Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

Worldwide 5G, Extending Human Eyesight, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

Synopsis:

The global 5G market is anticipated to witness a significant growth during the forecast period. 5G network is a promising innovation in the field of mobile telecommunication and networks. It anticipated to not only accelerate the expansion of telecommunications, but will redefine other industries like computing, automotive, manufacturing, healthcare, and entertainment. With its high throughput and low latency, the technology is expected to have the potential to operate high-value areas such as virtual reality monitoring, 3D robotic control, and remote medical control. It is also placed in like to successfully solve the challenges that today’s advanced technologies haven’t been able to address yet.

Drivers:

Demand for mobile data services is increasing due to the several subscriptions availed by the users. The commercialization of 5G data connectivity, huge demand for 5G-enabled mobile phones or smartphones with high-speed internet connectivity is expected to be a key driver for the market. Next generation 5G technologies are being progressively used in public transportation systems. It is capable of providing broadband access for public transportation, such as high-speed trains and buses, to provide fast internet in transit for information, entertainment, and interaction with smart mobility systems onboard. Furthermore, the involvement and use of advanced devices in applications such as smart cities, smart homes, etc., has surged the growth of machine-to-machine communication systems across industries. Therefore, the optimization of internet network to bring in efficient telecommunications and addressing capacity needs has been attributed mandatory for the smooth working of machine-to-machine communication systems.

Enhanced mobile broadband are likely to offer initial upside with respect to manifesting realistic expectations on their timeliness for proposition development. Wireless networks are come to the fore and is ahead of innovations in augmented reality content. Enhanced mobile broadband network is expected to emerge as a first large-scale use case of 5G technology, owing to its improved performance capacity in densely populated areas. Furthermore, 5G-based IoT technology is anticipated to unlock limitless potential for industrial transformation and will drive the growth of direct-to-consumer services over the coming years. The evolution of 5G is also expected to minimize the cost per gigabyte than the presently used 4G.

The prevailing 2G, 3G, and 4G are primarily radio focused, while 5G will present a system comprising of radio, OSS, and telecom core. This process will include new radio technologies, end-to-end orchestration and management, and a virtualized cloud-based core to facilitate automation and concepts like network slicing. Service providers that understand 5G’s potential to revitalize their workflow will be best placed to optimize their ROI over the next decade.

5G use cases are still in its nascent stage and have a long way to go before fully autonomous vehicles and remote surgeries become available commercially. Factors such as data protection regulation and the burden of legacy IT within specific industries is expected to remain the road map to game-changing innovation and is necessarily incremental. While 5G’s role is considered as a catalyst for IoT strategies, consumer connectivity and content is anticipated to hinge on significant refinements to the existing 4G-based value propositions.

Regional Outlook:

The North America region dominated the overall 5G market in 2019 as there has been a significant number of investments been made by the regional players and some of the key infrastructures is being materialized in the U.S. Huge investments has remained the main focus of the U.S. government and are primarily rolling out plans for smart city projects to drive the overall growth of the North America region.

Asia Pacific is projected to emerge as the fastest-growing region, registering the highest CAGR during the forecast timeframe. Some of the key regional players include China Mobile, China Telecom, SK Telecom, and KT Corporation. These companies are striving to increase their investments to speed up the production process of 5G-enabled smartphones across the developing countries and are likely to gain traction in smartphone manufacturers such as Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, and BBK Electronics Corporation, among several others.

Request a Free Sample Copy of 5G, Extending Human Eyesight, Extending Human Senses Market Report @ https://www.radiantinsights.com/research/5g-extending-human-eyesight-extending-human-senses-market/request-sample 

Competitive Landscape:

Industry players are incorporating new strategies to monetize new use cases of 5G technology and go beyond the customer’s connectivity market to catalyze various industry-specific use cases like smart buildings, autonomous transport, and remote surgery. Some of the key players operating in this market comprise of Advantech Co Ltd; ADT Inc.; Alphabet / Google; AMS ag; Amazon.com (AMZN); Apple; AT&T; BlueShift Memory; Baidu (BIDU); Broadcom; Cypress Semiconductor; Cisco; Dexcom Inc.; Facebook (FB); Ericsson; Garmin ltd.; IBM; Huawei; IBM / Red Hat; Intel; Kensaq.com; Juniper Networks; Amazon; Marvell Technology Group; Netflix; Mavenir; Micron’ Microsoft (MSFT); Mellanox Technologies; NeoPhotonics 400G CFP8 PAM; and Nokia among others.

The leading vendors in the 5G market have invested in high-quality technology and processes to develop leading edge monitoring and digital triggering activation capability. 5G is the most disruptive force seen in centuries. 5G markets are going from $31 billion in 2020 to $11 trillion by 2026. It has more far reaching effect than a stronger military, than technology, than anything.

5G markets encompass virtualization, cloud, edge, and functional splits. As 5G networks come on line in 2020, they require increasing sophistication from mobile operators. The challenge going forward in mobile network buildout is to bring together a growing number of LTE and 5G radio access technologies. A range of connectivity services are needed. APIs are needed in each small cell to manage connectivity to a number of customer sensors that are implemented in different segments.

The 5G sales at $31.3 billion in 2020 are forecast to reach $11.2 trillion in 2026. Networks spending has been transformed from macro cell tower dominance to 80% of spending on infrastructure and equipment for 5G. 5G supports wireless communications across short distances. All the indoor and outdoor places need to increase wireless coverage, providing significant market growth for 5G.

The digital economy, self-driving cars, drones, smart traffic lights, and smart connectivity of sensor enabled edge devices need more wireless coverage. According to Susan Eustis, leader of the team that prepared the research, “5G suppliers have a focus on broadband improvement. Power and performance are being improved. 5G improves the transmission coverage and density.”

This 5G coverage is needed as IoT, the Internet of things and smart phone video increase transmission needs.

Companies Profiled

Market Leaders
• Intel
• Ericsson
• Huawei
• Nokia / Alcatel-Lucent
• NEC
• Qualcomm
• Samsung
• Fujitsu
• ip.access

The report “5G, Extending Human Eyesight, Extending Human Senses Market” is available now at @ https://www.radiantinsights.com/research/5g-extending-human-eyesight-extending-human-senses-market

Market Participants
• ADT Inc
• Advantech Co Ltd
• Alphabet / Google
• Amazon.com (AMZN)
• AMS ag
• Apple
• AT&T
• Baidu (BIDU)
• BlueShift Memory
• Broadcom
• Cisco
• Crown Castle (CCI)
• Cypress Semiconductor
• Dexcom Inc
• Ericsson
• Facebook (FB)
• Garmin ltd
• Huawei
• IBM
• IBM / Red Hat
• Intel
• Juniper Networks
• Kensaq.com
• Amazon
• Netflix
• Marvell Technology Group
• Mavenir
• Mellanox Technologies
• Micron
• Microsoft (MSFT)
• NeoPhotonics 400G CFP8 PAM
• Nokia
• Nvidia Speeds and Feed
• Qualcomm
• Qorvo
• Rackspace
• Rogers Communications
• Salesforce (CRM)
• Samsung
• Sensata Technology
• Silicon Laboratories
• Skyworks Solutions
• SoftBank
• Telus
• Tencent (TCEHY)
• Tesla
• Toyota and Panasonic
• Tsinghua
• Twilio
• Verizon
• Xilinx

Key Topics
• 5G
• Virtualization
• Sensor Visualization
• Camera Visualization
• Cloud
• Edge
• Functional splits.
• 5G Network Transformation
• LTE Small Cell
• 5G Sensors
• Network Densification
• Hybrid Ethernet Based DAS
• DAS
• In Building Wireless
• Broadband Traffic
• In Air Interface Solutions
• Outdoor and Stadium Deployments
• Heterogeneous Network
• Hung On Aerial Coax, Fiber, Or Electricity Cables
• Distributed business
• Enterprise
• End-To-End Integrated 5G
• Metro Cell Solution Signal Transmission
• ADRF Positioning
• Bandwidth Allocation
• Across enterprise boundaries

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

LG V20 Review

LG V20 Review

By Prasid Banerjee | Updated May 22 2019
LG V20 Review
DIGIT RATING
74 /100
  • design

    83

  • performance

    70

  • value for money

    69

  • features

    72

User Rating : 4/5 Out of 1 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Great audio performance
  • Removable back and battery
  • Fast
  • CONS
  • Camera is only satisfactory
  • Battery life could have been better
  • Metal build doesn't feel as premium as it should

Verdict

The LG V20 is a phone for the audiophiles, or for those who want a removable back and battery. However, if those aren't your priorities, then the Google Pixel/Pixel XL or iPhone 7 Plus far surpass the V20, and are better choices.

BUY LG V20
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 29199
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 29890

LG V20 detailed review

LG’s valiant effort with the modular G5, is followed by an equally interesting device. The LG V20 was interesting from the minute it appeared on the Android Nougat website. Globally the first smartphone to get Nougat out-of-the-box, the V20 is LG’s second flagship of the year, and one of only two non-Pixel smartphones that run Android Nougat out-of-the-box.


But Nougat isn't the only attraction for the V20. It comes with a removable back and battery, and audio enhancements that make discernible differences. Does that make the LG V20 a phone worth buying, though? Or is it a niche product, for a select few buyers only?

Build and Design

Unlike LG flagships of late, the V20 is tall, which makes it unwieldy. It becomes even more of an issue, since you have to keep reaching for the top of the device, for the secondary display.

The LG V20 is tall and wide, making it unweildy, even for those with large hands

LG has dropped its plans for a modular future, but the V20 retains the button to detach modules. Placed on the bottom right, this button unlocks perhaps the best feature of the LG V20. It pops the back open, allowing you to remove the battery. It’s a welcome addition in a world full of ‘unibody’ metallic devices. The only use of plastic here is on the two thin strips above and below the back panel.

The back and battery on the LG V20 are removable.

Barring the height, the other problem with the V20’s design is that it doesn’t feel as unique. This is likely a result of MIL-STD-810G certification that makes the V20 really resistant to drops.

Personally, I’d have preferred a more premium body. Shock resistance doesn’t really protect the screen from breaking, and the LG V20 seems to take ugly bumps on the body quite easily. I got one unknowingly, without having dropped the phone even once.

My review unit got an ugly bump, without being dropped or bumped even once.

As with the G5, the rear fingerprint sensor is also the unlock button, and there’s a slightly raised module above it, that houses the two cameras, flash and laser auto-focus system. The V20 may be big, but it feels lighter than a phone this size would.

Display

A notable departure from LG’s flagship phones is the LCD panel used on the V20. The company’s displays usually look uber premium, with well represented colours.

While the V20’s display wouldn’t qualify as bad, it’s a notch below the flagship range. Black levels are noticeably lower, thanks to some light leak near the edges.

With the secondary screen on, when the 5.7-inch counterpart is off, you’ll see this leak pretty easily. The pixel density stands at 513 ppi, which is good.

Speaking of which, the secondary display can be useful at times, but it’s not a feature anyone really needs. You can place your most used apps, quic toggles etc here, but I found it pretty much a gimmick for the most part. It doesn’t really ‘add’ to the functionality.

Audio Quality

The LG V20 is the perfect smartphone for music lovers, especially those who record a lot of audio. I played a song on the iPhone SE, and put the LG V20 on recording. The recorded output from the V20 actually sounds much better than the original on the SE. The LG V20 is obviously louder, but that’s useful only in indoor conditions. More importantly, audio sounds richer. You can hear more notes on the V20.

The HD Recorder even allows you to record audio and save it in FLAC format. Audiophiles will appreciate this. The LG V20 has a 32-bit Hi-Fi DAC for digital to analog conversion, and three Acoustic Overload Point microphones for HD audio recording. While these do sound gimmicky on paper, they’re indeed useful for those who really need it. Between the LG V20 and HTC 10, the former is a tad louder, and clearer in terms of audio. The V20 is also better at recording audio.

Performance

The V20 runs on the Snapdragon 820 SoC, and 4GB of RAM. Our initial performance tests showed quite a few lags while gaming. This is because the phone is on the Game Battery Saver mode by default. Turning this off gets it back to flagship standards.

 
LG V20 Performance Graph
Create bar charts

While LG has surprisingly not fitted the Snapdragon 821, the 820 chip brings it at par with any flagship today. It is indeed fast, as far as Android phones go. And just like any Android phone, it’s slower than the iPhone 7.

That said, if you’re nitpicking, the Google Pixel XL is ever so slightly smoother. The difference perhaps is between Google’s Pixel launcher and LG’s UI.

Camera

The 16+8MP combo on the V20 is the same as on the G5. The camera has just as many manual controls as before, and the quality is no better either.

LG V20 Camera Samples

Sadly, that puts it well behind the Pixel or iPhone. Dynamic range is much lower than the Pixel XL, and low light photos, though satisfactory, aren’t up to the new flagship standards the Pixel XL brought forth.

As before, the wide angle camera produces a fish eye effect. If you like this, or know how to use this creatively, then there’s nothing to worry about. You won’t however, be getting optical zoom, or other possible impacts of a dual-camera.

Battery

Its 3200 mAh battery gives the V20 longevity. The phone drops 5% battery over 15 minutes of gaming, on its performance mode (mentioned above). On the PC Mark test, the V20 runs for over 5 hours, which is a satisfactory score too.

In practical terms, this results in about 12-14 hours of battery per day. So, you’re set for the work day on a single charge. However, when you have a longer day planned, keep the charger handy. This isn’t a phone that’ll last 24 hours. Here, again, the iPhone 7 Plus is better.

Bottomline

There’s no denying that the LG V20 is a fast and good phone. It’s just not in that absolute premium class. It’s not built like an iPhone, and it lacks the camera quality of the Pixel and iPhone.

The primary reasons to purchase the LG V20, are its removable back and battery, and superior audio performance. If you’re part of that niche segment, the LG V20 is the only flagship that fulfills your needs.

LG V20 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 09 May 2017
Variant: 64GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5.7" (1440 x 2560)
  • Camera Camera
    16 + 8 MP | 5 MP
  • Memory Memory
    64 GB/4 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3200 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Prasid Banerjee

Trying to explain technology to my parents. Failing miserably.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

LG V20

Buy now on flipkart 29199

LG V20

Buy now on flipkart 29199

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Plus Review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Plus Review

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Plus Review

Subhrojit Mallick   |  23 Oct 2019
DIGIT RATING
84 /100
  • design

    88

  • performance

    82

  • value for money

    84

  • features

    84

  • PROS
  • Improved low-light camera
  • Improved power efficiency
  • CONS
  • Patchy live focus in video
  • Headphone jack has been sacrificed

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ comes across as a phone very similar to the Galaxy S10+, save for a few new features that may or may not turn out to be useful. There’s a lot of reason for old Note users to upgrade to this one. Then there’s the smaller Galaxy Note as well which comes with watered-down features including a smaller display and form factor which might find acceptance among a new breed of power users eager to get the Galaxy Note experience. What I really liked about the phone is how Samsung has improved the camera performance, especially in low-light, and the new DeX mode that now works much better than before. Overall, the Galaxy Note 10+ feels like an incremental upgrade, but good enough for old Note users to get a new one.

BUY Samsung Galaxy Note10 Plus
Buy now on amazon Available 84200

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Plus detailed review

Two weeks into using the Galaxy Note 10+, it’s easy to see why people fawn over the flagship series so much. But then I also used the Galaxy Note 9 and the Note 8 extensively, and between the Note 10+ and the Note 9, the inherent experience hasn’t changed much. Samsung has heaped a lot of new features on it, that adds on to the experience of using the Note flagship. But is it really transformative? Let’s find out —

Performance - 7nm makes Exynos finally at par with Snapdragon

The new Exynos 9825 is based on the new 7nm EUV manufacturing process, as compared to the 8nm Exynos 9820 in the Galaxy S10 series. Most of the benefits of the new chipset are in terms of efficiency. Performance wise, only the mid-core in the SoC now has a slightly higher clock speed, up to 2.4GHz from 2.31GHz, but then again, Samsung also downclocked the efficiency core from 1.95GHz to 1.9GHz. The GPU inside is the same. The changes are minor, and the benchmark results of the Note 10+ are largely similar to those of the Galaxy S10+ performed. Interestingly, the OnePlus 7 Pro, which comes with more or less the same hardware inside (Snapdragon 855, 12GB RAM, UFS 3.0 storage), has beaten the Galaxy Note 10+ in all the major benchmarks You can see the scores below —

Yet, these are just simulated scenarios. In the real world, the Galaxy Note 10+ is a charm to use. It’s visibly faster than the Samsung Galaxy S10 that I have been using ever since it launched in India, which could primarily be because of the UFS 3.0 storage and 12GB RAM module that always keeps around 5 GB RAM free. There’s an anomaly, however. We noticed that OneUI’s resource management is too aggressive. It tends to kill most of the background apps if they are running for long. Case in point: BatteryLog app which clocks every time the battery drops a percent kept stopping within minutes, even after whitelisting it under the memory section. Even then, the Note 10+ keeps around 6.7GB RAM in use all the time with around 5.3 GB free for everything. It’s still a lot more than what most flagships offer, but the high RAM usage doesn’t match up to the aggressive resource management.

Nearly everything you throw at the Note 10+ is handled without any hiccups. Be it editing a RAW file on Lightroom, writing an article, shooting a 4K video, or playing an intensive game, the Note 10+ has no problems whatsoever in getting them done. That way, it’s perfect for power users. But then again, you get the same performance and reliability from the OnePlus 7 Pro which is much cheaper than the Samsung flagship.

Gaming on the Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ is also a delight, unless you are chasing the highest frame-rates. The screen is gorgeous and expansive enough to give a lot of hand-space, but the frame rates we clocked on PUBG Mobile and Asphalt 9 using Gamebench were much lower than what we saw on the OnePlus 7 Pro, for instance. PUBG Mobile ran at 40FPS with 88 percent stability, where it could go up to 60 FPS. Asphalt 9 gave 30 FPS with 96 percent stability. Impressively, the phone hardly got warm during the sessions.

One thing that sets the Note 10+ apart, is the revamped DeX experience. You can now access the desktop mode simply by connecting the phone to the USB port. DeX is now more akin to Windows than ever before. Apps get the full-screen and windowed modes, you can launch all the apps on your phone, and even get the Windows shortcut to work in the environment. It's however not as smooth as Windows and in fact a little sluggish. But then most of the Windows shortcuts work in DeX. I did try to write this review in the DeX mode but had to give up halfway since not all apps (including Microsoft Excel, Dropbox Paper) offer every feature. There’s no hot-switching between Windows and DeX either. To go back, you have to turn off the desktop mode. Samsung said you can even attend calls on your desktop, but the feature is not live yet.

My argument here is why would I need DeX in the first place? Yes, it works much better now, but I saw no reason to switch from a perfectly functioning Windows environment to a mobile experience that can't really match up to the smooth operation that Windows or MacOS offers.

My next gripe is with the S-Pen itself. It's what sets the Galaxy Note series apart from the rest and has been a useful addition during the early years. But over time, the S-Pen's use-cases have primarily been restricted to creative professionals or casual doodlers, both quite a small subset of users. This time, Samsung added Bluetooth to the S-Pen and it now supports air gestures. Presently, the air gestures are a bit rusty. We used them to control the camera and the circular motion to zoom in would often be mistaken for the flick gesture to switch from rear to front camera. Good thing is Samsung has opened up the SDK for the feature, but it remains to be seen how many developers actually incorporate it.


Battery Life - Boosted by the processor and a larger battery

 

The Galaxy Note 10+ in India ships with the new Exynos 9825 SoC while in the US, it ships with the Snapdragon 855. Before with the Galaxy S10, there was a noticeable difference, not in raw performance, but in power efficiency, based on the reviews and reports from around the world. Now that Samsung has switched to the latest 7nm EUV lithography process, we were promised better power efficiency. Now there is a boost in screen-on time and all things including a larger display taken into account, the screen-on time has increased by an hour or so. Then again, it’s difficult to say whether that’s due to the slightly larger 4300mAh battery (as compared to the 4100mAh on the Galaxy S10+), or from shifting to the best manufacturing process available for now.

 

We clocked 7 hours 16 minutes on Geekbench Battery life, an hour and a half higher than what the Galaxy S10+ gave. 15 minutes of PUBG Mobile drained the battery by 6 percent. So did 30 minutes of HDR content on Netflix. But it was our video loop test that went on for over 12 hours.

Camera - Software does the trick

You thought the Galaxy S10+ 's camera was overkill? The Note 10+ goes a step further and incorporates a ToF 3D camera along with the wide, ultrawide and telephoto lenses. It’s essentially the same set of lenses that’s there on the Galaxy S10+ 5G in the US. Yet, between the S10+ and the Note 10+, I feel Samsung has tuned the software even further so the images (especially in low-light) come out a lot better. There’s a dedicated night mode now, and live focus in video.

The Samsung Galaxy S10+ camera came out on top when we compared it against premium flagships in the first half of 2019. The Note 10+ picks up from there and improves on the colours, sharpness and details. It’s still essentially the same hardware inside though. So there’s a very good chance even the Galaxy S10+ might get the new software trickery that’s there on the Note 10+ eventually.

Examining the new night mode, it employs the same technique that other OEMs like OnePlus and Huawei uses. Shooting multiple photos and fusing them together to get higher sharpness and details. A first for Samsung, it works quite well in enhancing low-light photos as the samples above will tell you. Don’t try to pixel-peep though, because that’s when the photos start losing details.

The Live Focus video, however, is a little patchy. It’s supposed to keep the camera focused on a (moving) subject but it keeps switching focus from the foreground to the background, resulting in a messed up bokeh video. The blurring, though, is quite nice.

Design and display - Premium, cutting-edge and durable

The Galaxy Note 10+ takes after the S-series with the Aura colours that paints a RGB reflection on the rear panel. You see a new colour on the back of the phone at every different angle you hold from the Aura Glow variant we received for review. Certainly quite premium. There’s also Aura Black and Aura White colours that are meant for more buyers more conservative in their choices. The Note 10+ is housed in the same sturdy aluminium frame like the S10+ with glass sandwiching on both sides. It’s reinforced with Gorilla Glass 6 that’s around two times more durable than its predecessor and its IP68 water and dust resistant.

Between the S10+ and the Note 10+, the camera on the front has changed position. From the right corner, the single front camera is now drilled bang into the center.  It does alter the aesthetic, but doesn’t really come in the way of viewing things. The 3.5mm headphone jack port is now history with the Galaxy Note 10+ one of the last flagships to ditch the legacy port. Interestingly, you don’t even get a 3.5mm to USB-C converter in the box, but a pair of AKG-tuned earphones with USB-C out is packed in the box.

The Galaxy Note series’ display used to be one for everyone to beat. But this time around, the peak brightness we got from the Note 10+ under the sun was 635 lux, much lower than the 742 lux the OnePlus 7 Pro achieves. It’s even lower than the Galaxy S10+’s display. Yet, the AMOLED panel is HDR10+ rated and has QHD+ resolution. This alone makes objects in the display appear super sharp and crisp with excellent contrasts. HDR content on the 6.8-inch panel looks lively and vibrant, and you can play HDR content across all streaming platforms. With OneUI, however, Samsung did reduce the number of options to tweak the display settings. It’s set to Natural colours and FHD+ resolution by default which you can tweak to Vivid colours and either HD+ or QHD+ resolution. The Note 10+ is also an excellent phone to read content on before going to bed. The minimum brightness the panel can go to is 3 lux, and there’s a blue light filter, which together protect the eyes at night.

Bottomline

The Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ comes across as a phone very similar to the Galaxy S10+, save for a few new features that may or may not turn out to be useful. There’s a lot of reason for old Note users to upgrade to this one. Then there’s the smaller Galaxy Note as well which comes with watered-down features including a smaller display and form factor which might find acceptance among a new breed of power users eager to get the Galaxy Note experience. What I really liked about the phone is how Samsung has improved the camera performance, especially in low-light, and the new DeX mode that now works much better than before. Overall, the Galaxy Note 10+ feels like an incremental upgrade, but good enough for old Note users to get a new one.

 

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Plus Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 23 Aug 2019
Variant: 256GB , 512GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    6.8" (1440 X 3040)
  • Camera Camera
    12 + 16 + 12 + TOF | 10 MP
  • Memory Memory
    256GB/12 GB
  • Battery Battery
    4300 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Subhrojit Mallick

Eats smartphones for breakfast.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Plus

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Plus

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

Asus VivoBook 14 (X412FJ) Review

Asus VivoBook 14 (X412FJ) Review

By Vignesh Giridharan | Updated Jun 11 2019
Asus VivoBook 14 (X412FJ) Review
DIGIT RATING
67 /100
  • design

    46

  • performance

    61

  • value for money

    79

  • features

    82

  • PROS
  • Performance is up to the mark
  • Fingerprint scanner works swiftly
  • Comfortable keyboard
  • CONS
  • Bland and threadbare design
  • Colours look washed out
  • Poor audio from inbuilt speakers

Verdict

The Asus VivoBook 14 (X412FJ) is for the modern-day laptop user who expects speed, portability, and comfort from their mainstream laptop but overlooks a bland design and mostly colourless display.

BUY Asus VivoBook 14 (X412FJ)
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 55990

Asus VivoBook 14 (X412FJ) detailed review

No sooner had I wrapped up the review of one VivoBook laptop than another came knocking on my door. I finished reviewing the Asus VivoBook S14 (S406UA) only a couple of weeks ago, and already I’ve got the VivoBook 14 (X412FJ) on my lap.  It's indicative, I'm sure, of just how frequently Asus launches new laptop models in India. It’s yet another 14-inch VivoBook from Asus but the Taiwanese electronics manufacturer assures us that this is a brand new launch for India.

Our review unit, the VivoBook 14 (X412FJ), is powered by an Intel 8th Gen Core i5 CPU, 8GB of RAM, and an NVIDIA GeForce MX230 graphics card with 2GB of dedicated video RAM. In comparison, last year's Lenovo IdeaPad 530S employs an NVIDIA GeForce MX150 graphics card with similar specs. The VivoBook 14 looks as big as an average 14-incher and weighs 1.5 kilogrammes. Let's see how it did in our review.

Build and Design

There's nothing particularly great about the VivoBook 14's build and design. The laptop is as interesting to look at as an empty glass of masala tea. On the outside, the VivoBook 14 uses only matte plastic for its top cover and base panel and that shows through when you tap the surface of the laptop with your knuckles. Still, it feels a lot more solid than the VivoBook S14 (S406UA). Gripping the lid firmly while opening it reveals signs of flex across the entire width of the display, which is a disappointing eyesore. On the plus side, not too much flex is observed on the keyboard island even when the keys are tapped hard.

Opening the display reveals a 14-inch LCD screen with a matte finish and fairly slim bezels all around (5.7mm on the sides, 8.8mm at the top, and 11.4mm at the bottom). Asus claims the laptop manages an 87-percent screen-to-body ratio. The colour of the keyboard area and keys matches that of the laptop's lid. On the review unit, it was plain silver. In fact, only the screen's bezels are in matte black; everything else is monotone. The use of sharply coloured accents or shades on the inside and outside would have benefited the laptop's overall appearance greatly. The area around the keyboard gets a dotted finish, giving the laptop an iota of character. The VivoBook 14 is otherwise quite boring to look at.

Display, Audio, and IO

The Asus VivoBook 14 has, as you can imagine, a 14-inch LCD panel, which has a Full HD resolution and a 178-degree claimed horizontal maximum viewing angle. The colours on the display look mostly washed out and whitish whether you're browsing on the web, watching a video, or playing a game. Going by our test kit, the display is capable of reproducing 59 percent of the colours in the sRGB colour space and 43 percent of the colours in the Adobe RGB colour space. The VivoBook loses many points for not being able to produce over 90 percent of the colours in either colour space, which is something any average laptop should. In comparison, the VivoBook S14's display manages 93 percent sRGB and 72 percent Adobe RGB colours. At 199 LUX, max brightness is sufficient for indoor and outdoor use. The screen’s matte finish helps reduce glare too.

Sound from the two down-firing SonicMaster speakers on the VivoBook 14 is underwhelming at best. Songs like Starboy by The Weeknd and Here Comes the Hotstepper by Ini Kamoze sound blunt and flat at max volume. While mids and highs sound fairly accurate, lows don’t make it to the ears at all. The speakers are also not too loud. While they’re loud enough for music and video calls in a quiet office cubicle, they’re no good for open spaces with noisy colleagues. You’re better off getting yourself a good pair of headphones or a portable Bluetooth speaker along with this 14-incher.

The Asus VivoBook 14 is not shy to offer connectivity. On the left side of its body, there's a round-pin power port for charging, a full-size HDMI port, a USB-A 3.1 port, a USB-C 3.1 port, and a 3.5mm audio jack for headsets. On the right side, we see a USB-A 2.0 port and a microSD card slot. We also see a Kensington lock slot and a couple of LED indicators for power and battery status. Another USB-A 3.1 port would not have gone amiss on the VivoBook 14 but most mainstream laptop users shouldn't have a reason to complain with the two that it has. The VivoBook 14 comes with a fingerprint scanner on the top right corner of its touchpad. The scanner works surprisingly accurately and takes less than a second to authenticate through Windows Hello.

Keyboard and Touchpad

The VivoBook 14's keyboard is one of the laptop’s most finely engineered components with a couple of unflattering qualities. But we’ll get to that in a moment; let's talk about what’s good first. With a profile of 1.3 millimetres, the keys have just the right amount of travel and resistance. The keycaps are well spaced and well sized. Typing, for the most part, is an absolute treat on the VivoBook 14. On the review unit, I found myself making very few mistakes or mistypes while writing my reviews and articles. When tapped on, the keys on the VivoBook 14’s keyboard land with a definite thud that feels reassuring and final. What helps the typing experience is Asus’ ErgoLift hinge technology, which gives the keyboard a 2-degree tilt. This laptop is highly recommended for users who do a lot of typing day in, day out.

The keyboard design on the VivoBook 14 is nearly perfect barring two significant flaws. There are no dedicated keys for Page Up, Page Down, Home, and End functions on the keyboard, which means users who type a lot will be forced to rely on key combinations for those functions. It’s a mild productivity-killer for writers like me. The Delete key is placed adjacent to the power button, which could lead to unintended sleeps and hibernate. The review unit came in the Transparent Silver colour option, whose keyboard had white keycaps with transparent letters and characters. The colour of the keyboard backlight too was—you guessed it—bright white. So, when the backlight was disabled, the keys were easily identifiable. However, when the white backlight shone through the transparent characters on the white keycaps, they all looked like one big blob of white light. The chances are that you won’t face this problem if you buy the VivoBook 14 in any other colour.

The touchpad on the VivoBook 14 is a regular-size precision unit. This means that it supports multi-finger taps and swipes natively if you’ve not strayed away from the bundled Windows 10 operating system. You needn’t install any third-party drivers or utilities to get the most of your touchpad. The buttons under the touchpad’s surface are fairly easy to click and the touchpad works well for pointer movement and file dragging. The VivoBook 14 scores top marks in the input devices department.

Performance and Gaming

The unit we received for review was powered by an Intel Core i5-8265U (clocked at 1.60GHz), 8GB of RAM, and an NVIDIA GeForce MX230 graphics card with 2GB of dedicated GDDR5 video RAM. Storage was handled by an Intel 660P Series PCIe NVMe solid-state drive with a capacity of 512GB. According to the review guide supplied by Asus, some variants of the VivoBook 14 will feature a 1TB hard drive spinning at 5,400 rpm instead of the solid-state drive. In comparison, the Lenovo IdeaPad 530S shares the same CPU, SSD and RAM capacity but has the older NVIDIA GeForce MX150 graphics card with 2GB of dedicated video RAM.

Categorised as a mainstream laptop in our books, the review unit scored quite well on CPU and GPU benchmark tests. On PCMark 8’s Accelerated Creative Test, the VivoBook 14 scored 3758 points. In comparison, the Lenovo IdeaPad 530S scored 4351 on the same test. On 3DMark’s Cloud Gate and Sky Diver, the VivoBook 14 scored 10065 and 6296 respectively. In comparison, the Lenovo IdeaPad 530S scored 9950 and 9113 on the same two tests respectively. The VivoBook 14’s higher score on 3DMark's Cloud Gate could suggest better DirectX 10 and DirectX 11 performance.

In everyday use scenarios, the VivoBook 14 review unit’s performance was up to the mark. I was able to multitask on everyday applications with ease. The applications open across multiple virtual desktops were numerous instances of Chrome, OneNote, Word, Excel, Steam, File Explorer, and WhatsApp for PC. The laptop was able to handle browsing, background file transfers, and background downloads simultaneously without breaking a sweat. According to CrystalDiskMark, the Intel solid-state drive chip inside scored 1709.2 MB/s and 986.1 MB/s on sequential read and write tests respectively. In comparison, the Lenovo IdeaPad 530S scored 3246.5 MB/s and 1912.9 MB/s on the same two tests respectively.

Gaming on the review unit happened in an understandably strained manner. Doom ran on the review unit on Full HD resolution in Ultra (highest graphics setting possible) at an average frame rate of 14 frames per second. Bringing the setting down to Medium (two notches below) almost doubled the average frame rate. Metro: Last Light, on the other hand, ran on Full HD resolution in Very High (highest graphics setting possible) at an average frame rate of 21 frames per second. Turning it down to Medium (two notches below) made the average frame rate climb to 46 frames per second.

Playing either game in Ultra/Very High nearly killed the laptop. Stutters and lags were easily visible. Medium worked out better for both games, which means that it’s what you should go with if you’re planning to play games on the VivoBook 14. Sadly, screen tearing was prevalent while playing both games in any setting, even with vertical sync set to “Adaptive”. In summary, the VivoBook 14 isn’t too great for playing new and popular titles but is not shabby either. If your colleagues have been talking about a popular but slightly dated game (like Metro 2033) at work and you want to play it, the VivoBook 14 should be up to the task. The same goes for lightweight image- and video-editing tasks.

Battery

The VivoBook 14 ships with a dual-cell 37Whr lithium-ion polymer battery. On our standard battery benchmark test, the review unit scored an abysmally low 2 hours, 25 minutes. In comparison, the Lenovo IdeaPad 530S lasted only 22 minutes longer on the same test. In everyday use scenarios, the VivoBook 14 review unit did pretty well. With Wi-Fi and Bluetooth enabled, the screen set to 70 percent brightness, the laptop’s battery charge halved in two and a half hours. During that time, I ran multiple instances of Chrome, worked with locally stored files, and played music for about twenty minutes at max volume through the speakers. Charging from 11 percent to 100 took nearly two and a half hours. Despite its pitiably low benchmark test score, the VivoBook 14 lasts somewhere between four and five hours on a single charge, which is decent but nothing to write home about.

Bottom Line

The Asus VivoBook 14 is an ideal candidate if you’re looking for a lightweight mainstream laptop that can help you with everyday computing tasks, including writing, web browsing, number crunching, and light image editing. It can even take on a few popular game titles if it’s not asked to run them at the highest graphics setting available. What’s more, its comfortable keyboard and touchpad combo add to the overall pleasant computing experience.

Where does the VivoBook 14 fall short then? Its audio setup isn’t great for music and movie playback, especially when you need to entertain a small crowd around you. Its display is not very rich in colour either. Also, the laptop looks awfully plain and unexciting for a VivoBook, especially in Transparent White. It could have also come with a longer battery life. Notwithstanding its imperfections, the Asus VivoBook 14 (X412FJ) is a fine workhorse for the modern-day laptop user.

Note: Asus did not reveal the price of the Asus VivoBook 14 before the launch. Please read about the launch and the price of the laptop here.


Asus VivoBook 14 Pricing is as follows: 
- Asus VivoBook 14 with Intel Core i3-7020U processor = Rs 33,990 
- Asus VivoBook 14 with 8th generation Intel Core i5-8265U = Rs 54,990
- Asus VivoBook 14 with 2GB NVIDIA GeForce MX230 = Rs 59,990.


Asus VivoBook 14 (X412FJ) Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 05 Jun 2019
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • OS OS
    Windows 10 Home
  • Display Display
    14" (1920 X 1080)
  • Processor Processor
    Intel 8th Gen Core i5 | NA
  • Memory Memory
    512 GB SSD/8GB DDR4

Related Reviews

Asus TUF Gaming A15 Review

Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Review

HP OMEN 15 2020 Review

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 Review

HP Envy 15 Review

logo
Vignesh Giridharan

Progressively identifies more with the term ‘legacy device’ as time marches on.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Asus VivoBook 14 (X412FJ)

Buy now on flipkart 55990

Asus VivoBook 14 (X412FJ)

Buy now on flipkart 55990

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

AKG K245 Studio Headphones Review
AKG K245 Studio Headphones Review

AKG K245 Studio Headphones Review

Dhriti Datta   |  05 Mar 2020
DIGIT RATING
70 /100
  • design

    75

  • performance

    73

  • value for money

    70

  • features

    60

  • PROS
  • Detailed mids
  • Punchy yet controlled bass
  • Comfortable earpads
  • CONS
  • Lacklustre drive in treble
  • Soundstage seems restricted for open-back
  • Earcups may be small for larger ears

Verdict

The AKG K245 open-back studio monitors are quite a competent pair of headphones and sport a relatively affordable price tag as well. They look aesthetic and professional, however, the fit might be a bit cramped up for those with larger ears. The sound quality is not neutral, it is definitely bass-boosted, however, this nature doesn’t hamper the mids as expected. The treble performance, however, is lacklustre. Overall, these headphones are quite good for sound professionals, since they are mostly sonically accurate and do not fatigue the user even over extended periods of usage.

BUY AKG K245 Studio Headphones
Price 9999

AKG K245 Studio Headphones detailed review

One of the oldest brands in the headphones business, AKG was first established in the 1940s in Vienna, Austria. The brand’s parent company, Harman International, was then acquired by Samsung and ever since AKG has boasted a more modern identity. Priced at Rs. 9,999 on Amazon, the AKG K245 are open-back, wired headphones in AKG’s range of foldable studio monitors, which also include the K175 and K275. This open-back version is touted to be more suitable for long listening sessions since the open-back nature reduces listening fatigue and also doesn’t fall prey to the users’ ears becoming red hot over a period of time. Let’s look at how these relatively affordable, professional studio monitors fared in our tests.

Build and design

The AKG K245 is predominantly black and looks sufficiently elegant. The AKG logo is located at the back of each ear cup along with the model name and the words ‘Professional Studio Headphones’. The words are etched in white and silver and look quite attractive. The earcups house finely perforated metal, which gives the headphones its open-back quality. It looks technically designed but also doesn’t compromise on style. They employ a couple of different materials in the construction - leatherette cloth for the headband, plastic for the headband straps, and metal for the earcups.

The headband sports a unique construction with the band moving along two straps to adjust to heads while the frame stays still throughout. The result of this is that the headphones are extremely easy to adjust even when they’re firmly placed over the user’s head, something not many headphones are capable of. 

The headband, however, doesn’t sport the customary memory foam padding. Still, wearing them over extended periods of time, surprisingly, doesn’t create a hotspot on the head. The earcups, on the other hand, do have soft, plush memory foam that enveloped the reviewer’s ears excellently, providing a comfortable fit. However, for larger ears, these earcups definitely seem a bit too inadequate. If you have larger ears, you may feel a bit cramped when you have these headphones on. 

The headphones are also supremely flexible and malleable. The earcups can be folded inwards for some added portability. They also rotate 180-degrees which ensures that the cups sit flat on a table or on your chest, when not in use. Additionally, we tugged the earcups apart and they have a considerable amount of flex without the signs of any creaks. 

The product comes along with a spiral cable with a mini XLR plug that connects to the headphones and a gold-plated 3.5mm audio jack on the other end. The cable extends quite a bit and avoids tangles like the plague, however, it does feel a bit bulky. 

Performance

Packing sizeable 50mm transducers, the AKG K245 definitely lean more towards the bass and lows than the mids and highs. The bass reproduction, while exaggerated, is not muddy or boomy though. Instead, the bass notes are reproduced with precision. Despite the punchy bass response, they do a good job at not masking the mids. 

The sound profile is not as neutral as traditional studio monitors, still, the frequencies sound pretty balanced overall. The mids are quite detailed and tracks such as Shine On by Pink Floyd sound pristine. The intricacies in the mid-ranged instruments and the vocals are well-maintained. However, the upper-mids can, sometimes, get a bit peaky, which is odd since the treble is quite lacklustre on these.

The treble on these headphones is their only major weakness. This frequency range sorely lacks drive and enthusiasm causing treble-heavy tracks such Around the World by Kings of Leon sound dreary and lacklustre. 

The soundstage, as expected from open-back, studio monitors, is quite wide and features some decent height as well. The headphones have an airy auditory quality which makes tracks, regardless of genres, sound pleasant. The imaging is very accurate as well as heard in crowded tracks such as Selkies by Between the Buried and Me.

Being open-back it is understandable that the passive isolation of these is sorely lacking. These headphones aren’t meant to be daily drivers and using them during commute is not advisable at all, since the external sounds will definitely hamper your listening experience. Fortunately, the leakage is extremely controlled for open-back headphones, so you don’t have to worry about disturbing your deskmates too much.

Bottomline

The AKG K245 open-back studio monitors are quite a competent pair of headphones and sport a relatively affordable price tag as well. They look aesthetic and professional, however, the fit might be a bit cramped up for those with larger ears. The sound quality is not neutral, it is definitely bass-boosted, however, this nature doesn’t hamper the mids as expected. The treble performance, however, is lacklustre. Overall, these headphones are quite good for sound professionals, since they are mostly sonically accurate and do not fatigue the user even over extended periods of usage.

 

AKG K245 Studio Headphones Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price: ₹9999
Release Date: 16 Jul 2019
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Playback Time Playback Time
    NA
  • Frequency Range Frequency Range
    NA
  • Channels Channels
    NA
  • Dimensions Dimensions
    NA

Related Reviews

Jabra Elite 45H Review

Sony WI-SP510 Review

Sennheiser CX 150BT Wireless Review

JBL Tune 125TWS Review

PlayGo T44 Review

logo
Dhriti Datta

Perpetually sporting a death stare, this one can be seen tinkering around with her smartphone which she holds more dear than life itself and stuffing her face with copious amounts of bacon.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

AKG K245 Studio Headphones

Price : ₹9999

AKG K245 Studio Headphones

Price : ₹9999

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

Huawei Nova 3 Review

Huawei Nova 3 Review

By Subhrojit Mallick | Updated May 22 2019
Huawei Nova 3 Review
DIGIT RATING
78 /100
  • design

    81

  • performance

    84

  • value for money

    69

  • features

    76

User Rating : 3.5/5 Out of 2 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Stunning glass design
  • Four cameras
  • CONS
  • Inconsistent AI
  • Dated hardware

Verdict

The Huawei Nova 3 packs all the features that are in demand this year. It particularly excels in the design. The dual tone glass back looks simply stunning. But the good looks inside is marred by an ugly EMUI interface. The performance of the phone also isn’t at par with the competition, and the AI features are a hit or miss. The camera on the Nova 3 is good, but quite inconsistent. Overall, this is a device that will work best under ideal conditions, but a little out of the comfort zone, and the shortfalls start showing.

BUY Huawei Nova 3
Buy now on amazon Available 19999

Huawei Nova 3 detailed review

The high-end  segment has been seeing a lot of action, even more than the flagship segment for that matter. Most of the Snapdragon 845 phones that launched this year belongs to that ‘flagship killer’ category carved out by OnePlus. The Huawei Nova 3 aims to beat OnePlus at its own game. With four-cameras, a stunning glass design and a lot of AI-backed features,  the Nova 3 isn’t taking any chances. But with top-of-the-line hardware now available even under Rs 20,000, can the Huawei Nova 3 priced at Rs 34,999 a good choice to go for? We find out.


Design

You’ll stop and gaze at the Huawei Nova 3 before picking it up. It’s that good looking. Where most phones go for solid colours in the design, the Nova 3 offers a gradient of colours. The phone’s colour changes shade from a deep purple to a chrome blue as you go upwards. The gradient change is also visible when you hold it in different angles creating vertical streaks of light. It takes the dual tone design from the Honor 10 and the Huawei P20 Pro and takes it up a notch, without going all gaudy and tacky. Needless to say, the phone will make heads turn.

But the fact remains that using glass automatically brings down the durability of the phone. Huawei didn’t specify whether there is Gorilla Glass protection. The phone does have a solid metal frame holding the glass at the front and the back together with no flex whatsoever. That’s a respite. The phone also has a slim profile. I had no problem using it with one hand. The glass back adds a bit of heft but it also adds to the grip.

The colourful back panel houses the dual camera unit which has a slight bump and a fingerprint sensor. While the bump is just too subtle to take away from the good looks of the phone, it does tend to attract a lot of dust. Huawei provides a transparent case inside the box that keeps the glass back smudge-free. The endangered 3.5mm headphone jack remains and the phone is charged via a USB-Type C port.

The Huawei Nova 3 is all screen up front. While it’s not exactly bezel-less, it’s dangerously close to being one. Huawei manages to increase the screen real estate by putting a notch on the display. The notch houses dual cameras and an IR-sensor that is used to unlock the phone in the dark, apart from other sensors and the earpiece. The notch is much larger than the one on the OnePlus 6 or the Honor 10. The notch, as we have stated before, is a stopgap solution, in my opinion that is acceptable simply for the fact that it provides extra space to house the status bar icons. This leaves the rest of the space (that would be there without the notch) all for content. Huawei does offer the option to hide the notch, but even when you do, the icons continue to occupy the notched area keeping the rest of the screen free for everything else.

The Nova 3’s design is one of the compelling factors to buy this phone. It’s easy to hold, looks good and manages to make good use of the notch. However, there is no water and dust resistance, which calls for cautious use.

Display

Thanks to the notch on top, the display of the Huawei Nova 3 takes up most of the real estate up front. The minimal bezels makes the screen quite immersive and if you’re in the dark with the screen on, it looks truly bezel-less. The Nova 3’s screen stretches to 6.23-inches diagonally. It’s an IPS LCD panel with FullHD+ resolution, which means the effective pixel density is around 409 ppi. That’s quite standard in notched displays. It’s also not that wide allowing my tiny hands to reach the other end without much effort. As a result, the panel on the Nova 3 is quite functional. Huawei gives the option to dial down the screen resolution to HD+ so as to save some power.

Relatively speaking, the brightness levels on the Nova 3 aren’t all that high. In our tests, the display clocked a brightness of 634 lux, which is nowhere close to the OnePlus 6 which has an AMOLED panel and a rating of around 900 lux. That means you might have to strain your eyes to read content outdoors on a bright, sunny day. The display also has a strong blueish tint on top and the colour temperature is on the cooler side. It becomes apparent when you’re reading text on a white background. Huawei does provide a blue-light filter.  You can also tweak the text size and the font.

I watched a couple of episodes of Sacred Games on the phone and the experience was quite enjoyable. I was able to hold the phone easily as the palm rejection works quite well. Netflix also upscaled the video to fit the screen (without including the notched area). Other apps like YouTube and Amazon Prime Video also scale up automatically. In case an app doesn’t, Huawei gives the option to run it in full-screen mode in the Settings menu.

Overall, the panel on the Huawei Nova 3 is functional to say the least. It’s not as much as a head-turner as the design of the phone.

Performance

 

The Huawei Nova 3 is pitched as a flagship performer at a not-so-flagship price. The company essentially replicates the same strategy that made OnePlus devices popular. It is powered by the flagship HiSilicon Kirin 970 SoC  that’s designed in-house by Huawei. The Kirin 970 Soc has an octa-core setup with four Cortex A73 cores clocked at 2.4GHz and four Cortex A53 cores clocked at 1.8GHz. There’s also a co-processor inside to handle AI workloads. Based on the chipset alone, it’s clear that it can’t match the performance of a Snapdragon 845-powered device. While on paper the Kirin 970 chipset can't work as fast as the Snapdragon 845, the two SoCs do deliver performance that is unhindered and butter smooth for the most part.
You also get 6GB LPDDR4 RAM and 128GB of UFS storage. There’s also expandable storage support via microSD cards up to 256GB, which isn’t there in its closest competitor, the OnePlus 6. Although, you have to decide between a second SIM and a memory card, as it has a hybrid slot. If you choose two SIM cards, there’s dual VoLTE that lets you get 4G connectivity from two networks.

Benchmark results show the Nova 3 isn’t going head to head with the latest Qualcomm flagship chipset. It scored 207396 in AnTuTu while on Geekbench Single Core and Multi Core tests, it scored 1922 and 6616 respectively. It closest competition, the OnePlus 6 beats the Nova 3’s test results by miles. But that doesn’t really reflect in the real world usage though.

In real world usage, the Huawei Nova 3 is quite breezy and fluid. I saw no instances of the phone freezing or taking time to launch apps. Games like PubG Mobile loaded quite smooth, while Facebook, Instagram and the likes also had a lag-free experience. Even while gaming, the phone doesn’t heat up by much. Switching between apps also doesn’t stress the phone much. The software of the phone, however, is quite heavy. A flick through the Settings app will tell you the number of features it packs. Features like scanning a QR code to connect another device to the Wi-Fi network, dual instances of apps, battery usage broken down into hardware and software (very useful!), app lock and much much more. You won’t find most of these features in stock Android phones. However, the UI could do with some polishing. The big, ugly icons seem like a cheap imitation of iOS. A strong clash with the aesthetics of material design in Google apps and EMUI’s interface is very evident across the operating system. There is also two folders worth of bloatware here, out of which some can be uninstalled. This isn’t your best designed UI to be frank.

Furthermore, Huawei uses an aggressive resource allocation algorithm that often kills background apps, including those that are essential. Facebook Messenger, as a result, didn’t work correctly. I would often get messages once I turned on the phone. Notifications would be delayed. In fact, the problem has led to apps like VLC Player to blacklist Huawei devices.

Camera

The primary feature of the Huawei Nova 3 is its camera prowess. The phone offers not one, not two, but four cameras on its body. Two on the back, two up front. At the back is a 16MP primary sensor with f/1.8 aperture along with a 24MP secondary camera that shoots only in monochrome again with f/1.8 aperture. Both have PDAF and thanks to AI trickery, the Nova 3 can enhance the details of the photos taken by the hardware. Up front is a 24MP sensor coupled with a 2MP depth sensor for selfies. The camera is also not just for taking photos this time. Huawei has tied up with Amazon to offer an AR-based shopping experience. And then there are fun things to do like making 3D Qmojis which is Huawei’s take on animojis.

The camera app of the Huawei Nova 3 is both intuitive and cumbersome at the  same time. While the most used options are within the reach of the fingers, going to the Pro mode requires a few more swipes. A good thing is that you can turn off the ‘AI-fication’ of photos. There’s also hardware-level HDR according to Huawei. Since there is a lot happening with the Nova 3’s camera, we’ve broken it up into smaller sections for clarity.     

AI Cameras

The four cameras on the body of the Nova 3 is infused with machine learning thanks to the NPU in the Kirin 970 SoC. The NPU aids the rear camera to detect around 22 different scenes that includes food, sunrise, blue skies, beach, etc. The  front camera too can recognise up to eight different scenes. After understanding what you’re shooting,  Huawei goes ahead and applies more filters to make photos appear prettier. The results are a hit or miss. When it works, it looks really good, and when it doesn’t, it becomes an eyesore.

Below are two photos taken at the same time. One with AI turned on and another with AI turned off. There’s a noticeable difference in the way the photos turn out. The photo taken normally is quite bland even though the sky ahead had all sorts of colours.  The AI recognised I’m shooting a sunrise and made the darker parts of the photos (near the buildings) brighter to increase the dynamic range. However, if you pixel peep the enhanced photo, you will notice a severe lack of details.

AI turned off

AI turned on

The second photo is also taken at the same time, but look between the buildings. You will notice a soft shadow of what would be other buildings far away. The AI simply ghosts them out and casts that ugly shadow in the photo.

HDR Pro

The Nova 3 rear cameras boast of hardware-level HDR capability where the phone takes multiple photos with multiple exposure points and fuses them together to improve the dynamic range. It’s mostly good, although nothing close to what the Pixel 2 can do with its software-based HDR. Check out the sample below:

Low light

This when the HDR Pro mode is useful. In the photo below,  I was focusing inside the restaurant where there was a lot of light. Most other phones I took the same photo from couldn’t light up the Big Chill name properly. It was all dark and shadowy. The Nova 3, on the other hand, managed to light up the frame evenly. The insides are adequately exposed, not going too high. The details are visible. Thanks to the HDR Pro capability, even the outside of the photo was evenly exposed. However, truth be told, the OnePlus 6 also managed to do the same. There wasn’t much of a difference between the photos taken by the two.

Shot from Huawei Nova 3

Shot from OnePlus 6

Using the AI mode in low-light isn’t a good idea though. While you will get rich, saturated colours (with ample noise), ghosting around the edges of objects is more prominent. The photo below will demonstrate that.

Aperture Mode

The Huawei Nova 3 has separate categories of shooting bokeh shots and portrait shots. The former is called the Aperture mode here where you can simulate the aperture size from f/16 to all the way down to f/0.95 (!!). The aperture adjustment is of course software based and uses the secondary camera and machine learning to simulate the bokeh. The results are fairly consistent with the edges uniformly blurred. You can also see the amount of background blur in real-time while adjusting the aperture. It does not, however, look natural. You can make out this is the software doing the blurring and not an actual wide aperture as it lacks the circular highlights characteristics. .

Portrait Mode

The portrait mode in the Huawei Nova 3 is for shooting portraits. Huawei gives you the option of using 3D lighting effects like the iPhone 8 Plus has. The implementation is nowhere close to Apple’s though and you will look like a cutout poster when using it. There’s also a beauty filter that seems to be an advert for a fairness cream. In other words, I would refrain from using this mode to take portrait shots. Instead, using the pro mode or even the default photo mode is much better.

Monochrome

Over the years, Huawei has made a name for itself for its monochrome shooting capabilities. While there is no Leica branding on the Nova 3, it can also take detailed, rich monochrome shots using the 24MP B/W sensor. Take a look at the photo below.

AR Shopping

As a first, the Nova 3 also provides AR-based shopping experience powered by Amazon. The idea is to take a photo of an object and find it on the e-commerce portal to purchase. You can also scan bar-codes. But it doesn’t always work. I used the feature on smartphones which was a hit or miss. The phone couldn’t recognise the OnePlus 6 with its distinct Iron Man cover. I used it on my backpack and got results of other backpacks. It did recognise barcodes correctly though and redirected me to the product on Amazon. It’s mostly a gimmick for now and will need more accuracy to become a reliable feature.

Front Camera

The dual front camera of the phone is also one of the highlights. The 24MP primary sensor is accompanied by the 2MP depth sensor. There’s also AI, HDR Pro and 3D lighting up front, along with bokeh mode and beautification. Feature wise, this is as packed as a selfie-centric phone can get. Selfies also turn out quite good, although a 1:1 crop will reveal a severe lack of details in the AI mode. The HDR Pro mode works well here to light up the face against a harsh source of light. The 3D lighting, however is better left unused.

Battery

The Huawei Nova 3 has a 3,750mAh battery that is quite adequate for the package. For the time I used the phone, it easily lasted me a full day. I mostly used the phone to take photos, browse social media and play PubG Mobile. While gaming for long drains the battery quickly, a one-time session won’t require much juice. Furthermore, you get a fast-charging adapter that tops up the battery in around an hour.

Bottomline

The Huawei Nova 3 comes off as an impressive device. It’s a 2018 smartphone through and through. The gradient-tone glass design, the taller display, AI cameras, are all features highly in demand this year and the Nova 3 ticks all the boxes. However, the implementation of the features are somewhat inconsistent, especially the AI enhancements. The design, while it looks stunning, isn’t durable and you will have to put a case at the back which is counterproductive. While the processor is adequately powerful, it won’t be able to outpace the Snapdragon 845-powered smartphones. Then there’s the software which isn’t the best out there. The Huawei Nova 3 at Rs 34,999 is a direct competition to the base variant of the OnePlus 6. It’s a good alternative if you don’t want to go for the OnePlus 6, but not the perfect substitute. Between the two, I prefer the UI of the OnePlus 6 and it definitely feels faster than the Nova 3. The camera on the OnePlus 6 isn’t the benchmark by all means, but at least it’s consistent. The Nova 3 is wildly inconsistent and has some inherent issues like ghosting and lack of details that could be a dealbreaker if you tend to rely on your smartphone for your photos. In case you want to experience the power of AI in smartphones, a more affordable is there in the form of the Asus Zenfone 5z which takes on the OnePlus 6 on the spec-sheet and then some.

 

Huawei Nova 3 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 26 Jul 2018
Variant: 64GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5.9" (2160 x 1080)
  • Camera Camera
    16 & 20 MP | 20 + 2 MP
  • Memory Memory
    64 GB/3 & 4 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3340 mAh

Related Reviews

IQOO 3 5G Review

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

logo
Subhrojit Mallick

Eats smartphones for breakfast.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Huawei Nova 3

Huawei Nova 3

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

Samsung Galaxy S10e Review

Samsung Galaxy S10e Review

By Subhrojit Mallick | Updated Jun 03 2020
Samsung Galaxy S10e Review
  • PROS
  • Compact form factor
  • Gorgeous display
  • Reliable camera
  • CONS
  • Half-day battery
  • Not suitable for gaming
  • Selfies have a painting-like effect

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy S10E is proof that phones don’t have to come in a giant footprint to be deemed powerful. Sometimes, the smallest packages pack the largest punch and the Galaxy S10E does just that. It’s performance and the camera quality is more or less similar to the Galaxy S10 and the Galaxy S10+. While you’re unlikely to miss the larger display or the extra cameras, the disappointingly short battery life is sure to rain on the S10E’s parade. Just remember to keep a charger handy all the time. For an otherwise fantastic package, the battery life is a big let down and is the only reason why I’d recommend the Galaxy S10 over the S10E. We will be keeping a close eye on the software updates pushed out by Samsung over the next few months and will report in case the battery life improves.

BUY Samsung Galaxy S10e
Buy now on amazon Available 50999
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 59000

Samsung Galaxy S10e detailed review

When we think of flagship devices in 2019, form factors that come to our mind range from giant phablets to bezel-less, edge-to-edge displays to even displays that fold. And while Samsung did launch flagships that are large, that can fold and have more cameras than you can keep count, the Korean giant also came out with the Galaxy S10E, a compact flagship to cater to a segment of users that have mostly been ignored in India. Compact flagships used to be Sony’s forte with the Xperia Compact series that did launch in India till a few years ago. There’s also the Google Pixel 3, supposedly aimed at users looking for a smaller phone without compromising on the performance. But no device out there presently can match the size and compact form factor of the Galaxy S10E. Yes, we checked with all other compact flagships kept side-by-side. But form-factor aside, the Samsung Galaxy S10E doesn’t seem to skimp on the features that define the Galaxy S10 flagship lineup, save for a few missing features here and there. And for a price of Rs 55,900, it certainly doesn’t demand a kidney. But with the iPhone XR, Google Pixel 3 and even the OnePlus 6T vying for the attention of a price-conscious smartphone enthusiast, can the Samsung Galaxy S10E offer enough benefits for your money? Let’s find out.

Design

The Samsung Galaxy S10E can be credited for reviving the seemingly dead compact flagship segment. Only the Google Pixel catered to the segment so far and the S10E becomes a good alternative to go for if you are a stickler for small phones. In fact, the Galaxy S10E is even smaller than the Google Pixel 3, and in front of it, the iPhone XR looks like a giant phablet.

It’s all glass, though, on the front and the back, as has been the case with Galaxy flagships since the Galaxy S6. However, while every year Samsung uses the latest generation of Corning Gorilla Glass, the Galaxy S10E has Gorilla Glass 5 on both the front and the back. Samsung does bundle a perforated case in the box which saved the phone from receiving any damage when it fell from pocket height.

The prism white  reflects new colours every time you pick it up.

The Galaxy S10E is offered in two colour variants in India. The Prism White and Prism Black variants are identical to the Galaxy S10’s design. The black variant is glossy but doesn’t reflect colours when held against the light. The Prism White variant, however, reflects new colours every time you pick it up. It looks perfectly premium, and even though this is the ‘budget’ flagship, there has been no compromise in the build and design of the phone.  The only place where Samsung seems to have saved costs is in the fingerprint sensor. The larger Galaxy S10 and the S10+ have an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor embedded under the display, but the S10E comes with a capacitive fingerprint sensor embedded into the power button on the right side. While it becomes muscle memory after a few days of use, I often found the fingerprint sensor and especially the gestures associated with the sensor interfering with my activities like gaming. However, when compared against the in-screen fingerprint sensor on the Galaxy S10, it’s much faster and offers instant access to the lock-screen when the screen is off.

Despite being made of glass, the Galaxy S10E doesn’t feel slippery at all. The compact form-factor also allows for a solid grip in the hand and it’s easy to use the phone one-handed. Only the bottom bezel is quite distinct and while the screen doesn’t curve around the edges (another cost-saving feature) like in the Galaxy S10, the borders around the screen are minimal enough to not come in the way. Speaking of buttons and ports, the S10E has only the power button on the right while the volume rockers and the Bixby button are on the left. The power key with the embedded fingerprints takes up a relatively larger area and is flush with the body which makes it difficult to locate for the first few times. Nothing that you won’t get used to, though. Samsung also finally gave in to demand and made the Bixby button customisable to launch other apps.

Galaxy S10e's size in comparison with the Galaxy S10

Especially noticeable is the new punch-hole camera. The 10MP front camera is embedded under the glass. Credit has to be given to Samsung for staying away from the notch that seem to be there on almost any and every smartphone last year. The company leapfrogged ahead to drilling the camera inside the display. The new design is much less intrusive. You can in-fact use
interesting wallpapers to disguise the camera. There’s an entire sub-reddit for that even.

The design and build of the Samsung Galaxy S10E is every bit premium. Don’t let the lower price let you think otherwise.

Display

There might not be many takers for a compact phone these days, but Samsung gives you enough reason to not look elsewhere. While most manufacturers tend to compromise on the display of their budget offerings, Samsung went all out and put a HDR10+ certified display on the Galaxy S10E. Compared to last year’s ‘budget iPhone’, it’s miles ahead. The Galaxy S10E’s 5.8-inch display has FullHD+ resolution with support for next-gen HDR standard. It’s the same display that’s on the larger Galaxy S10 and the S10+ with only the resolution dialed down from 2K to HD.

The Galaxy S10e's front camera is drilled into the display

When watching content on Netflix, you will often spot the HDR tag on shows and movies and you can enjoy those in stunning clarity provided the internet speed is adequate. There’s visible difference between the colours and the details on say the OnePlus 6T and the Samsung Galaxy S10E. The iPhone XR despite coming with only a 720p display also did quite well in our display tests, but can’t hold a candle to the perfection Samsung brings to the table when it comes to the display.

Maximum Brightness (In lux)

Minimum Brightness (In lux)

We registered peak brightness of 604 lux in our tests while the phone went down to a minimum 4 lux when the brightness was the least. The brightness also gets a boost if auto-brightness is turned on and the proximity sensor senses you are outside in the sun. But then no matter how bright it is outside, the Galaxy S10E’s display never seemed to wash out. It’s perfectly legible under direct sunlight.

Display settings on the Galaxy S10e

Samsung also offers the ability to tweak the colour temperature, and even set the white balance of each individual colours. By default the Vivid mode is selected that does boost the colour contrasts and saturation. We recommend switching to Natural, where the vivid colours are engaged only when you’re watching HDR content.

Performance

Despite being the smallest of the lot, the compact Samsung Galaxy S10E is just as powerful as its bigger siblings. Under the hood is the same hardware that powers the Galaxy S10 and the Galaxy S10+ — The Exynos 9820. It’s Samsung’s latest flagship chipset manufactured on a 8nm process with a tri-cluster CPU setup. There are two high-performance custom cores based on ARM Cortex-A76 clocked at 2.73GHz, two medium-performance ARM Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.31GHz and four high-efficiency ARM Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.95GHz. The tri-cluster arrangement apparently allows for a better load distribution between the cores. For instance, the custom cores are engaged only when there’s heavy load like gaming, or shooting at 4K, while the medium cores are engaged when you’re taking photos, or watching a YouTube video. The four efficiency are used the most when you’re just generally using the device. Whether it’s the latest ARM cores, or the tri-cluster setup, the Galaxy S10E runs butter smooth no matter what you throw at it.

The Exynos 9820 is paired with 6GB LPDDR4X RAM and 128GB UFS 2.1 storage. It’s weird how Samsung refrained from using the next generation memory and storage despite pioneering LPDDR5 RAM and UFS 3.0 storage in the mobile space. Nevertheless, between the three variants, there are slight differences in benchmark scores, but if you compare it against the likes of the OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition and LG G7+ ThinQ, both of which are priced in the same range, the S10E comes out on top. However, when pitted against the iPhone XR, Apple’s budget iPhone launched last year, we see some interesting differences. Here’s what the benchmarks revealed —

Benchmarks

CPU

On AnTuTu, the Samsung Galaxy S10E outscored all other Android flagships launched last year, but fell just shy of beating the iPhone XR, while on Geekbench Single Core and multi-core tests, it was bested only by the iPhone XR.

GPU

However, when we tested the graphics rendering using 3DMark Slingshot test, the Galaxy S10E managed to beat the iPhone XR, but the LG V40 ThinQ and the OnePlus 6T both performed much better in those tests. The Galaxy S10E also got modest scores for AI performance and VR rendering. We also checked for artificial boosting which some OEMs tend to do when a benchmark app is detected. There was no such issue with the Galaxy S10E.

Daily usage

In day-to-day usage, the Galaxy S10E worked without a hitch. I used the phone as my daily driver and except for the shoddy battery life (more on that, later), I faced no issues whatsoever. I used the phones to write my articles, take photos and edit them on the go using Snapseed and Lightroom Mobile and everything happened quite seamlessly. Considering its compact nature, it took a little time to get used to typing (I was coming from the OnePlus 6T), but once I did, there was no problem in belting out long sentences. The tactile feedback is especially good. There seems to be absolutely no difference between the three Galaxy S10 models as far as performance is considered.

Gaming

Gamebench scores of PUBG Mobile

Gaming on the Galaxy S10E, on the other hand, isn’t the best experience. Firstly, the display is just too small to have a wide screen-space to move your fingers around, and secondly, the Mali-G76 MP12 isn’t the best GPU for mobile games. We played multiple sessions of PUBG Mobile and Asphalt 9 and recorded the frame rates in real time using GameBench. PUBG Mobile gave a frame rate of 37 FPS with 91 percent stability while Asphalt 9 delivered 29 FPS at 86 percent stability. The frame rates are higher than what the Galaxy S10+ and the Galaxy S10 produced while playing the same games at the same settings, but that’s likely because the S10 and the S10+ come with 2K displays, and more pixels mean more time to render, leading to a lower frame rate. Between the three Galaxy S10 devices, the S10E is the best phone for gaming, but overall, the OnePlus 6T still tops the chart in terms of frame rates and stability.

Software

The Samsung Galaxy S10E runs on Samsung’s new OneUI based on Android 9 Pie. It’s a big departure from the Samsung Experience interface that the company offered in the Galaxy S9 and the Note 9 last year. It’s much more seamless and intuitive, but more than that, it’s much more aesthetically pleasing than the older interface. OneUI brings gesture navigation which only involves swiping up from different parts of the screen to navigate. Furthermore, Samsung finally allows users to remap the Bixby button to do just about anything. I used it as a quick access to the camera. However, you won’t be able to install third-party themes and icon packs. Instead, you have to rely on the Galaxy Store to download them, and most of the good ones are not free to use.

Bixby itself is now much more usable. I particularly liked Bixby routines which activated preset settings at a particular time or location,  like turning the Wi-Fi off when I left work. These can easily be done by a third party app like IFTTT, but having it baked in makes it much easier. The Galaxy S10E also comes with Digital Wellbeing which was announced alongside Android 9 by Google which helps monitor your smartphone usage, and if required, even take steps to curb it down.

There are a lot more new features that would require a separate article to talk about. But overall, this is an excellent evolution of the old Samsung interface which was one of the primary reasons most people held back from buying a Samsung flagship. OneUI makes using the Galaxy S10E so much better.

Camera

No triple cameras on this one, but you won't really miss the telephoto lens

While there isn’t any compromise in the performance or the display, what makes the Galaxy S10E the least expensive sibling of the Galaxy S10 trio is the camera on the back. Instead of three on the back and two on the front, the Galaxy S10E has two cameras on the back and one on the front. The dual camera stack includes a primary 12MP sensor with variable aperture of f/1.5 and f/2.4 along with a 26mm wide lens, and a 16MP ultra-wide angle sensor with f/2.2 aperture and fixed focus and 123-degree wide field of view. The primary sensor comes with OIS but the wide-angle sensor doesn’t have it, and frankly, doesn’t require it. What the S10E lacks is the telephoto lens that’s there on the S10+ offering 2X optical zoom.

To be honest, you won’t be missing out on much. It’s difficult to tell photos taken from the three variants apart from each other, so it’s safe to say, the cameras are tuned and optimised similarly. The sensor offers excellent dynamic range at daylight, while low-light shots come out fairly bright and usable.

Primary 12MP sensor

While Samsung refrained from getting into a megapixel war that is currently waging with the 48MP camera sensors, the 12MP sensor on the Galaxy S10E manages to take some fine photos, even in tricky lighting. The sensor used on the S10E has a smaller 1/2.55” surface area but has large 1.4um pixel size. If you compare against the 48MP Sony IMX586 sensor, that’s exactly the pixel pitch you get in the binned mode. Essentially, apart from the crazy details the 48MP sensor promises, the S10E’s 12MP sensor is perfectly capable of producing images with good exposure and sharpness.

In the sample above, the colours are perfectly reproduced with high precision. Even a bright sky could not darken the subject. Moreover, the sharpness of the phone is quite high. A 100 percent crop (shown below) reveals how well the details are retained.

1/320 sec. f/2.4, ISO 50

Having said that, in the samples shown above, Samsung’s aggressive sharpening algorithms does make the lines appear a bit too sharp when zoomed in. However, the exposure and the details are almost always perfect when shooting in daylight.

1/125 sec. f/2.4, ISO 64

Like the Galaxy S9 and the Note 9 that came out last year, the S10E’s primary camera also has the dual-aperture mechanism. It can switch between f/1.5 and f/2.4 automatically with the option to do it manually in the pro-mode. The f/1.5 aperture is used to capture low-light images while the f/2.4 aperture is put to use for all other time of the day. At low-light, shifting between the two aperture does result in different exposures, but I’m yet to find one good reason why anyone would attempt to shoot low-light photos at f/2.4 when most smartphones use f/1.8 to f/1.5 apertures across all situation.

Low-light images using the primary camera are much better than what the S9 managed to produce. Earlier, Samsung’s nasty noise-reduction algorithm almost always smudged the details, but this time around, even though there is some level of noise-reduction applied, the result is much sharper with good exposure and contrast. The samples below will tell you the story.

1/50 sec. f/1.5, ISO 800

1/50 sec. f/1.5, ISO 640

A word about the AF system of the Galaxy S10E. The S10E uses the same dual-pixel mechanism to focus on the subject, and this time there are more pixels available to use for auto-focus which greatly improved the auto-focus performance, especially at low-light. The sample below will be a testament to that. I took this photo from inside a speeding auto and the result is quite impressive.

1/10 sec. f/2.2, ISO 640

The Galaxy S10E is also equally good at taking close-up photos. We wouldn’t call it macro as the minimum focusing distance isn’t all that small. Furthermore, Samsung could have enabled AF in the ultra-wide angle camera to use as a macro lens like the Huawei Mate 20 Pro does, but unfortunately the wide-angle lens has a fixed focus.

1/50 sec. f/1.5, ISO 400


Ultra-wide camera

Between the telephoto and the ultra-wide camera, I’m glad the Galaxy S10E retained the ultra-wide angle camera as part of its dual camera system. It’s a good way to stand out from rivals like the OnePlus 6T and to compete head on against the LG flagships which have been the flagbearer of ultra-wide cameras on phones for years.  In fact, the S10E’s ultra-wide camera does a much better job than the LG V40 ThinQ. There is barrel distortion of objects that are very near to the lens, but it is expected given that this is a 12mm lens.

However, the lens lacks autofocus and has the focus set to infinity, limiting your shooting options. This makes it tricky to use the camera first, but after a few tries, it’s not hard to figure out the sweet spot. Samsung’s Shot Suggestion feature does come in handy if, like me, you’re not a professional photographer. The feature intelligently analyses the scene you’re shooting and suggests you how to frame it. In most cases, the photos came out straight and well-composed when using the feature.

Using the wide-angle lens to shoot low-light photos isn’t a good idea though. The f/2.2 aperture is too small to take in more light and wide-angle lenses in phones, generally  tend to underexpose frames in low-light.

Take a look at a few samples from the ultra-wide camera —

 

 

1/500 sec. f/2.2, ISO 50

1/320 sec. f/2.4, ISO 50

1/800 sec. f/2.2, ISO 50

Portrait mode

The Galaxy S10E may not have a telephoto lens to use a depth sensor, but it still manages to take fine portrait photos with the background blurred. The algorithms are well-optimised to detect the edges of the subject, however, the blurring is not as natural as what the iPhone XS produces. You also have to stand at a particular distance to get the feature working.

Having said that, Samsung introduced some new bokeh effects that does make taking portraits fun. There’s a swirl effect and a zoom effect. Both of these features work quite well. There’s also a third option of colour pop which isn’t quite accurate and often colours elements other than the subject.

You can also adjust the type and amount of bokeh in your photo after shooting it. Here are some samples —

Live Focus mode

Portrait Mode effect

Portrait Mode effect

Colour Pop mode

Selfies

1/15 sec. f/1.9, ISO 2000

The Galaxy S10E doesn’t have two cameras on the front like the S10+, but the single camera drilled into the display works well enough to not miss the second camera. You will not get a wider field of view, but the selfies are the same as the S10E’s bigger siblings. Outside under the sun, the 10MP selfie camera works quite to offer good dynamic range and sharpness. However, indoors and in low-light, the details come out smudged like a water-colour painting.

 


Battery

The Galaxy S10E would have been almost flawless had it not been for its poor battery life. It’s understandable Samsung didn’t have much space to work with in the phone, but a 3100mAh is too little for a flagship device. The iPhone XR with its smaller 2942mAh battery manages to last much, much longer.

Geekbench Battery Test (Full Discharge)

The Galaxy S10E lasted 5 hours 31 minutes in the Geekbench battery test. 15 minutes of PUBG Mobile on the S10E drained the battery by around 10 percent which is quite a lot. Similarly 30 minutes of streaming Stranger Things Season 2 in HDR drained the battery down from 44 percent to 29 percent. Even during my daily usage for the three weeks I used the phone, the battery drained by one percent every three minutes which is alarming. I would be staring at an empty battery almost everyday around 5PM and even earlier if I’m out covering a launch event where the camera, messaging, Twitter and Instagram are all used simultaneously. In fact, we even asked for a replacement unit from Samsung and the replaced unit also reported the same.

The poor battery life of the phone is somewhat compensated by the fast 15W charging. It takes around an hour and 20 minutes to top up the phone to its max capacity. Incidentally, you can also charge the phone wirelessly in the same speed but you will need a 15W compatible Qi wireless charger for that. The phone also supports 9W reverse wireless charging which did charge my Galaxy Buds by 20 percent in around 30 minutes. It’s a gimmick of sorts and we won’t recommend using this feature to charge another smartphone as the phone does tend to get quite hot after some time of reverse charging.

Bottomline

The Samsung Galaxy S10E is proof that phones don’t have to come in a giant footprint to be deemed powerful. Sometimes, the smallest packages pack the largest punch and the Galaxy S10E does just that. It’s performance and the camera quality is more or less similar to the Galaxy S10 and the Galaxy S10+. While you’re unlikely to miss the larger display or the extra cameras, the disappointingly short battery life is sure to rain on the S10E’s parade. Just remember to keep a charger handy all the time. For an otherwise fantastic package, the battery life is a big let down and is the only reason why I’d recommend the Galaxy S10 over the S10E. We will be keeping a close eye on the software updates pushed out by Samsung over the next few months and will report in case the battery life improves.

Samsung Galaxy S10e Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 06 Mar 2019
Variant: 128GB , 256GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5.8" (1080 x 2280)
  • Camera Camera
    12 + 16 | 10 MP
  • Memory Memory
    128GB/6GB
  • Battery Battery
    3100 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Subhrojit Mallick

Eats smartphones for breakfast.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Samsung Galaxy S10e

Samsung Galaxy S10e

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review

Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review

By Swapnil Mathur | Updated Nov 04 2019
Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review
DIGIT RATING
86 /100
  • design

    94

  • performance

    83

  • value for money

    76

  • features

    90

User Rating : 4/5 Out of 1 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Great ergonomics
  • In-camera HDR Video
  • Fast and accurate AF
  • CONS
  • Burst limited to 6.5 fps
  • Heavy for extended use
  • Single SD Card slot

Verdict

The Canon 6D MarkII is a great entry-level full-frame camera for anyone who is either looking to be able to shoot great photos, or wants to step into the world of professional photography. It even offers impressive video features, but in the world of mirrorless cameras, loses some points due to its bulk and weight.

BUY Canon EOS 6D Mark II
Buy now on flipkart Available 161990

Canon EOS 6D Mark II detailed review

Full-frame cameras used to once be a commodity reserved for the serious professional due to the significantly high price tag associated with them. However, as photography continues to become a more wide-spread hobby, passion and potential career choices, cameras have been getting cheaper. The influx of Sony’s mirrorless full-frame cameras has particularly been driving up the competition for legacy brands like Canon, facilitating the need for a “budget-friendly” full-frame DSLR. The Canon 6D was a surprise from Canon a few years ago, significantly lowering the entry-point into the world of Full-Frame DSLRs. A few years ago I had reviewed the 6D and now having returned to Digit after a hiatus of a few years, I ended up reviewing the Cano 6D MarkII. I had plenty beef with the original 6D, so here’s how things have changed over the years.


Build and Ergonomics
Canon’s consistency with product design is quite amazing. With 5 years between the two cameras, the changes in the body’s design are minimal. The body has shed 5 grams of weight (body-only weight) which is further helped by the fact that the new 24-105mm L IS USM II lens is also significantly lighter than its predecessor. In terms of the overall dimensions, they remain mostly unchanged. From its predecessor, the Canon 6D MarkII does seem to have a slightly deeper grip, but this could be more anecdotal than anything else, since it has been over a year since I held the original 6D in my hands. Regardless, the grip and feeling of holding a DSLR is unparalleled and as such, the 6D MarkII feels very well balanced as a camera.

What has changed this time around is that the top part of the body which was constructed out of polycarbonate on the original 6D has now been upgraded to a full magnesium alloy build. Sadly, a traditional jog-stick is still missing (like the one found on the 5D,1D and even the cheaper 7D series of cameras), but this time, the jog dial on the back is multi-directional and can be configured to move the AF points around. Personally, I much prefer the joystick over the jog-dial simply because with the latter, there is some wiggle room for error while that’s not the case with the joy-stick.

Overall, the ergonomics of the 6D MarkII fall well within the norms of a DSLR. What that means is that the camera is easy to grip and hold. The buttons are placed well enough to be easily accessible without having to take your eye off the viewfinder. As convenient as mirrorless cameras may be to carry around, DSLRs still provide the perfect grip for easy and comfortable operation.

Features
The original Canon 6D was the first DSLR at its time to offer built-in GPS and Wi-Fi. Now, these features are more or less standard, so what could Canon do next? Plenty, it would appear. The new Canon 6D MarkII against brings a host of new features with it, the most notable being in-camera HDR video. Unlike the complicated approach to HDR video which requires 10-bit video capture, professional colour profiles and complex editing processes, Canon takes a very consumer-first approach to it. Since the 6D MarkII is capable of shooting 1080p video at 60fps. In HDR mode, the camera shoots two frames near-simultaneously to generate a 1080p video file at 30fps. One frame is captured at the chosen shutter speed and aperture while the second frame is slightly underexposed. The two frames are merged together to make one frame, resulting in HDR video. The photography approach to HDR video is quite ingenious but does come with its own limitations, such as the fact that it is unusable in low light. Secondly, you don’t get any control over the final look of the file. If you’re looking to get into HDR video, it would be better to go with the Panasonic GH5s which can shoot 10-bit video in-camera.

Besides HDR Video, you also get an in-built time-lapse video feature where the camera will do all the work for you. Just select what kind of an output file you’d like, and the camera will shoot and stitch the frames together to output the time-lapse video. Again, a very consumer-centric feature, which is great since this camera is for those who are looking to step up their game.

The other really nice addition to the 6D MarkII’s feature set is the fully articulating 3” touchscreen. Canon has really made a very functional touchscreen, replicating a very smartphone-like experience. You can use it as a touch-shutter or even put that STM motor in your lens and just drag your finger around the screen to have the focus motor follow. It works wonderfully and is going to be extremely useful for videographers.

Autofocus
My biggest beef with the Canon 6D was its archaic autofocusing system. With just 11 AF points with 1 cross-type, the 6D left a whole lot to be desired in terms of focusing. The 6D MarkII brings 45 AF points to the game, all cross-type. Augmenting the focusing points in Canon’s Dual Pixel AF which offers significantly improved focusing performance in comparison to regular AF systems. For this review, the Canon 6D MarkII was paired with the stock kit lens (Canon 24-70 f/4 L USMII), a Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 IS and a Sigma 50mm f/1.4 to see what parts of the performance was from the camera and what bits were attributable to the lens. What is immediately evident is that the camera has come a very long way from its predecessor. The focus was able to lock onto subjects even in low light (dimly lit household) with only a little bit of hunting whereas in good light, the performance was as reliable as you would want from a professional camera. Frankly, the AF system is the biggest upgrade to the 6D MarKII, alone making the camera worthy of your consideration.

Performance
The Canon 6D MarkII houses a 26.2 Megapixel sensor, slightly larger than the 24-megapixel silicon found on the 5D Mark 4. There’s been plenty of talk about how the sensor’s dynamic range is at par with its predecessors and not an improvement, but let’s stop for a second and examine just how much DR we’re really talking about here. For starters, you get a little over two whole stops worth of latitude in post-production. The highlights roll-off isn’t as smooth as that on the 5D Mark4, but that has nothing to fault the dynamic range for.  

The RAW images out of the Canon 6D MarkII are flat, as all RAW files should be. Edit allows for up to 2.3 stops worth of recovery and grading, which is pretty much what you can expect from a full-frame sensor with this kind of resolution. If Canon had used a 24-megapixel sensor instead of 6, maybe the DR could have been slightly better, but there is nothing to complain about at all. Daytime performance is where the camera shines bright (no pun intended). The autofocus (especially with Canon lenses) is fast and accurate, locking on intended subjects 9 out of 10 times (or better) with incredible consistency.

In low light, the sensor can be pushed all the way to ISO 8000 without having to worry about chroma noise (red-blue dots). The appearance of luma noise (salt-pepper dots) is evident, but nothing a little noise reduction can’t fix. Where you will notice a drop in performance, however, will be the AF. In low light, AF accuracy dropped to 6/10 with the stock Canon lens but was more or less reliable. The Sigma 24-70 was also fairly accurate in locking focus, but did hunt a little bit, and was as fast as Canon’s counterpart.

With a reliable AF module and a hefty 26-megapixel sensor, the fastest you can shoot with this camera (with AF Tracking enabled) is roughly 6 frames per second. This is more than adequate if you’re shooting in the studio or even a subject in motion (given you have the right shutter speed) but a sports camera this is not. The AF is not fast enough to track a dog running at full pace, let alone sports and neither does it have the frame-rate. For everything else, the Canon 6D MarkII works.

You can see the full gallery of images from the 6D MarkII here.

If you would like an idea about the ISO performance, here is a test scene shot at various ISOs.

Below are crops of the center portion of the above scene. In case you would like to see high-resolution JPGs of the entire scene, you can go to our Flickr gallery here.

ISO 200 ISO 400 ISO 800 ISO 1600 ISO 3200

 

ISO 6400 ISO 8000 ISO 12800 ISO 16000 ISO 25600

Bottomline
The Canon 6D MarkII is a substantial upgrade from its predecessor that has taken 5 years in the making. However, in the five years, the competition too has been ramping up its portfolio. While Nikon and Canon have always been at each other’s necks, Sony has slowly been creeping up in the mirrorless segment, giving stiff competition to the legacy players. For the price of the Canon 6D MarkII, you can also choose between the Nikon D750, The Sony A7 mk2 and even the new Sony A7 mk3. All four cameras cost more or less the same and come with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Canon 6D MarkII’s strength is its in-built 4K time-lapse feature, the HDR video mode and the fact that you get a camera that produces very versatile images. What does bother about the 6D MarkII is the weight, when you pit it against the much smaller Sony offerings. However, as an entry point full-frame DSLR, the Canon 6D MarkII maintains its strengths and continues to be a solid contender for your money.

Canon EOS 6D Mark II Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 19 Jul 2017
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Resolution Resolution
    NA
  • Shutter Speed Shutter Speed
    NA
  • ISO ISO
    100 meters
  • Optical Zoom Optical Zoom
    NA
logo
Swapnil Mathur

Digit's resident camera nerd, (un)official product photographer and the Reviews Editor

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Canon EOS 6D Mark II

Canon EOS 6D Mark II

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

Sony Xperia XZ Premium Review

Sony Xperia XZ Premium Review

By Prasid Banerjee | Updated May 22 2019
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Review
DIGIT RATING
72 /100
  • design

    85

  • performance

    71

  • value for money

    64

  • features

    59

  • PROS
  • Unique looks
  • Good display
  • Fast
  • CONS
  • Sub-par battery life
  • 4K display and 960fps slo-mo are gimmicks only

Verdict

The Sony Xperia XZ Premium is the best smartphone that Sony has to offer, but it's still behind competing devices. As far as flagships go, you could consider the Xperia XZ Premium, but the Galaxy S8 is faster and has better battery life.

BUY Sony Xperia XZ Premium
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 33500
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 39990

Sony Xperia XZ Premium detailed review

Sony may not have a real hold on the smartphone space anymore, but its phones remain as relevant as ever. The company recently announced that it’ll focus on the premium range from now on. That, combined with the fact that Sony only caters to its own fans, means the company now has a niche sort of market for itself. For that niche market, the Sony Xperia XZ Premium is the best the Japanese mainstay has to offer.


But niche or not, Sony has a place in the market as long as it wants. Not only does the company supply almost all camera modules out there, its flagship phones are still a testament to what the best of Android can be. The Xperia XZ Premium is priced at Rs. 59,990 and carves out a place for itself in a market that’s more crowded than the Mumbai local trains.

Build and Design

You can always trust Sony to stand apart in one way or the other. The Xperia XZ Premium looks nothing like any other smartphone you’ll find. While it does have glass on both sides like so many other smartphones today, the mirror-finish is distinct. True to its name, the Xperia XZ Premium literally feels like it’s wrapped in a mirror.

While it’s a unique design indeed, the mirror finish is slippery and extremely fingerprint intensive. Combined with the phone’s large footprint, the XZ Premium is certainly difficult to use. While the display size is only 5.5-inch, there are large strips of glass above, below and on either side of the display. The phone’s overall footprint is closer to 6-inch or larger smartphones. 

Almost all of Sony’s design choices here are double-edged swords. For instance, the top and bottom of the phone have chamfered metallic strips, which look premium and unique, but they’ll dig into your hands when holding the phone in landscape mode. Similarly, the dedicated camera shutter button lies near the bottom of the right side, and you often end up pressing it inadvertently.

Personally speaking, I do like the Xperia XZ Premium’s design. It’s refreshing, new, unique and there’s not a single bone to pick in terms of build quality, except the obvious fact that glass breaks and scratches easily.

That said, many may call this gaudy, especially in the chrome finish, while fingerprints will be easier to spot on the black variant.

Display

The pixel race on smartphone displays seemed to have reached saturation, until Sony unveiled the first version of this phone last year. The highlight here is that the XZ Premium can render 4K resolution and HDR colour. So, not only is it at par with competing flagship phones, it can actually show you more pixels on occasion.

We’ll get to the 4K and HDR bit a little later, but let’s talk about the display in general at first. The 5.5 inch display is rendered in 1080p for the most part. So, there’s actually little to separate it from the Xperia XZs. Colours are slightly swayed towards the cooler side, but there’s excellent control settings for this, allowing you to tune them to your own preference. I found the Pro settings to my liking, but you can choose others, or use toggles to directly tweak the primary colours.

The display is as bright as it gets and Sony seems to have tweaked Android’s auto-brightness algorithms to good effect. The XZ Premium isn’t as adept at manipulating brightness as an iPhone, but it’s much better at it than most Android devices. It judges ambient light quite well and brightness levels are changed smoothly.

4K and HDR

The display kicks into higher gear only when you deliver 4K and HDR videos. To be absolutely frank, higher resolution is of little significance on a 5.5-inch panel. While the the display is noticeably sharper, you’ll have to take a really close look to ascertain the same. I used an Xperia XZs (1080p) and XZ Premium (4K) side-by-side, playing and pausing the same video in 1080p at precisely the same time to find the difference. With enough effort you’ll see added details like the scales on human hands, but it doesn’t make a very big difference for regular usage. The tangible difference here is that the Xperia XZ Premium is the only smartphone that trigger’s YouTube’s 4K playback option right now.

The really important addition here is HDR colour, which actually makes a much more noticeable difference. The XZ Premium produces better details in shadows, and contrast ratio and colour details is enhanced here. You won’t see this difference unless you’re comparing HDR and non-HDR displays side-by-side, but HDR does allow viable benefits in the long run. Sony’s display is at par with the Samsung Galaxy S8 or LG G6 on this front.

It’s worth noting that the phone tends to heat up a little bit when playing 4K and HDR videos. It’s not abnormal heating by any stretch, but internal temperatures can rise to 44 degrees, which you won’t find during regular video playback. Also, the Xperia XZ Premium drops 5% battery after 15 minutes of 4K HDR playback, which is not ideal.

Performance

The Xperia XZ Premium is our first phone running the Snapdragon 835 chipset from Qualcomm. Clocked at 2.45GHz, the chipset uses eight of Qualcomm’s semi-custom Kryo cores and supports up to 1Gbps downlink speeds. It’s built on the 10nm fabrication process, making it power efficient as well. But, for all intents and purposes, the Snapdragon 835 is an evolutionary update over the 820.

On the Xperia XZ Premium, it drives benchmark scores to as high as Android phones can do today, but regular usage is not noticeably faster. To be clear, the XZ Premium is as fast as any flagship should be, it’s just not noticeably faster. You’ll find subtle differences in the fact that the XZ Premium switches from mobile data to WiFi (and vice-versa) faster than the XZs. Similarly, Bluetooth connections are achieved faster too, but not because of Bluetooth 5.0 support. The Xperia XZ Premium processes such functions faster than phones with the Snapdragon 820, but it’s an incremental improvement only.


AnTuTu Benchmark


Geekbench 4 Single Core


Geekbench 4 Multi Core


GFXBench Car Chase

There are also no noticeable heating issues on the Xperia XZ Premium. In regulated environments, with the room temperature controlled to 24 degrees, the phone rises to about 45 degrees on heavy gaming for over half an hour. That’s normal for smartphones today. A similar result is found when recording 4K videos, more heat is generated with this than on gaming. That’s not abnormal either.

Overall, the Xperia XZ Premium is as fast as any flagship today, and in comparative terms it’s faster than the LG G6, which runs on the Snapdragon 820. You can expect smooth UI transitions and reasonably lower load times. Although we must say that the Samsung Galaxy S8 felt faster in terms of regular user experience.

Camera

Like the XZs, the Xperia XZ Premium also boasts 960fps slow motion recording. You can learn about the technology involved and its impact in the Xperia XZs review.

The camera on this phone is the same as the XZs anyway. The camera here is faster than previous Sony flagships and image quality is excellent in most conditions. It’s not the best you can get in terms of low light performance. The XZs produces good details and accurate colours, while noise is kept under control. Contrast levels are decent as well and dynamic range is pretty high. 

The camera works well as long as you’re not shooting in low light. In such conditions, phones like the LG G6 (review) and Samsung Galaxy S8 (review) are ahead. While the G6 produces clearer details and better contrast in low light, the Samsung Galaxy S8 clicks brighter photos. While Sony has reduced shutter delay and processing times on this phone, both the LG G6 and Galaxy S8 remain faster.

Another tricky element of the Xperia XZ Premium camera is the dedicated shutter button. While camera enthusiasts will indeed appreciate the button, it’s somewhat erratic in practical terms. There seems to be a noticeable delay between when the button is pressed and the photo clicked. Also, half pressing the button should direct the phone to focus, but this doesn’t work well sometimes.

Battery

For the most part, the Xperia XZ Premium is at par with any flagship smartphone out there. But that can’t be said about its battery. While flagship phones do produce only about a work day’s worth of battery life, the Xperia XZ Premium lasted us lower still. On regular usage, you’re looking at about 38% lower battery life than the Galaxy S8 and nearly 45% lower than the LG G6. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium lasts just under 6 hours on the PC Mark Battery test, which is the weakest score for a flagship on our benchmark tests at the moment.


PC Mark Work 2.0 Battery Test (in minutes)

You’ll need to charge this phone twice a day to have it last a full 24 hours. Sony does allow fast charging, so you can get a quick boost of power when you need it. Streaming an hour of HD video on Amazon Prime Video uses about 20% battery, while an hour of gaming is a tad more power consuming. In essence, if you charge this phone to 100% at 9am, you’ll need to charge it once more at around 5pm. If you’re a heavy user, you’ll need another charge in between.

While we’re on the topic, Sony’s Battery Care feature is a nifty addition. The feature learns when you usually leave your device on charge for extended periods. If it detects the same, it trickle charges the phone over this time, so that the battery’s life is extended. It also tells you when your battery is estimated to run out, or if it’s going to run out before the next charge. The predictions aren’t always accurate, but trickle charging to extend life is a good idea by Sony.

Bottomline

To sum up, the Sony Xperia XZ Premium is the best Sony has to offer right now. It keeps up with competing flagships for the most part, with battery life being it’s real downfall. 4K resolution and 960 fps slo-mo video recording are gimmicks that some may like, but it’s tough to see practical implementation for those. The Xperia XZ Premium is a decent flagship smartphone for the Sony fan. It’s just not the smartphone we’d recommend over the Samsung Galaxy S8.

Samsung’s phone feels faster, shoots better photos and lasts longer on each charge. That said, amidst a sea of well matched flagship phones, the Sony Xperia XZ Premium is certainly one that can catch your fancy.

 

Sony Xperia XZ Premium Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 27 Feb 2017
Variant: 64GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5.46" (2160 x 3840)
  • Camera Camera
    19 | 13 MP
  • Memory Memory
    64 GB/4 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3230 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Prasid Banerjee

Trying to explain technology to my parents. Failing miserably.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Sony Xperia XZ Premium

Buy now on amazon 33500

Sony Xperia XZ Premium

Buy now on amazon 33500

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

Sony A9G 55 inch 4K UHD Smart TV Review
Sony A9G 55 inch 4K UHD Smart TV Review

Sony A9G 55 inch 4K UHD Smart TV Review

Sameer Mitha   |  12 Mar 2020
DIGIT RATING
91 /100
  • design

    88

  • performance

    95

  • value for money

    90

  • features

    88

  • PROS
  • Fantastic picture quality for 4K, 1080p, HDR and SDR content
  • Clean and smooth UI
  • Functional and well-built remote control
  • eARC support
  • CONS
  • Sits flush with the tabletop, which may make it inconvenient for some home entertainment setups

Verdict

The Sony A9G is a fantastic premium OLED TV and a worthy consideration for those looking for a premium OLED TV. It has a bright rich display for consuming content and gaming. The UI is fluid, features are plentiful and audio is acceptable for TV viewing. 

BUY Sony A9G 55 inch 4K UHD Smart TV
Buy now on flipkart Available 79499
Buy now on amazon Available 269900

Sony A9G 55 inch 4K UHD Smart TV detailed review

OLED TVs have been around for a few years now and 2019 is the first time we have seen a brand launch an OLED TV under the Rs 1,00,000 price point. Whether that TV is a game-changer for the market is something we will know when we review it. Until then, we have the Sony’s 2019 flagship, the A9G. The OLED TV is a sight to behold and brings with it an interesting feature set. Is it one that deserves your attention, though?

Specs at a glance

Panel Size: 55-inch (available in 65-inch as well)
Panel Type: OLED
Panel Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - 4K
Panel Refresh Rate: 120Hz
HDR 10 support: Yes
Dolby Vision Support: Yes
Weight (with stand): 22.3kgs
HDMI Ports: 4
USB Ports: 3
Bluetooth: Yes
Wi-Fi: Yes
Ethernet: Yes
Built-in storage: 16GB
Price: MRP Rs 2,99,900

Display and picture quality

Let’s dive into the thing that matters the most first - display and picture quality. The Sony A9G has an OLED panel with support for 4K resolution along with HDR 10 and Dolby Vision support. It also has a 'Netflix Mode', which first launched when Sony introduced the Master Series of TVs. Just like the Sony TVs we’ve tested in the past, the TV brings with it Dolby Vision Bright and Dolby Vision Dark for HDR content. Considering the panel on the TV is an OLED panel, one does not need to worry about the viewing angles. OLED panels are quite reflective, so if you use the TV in a brightly lit room, then this is one thing you may want to keep in mind. We will run through all of this in the sections below. 

4K and HDR performance

The A9G has the same X1 Ultimate chip powering it like the 2018 Sony OLED, the A9F. Honestly, it would take a keen eye to notice the difference between the two. So, if you are contemplating which of the two is for you, it will not be based on the performance of the picture processor but the features the TV brings. More on that in a bit. 

Coming to the visuals, firing up our test sequences of Altered Carbon using the built-in Netflix app and the first frame immersed me. In season 1 episode 7 there is a fight sequence that switches between slow motion and fast-paced action in a warehouse littered with dark corners and sunlight coming through the roof. The dynamic range and peak brightness in these situations make the content look immersive while the details are well preserved. If you watch this sequence in a pitch dark room, then the deep blacks, courtesy of the OLED panel are a treat. Needless to say, every detail stands out in each frame vividly. If there is light coming into the room, I suggest using the Dolby Vision bright setting to make the highlights slightly brighter while still retaining details. 

Other HDR content including Daredevil, Love Death + Robots and more exhibited the same amount of detail in every scene they presented. The details in every frame of the content held my attention. The only question in my mind is how well does the LG C9 hold its own against this TV and we will comment on that when we get the C9 in for review. 

FHD performance

We played a lot of FHD content from the TV like Wonder Woman, Young Sheldon, and more and FHD content is presented beautifully as well. The scenes in Young Sheldon look bright, and the facial features of the characters are visible with a lot of details. Even Wonder Woman, with is war-torn gritty environments was a treat. 

Gaming performance

Our trusty Xbox One X was our console of choice and we played the following games. Forza Horizon 4, Doom and Gears of War 4. Here’s the thing, Gears of War 4, which is a 4K HDR game, is a benchmark for the gaming performance of the TV. After playing Gears 5 (read our review here), which is also a 4K HDR game and a benchmark for HDR performance, we were itching to try it on this TV, but sadly, the TV left our labs before we could do so. 

In Doom, which is a game in 4K but SDR, the surface of Mars looked dusty orange as it is supposed to. Sometimes when Doom loads a new area, you can see textures pop in. The pop-in was so evident in some sections that it is a testament to the TVs ability to render sharp details up close. 

Just like the X95G that we reviewed earlier (read our review of the X95G here), the A9G also supports eARC and all the ports are HDCP 2.3 compatible. So, if you are looking to invest in an eARC enabled soundbar or home theatre, then you are good to go with this TV. With eARC, consumers will be able to get DTS-X and Dolby Atmos audio from the TV to compatible audio gear. 

Audio performance

Sony’s Acoustic Surface technology makes an appearance here as well and is one of the better sounding TV speakers that we’ve tested. Dialogue is clear, music is enjoyable but the overall punch is missing, especially during action movies or games. Sure, when you watch regular TV or TV shows, you should be fine with the speakers on the TV. They sound a lot better than what we have seen on TVs around the Rs 1,00,000 to Rs 1,50,000 price point. 

UI

Sony has been helming Android TV OS since the beginning of Smart TVs and the A9G is running on Android TV 8, the exact same as the X95G. The overall experience is butter smooth. There was not one moment, be it when gaming on a console, streaming using the native apps or when logging into the play store that the UI didn't respond. It works very smoothly. One of the best things about the Sony TV is to switch it on and off by simply using your voice. Know that this will only happen when you keep the TV in standby mode. But it is really cool if you don't know where you left the remote control and want to start using the TV. It is a brilliant feature and one that others need to implement. 

There are some subtle changes to the UI, again, exactly the same we saw on the X95G. If you want to change sources, picture or audio settings, you don't need to pull up the right side navigation bar to hamper the viewing experience. For basic setting changes like picture mode, audio, source and more, a small strip comes up at the bottom of the display and it is easy to navigate through. You can add certain settings you'd like to change to this bar at the bottom making it easier for you to change your most frequently used settings. 

Remote control

We get the upgraded remote control with the A9G as well. It comes with a textured back giving it a good grip. The buttons are well spaced and have a nice rubbery click to them. If you grip the remote in the centre, you will have access to most of the functions within the reach of your thumb. Unlike the LG TV UI, Sony’s TV remote still doesn't have a mouse feature and typing is still manually navigating the onscreen keyboard, but you can use the Android TV app on your smartphone to make the typing process easier. Since passwords for apps like Netflix, Prime Videos and more can be saved in your Google log-in, logging into the TV once ensures all your streaming service apps are up and running without the need to log in again and again.

Build and design

Finally, let's talk about the build and design of the TV. The TV is slim with the bulger at the back housing the connectivity options and the motherboard of the TV. The placement of the ports is pretty standard. They are all on the right side of the TV. At the back, we have the antenna port, LAN port, optical audio port, three HDMI ports (one of which is eARC) and one USB port. On the right side, we have one HDMI port, 2 USB ports, headphone port and the Video-In port. The beauty of this TV is the cable management it brings with it. The back has modular panels which are essentially plastic covers which can be pulled out and the cables can be managed through them, out the base stand to ensure you get a clean setup. For those of you that want a clean cable set up with your TV, this is definitely one thing you will love. 

Coming to the bezels, the TV has really slim bezels which do not interfere with the viewing experience. There is a small white LED at the bottom of the TV but you can control its intensity in the TVs UI. It is not a hindrance when watching TV. 

If you decide to put the TV on a tabletop, know that there is no space between the base of the TV and the table to house a console or a soundbar. The TV sits flush when kept on a tabletop. So this is one thing to consider when setting up the TV in your home entertainment centre. 

Bottom Line

The Sony A9G is a flagship OLED TV to consider. There is little one can say in terms of cons for the TV. The only one I can think of is that it sits flush when kept on a tabletop but that is something one only thinks of when aesthetically placing the TV. But here is the question to answer, which Sony 2019 flagship, namely the X95G or the A9G is the one for you? Well, if you watch TV in a well-lit room, then go for the X95G as the VA panel does a slightly better job of reflection handling. But, if you watch TV in a relatively dark room and are looking for a cinematic experience, then the A9G is the way to go.

Sony A9G 55 inch 4K UHD Smart TV Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 30 Jul 2019
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size (inch) Screen Size (inch)
    55
  • Display Type Display Type
    OLED
  • Smart Tv Smart Tv
    Smart TV
  • Screen Resolution Screen Resolution
    3840 x 2160

Related Reviews

TCL 65 inches 4K QLED ANDROID TV (C715) Review

OnePlus U1 55-inch 4K HDR TV Review

Realme 43 inch Full HD LED Smart Android TV (TV 43) Review

Nokia 43-inch Smart TV Review

logo
Sameer Mitha

Sameer Mitha lives for gaming and technology is his muse. When he isn’t busy playing with gadgets or video games he delves into the world of fantasy novels.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Sony A9G 55 inch 4K UHD Smart TV

Sony A9G 55 inch 4K UHD Smart TV

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

HTC Desire 516 Review

HTC Desire 516 Review

By Kunal Khullar | Updated May 22 2019
HTC Desire 516 Review
DIGIT RATING
63 /100
  • design

    64

  • performance

    52

  • value for money

    75

  • features

    63

User Rating : 4/5 Out of 1 Reviews
  • PROS
  • BlinkFeed is a welcome feature
  • Supports high-end games thanks to the Snapdragon chipset
  • CONS
  • Glossy design, leads to fingerprints and smudges
  • Very average looking display
  • Poor camera performance

Verdict

HTC usually impresses in its design and build quality but since this is a budget smartphone, HTC seems to have compromised on its overall construction. At this price, the HTC Desire 516 doesn't give you any reason to spend your money on it and in our opinion there are way better designed smartphones that work better. Even the camera and the display are disappointing and something that we didn't expect from a reliable brand like HTC.

BUY HTC Desire 516
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 4999
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 11900

HTC Desire 516 detailed review

HTC has also taken the affordable smartphone route and has started launching smartphones under the 15k price segment. The Desire 516 takes on the Moto G by offering similar specs at the same price point, but has HTC done enough to make it worth the money? Let’s check it out…


SPECIFICATIONS

BUILD AND DESIGN

We were a bit disappointed with HTC as we are used to seeing good looking devices from the brand. The Desire 516 has an all plastic design and it isn’t what we would call desirable. The glass on top of the display and the glossy back, are fingerprint magnets and make you clean the device every now and then.



The smartphone has a 5-inch display with a 960x540 pixels resolution. Now for a 5-inch device the resolution is quite low, but overall the display looks decent. Colours aren’t completely washed out when viewed from different angles, although under direct sunlight, it gets difficult to read. Below the display there are three capacitive touch Android navigation keys which give a rather weird vibration feedback. Above the display there is the earpiece, the HTC logo and the front camera. Surprisingly we didn’t find any proximity or light sensors above the display.



The right edge houses the power/lock key with a chrome finish and the volume rocker keys are on the left. The top has the microUSB port and the 3.5mm audio jack. The bottom is pretty much empty and only has the microphone.


The back is really glossy and there wasn’t a single moment where the back was free of smudges or fingerprints. The back also has the 5MP camera with an LED flash and the back panel comes off to the reveal the battery, two regular sized SIM card slots and a microSD card slot.

The device has a very standard build and design and frankly speaking we expected a better quality from HTC, but it seems that a lot of cost cutting has been done to make the smartphone affordable.

UI AND PERFORMANCE

HTC has crammed in a mixture of stock Android 4.3 along and a drop of its Sense UI. Don’t be excited as essentially you have a stock Android device with just BlinkFeed and the HTC app drawer menu. This clearly shows that HTC is planning to wipe out its support for any devices running below Sense 5 UI.

The UI isn’t completely smooth and it is slightly sluggish. For that matter we wish HTC had put a stock KitKat ROM on the device. Apps and multitasking gave us no issues, and everything runs perfectly fine on the smartphone. Even games like Dead Trigger 2 and Temple Run 2 can be played on the smartphone with very minimal lag. The handset does however fumble when playing full HD videos if you play them on the default video player. Video playback was choppy, although the issue was resolved when we tried a third party app.

Another issue that we noticed was that the call performance on the smartphone isn’t up to the mark. The speaker for attending calls is very low on volume and the first 2-3 seconds of your call are almost inaudible. Now this could be an issue with the review unit that we got, and we will test out another unit and give an update here.

In the benchmark tests, we found that the Desire 516 offers almost similar looking scores as the Moto G, however like we have said before, daily usage performance matters more. Check out the benchmark results of the HTC Desire 516 over here

Somehow even though the UI is close to stock Android, it doesn’t feel refined. HTC certainly could have done better job with it.

CAMERA

There is a 5MP camera on the Desire 516 backed up with an LED flash. There is also a front 2MP camera for video calls and selfies. The primary camera is quite disappointing as everything seems very slow. The focusing is slow and even the shutter takes a long time to take the picture. Pictures in bright daylight are decent but as soon as you move indoors the quality goes down drastically. 

Even the camera app UI was really poor as it looks like a really old version of a stock camera app where one can’t find which setting is where.

The camera can also shoot 720p videos although they come out best when you’re under the bright sun or in a very well lit room.

 
 

We’ve tested many smartphone cameras and the module on the Desire 516 is surprisingly average.

CONCLUSION

From a brand that makes some great looking smartphones, we didn’t expect the rote design of the HTC Desire 516. Yes one has to compromise on certain features when we talk about budget smartphones, but a glossy plastic body, a substandard camera and an incomplete UI makes the Desire 516 a shaky effort by HTC.

Instead of the Desire 516, you can opt for the Moto G or the newly launched Asus Zenfone 5.

HTC Desire 516 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 06 Jul 2014
Variant: 4GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5" (540 x 960)
  • Camera Camera
    5 | 2 MP
  • Memory Memory
    4 GB/1 GB
  • Battery Battery
    1950 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Kunal Khullar

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

HTC Desire 516

Buy now on amazon 4999

HTC Desire 516

Buy now on amazon 4999

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Worldwide 5G\, Extending Human Eyesight\, Extending Human Senses Market from 2020 to 2026

Sony Xperia M2 Dual Review

Sony Xperia M2 Dual Review

By Prasid Banerjee | Updated May 22 2019
Sony  Xperia M2 Dual Review
DIGIT RATING
67 /100
  • design

    65

  • performance

    74

  • value for money

    55

  • features

    77

User Rating : 4/5 Out of 1 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Battery last one day and more under regular usage.
  • Performs well even when used for resource intensive games.
  • Good build quality and overall good looking smartphone.
  • CONS
  • Camera quality is dissapointing.
  • Cheaper smartphones have better displays.
  • UI is sluggish.

Verdict

The Xperia M2 Dual is an average device from a manufacturer who is otherwise quite consistent. The price tag on the device is way too high for the features of the device. It is hard to recommend this device in the competitive mid-ranged smartphone market.

BUY Sony Xperia M2 Dual
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 9999
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 11000

Sony Xperia M2 Dual detailed review

Japanese smartphone maker Sony has rolled out quite a few quality devices under its Xperia brand. The flagship Xperia Z series has received good reviews from users and experts alike. But not all of the company’s devices are quite as good. Some unfortunately are quite average. Point in fact is the Xperia M2 Dual smartphone, which we recently got in our hands.


Design and Build

Sony has been riding the wave with their much appreciated ‘omnibalance’ design, which continues with the Xperia M2 Dual. The device has a 4.8-inch TFT capacitative display, with glass finishes on both the front and back. In addition, it offers a good grip with the rubberised sides that Sony has used on the smartphone. The device looks good overall, but it is a fingerprint magnet, like many other Sony smartphones.

The M2 Dual has all its buttons placed on the right side, which consists of the camera, power on/off and volume rocker buttons. Also on the right side is the dual-SIM slot. On the top you will find the 3.5-mm jack for headphones, while the micro-SD and charging ports are placed on the left side of the smartphone.

It is an ergonomically built device, which despite its size doesn’t feel block-like. Neither does the Xperia M2 Dual disappoint in terms of its weight. At 148 grams, the device isn’t the heaviest in its range and feels comfortable in your hand and pocket.

Display and UI

This is where the Xperia M2 Dual suffers its first setback. For about Rs 5,000 less, the Moto G smartphone brings you a IPS HD display, which is much better than this one,  albeit smaller in size. The TFT display offers a resolution of 540x960, while the Moto G brings you 720x1280 pixels. That said, the screen isn’t all that bad either and gives good outdoor visibility, while lacking from some viewing angles.

        

(L-R) Home Screen, App Drawer

       

(L-R) Settings Screen, App Drawer Settings

Moving to the UI, Sony has always been minimalistic in terms of the amount of layering it does on Android. But looking at the big changes coming to Android, the company should be bringing in some changes to its UI soon. On the M2 Dual, the UI is often sluggish, even under regular use. The device currently comes with the Android 4.3 Jelly Bean OS, but is expected to receive the update to KitKat soon.

Performance

This is one area where the phone surprised us. The Adreno 305 GPU performs well with games like Dead Trigger 2, running them smoothly and without lags. In addition, the device doesn’t heat up very easily, allowing for extended gaming, even when the processor and GPU are put under a lot of stress.

In the 3D Mark Ice Storm Unlimited benchmark test, the device scored 4,734, while AnTuTu X benchmark returned scores of 17,311. Quadrant Standard and Smartbench both returned scored of 8,507 and 5,348 respectively.

Camera

Perhaps the biggest disappointment with the Xperia M2 Dual is its camera. Sony has been known for its camera technology, providing very good cameras on earlier devices. The Xperia M2 Dual’s 8 MP camera on the other hand, doesn’t live up to the standards that the company itself has set.

There’s a lot of colour noise in pictures clicked, even in proper light conditions. Under low light conditions, the camera is even more disappointing. Considering the fact that many users buy Sony simply for its cameras, this is a major shortcoming. Add to that the fact that the front camera is of VGA quality and you do have to wonder how this device justifies its price tag.

Battery

From bad to good, the Xperia M2 Dual’s strength lies in its battery. It took us one and a half hours of full HD video viewing, half an hour of resource intensive gaming and half an hour of camera usage to get the device down to 50% from a previously fully charged battery. Under regular usage, it lasted us throughout the day quite easily. Don’t be surprised if it gives you more than that either. In this area, it is definitely a job well done by Sony.

Conclusion

The Xperia M2 Dual is a blemish in Sony's otherwise commendable track record with smartphones. The company seems to have given less though to this device and could have at least chosen a lower price for it.

Sony Xperia M2 Dual Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 24 Feb 2014
Variant: 8GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    4.8" (540 x 960)
  • Camera Camera
    8 | N/A MP
  • Memory Memory
    8 GB/1 GB
  • Battery Battery
    2300 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Prasid Banerjee

Trying to explain technology to my parents. Failing miserably.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Sony Xperia M2 Dual

Buy now on amazon 9999

Sony Xperia M2 Dual

Buy now on amazon 9999

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status