slower than its competitors, hence its expected longevity is also shorter. If you’ve read the Galaxy J7 Pro review, you would know that that’s what I said about the Galaxy J7 Max as well.

Camera: Has its moments, but lacks dependability...

Performance isn’t the only similarity between the Galaxy J7 Pro and J7 Max. The phone has the same 13MP camera with Samsung’s own ISOCELL sensor and f/1.7 aperture. In fact, image quality here is identical to what we’ve seen on the J7 Pro. Which means this phone is amongst the best camera phones you can buy.

The Samsung Galaxy On Max is our favourite low light shooter in the budget segment today, and the J7 Pro is at par with it. It shoots good details in well lit conditions and white balance is quite good as well. Photos are bright when shooting in low light, but soft in some ways, with loss in details. All in all though, irrespective of the conditions, the Galaxy J7 Pro will certainly take photos adequate for social sharing.

Outdoor daylight

100% crop

Outdoor daylight

100% crop

Outdoor daylight

100% crop

Indoor tubelights

100% crop

Low light sample

The camera isn't always dependable

That said, the phone does take too long to focus, especially in low light. In fact, it sometimes completely failed to focus while shooting at night. That makes it difficult to depend on this camera and you may end up with blurry photos sometimes.

Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro

The gallery contains full sized image samples clicked with the Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro

Battery: Amongst the best...

I started off this review by informing you that there’s a bigger battery on this phone. The Galaxy J7 Pro has a 3600 mAh battery that easily lasts more than a day. The PC Mark battery test takes 14 hours and 39 minutes to drop the battery from 80% to 20%. That’s amongst the highest you will find amongst budget phones today.

On regular usage, you can easily expect 16-18 hours on each charge. The the current (2017) crop of mid-ranged or budget phones, this is certainly amongst the best battery performers we have seen.

Bottomline: Beaten by price...

To sum up, the Galaxy J7 Pro has excellent battery life, an above average camera, pretty display and it’s well built. That would make a pretty good smartphone to buy, if it wasn’t priced at the absolute high-end of the budget range. The J7 Pro is priced at Rs. 20,990, that doesn’t really make it a value for money phone.

If Samsung had nailed the performance (like it did on the Galaxy C9 Pro), this could have been the best phone at this price.

How it compares: Not the best, but almost there...

I said the Galaxy J7 Pro is not particularly a value for money device. That’s because you can spend just about Rs. 4000 more to buy the OnePlus 3T (review), which is much more powerful and has a more dependable camera. If you want to stick to your budget, phones like the Moto G5 Plus (review) can give you almost everything this one can.

While the Galaxy J7 Pro has a good camera, it’s not particularly dependable. It’s well designed, but so is the Moto G5S Plus (review). It’s good looking too, but then again, so is the LG Q6 (review). Essentially, what I’m saying is that while the Galaxy J7 Pro is certainly a good phone, it’s not the best value for money. If you want Samsung’s brand name, excellent battery life, a decent camera and a good display, you should certainly consider this phone.

Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 15 Jul 2017
Variant: 64GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5.5" (1080 x 1920)
  • Camera Camera
    13 | 13 MP
  • Memory Memory
    64 GB/3 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3600 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Realme 6 Pro Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Prasid Banerjee

Trying to explain technology to my parents. Failing miserably.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro

Buy now on amazon 14999

Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro

Buy now on amazon 14999

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

DCGI allows Oxford to resume trial of Covid-19 vaccine - DCGI ने ऑक्सफोर्ड के कोविड-19 टीके का परीक्षण दोबारा शुरू करने की अनुमति दी | India News in Hindi

DCGI ने ऑक्सफोर्ड के कोविड-19 टीके का परीक्षण दोबारा शुरू करने की अनुमति दी

डीसीजीआई ने दूसरे और तीसरे चरण के परीक्षण के लिए किसी भी उम्मीदवार को चुनने को रोकने वाले अपने पहले के आदेश को रद्द कर दिया

DCGI ने ऑक्सफोर्ड के कोविड-19 टीके का परीक्षण दोबारा शुरू करने की अनुमति दी

प्रतीकात्मक फोटो.

नई दिल्ली:

भारतीय औषधि महानियंत्रक (डीसीजीआई) डॉ.वीजी सोमानी ने मंगलवार को सीरम इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ इंडिया (एसआईआई) को ऑक्सफोर्ड के कोविड-19 टीके का उम्मीदवारों पर क्लीनिकल ट्रायल (चिकित्सकीय परीक्षण) फिर से शुरू करने की अनुमति दे दी. डीसीजीआई ने दूसरे और तीसरे चरण के परीक्षण के लिए किसी भी उम्मीदवर को चुनने को रोकने वाले अपने पहले के आदेश को रद्द कर दिया.

यह भी पढ़ें

हालांकि डीसीजीआई ने इसके लिए जांच के दौरान अतिरिक्त ध्यान देने समेत अन्य कई शर्ते रखी हैं. एसआईआई से डीजीसीआई ने विपरित परिस्थतियों से निपटने में नियम के अनुसार तय इलाज की भी जानकारी जमा करने को कहा है.

इससे पहले 11 सितंबर को डीसीजीआई ने सीरम इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ इंडिया को निर्देश दिया था कि कोविड-19 के संभावित टीके के चिकित्सकीय परीक्षण पर रोक लगाई जाए क्योंकि दिग्गज दवा कंपनी एस्ट्राजेनिका ने अध्ययन में शामिल हुए एक व्यक्ति के ''तबीयत खराब'' होने के बाद अन्य देशों में परीक्षण रोक दिया था.



(हेडलाइन के अलावा, इस खबर को एनडीटीवी टीम ने संपादित नहीं किया है, यह सिंडीकेट फीड से सीधे प्रकाशित की गई है।)

Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com

अन्य खबरें
 

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

Sony Xperia Z1 Review

Sony Xperia Z1 Review

By Vishal Mathur | Updated May 22 2019
Sony  Xperia Z1 Review
DIGIT RATING
77 /100
  • design

    79

  • performance

    72

  • value for money

    75

  • features

    80

  • PROS
  • Elegant design
  • Excellent performance
  • Camera at 20MP does fairly well
  • Much improved battery life with Stamina Mode
  • Sony's new UI is growing on us!
  • CONS
  • Glass at the back catches scratches easily
  • Camera Auto Modes restrict aspect ratio and megapixels
  • For a 5-inch screen, the phone is too tall, Sony could reduce the space at the top and bottom beyond the display area to make the unit more compact.

Verdict

This is essentially the Xperia Z's form factor, with the power of the Xperia Z Ultra. Simply put, the successor to the Xperia Z is on paper the most powerful smartphone available in India. It carries on with almost the same design tone, the water and dust resistance capabilities, but improves on the display, battery life and to a certain extent, the camera as well. It does cost a lot of money, which may make the potential customer think about the investment.

BUY Sony Xperia Z1
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 27212
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 56699

Sony Xperia Z1 detailed review

The Sony Xperia Z1 is pretty much Sony telling its rivals that they will not be left behind in the flagship smartphone battle. In fact, it has pretty much taken over the smartphone spec sheets with the adoption of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processors, which the likes of HTC haven’t, yet. And, yes, it also towers over its competition when it comes to price.


Build & Design: More of the same
We had said this when we reviewed the Xperia Z Ultra, and we will say this again - the Z1 carries forward the design theme that started with the Xperia Z. You have the slab-like design, with the glass at the back. The water and dust resistance ratings mean the ports and slots get the similar looking flap covers. It's still fairly slim, at just under 9mm, but the glass and the metal frame adds to the weight, tipping the scales at 170g.

 

This is still a pretty big phone. Sony now has settled on a design accent, that seems to be consistent across all new Xperia flagships. 

Up front is the 5-inch display, but nothing else to distract you because the usual touch sensitive controls are integrated into the UI itself. The left side spine of the Z1 has the dock connector and the covered slots for the memory card and the micro USB port for charging. There is the dock connector as well. The right side spine has the SIM card slot, with the helpful tray to slot it in. And also the volume rocker, the shutter button and the attention grabbing power key. Speaking of the dock for a second, you might consider getting one, if you believe that opening and closing the charging port flap on a daily basis will do it no good. Also, if you are taking this phone in the pool with you, and your earphones are water-proof, the Z1 will have absolutely no issues - the 3.5mm headphone jack is also waterproof internally.

 

The water and dust resistance ratings continue as is. The flaps protect the water from seeping in. Even the 3.5mm headphone jack, which doesn't have a flap cover, is internally sealed away. 

While the dimensions of the Z1 are much more in control when compared to the Z Ultra, the phone still retains the slippery nature of its predecessors, thanks to the glass at the back. It's interesting to note that the Z1 has a slightly bigger  footprint than the Xperia Z, but that can be attributed to Sony packing in a bigger battery and the better camera hardware. But, because it is slippery and doesn’t grip very well, you will need to hold this carefully when attempting to use it with the same hand.

While such a design has its issues, there is no doubt that the straight lines and flat surfaces on the Xperia Z1 look stunning and very different from what the other flagships offer. The phone is built well, no disappointments in the terms of how it has been put together and the quality of materials used. But surely, the entire package could have been designed in a way so that it was also easier (and safer) to hold.

Display: Building on the good stuff
The Xperia Z was one of the first phones to sport a Full HD display, and the Z1 builds on that. The Triluminos technology makes this display a very good one to watch movies on, because the colours are much more vibrant and the details have improved as well. Not surprisingly, text rendering has seen an improvement as well, which is something we are very thankful about. The X-Reality engine boosts colour and sharpness, and while it does slightly increase the battery consumption, we found that it does make a huge difference while browsing through pictures.

The video playback experience on the Xperia Z1 is miles ahead of the Xperia Z, with the Triluminos technology ensuring that the colours are a lot richer now. 

But for a natively bright display, the reflective glass above the screen does sort of complicate matters. Visibility in sunlight will be compromised if you don’t have the auto-brightness setting turned on, and even group viewing of a picture will not be ideal, because the people sitting at the sides will be treated to reflections most of the time.

Performance: Blazing fast
After spending ages lagging behind, it is good to see Sony finally giving importance to the specs powering their phones, with the Xperia Z1 packing in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processor and 2GB of RAM. The Xperia Z Ultra has the same specs, and was comfortably ahead of the likes of the HTC One and the Samsung Galaxy S4 in the benchmark test scores. The Z1 Ultra’s performance, therefore, isn’t surprising.

The specs translate brilliantly into the real world usage performance scenario, with apps opening instantaneously, and the background app load not bothering us one bit. As a primary smartphone, its interesting to note that the Z1 never felt sluggish, something that even the HTC One could not completely claim because every once in a blue moon, it also had that moment of sluggishness craving for a restart. Tap on the Real Racing app on both phones at the same time, the Z Ultra wins the race by a couple of seconds. Even within the app, race loading times are lesser. All in all, be it serious work or some fun gaming, the Z Ultra handles both with such comfort that it borders on arrogance.

However, for a phone that packs in so much power, there is the inevitable heating issue. Use the camera to take around 10-12 shots, or the web browser for 5 minutes and the back heats up considerably, particularly just above the Sony logo and slightly to the left of it. For anyone considering packing this inside a case or a skin, that really wouldn’t be the best idea. Also, the Z Ultra did not heat up this much, under the same usage pattern, just for reference’s sake.

Battery life from the massive 3000mAh pack is quite good. With the Stamina Mode turned on, this one lasted me from 8am full charge one day till 3:30pm the next day, as a primary phone with calls, mails, messages and IM. Throughout, the brightness was set at around 40%. Stamina Mode allows you to set which applications can use the data connectivity when the phone is in stand-by mode. For example, if I only want the Gmail client and Facebook to refresh and not have the other apps doing the rigmarole, it allows for that.

Camera: Has its good points
Using the camera on the Xperia Z1 is a rather simple experience, pretty much the traditional methods of either accessing it via the icon on-screen, or long pressing the shutter button. The UI, once you open the camera, is pretty similar to the Xperia flagships of the recent past - three buttons on top, from where you can select the settings for the camera and which mode you want to shoot in. In addition to the plethora of auto modes, the manual mode offers some sense of flexibility to serious photographers. Without doubt, the Superior Auto mode will be the most commonly used , but this does come with a rather serious drawback - the aspect ratio is locked to 16:9 and the maximum image resolution is set at 8 megapixels. We looked everywhere for an option to change the resolution back to 20 megapixels, but no luck. The only way to get maximum resolution out of the Xperia Z1 is by switching the shooting mode to Manual, something many users may not be comfortable with. This pretty much does away with the “take out of the pocket and shoot” experience, for someone who is paying for the 20MP goodness.

The manual mode continues with the confusion, because it does not let you set the aperture or shutter-speed. What you can tweak are the white balance settings, exposure compensation and the ISO. You can tap to focus, and also tap to shoot, and the menu options provide for the flexibility of either/or, or even both.

The Sony Xperia Z1, when shooting at 8 megapixels, in Superior Auto mode, tends to capture far less details and the overall image quality suffers when compared to the 20 megapixel counterpart. We believe this is because the Z1 is capturing the image at a full 20 megapixel, but then proceeds to down-sample it to 8 megapixels, which has a negative impact on the detailing.

You can read the detailed camera comparison between the Sony Xperia Z1, the Nokia Lumia 920, the Apple iPhone 5 and the HTC One, here

You can view all the test shots below:





Images shot with the Sony Xperia Z1 (click on images to enlarge in new window)

To buy or not to buy: A flagship that’ll show the way for the next wave
Clearly, spending so much money on a smartphone is no easy decision. But, when one has to be made, it just needs to be the smartest one possible. Today, the Xperia Z1 is the sensible choice, if this is what your budget allows. You can consider the HTC One and the Galaxy S4, but for the fans of pure performance, the Z1 is the most attractive proposition. With a screen this big, there will always be issues with the single hand operations and the form factor footprint. But, we're happy to note that the experience is enhanced by the better display and a camera that is fairly competent.

With camera test inputs from Swapnil Mathur.

Sony Xperia Z1 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 04 Sep 2014
Variant: 16GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5" (1080 x 1920)
  • Camera Camera
    20.7 | 2 MP
  • Memory Memory
    16 GB/2 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3000 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Vishal Mathur

https://plus.google.com/u/0/107637899696060330891/posts

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Sony Xperia Z1

Buy now on flipkart 27212

Sony Xperia Z1

Buy now on flipkart 27212

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

OnePlus 7 256GB Review

OnePlus 7 256GB Review

By Subhrojit Mallick | Updated Oct 23 2019
OnePlus 7 256GB Review
DIGIT RATING
77 /100
  • design

    70

  • performance

    85

  • value for money

    76

  • features

    68

  • PROS
  • Lag-free, super smooth performance
  • Better ergonomics than the OnePlus 7 Pro
  • HDR-enabled display
  • CONS
  • Camera takes time to focus
  • Lacks water resistance
  • No 3.5mm headphone jack

Verdict

The OnePlus 7 is the phone to get if you prefer the OnePlus brand and hope for flagship performance. The camera is where the phone falters but it makes up for that with the display, design and performance.

Read the full review to find out more —

 

BUY OnePlus 7 256GB
Buy now on amazon Available 37999

OnePlus 7 256GB detailed review

With the OnePlus 7 Pro now becoming the de facto flagship of the company, OnePlus in 2019 is a changed company with one foot on the premium side while one still drags along the lines of a budget flagship. Not to forget its roots, OnePlus announced the regular OnePlus 7 alongside the Pro version with some obvious downsizing. The company went from launching one flagship smartphone a year, to a 6-month refresh cycle and now, we have two OnePlus phones vying for your attention at the same time. It’s no longer the case where one device will get all the attention. Instead, the focus was divided between two — Everything’s that’s premium (90Hz display, triple cameras) will be present in the Pro variant while everything that isn’t (a regular AMOLED display, dual cameras) will be reserved for the regular variant. Does this bode unwell for OnePlus fans? You still get the flagship Qualcomm processor along with more RAM and storage that you can possibly put to use, but here’s the thing. The OnePlus model of success is now copied by almost everyone. Sitting in the second half of 2019, we have more flagship phones south of Rs 50,000 than above it, and while that’s definitely a good thing for the consumer, it’s something OnePlus would probably be spending a lot of sleepless nights thinking. So with the OnePlus 7 now coming in a crowded space, does it still hold the same promise as before? Let’s find out.

OnePlus 7 vs competition

The OnePlus 7 is pitted against the Asus 6z, Oppo Reno 10X Zoom and the Black Shark 2. The upcoming Redmi K20 Pro will also give tough competition to the smartphone. All of these devices are powered by the Snapdragon 855 processor and as such, good flagship performance is more or less guaranteed. Where the OnePlus 7 excels is in offering a good software experience. It’s better than most budget flagships out there. OxygenOS 9 stays updated regularly, offers smooth, lag-free performance and a minimalist design. However, the OnePlus 7’s camera might not be up everyone’s taste. The Oppo Reno 10X Zoom’s camera, in my opinion, offers punchier, more vibrant colours and the flexibility to go up to 10X zoom and 120-degree wide-angle. The Asus 6z is also unique in its own way. The flip camera on the phone doubles up as both the rear and front camera, with the same 48MP camera coming on both sides. The OnePlus 7, as a result, stands out, for covering the basics really well and offering just a little bit more in terms of uniqueness.

Performance and battery

Let’s start off with the most important aspect first. The performance of the OnePlus 7 is pretty flawless while the battery life is enough to power through the day. The Snapdragon 855 inside the phone is coupled with up to 8GB LPDDR4X RAM and 256GB UFS 3.0 storage. There’s no question of the phone slowing down anytime soon. The components OnePlus has used in this are the same as the Pro variant, save for the lack of a 12GB RAM variant. As a result, the performance of the phone is one of the best on an Android device. Credit should also be given to OxygenOS that’s based on Android 9 Pie and brings onboard interesting optimisations that ultimately result in faster app launches, unlock and boot-up and the likes. Having said that, if you are coming from the OnePlus 6 or the OnePlus 6T, it’s likely you won’t notice any significant boost in speed.

Benchmark analysis reveals the OnePlus 7 is just as fast as its sibling and even ahead in some cases when compared to other Snapdragon 855-powered phones. You can see the scores projected in the graphs below to get a better idea of where the OnePlus 7 stands. For a more detailed analysis, check out our performance comparison between the Asus 6z, Oppo Reno 10X Zoom and the OnePlus 7.

Part of OnePlus 7’s blazing fast speed is also because of the software the phone uses. It’s a customised take on Android 9 that’s very close to the stock Android interface in terms of the aesthetics and there are deep-seated optimisations in place that make the phone run super smooth. On top of that, there are now a handful of India-centric features like parking location, live cricket scores and a dedicated gaming mode which frees up resources, puts calls and notifications on hold and the likes. Then there’s the Zen Mode which I found particularly useful. When the mode is turned on, you can’t do anything on your phone for 20 minutes. The aim is to wean users off smartphone addiction and while it pretty much failed to do so in my case, the mode did allow me to focus on my work much better.

The 3,700mAh battery on the OnePlus 7 is the same as its predecessor. But while the capacity is the same, there is a slight increase in the screen-on time, thanks to the 7nm efficiency Snapdragon 855 brings to the table. On Geekbench Battery Test, it took around 10 hours 15 minutes to drain the battery while 15 minutes of PUBG Mobile drained the battery by around 5 percent. On the other hand, 30 minutes of Netflix (with HDR on) drained 7 percent battery and an hour of navigation brought down the charge by 8 percent. These are decent numbers and in line with most other Snapdragon 855-powered phones, so the efficiency is more or less at par with other budget flagships out there in the market.

Camera

The camera is the second most important thing in a smartphone. Straight off, it becomes clear the OnePlus 7 Pro was what the company was more focused on, while the OnePlus 7 camera comes off as an afterthought. The 7 Pro’s triple-camera offers flexibility with an ultra-wide angle lens, a 3X telephoto lens and a 48MP primary sensor. For the OnePlus 7, only the 48MP sensor was brought down and paired with a 5MP depth sensor. By default, you are restricted to shooting either the regular wide-angle photos or portrait shots with blurred backgrounds. There is 2X zoom, but that’s digitally acquired and doesn’t offer the same quality as optical zoom.

As for the images themselves, they carry the typical OnePlus look. Neutral colours, excellent HDR performance, and now extra sharpness thanks to the pixel binning that the camera performs by default every time it takes a photo. As such, the OnePlus 7 camera is pretty reliable in taking landscape photos, but struggles to take close-up shots. The AF system in the 48MP sensor has difficulty locking focus even after tapping the region you wish to be focused. For instance, in the photo below, you can see the branch being in focus while the flower is blurred out despite both being approximately at the same distance.

There’s OIS in the camera which helps take a stable shot when zoomed in, but it particularly helps while shooting videos where the OnePlus 7 does a decent job and focusing is much more reliable. This could just be a bug in the camera software and if highlighted, could be fixed via an OTA update.

Then there’s the portrait mode. The feature has mostly worked well on previous OnePlus phones, at least when assisted with enough light, and on the OnePlus 7, it works well in objects that are near the camera. Objects that are a little further away has inconsistent subject separation which is ironic considering the only use of the secondary 5MP depth sensor is to get better depth of field.

There’s also the nightscape mode which works pretty well, but not without its own flaws. For one, it takes a long time to shoot the image irrespective of the amount of light available. For instance, phones from Huawei, we have observed, take less time to shoot multi-frame night mode images when there’s at least some level of illumination. In case of the OnePlus 7, the number of shots, and as a result, the take time, is a constant. Thankfully, there are algorithms in place that controls the amount of exposure the shot needs. The shots are also sharper when you shoot with night mode (provided the subject is steady for the time it takes to shoot), but don’t expect too much out of them. Zooming into a nightscape shot will show the details are artificially rendered and touched up with a lot of noise reduction.

As such, the OnePlus 7’s rear camera stack is reliable, but not exciting. Around the price of the OnePlus 7, you have phones that come fitted with a wide-angle camera, while paying a little extra will get you all three lenses including a telephoto lens with 10X hybrid zoom.

Design and Display

Even though the OnePlus 7 is built out of glass, it feels pretty solid. There’s Gorilla Glass 5 on the back and Gorilla Glass 6 on the front allowing at least some level of protection. There’s a screen-protector built-in to the display that got scratched easily and the mirror red finish that we received for review looks pretty swell. Unlike the OnePlus 7 Pro that offers a new design, the OnePlus 7 is quite identical to the OnePlus 6T — A waterdrop notch, thin bezels, curved rear panel and a sturdy aluminum frame. What’s changed is the gigantic bump around the camera module that makes the phone wobble when placed on a flat surface. Otherwise, the button quality and the tactile response is pretty solid and gives a feeling of longevity.

The OnePlus 7 doesn’t have an advertised IP rating, but OnePlus did assure there is some level of water resistance but water damage is not covered under warranty. What’s missing is the 3.5mm headphone jack but the dual stereo speakers have made their way to the OnePlus 7 as well along with support for Dolby Atmos. There’s also an in-display fingerprint sensor that’s visibly faster than the OnePlus 6T, and is pretty accurate too. However, face unlock still works faster and I hardly got the chance to use the in-display fingerprint sensor on the phone.

The display on the OnePlus 7 will come off as a big compromise if you get your hands on the OnePlus 7 Pro. For one, this is a smaller 6.41-inch AMOLED panel  interrupted by the waterdrop notch in the middle. It’s FHD+ instead of QHD+ on the Pro and the screen refresh rate is 60Hz instead of 90Hz. Not that all that makes the OnePlus 7 look bad or anything, but once you use the display on the Pro, there’s no going back to the regular ones. Having said that, the OnePlus 7’s display is bright and vibrant. It’s HDR rated and also supports Netflix HDR.

Bottomline

The OnePlus 7 is the budget flagship OnePlus was known for before they started getting into the very segment they intended to kill. The good thing about that is while the OnePlus 7 Pro breaches the Rs 50,000 mark, the OnePlus 7 starts at a price lower than what the OnePlus 6T did. For a lesser price, you not only get the same raw performance as the OnePlus 7 Pro, but also an HDR display and a sturdy build. In fact, one of my coworker told me he found the OnePlus 7 more handy than the OnePlus 7 Pro for the form factor it retains from its predecessor. The OnePlus 7 Pro, on the other hand, is heavier and the curved display often results in accidental touches. If OnePlus is your brand of choice and spending over Rs 50,000 is out of the question, the OnePlus 7 is the phone to get.


OnePlus 7 256GB Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 14 May 2019
Variant: 64GB , 128GB , 256GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    6.4" (1080 X 2340)
  • Camera Camera
    48 + 5 | 16 MP
  • Memory Memory
    256GB/8GB
  • Battery Battery
    3700 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Subhrojit Mallick

Eats smartphones for breakfast.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

OnePlus 7 256GB

OnePlus 7 256GB

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Life insurers find their mojo but experts sound cautionary note

MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro 4K Review

MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro 4K Review

By Hardik Singh | Updated Nov 01 2019
MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro 4K Review
DIGIT RATING
80 /100
  • design

    75

  • performance

    93

  • value for money

    75

  • features

    78

User Rating : 5/5 Out of 1 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Excellent 4K display
  • brilliant 1080p gaming performance
  • Good audio output
  • VR capable
  • CONS
  • Heavy and large in size
  • Expensive

Verdict

The MSI GT73VR is a high-end gaming grade desktop that’s meant for the hardcore gamers and enthusiasts. If you’re one of them, give this laptop a thought.

BUY MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro 4K
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 334990

MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro 4K detailed review

Whenever someone asks me whether they should be investing in gaming laptops or a desktop, I tell them to invest in a desktop if they play only at home. But, there are many who want to game on the move, or do not want to undertake the hassle of building and maintaining a gaming PC. For these people gaming laptops are the solution. They offer portability (to some extent) and are usually plug-and-play, which is tougher for desktops. However, when I saw this giant MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro for the first time, the concept of a laptop being portable was immediately out the window. There’s also the price tag. At Rs. 3,34,990, costs almost as much as a new car, so one must determine whether it’s worth the premium.


Tech specs of our test machine:

Display: 17.3-inch, 4K, IPS Panel

CPU: Intel Core i7-7820HK

RAM: 32GB

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080

Storage 1: 2 x 512GB SSD (Raid 0)

Storage 2: 1TB HDD 7200RPM

Battery: 75 whr

Price: 3,34,990

Looks and aesthetics

Gaming PCs or laptops are expected not only to perform well, but to have its extreme appearances. They should either look understated or should go all out with wild angular accents, fins, large heat vents, LED stips, you get the drift. The GT73 Titan Pro does the latter. It has all the right angles, paint schemes, design aesthetics, and screams gaming. You get red metal inlays on the lid, the dragon logo is backlit, the power button sits underneath an angular cut-out on the keyboard deck, the vents have red accents and the bottom has a red perforated grille. The MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan looks dramatic, which will appeal to the gamer.

MSI has almost nailed the design here, but I believe it could have been better. Machines like the Asus G752VY not only look good visually, but are distinctive as well, whereas the MSI GT73 settles for the same old black-and-red design. That being said, it is as unwieldy as the Asus machine, weighing over 4kg and its about 2-inches thick. 

Build quality and I/O

Like the design, the build quality leaves little room for complaints. The lid and the keyboard deck are metallic, laid over a plastic sub-frame. The machine feels quite sturdy and there is minimal flex in the body. There’s some flex in the display, but it is not a really deal-breaker. Since this is a gaming laptop, there are plenty of grilles and vents. The keyboard is well laid out and the keyboard deck offers plenty of space to rest your palms on. The base of the laptop is plastic and has more perforated grilles for air flow. 

The display hinge is one of the smoothest I have seen in awhile and opens to about 140 degrees, leaving enough room for third party cooling pads. While the base of the laptop is removable and some things, like the RAM and storage, can be user replaced, warranty will be voided if you do so.

On the I/O front, you get almost everything you may ask for. You get three USB 3.0 Type-A ports on the left and two on the right. On the back, there’s a standard RJ54 ethernet port, mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3 via USB Type-C (USB 3.1 / Gen-2) and an HDMI 2.0 port, which will support a 4K output @60Hz. You also get an SD card reader on the right, but a DVD drive is not included. DVDs are indeed obsolete today, but the company provides one on its much cheaper GE62 laptop, so not providing one here seems a bit odd. Also, I expected at least two USB Type-C ports on the laptop.

Keyboard and touchpad

The MSI GT73VR shares the same keyboard and touchpad layout we saw on the much cheaper GE62 a few months back. It’s a Steelseries designed keyboard, with RGB lighting and a  large but slightly stiff touchpad keys.

The keyboard has nice large keycaps and offers more travel than most of its counterparts. Each key-press feels precise, but if you are accustomed to a mechanical keyboard, you might want to stick to that. As for the light settings, there are plenty to choose from (RGB) and you can tweak them from the MSI Dragon centre app. While the keyboard works for gaming to some extent, I would have preferred a row of macro keys as well. It will take some getting used to, due to the unorthodox key layout. For example, the right Shift key is shortened to make space for the top arrow key, there is no Windows key under your left thumb and the Delete key sits on the top row above the keypad, breaking the flow whenever you use it. 

I also find the the function keys quite cumbersome. They are smaller in size and would have been better if brightness controls and media volume controls were integrated. That said, I am pretty sure nobody would be buying this machine to use Word and Excel.

The touchpad is good, as is expected from a high end laptop. The cursor speed is not calibrated to cover the 4K screen in a single swipe by default, but that can be toggled with in the settings. Once that was done, I didn't find the experience lacking in any way. The trackpad itself is smooth, supports gestures, and is quite accurate. The left and right click buttons are stiff to press, which pushed me to connect a mouse immediately. You will be a using a mouse most of the times anyway, as the touchpad is not really meant for gaming. Meanwhile, RGB lovers will love the illuminated ring around the touchpad.

Display

The MSI GT73VR has one of the best displays we have seen on a laptop. While it is available in 120Hz FHD panel, only the 4K (@60Hz) variant is available in India. It has impressive colour saturation and very good viewing angles. There is no light bleed and the display is quite bright with a recorded max luminance of 480 lux at the centre. What is even more impressive, is that the brightness remains uniform all over the display. In addition to great colours and uniform brightness, the 17.3-inch matte display is also G-Sync enabled. This is supported by the heavy hitting hardware the laptop packs.

Performance

With an Intel Core i7-7820HK at the helm and an 8GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 to handle graphics, the GT73VR Titan Pro undeniably houses the best gaming hardware available on a laptop. Both the CPU and GPU can be overclocked using BIOS and afterburner software, respectively. Although, you don't need extra processing power since the system already has plenty in stock mode. Our test machine was configured with 32GB of DDR4 RAM and dual storage solution, with two Samsung SSDs in Raid 4 and one 1TB Toshiba HDD @7200rpm. 

With such powerful hardware on the laptop, it wasn't a surprise that it blitzed through each and every benchmark we threw at it. While the scores are considerably higher than last year’s G752 from Asus, performance is very close to the Asus ROG G20CB (1080 revision) gaming PC I reviewed late last year. Compared to the Asus ROG G20CB desktop, one can easily see the difference or lack thereof in performance of a last gen Intel desktop processor and a current gen top of the line Intel mobile CPU.

So, whether you look at the PCMark 8 Creative scores or Cinebench, the Intel Core i7 6700 (not K) processor used on the G20CB performs at par with the latest Intel Core i7 7820HK used in this MSI GT73VR notebook. Although this is an apples-to-oranges comparison, the fact of the matter is that a desktop class processor, albeit last generation will give you similar performance.

Same goes for the desktop and laptop variant of the NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1080 GPU. In 3DMark synthetic benchmark, the desktop grade GTX 1080 performed marginally better than its mobile cousin, and that just goes to show how NVIDIA has closed down the performance gap between desktop and its mobile class GPUs, although a slight performance difference is still there.

Synthetic benchmarks aside, the GT73VR works like a charm on the gaming front and chews through every game we threw at it in 1080p or even 2K. Newer titles like Battlefield 1 and Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands run flawlessly punching more than 70 fps easily on 1080p. Even when I tried gaming on an external display, the drop in performance wasn't much. 4K rendering is still not particularly great, though. You can play most games in 4K in high or ultra settings, and it really helps if the game supports DX12. Older titles do struggle to provide you favourable frame rates.

Games like Tom Clancy’s Division, which is a heavy title, managed just 40 fps at 4K ultra settings, keeping it playable. However, older games like Metro Last light, known to bring GPUs to their knees, occasionally brought the frame rates down to single digits when testing on high graphic settings.

I even tested the machine with HTC’s Vive VR headset, which again works without any issues. I tried more than half a dozen experiences and they all worked fine, with occasional stutters, although it could be because of other reasons as well.

I am truly happy with the cooling on this machine, which is really loud, but does the job well. There are four vents on the laptop, two on the back and two on the side, pulling in air from the bottom and cooling the hardware inside. Even at high temperatures I recorded less than 40 degrees on the keyboard deck, which is quite good for a powerful machine like this.

I should also talk about the 4.1 speaker system on this machines, which is enabled by Nahimic audio and produces crisp and loud audio output throughout. The software can be set for different types of games.

Software

To help you toggle all the performance settings and various others, MSI has added its Dragon Centre application on the laptop that one can use to check system stats, change the RGB keyboard settings or change performance and cooling modes. The laptop will even connect to an app by the same name on your phone, giving you the vital stats of your laptop in the palm of your hand.

Battery Life

This is a gaming laptop, and the rule of thumb is that these machines don’t have good battery life. With a 75whr battery on-board, I wasn't expecting great battery life and the GT73VR didn't prove me wrong. In fact, the laptop ran for just an hour and a half, before dying on the PCMark8 Creative battery test. If you are using it for browsing or writing Word docs (I am judging you now), the system easily lasts for two hours or more, but beyond that you may have to pick up the 1.2kg power brick to charge this device.  

Bottomline

The MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro is quite simply a desktop replacement for all your gaming needs. Yes, you can build a similar PC, but it will be only marginally cheaper if you include a 4K G-Sync display, keyboard-mouse and a 2.1 speaker system to match the GT73VR evenly. So, it is certainly worth the price, but do you need this much processing power? You don’t, unless you plan to game in 4K only.

In conclusion, the MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro is the perfect gaming laptop, although not the one you and I would be able to afford. It is primarily meant for enthusiasts or hardcore gamers, who have the cash to spend for it. For most of us out there, building a gaming PC would be easier and you can keep updating it in future. 

MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro 4K Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 07 Jan 2017
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • OS OS
    Windows 10 Home 64 bit
  • Display Display
    17.3" (3840 x 2160)
  • Processor Processor
    Intel Core i7 (7th generation) | NA
  • Memory Memory
    1 TB with 512 GB SSD SATA with SSD/64GB DDR4

Related Reviews

Asus TUF Gaming A15 Review

Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Review

HP OMEN 15 2020 Review

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 Review

HP Envy 15 Review

logo
Hardik Singh

Light at the top, this odd looking creature lives under the heavy medication of video games.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro 4K

Buy now on amazon 334990

MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro 4K

Buy now on amazon 334990

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status