Serious criminals to serve two-thirds of jail term in justice shake-up

  • 16 September 2020
Prison van leaves the Old Bailey in London Image copyright Getty Images

Sexual and violent offenders will serve at least two-thirds of jail terms, rather than half, as part of changes to the criminal justice system in England and Wales.

An overhaul of sentencing laws is being formally announced on Wednesday by the Justice Secretary Robert Buckland.

Whole-life orders will also be extended to 18 to 20-year-olds convicted of terrorism causing mass loss of life.

Mr Buckland said it marked the end of "complex and confusing" laws.

He said the changes to sentencing would ensure the most serious violent and sexual offenders "get the prison time they deserve".

More help is being promised for those with mental health and addiction issues.

It comes after the criminal justice system ground to a halt during the coronavirus pandemic.

There are steep backlogs and delays for victims and defendants, who are facing trial dates years ahead.

Among the new interventions proposed in a White Paper published on Wednesday are:

And offenders sentenced to between four and seven years in prison for serious crimes such as rape and manslaughter will no longer be automatically considered for release halfway through their jail terms.

While tougher sentences are among the measures proposed, changes to criminal records to reduce the time offenders have to declare past crimes to employers are also included.

For the past few days, the government has been trailing its White Paper with a series of eye-catching announcements promising tougher sentences for terrorists, violent offenders and motorists who kill.

Many of the plans are likely to command broad public support while measures to relax criminal records disclosure rules have the potential to make a real difference to ex-offenders struggling to find work.

But the timing of the proposals is somewhat odd, as the government grapples with the biggest crisis the criminal justice system has faced in decades.

Problems caused by the coronavirus have meant that a huge backlog of trials across England and Wales has got even bigger.

The sentencing changes, if they go ahead, won't help the tens of thousands of victims, witnesses and defendants caught up in the backlog who now face the prospect of waiting up to two years for their day in court.

A focus on supporting ex-offenders will see custodial sentences become "spent" after 12 months without reoffending, with convictions of up to four years no longer disclosed after a further four crime-free years.

Sentences of more than four years will not automatically be disclosed to employers after a further seven-year period of rehabilitation is completed.

Backlog

The announcement of reforms to sentencing comes after lawyers warned hundreds of thousands of people may have to wait until 2022 for justice, due to delays in the Crown Courts.

Since lockdown began in March, the backlog of Crown Court cases has risen by 6,000 to 43,000.

The Ministry of Justice has pledged an extra 1,600 court staff and £80m towards a range of measures, including more Nightingale courts.

And Mr Buckland has told the BBC he would "use every tool in the book" to clear the case backlog.

Meanwhile detection rates for crimes remain low, having fallen from one-in-seven crime reports leading to a charge in 2015 to around one-in-14 last year.

Related Topics

Share this story About sharing

More on this story

Serious criminals to serve two-thirds of jail term in justice shake-up

Micromax Unite 2 A106 Review

Micromax Unite 2 A106 Review

By Kunal Khullar | Updated May 22 2019
Micromax Unite 2 A106 Review
DIGIT RATING
70 /100
  • design

    68

  • performance

    67

  • value for money

    69

  • features

    74

User Rating : 3.5/5 Out of 4 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Good build and design
  • Latest Android 4.4.2 update
  • 20 regional language support
  • CONS
  • Screen is dissapointing
  • UI needs to be improved

Verdict

Head to head, the Unite 2 is a better option than the Moto E, but there are certain issues which make you think twice about this smarpthone. The build and design quality is quite good and even the performance capability is worthy of the price. For the price, the Unite 2 is a recommended smartphone if you dont want to invest in something like the Moto E.

BUY Micromax Unite 2 A106
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 4990
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 7106

Micromax Unite 2 A106 detailed review

Micromax announced the Unite 2 just a few days after the launch of Motorola’s most affordable handset, the Moto E. The Unite 2 has been launched to give the Moto E a tough competition and if we compare the two, the winner is quite obvious. But how well does the Unite 2 perform in the real world? Check out the review…


SPECIFICATIONS

BUILD AND DESIGN

The Unite 2 has a surprisingly smart looking design with a rubberized plastic back and a full glass finish on the front. Under the protective glass, we have a 4.7-inch display with an 800x480 pixel resolution below which the three Android navigation touch keys sit. Above the display, we have the usual bunch of sensors, a notification LED, the earpiece and the front-facing 2MP camera. The volume and power/lock keys are on the right edge while the microUSB port and headphone jack is on the top.


The display is an IPS panel, but the protective glass over the display gathers a lot of fingerprints and smudges which leaves you cleaning the display after every hour or so.  Viewing angles are pretty average, with slight wash in colors when viewed from the sides. A 720p resolution would have been perfect, or maybe we are just being over-ambitious.


The back houses the 5MP camera with and LED flash, a shiny Micromax logo and the loudspeaker. The back panel is removable which reveals the battery, two SIM card slots (one regular one micro) and a microSD card slot.


The size of the device fits perfectly well in the hand although it feels slightly heavy. The rubberized back gives a nice grip and one hand operations are easy.. If we compare the quality of design with the Moto E, the Unite 2 is not shabby at all. Micromax has done well in the overall design and quality of the smartphone.

OS AND PERFORMANCE

The Unite 2 runs on Android 4.4.2 KitKat and has a stock UI with some customized colorful icons. The handset comes preloaded with apps like Kingsoft Office, few games, Micromax’s very own games and apps store, and the MAD app which allows you to earn recharge credit by just watching adverts. The handset also supports 20 regional languages which makes it quite useful for the ones who like chatting in their region specific language. It also comes loaded with all the Google based apps and of course Google Now.



The UI is light, thus everything seems quite smooth and scrolling through the menus and even multitasking was lag-free. Although we weren’t fully satisfied with the UI as we think it needs to be a bit more refined.

We carried out our standard benchmark tests which include installing and running the tests like 3DMark, Antutu X, Smartbench 2012 and Quadrant Standard. Here is a comparison of the benchmark results of the Micromax Unite 2.

  Moto E Nokia X Xolo Q1100 Micromax Unite 2
Quadrant Standard 5108 2962 9583 8738
Antutu 12158 7007 19680 17769
Smartbench 2012 (Productivity) 3458 1948 6077 4353
3D Mark Ice Storm 3960 Crashed 5631 3261

In the battery test, we found that the MediaTek processor, as usual, requires a lot of power. We ran a full HD video for one hour after charging the battery to 100%. There was a loss of 22% which translates to about 4.5 hours of battery backup when playing the video continuously. This means that the battery backup isn’t all that good.

CAMERA

The 5MP camera isn’t the best that we have tested, but it doesn’t perform all that bad. The auto-focus is fairly fast and accurate. In well-lit conditions the pictures come out well and colours are vivid. As we move indoors the color saturation dips although pictures still have a good amount of detail. The addition of a flash is also a plus point as it helps in low light conditions. When shooting in low-light without flash, pictures produced are soft and lack a lot details.

 
 

In the video department, the camera can shoot upto 1080p videos which are fairly decent. Colours aren’t all that punchy although focusing is good and tapping on the screen quickly shifts your focus. Audio recording in videos is just average and audio is not very crisp.

Overall, the camera is a decent shooter and comparatively better than the Moto E.

CONCLUSION

For the price it is offered, the Unite 2 is a noble offering from Micromax. We were quite surprised with the design as it felt much more refined than previous Micromax smartphones. Performance levels on the smartphone are better than most in the same price bracket, although the battery backup isn’t very satisfying.

We can’t say the Unite 2 is better than the Moto E, but we can surely tell you that Micromax hasn’t been a slouch when designing this smartphone.

Micromax Unite 2 A106 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 19 Jun 2014
Variant: 4GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    4.7" (480 x 800)
  • Camera Camera
    5 | 2 MP
  • Memory Memory
    4GB & 8GB/1 GB
  • Battery Battery
    2000 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Kunal Khullar

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Micromax Unite 2 A106

Buy now on amazon 4990

Micromax Unite 2 A106

Buy now on amazon 4990

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Serious criminals to serve two-thirds of jail term in justice shake-up

Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC Review
Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC Review

Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC Review

Dhriti Datta   |  10 Feb 2020
DIGIT RATING
74 /100
  • design

    80

  • performance

    81

  • value for money

    62

  • features

    72

  • PROS
  • Stellar sound quality
  • Great microphone
  • Comfortable fit for most heads
  • CONS
  • ANC performance is disappointing
  • Exorbitantly priced
  • Gimmicky LGS (light guidance system)

Verdict

The Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC wireless headphones feature an aesthetically-appealing design and sport a comfortable fit for most heads. The sound quality, as expected of the company, is stellar, with boosted lows and mids and detailed highs. However, the soundstage is quite restrictive and ANC performance is severely lacklustre in comparison to the Bose NC 700 and Sony WH-1000XM3. Additionally, the forward and rewind touch controls did not work for us despite repeated attempts. However, if stellar sound quality and decent battery life are what you’re after, the Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC can be a great purchase. However, if these cans were priced 10K lower, we would have a much easier time recommending these to all the audiophiles as well as casual listeners out there.

BUY Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC
Buy now on amazon Available 29990

Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC detailed review

The Beyerdynamic (stylised as ‘beyerdynamic’) Lagoon ANC headphones are the company’s offering in the premium wireless headphones segment. Priced exorbitantly at Rs 29,990, the cans go up against acclaimed headphones, from other established audio brands, such as the Bose NC 700, Sony WH-1000XM3, and Jabra Elite 85H. This means it comes equipped with most of the bells and whistles that the headphones we mentioned above have, including touch controls, Active Noise Cancellation (ANC), extra codec support and more. We put these cans to test and let’s see what the results are.

Build and design

The Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC wireless headphones have two separate models - the Traveller and the Explorer. However, the only difference between the two ‘models’ is the colour. So, they’re essentially two different colour variants with different names. The beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC Traveller is black in colour while the Explorer is brown and grey. We received the Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC Explorer - the brown and grey variant - for the review.

Upon unboxing the packaging, you’ll find a swanky looking hard case with the Beyerdynamic logo stamped right in the middle. The case has a shape that resembles a teardrop and looks quite unique. You don’t see too many wireless headphones deviating from the standard circular/oval-shaped hard case, and it’s nice to see Beyerdynamic taking some liberties to this end. When you unzip the seemingly robust case, a soft foam material is used for the interiors to keep the contents secure.

Within the case, you’ll find the headphones themselves, a USB Type-C charging cable and a 3.5mm audio connector for passive usage. Both cables are made up of the standard rubber material. Sitting snugly inside the case is the Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC Explorer.

These circumaural headphones certainly ooze a premium look even though they are predominantly made out of plastic. The memory foam on the headband and earcups are brown while the rest of the headphones sport a matte grey finish. The plush memory foam present on the headband is softer than on the earcups. Additionally, on the earcups, the memory foam isn’t completely symmetrical and features a slight bulge on the lower half to better encompass ears. The foam on the earcups is quite firm but has adequate give allowing them to take the shape of your ears. We really enjoyed the attention to detail from Beyerdynamic in this department.

The memory foam on the headband, while softer than on the earcups, still ensures that no hotspot is created on the top of your head over extended periods of usage. The headphones can also be extended a fair bit and have steel reinforcements within. However, at their most compact, the Lagoon ANC might be a bit too large for smaller heads, which leads to insufficient isolation. 

The earcups can be rotated 90 degrees which ensures that they lay flat on your chest when not in use and simply kept around your neck. The earcups can also be folded upwards to aid portability. Also, they sit in a folded state within the provided case which is quite compact. The earcups even move a fair bit to adjust to the angle of your head and your ears. So, unless you have an inordinately tiny head, these headphones should fit you just about perfectly and feel extremely snug and comfortable over hours of usage.

The headphones, while sturdy, are also quite flexible. They can be tugged apart a fair bit and you won’t hear any loud, concerning creaks and squeaks. However, we did hear faint ones which is not the case with other premium headphones such as the Bose NC 700 and Sony WH-1000XM3.

On the right earcup, you have all your physical buttons, touch controls and ports. Firstly, there are two toggleable switches - one for ANC and the other for power. The power switch can be flicked from Power Off position to On/Bluetooth Pairing position. The ANC switch has three modes - Off, ANC level 1 and ANC level 2. Level 1 basically mutes external noises slightly while level 2 is the full-blown ‘shut-the-world-out’ mode. Then, there's the power on/off toggleable switch which also puts the headphones into pairing mode. You also have the USB Type-C port and 3.5mm audio jack here, as well as the touch controls on the surface of the right earcup.

Overall, we really enjoyed the design of the Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC wireless headphones. They feel sturdy, look super premium, and fit comfortably for most heads.

Features

The headlining feature of the Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC headphones is obviously the ANC. As aforementioned, you have two different ANC modes and you can toggle between them as per your liking. However, we would have preferred a more granular control over ANC like with the Bose NC 700 which allows you to control the ANC level by the 10s. In these, however, you can only have them off, at 50 per cent or max. 

Another eye-catching feature is LGS or light guide system. Basically, the inner part of the earcups glows a different colour to deliver visual prompts such as Power On, Pairing mode, etc much like voice prompts on most wireless headphones. However, even though Beyerdynamic has implemented this seemingly novel prompting method, voice prompts are still very much present. 


Source: https://global.beyerdynamic.com/

A few LGS prompts include - battery level prompts (pulsing red for low battery, continuous green colour for full battery and more), pairing prompt where the left and right earcups alternately flash blue, and continuous orange colour for active Bluetooth connection. The LGS also switches to standby mode when the cans are not in use for more than 10 seconds. This is done via built-in motion sensors which get triggered when you’re nearby and go off when not in use.

The cans also feature a hybrid control system which comprises of some physical controls (which we explained above) as well as touch controls. The touch controls lie on the right earcup and are intuitive.  However, the sensitivity seems to be too high since plenty of false touches were registered in the duration of our testing. 

The touch controls worked seamlessly for the most part. They are quite standard - double tap to pause/play, swipe up and down to increase and decrease volume respectively, swipe right for next track and left for previous and swipe and hold right/left to fast forward/rewind. To awaken your default voice assistant, you simply have to press the centre of the touchpad for 2 seconds. Similarly, you can also accept calls by double tapping, reject by pressing and holding for 2 seconds and control call volume by swiping up or down. 

The controls, as we iterated before, are quite intuitive, so they’re easy to learn and most of them worked well. However, we absolutely couldn’t get the ‘Fast Forward’ and ‘Rewind’ controls to work no matter how many times we tried. Additionally, the motion sensors within the headphones are utilised to enable smart pausing. The headphones pause music playback when they are removed and tilted downwards. This worked quite flawlessly in our experience. 


Source: https://global.beyerdynamic.com/

Lastly, the headphones can be tuned on the accompanying app to your specific hearing ability. This feature is called Mosayc. While it didn’t necessarily tweak our music-listening experience too much, this can be particularly useful for those with hearing disabilities. Unfortunately, the app doesn’t include a customisable EQ to fine-tune your listening experience. This is something we sorely missed even on the Bose NC 700 app and we cannot understand why these companies fail to include this small, but significant, quality of life feature.

Additional features include extra codec support such as Qualcomm aptX LL (Low Latency), aptX, and AAC, speech intelligibility using Qualcomm cVc, up to 45 hours of battery life (without ANC) and wired (passive) usage. However, it uses Bluetooth version 4.2 instead of the industry standard 5.0, which is, frankly, absurd at this price point and it also does not come with an IP rating. Additionally, the LGS feature feels largely gimmicky since the chances that users are going to pull off the headphones and take a look at the ‘lights’ are abysmally low, especially since voice prompts are available. You can always turn the voice prompts off on the app, but why would you do that? They’re so much more convenient. Nevertheless, LGS does make it stand out and look flashy though.

Performance

Beyerdynamic is known for its audiophile-grade headphones with stellar sound profiles. The Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC is no exception. The only thing lacking in this regard is the relatively narrow soundstage, especially when compared to the likes of the Jabra Elite 85H and the Sony WH-1000XM3. It feels quite restrictive and tracks such as Hotel California by The Eagles sound compressed instead of extended. Nevertheless, the imaging is almost perfect, so the relatively narrow soundstage at least places all the instruments accurately.

The headphones deliver solid low-frequency response which doesn’t distort the slightest bit even at top volume levels. The bass has a strong thump to it but doesn’t sound jarringly boosted. With ANC on, however, the bass gets a bit more body but nothing too unmanageable. The midrange has a certain emphasis on it as well which boosts the quality of vocals, guitars and their harmonic resonances. 

The highs are quite extended, however, the roll-off point is quite accurate and seamless. There’s a dip in the high frequencies which dim out those frequencies that sound jarring to the human ear, much like Sennheiser products. 

In songs such as Another One Bites the Dust by Queen, the mid and low frequencies complement each other fantastically. So, while the song does feature strong bass beats, the quality and clarity of Mercury’s vocals are not compromised. The bass is slightly more exaggerated in comparison to headphones from Sennheiser and Bose, however, the equally boosted mids ensure that they don’t sound boomy, but balanced.

Passive isolation is certainly one of the weak elements of the Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC headphones, however, what’s even weaker is the ANC performance. The ANC performance isn’t bad by any means and performs relatively well in dulling out background sounds, however, priced at Rs 29,990, it competes with ANC royalty such as the Sony WH-1000XM3 (which costs lesser) and the Bose NC 700. These headphones do well at dimming out low-frequency rumbles that are constant, however, they mess up majorly on high frequencies. Even the typing of our mechanical keyboard is heard as clear as day on ANC Level 2, which is disappointing. Had these headphones been priced around 18-22K, we wouldn’t be complaining this much, but at nearly 30K perfection is rightfully expected.

Battery life, on the other hand, is quite adequate. The company claims a massive 45 hours without ANC turned on and 24.5 hours with ANC on. Of course, this number will vary from user to user depending on the ANC mode and the volume level. We had the ANC on for 80 per cent of the time at level 2 with the volume at around 60 per cent. This netted us a battery life of about 26 hours, which is quite respectable in this category.

Bottomline

The Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC wireless headphones feature an aesthetically-appealing design and sport a comfortable fit for most heads. The sound quality, as expected of the company, is stellar, with boosted lows and mids and detailed highs. However, the soundstage is quite restrictive and ANC performance is severely lacklustre in comparison to the Bose NC 700 and Sony WH-1000XM3. Additionally, the forward and rewind touch controls did not work for us despite repeated attempts. However, if stellar sound quality and decent battery life are what you’re after, the Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC can be a great purchase. However, if these cans were priced 10K lower, we would have a much easier time recommending these to all the audiophiles as well as casual listeners out there.

 

 

 

Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 01 Aug 2019
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Playback Time Playback Time
    NA
  • Frequency Range Frequency Range
    NA
  • Channels Channels
    NA
  • Dimensions Dimensions
    NA

Related Reviews

Jabra Elite 45H Review

Sony WI-SP510 Review

Sennheiser CX 150BT Wireless Review

JBL Tune 125TWS Review

PlayGo T44 Review

logo
Dhriti Datta

Perpetually sporting a death stare, this one can be seen tinkering around with her smartphone which she holds more dear than life itself and stuffing her face with copious amounts of bacon.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC

Beyerdynamic Lagoon ANC

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Serious criminals to serve two-thirds of jail term in justice shake-up

Dyson Pure Hot+Cool Review
Dyson Pure Hot+Cool Review

Dyson Pure Hot+Cool Review

Shubham Sharma   |  09 Aug 2019
DIGIT RATING
68 /100
  • design

    69

  • performance

    54

  • value for money

    62

  • features

    77

  • PROS
  • Good design and air purification capabilities
  • Heated air projection
  • IoT Compatible
  • CONS
  • Requires a power plug point
  • Sides warm up during heated air purification mode

Verdict

Overall, the Dyson Pure Hot+Cool is a good air purifier that performed well in our extended tests. It was able to lower harmful PM2.5 and PM10 particulates under the permissible limit. Jam-packed with great features like heated air projection, IoT connectivity, oscillation, scheduling and more, it makes for a really convenient device. While the set price of Rs 54,900 might be too steep, it makes sense for those consumers who want to spend the amount to get the air purifier that not only looks good but also works well. 

BUY Dyson Pure Hot+Cool
Buy now on flipkart Available 55900
Buy now on amazon Available 55900

Dyson Pure Hot+Cool detailed review

The Dyson Pure Hot+Cool air purifier was launched back in February, in India. Priced at Rs 54,900, the air purifier not only builds on the features and capabilities of its predecessors but it also has some new tricks up its sleeve. As the name suggests, the Dyson Hot+Cool air purifier is not only capable of purifying air, but it can also circulate warm/hot air inside a room, thanks to a heating element that it comes equipped with. However, will new features enhance the device’s functionality or will it impede its purification capabilities? 

Performance

When measuring the reduction in air pollution, performance is what matters most. While we do state that features like IoT connectivity, sensors and a digital display add value to a device, its first and foremost function is to purify air. We have previously seen Dyson air purifiers perform well in moderate pollution levels when the PM2.5 level ranged between 150-250 µg/m3 and for the Dyson Pure Hot+Cool air purifier, we tested it for a longer period of time to see if its air filtering efficiency holds up over time. 

We ran the air purifier in our three test rooms for 45 minutes and noted PM2.5 and PM10 levels before, after and randomly in-between. Do note that the particulate levels we measured are represented in µm/m3 and the lower these readings, the better the air quality could be. Before commencing the test in room 1, PM2.5, PM10, and the overall AQI (Air Quality Index) readings were 174, 198 and 224 respectively. After running the air purifier for 45 minutes, we measured the readings to find that the Dyson Pure Hot+Cool managed to bring the PM2.5 levels down to 52, PM10 to 48 and the overall AQI to 141. In the limited time tests we performed, the air purifier did a commendable job of reducing particulate levels in room 1. 

Coming to the second room, we recorded PM2.5 levels at 184, PM10 at 211 and AQI was at 234. It should be noted that these levels are still well above the permissible limit in India, which are set at 60 µg/m3 for PM2.5 and 100 µg/m3 for PM10 particulates. After 45 minutes of testing, the Dyson Pure Hot+Cool was able to reduce the PM2.5 levels to 45, PM10 to 53 and the overall AQI to 124. In this case too, the air purifier successfully brought down the particulate levels under permissible limits. 

As mentioned earlier, room number 3 is one of our conference rooms that is well maintained. The PM2.5 and PM10 levels were already under the limit at 58 and 44 respectively and the AQI was recorded at 151, which falls in the moderately polluted range. After 45 minutes of runtime, the PM2.5, PM10 and AQI levels were recorded at 37, 30 and 104 respectively. Lowering already low levels of pollutants can be difficult for air purifiers but the Dyson Pure Hot+Cool performed well in this case too.

Overall, after testing the Dyson Pure Hot+Cool air purifier in moderate air pollution levels, we found that its air circulation and purification capabilities are on point. In addition, our extended duration of our testing spanned over two months and in this time, we didn’t record any drop in the air purifier’s purification capabilities. However, it is recommended to dust the lower module of the device that houses the filters once in a couple of weeks since it captures most of the dust and bigger particles. 

Build and design

We have already applauded Dyson for coming up with a really good air purifier design. The Dyson Pure Hot+Cool air purifier also features a tower air purifier design, similar to its other siblings like the Dyson Pure Cool air purifier. Features like propelled air projection and good air circulation are enabled by the device’s unique design, which are usually missing on most other air purifiers. The glossy ABS plastic it is constructed from is not only sturdy but it also imparts a sleek and stylish look to it. The Dyson Pure Hot+Cool air purifier takes up minimum space and it definitely stands out in a home instead of simply blending in with the background. 

The Dyson Pure Hot+Cool air purifier sucks air in from the circular module at the bottom, which houses the air filters, and expels it from the upper tower. However, since the bladeless top of the purifier projects air via thin slits, the air is pushed out with considerable force and this enables the device to double up as a fan. It should be noted though that the air thrown out is not cooled, but it can be warm in case you are using the heating feature. 

While the build and design of the new Dyson Pure Hot+Cool air purifier are almost similar to Dyson’s previous tower styled air purifiers, the company has added one additional design feature this time. The new air purifier can tilt forward and backward so that one can adjust the angle at which it is blowing air. This comes in handy not only when the device is kept on the floor but if it is elevated on a table. The air purifier can also oscillate 350 degrees and comes with an alternate, wider aperture on the back. Purified air is directed from this secondary aperture while operating the purifier in “Diffused mode,” so that one doesn’t feel too cold in winter while the air purifier is operating. 

Filters and sensors

The Dyson Pure Hot+Cool comes equipped with a circular H-13 HEPA filter, along with an activated carbon filter. Made using nine meters of pleated borosilicate fibers, the HEPA filter is said to capture pollutants as small as 0.1 microns. The additional filter with activated carbon is aimed at eliminating harmful gases like benzene, NO2, formaldehyde, amongst others. The carbon crystals used in the carbon filter are treated with oxygen to make them more porous, which helps in better absorption of gases and removal of odour.

The filters are placed inside a circular housing on the Dyson Pure Hot+Cool air purifier’s bottom panel. While both the HEPA and the circular carbon filters are circular, they are disjointed, which means there’s a higher possibility of impure air leaking through. However, Dyson claims to have a completely sealed system in place that prevents this from happening. The filters are touted to last for about six to eight months, depending on the air pollution in the area where you reside and how long you run the air purifier. Replacing the filters is easy and doesn’t really require any expertise and for each filter, replacements can set you back by Rs 2,490. 

For sensors, the Dyson Pure Hot+Cool is equipped with three sensors, which not only display air quality metrics but also enable the device to work automatically. There’s a humidity and temperature sensor, along with a laser-based particulate sensor keeps track of the PM2.5 and PM10 particles in the air. A VOC sensor detects harmful gases in the air. 

The sensors produce data that is displayed on the air purifier’s LCD screen and can also be accessed via the Dyson app. These sensors also kick in when the device is switched to auto mode. Going by the data generated by the sensors, the air purifier adjusts its speed automatically. In addition, the temperature sensor is used to raise a room’s temperature to the desired level, which can be set by the user. 

Air heating  

Dyson has added a great new feature to its lineup with the Pure Hot+Cool air purifier. The device comes equipped with ceramic heating plates, which heats the purified air before it is pushed out. The new option is a welcome addition as it works as intended and the device is surprisingly quick in spewing hot air. When one sets their desired temperature, the air purifier starts pushing out hot air till the target temperature is reached and stops automatically too. The air heating feature is a really great addition, especially during the winter, as the air purifier then also doubles up as a heater. 

However, one must take care to ensure that kids are nowhere near the device when it is being used to heat up the air in a room. We used a heat gun to find that the sides of the air purifier can get up to 76 degrees Celcius after using the heating mode for 10 minutes. Additionally, we recorded a peak temperature of 104 degrees for the hot plates that are situated near the air purifier’s front aperture from where the air is pushed out. This is something one needs to be wary of, in case there are kids at home. 

Controls and app connectivity 

The Dyson Pure Hot+Cool comes with an IR remote that enables controlling the air purifier’s functions. The compact, cleanly designed remote is well-built and features tactile buttons with good feedback. There are standard buttons for switching the device on or off and increasing or decreasing its speed. While there are also buttons to increase and decrease the temperature, this doesn’t mean that the expelled air is being heated to the set level. It is more like setting a thermostat where the device will keep spewing out hot air till the ambient temperature of the room reaches the level set by the user. The remote can also be attached magnetically to the top of the air purifier’s loop and doesn’t slip off. 

The remote can also enable oscillation, night mode and a diffused air purification feature. In night mode, the air purifier’s speed is slowed down and the LCD screen on the front is also dimmed. There’s also an auto mode, which works as we described in the filters and sensors section. The information button is a great way to go through the data being captured by the air purifier’s sensors like the current AQI or AQI levels logged over the last 24 hours. In addition, the purifier’s display shows PM2.5, PM10, VOC, and NO2 levels. However, exact values are shown only for PM 2.5 and PM 10 particles.

In this world of connected living, there’s an app for everything and it makes sense that the Dyson Pure Hot+Cool air purifier can be controlled via an app. IoT connectivity on an air purifier makes a lot of sense as one can switch the device on before reaching their home and switch it off remotely, in case it is required. It is quite easy to pair up the Dyson air purifier with the Dyson Link app and once done, one can not only control the air purifier from their phone but also access a wide range of stats. 

The Dyson Pure Hot+Cool connects to the local WiFi and the app features all the option, which you would find on the device’s remote control. Alongside switching the air purifier on and off, one can set the speed, oscillation angles, temperature, enable sleep mode, auto mode or diffused mode. The app also enables an additional scheduling feature so that one can set when the device is switched on and off. The air purifier’s filter life is shown in percentage and it can be checked in-app. As mentioned earlier, one can access a wide range of sensor data via the app like PM2.5, PM10, temperature, humidity, along with VOC and NO2 pollutants. 

Bottomline 

The Dyson Pure Hot+Cool offers some additional features and relatively better air purification over the company’s previous air purifiers. The device comes with great IoT capabilities, which enables a user to operate and check on it from anywhere in the world. In addition, this time, there’s a heating feature that is really handy and a much-welcomed addition. At Rs 54,900, the price seems too high for the features it offers. However, the company says that it is targeting a niche market and this certainly seems to be the case. For those who want to show off a futuristic-looking piece of engineering in their home that is also a good air purifier, the Dyson Pure Hot+Cool is a no brainer. 

However, India being a price-sensitive market, it would be unfair to say that there are no alternatives available for it. For those who want even better air purification around the Rs 30,000 range, one can check out the Blueair Classic 280i (review). The Blueair air purifier performs well, is IoT enabled, has relatively cheaper filters and, as we found out in our review, is really silent. Then, there is the last year’s Digit Zero1 award winner in the air purifier category, the Sharp FP-J60M (review). While not IoT enabled, the air purifier offers really powerful air purification and it aced our tests in the sub Rs 35,000 price range.

Dyson Pure Hot+Cool Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 09 Aug 2019
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Power Consumption (W) Power Consumption (W)
    40W
  • Coverage Area(sq.ft.) Coverage Area(sq.ft.)
    600 sq.ft
  • Noise Level (dB) Noise Level (dB)
    NA
  • Air Flow Rate (cubic m/h) Air Flow Rate (cubic m/h)
    NA
logo
Shubham Sharma

Interested in tech, gaming, cyber-security, anime, and more

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Dyson Pure Hot+Cool

Dyson Pure Hot+Cool

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Serious criminals to serve two-thirds of jail term in justice shake-up

Oppo F1s Review

Oppo F1s Review

By Hardik Singh | Updated May 22 2019
Oppo F1s Review
DIGIT RATING
65 /100
  • design

    82

  • performance

    58

  • value for money

    47

  • features

    74

User Rating : 4/5 Out of 6 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Well built
  • Good display
  • Respectable battery life
  • Best selfie camera under 20K
  • CONS
  • Higher price
  • Rear camera is not the best

Verdict

The Oppo F1s is not the best phone you can buy under 20K, but it is definitely one of the best selfie focused smartphones in that price range. The front camera takes great snaps, but if you want a complete smartphone, the Redmi Note 3 and LeEco Le 2 are better options.

BUY Oppo F1s
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 12990
Buy now on amazon Out of Stock 17840

Oppo F1s detailed review

Did duckface selfies come first, or did selfie-centric smartphones? It doesn’t matter really, does it? The truth is, we as a nation, and the world over, have taken to selfies and while it may be scientifically categorised as a mental disorder, it seems we’re all in for the long haul. The market for selfie-centric smartphones has grown over time, and there’s a lot to choose from. One company that has been at the forefront of these changes, is Oppo, with its selfie-expert line. It is this line that the Oppo F1s is a part of, and it has a whopping 16MP front camera. What we try to determine today, is whether a 16MP camera is enough to buy this smartphone.


Build and Design: Inspired
Apple’s iPhone does influence the Oppo F1s’ design, but there are easy to spot differences. The F1s’ curved edges feel good, although it is flat on the sides. While it is a well built smartphone, the quality of material used isn’t as premium as the bigger, Oppo F1s Plus. The physical keys offer good tactile feedback, and while the phone is somewhat slippery, is is sturdily built. It is also not ergonomic.

Display and UI: Bright and beautiful
The Oppo F1s packs in a 5.5-inch display, with true to life colours and good viewing angles. It has good touch response and the 2.5D curved gorilla glass feels premium. However 720p on a 5.5 inch display is too low, and it shows. The the brightness is also not the best we have seen in this price.

Like the design of the phone, the UI is also somewhat conceptualised over the design of Apple’s iOS. So much so, that all settings for native apps are bundled into the main Settings menu. While a lot of things do look like iOS, at the end of the day it is still Android and you will get plenty of customization features. Oppo’s ColorOS is quite smooth and functional for the most part and never lagged during my review period. 

However, the phone runs on Android 5.1 out of the box, which is a bummer. UI changes of course don’t matter from a cosmetic point of view, but Android 6.0’s performance enhancements, security features will be missing.

Performance: Satisfactory
The Oppo F1s has an older SoC, but Oppo has optimised it quite well, offering good day to day performance. It isn’t meant for gaming, though. While there aren’t any in-game lags, the load times are higher. Switching between multiple games will take a toll on the device as well. It also skipped frames occasionally but not enough to upset a basic user. To put it simply, if you play games like Subway Surfer only, you should be fine. While most games run fine, the inferior graphic quality may put off some power users.

Another good thing worth mentioning is that the phone does not get uncomfortably hot. I recorded temperatures under 40 degree celcius even after playing Asphalt 8 for 30 minutes. Overall the performance is satisfactory, but not close to the likes of the LeEco Le 2.

Call reception and quality were at par with most phones out there. However, general audio quality is not upto the mark. Audio output via headphones is a bass heavy, and the bottom mounted speakers aren’t loud.

Battery: Respectable
Like the MediaTek MT6750 SoC, the 3075 mAh battery is also well optimised and is able to put up a respectable score of 4103 points on the Geekbench 3 battery test. In day to day usage, with music streaming, YouTube, half a dozen calls, constant WhatsApp, Facebook and half an hour of gaming, the phone was able to last for about 10-12 hours, which is a normal work day. Gaming on the phone will deplete the battery faster, which is normal.

Front Camera: Best selfies for the price

The Oppo F1s sports a 16MP camera, offering one of the best selfie experience you can get on a sub-20K smartphone. The aperture is set to f/2.0, offering better depth of field than most smartphones at its price. Your selfie experience is further enhanced by the beauty mode, which can either make you look “fair” or “rosy” depending upon your preference. The overall image quality it produces is good and very consistent in normal lighting. There is visible noise in low light but the image quality is still good enough to be shared social media. The camera also gets a panorama mode for those group selfies. There’s also a time-lapse selfie mode, which allows for some fun selfies.

View post on imgur.com

Rear Camera: Not upto the mark
The 13MP rear camera on the other hand is not the best. While the overall image quality is good for the price, details are missing from images. It is too inconsistent. Colour reproduction is also not great, with low vibrance. A lot of these issues can be countered in the manual mode, but only if you have a better grasp on cameras.

View post on imgur.com

Bottomline
The Oppo F1s is for the selfie loving audience only. It has a brilliant 16MP front facing camera, making it one of the best selfie oriented smartphones I have tested. The performance is satisfactory and the battery is also respectable. That said, the phone is still miles behind the competition and the Redmi Note 3 and LeEco Le 2 remain better choices for those not interested in selfies.

 

Oppo F1s Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 02 Aug 2016
Variant: 32GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5.5" (720 x 1280)
  • Camera Camera
    13 | 16 MP
  • Memory Memory
    32 GB/3 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3075 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Hardik Singh

Light at the top, this odd looking creature lives under the heavy medication of video games.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Oppo F1s

Buy now on flipkart 12990

Oppo F1s

Buy now on flipkart 12990

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Serious criminals to serve two-thirds of jail term in justice shake-up

Xiaomi Mi4 Review

Xiaomi Mi4 Review

By Prasid Banerjee | Updated May 22 2019
Xiaomi Mi4 Review
DIGIT RATING
77 /100
  • design

    76

  • performance

    79

  • value for money

    70

  • features

    83

User Rating : 1/5 Out of 1 Reviews
  • PROS
  • Compact and premium build
  • Good performance
  • Good camera with lots of manual controls
  • CONS
  • 16GB internal storage with no memory card slot is a deal breaker
  • Heats up fast in Performance mode
  • Glossy back is slippery

Verdict

The Xiaomi Mi4 is no doubt a value for money device, but the 16GB internal storage with no micro-SD slot is a deal breaker for us. If you want a phone below 20k, then go for the Honor 6. If you're hell bent on getting an Snapdragon 801-powered device, then the OnePlus One provides more value with its 64GB storage capacitiy, inspite of the slightly higher pricing.

BUY Xiaomi Mi4
Buy now on amazon Available 6999
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 14999

Xiaomi Mi4 detailed review

Five devices in six months, that’s the track record Xiaomi has in India till now. The company started operations here back in July last year and has launched five smartphones in the Indian market since then. It started with the ground breaking Xiaomi Mi3, followed by the Redmi 1S, two Redmi Notes and now the Xiaomi Mi4. Amidst all this, Xiaomi’s trademark has always been the low price of its devices, despite offering flagship level specifications. Until now, that is. The Xiaomi Mi4, which in a way fills a void in the company's portfolio in India, has been priced at Rs. 19,999.


With the discontinuation of the Mi3, Xiaomi had been lacking a flagship in the market. The Mi4 fills that void and unlike its other devices, we’ve seen a lot of negativity with the Mi4 already. While some say the device has come too late, others comment on the pricing. In addition, unlike the others, which had little to no competition, the Mi4 has a lot to live up to. The smartphone is competing against the likes of the OnePlus One, Huawei Honor 6 and the Lenovo Vibe X2; devices that have all been loved by consumers till now. So, is the pricing bad for this one? Or is the Mi4 another ground breaking Xiaomi device that you should wait in line for (speaking digitally of course)? Let’s find out.

Build and Design

We had first spent some time with the Mi4 in October and if you had read our story at that time, you would know that we weren’t thrilled with the glossy back. Well, that remains the same. While the Mi4 is a very sturdily built device, which feels premium enough, the glossy back makes it a little slippery.

Xiaomi Mi4 (left) placed alongside the Xiaomi Mi3 (Right)

That said, it is also a small misstep in an otherwise well built device. The metal rim around the side of the smartphone feels good and it is compact enough to be used with one hand. The Mi4 does feel slightly heavy, when compared to some other smartphones, but it isn’t heavy enough to really be a problem. 

We're not really big fans of the glossy back on the Xiaomi Mi4

The phone has an iPhone 5S like feel, barring the metal back that the iPhone had and the fact that the Mi4 is considerably bigger. So, in the build and design aspect, this phone will get a lot of points, whichever way you look at it.

The Xiaomi Mi4 (right) is a well built device and the metal rim gives it a premium feel

Display and UI

You know how Nokia’s ClearBlack displays are aided by the Windows interface? The same happens here with MiUI 6. The colourful nature of the UI makes the display seem vibrant and the pixel density is enough to rival any of its competitors, including the larger OnePlus One. In fact, you may easily find the Mi4’s display to be the better of the two.

That said, the display is quite warm. While this is an IPS panel, the colours on the display make it seem more like an AMOLED panel. The warmth is quite like what you get on Samsung devices, so the decision would ultimately depend on whether you like such displays.

MiUI 6

Yes, it does look similar to the iOS, but MiUI 6 also stands apart with its own personality. If MiUI 5 was about customisation and control over your phone, MiUI 6 is more about the visual aesthetics. The iOS-like animations and visual elements do bring it a lot closer to being called an Apple ripoff, but again, MiUI 6 has its own personality.

The colours are vivid and the animations are slick. The overall feel of the new user interface is good, with the added incentive of customisation options that we had seen in MiUI 5. The Notifications panel is translucent now, with a swipe to the right required to go to quick settings. Unfortunately, the Music controls above the Quick Settings are utilitarian, allowing you only to pause a song or skip to the next one.

The Music and Notes widgets are gone and the Music app itself lacks many options for sorting through your music. The Theme Store is still present and you can download various themes like before.

Overall, MiUI 6 basically takes the older versions and improves on their visual aesthetics. There’s not much that is new here, by way of features.

Performance

At Rs. 19,999, the Mi4 is still the cheapest Snapdragon 801-powered smartphone you can buy today. Also, that puts it squarely in competition against the OnePlus One smartphone and other powerhouses like the Vibe X2 and Honor 6. In terms of pure performance, for playing games etc, the Mi4 is every bit the performer. Remember though, the phone has two performance modes — Balanced and Performance.

Performance Mode (Left) vs Balanced Mode (Right)

The balanced mode clocks the processor down to around 300 Mhz per core, while the Performance mode unshackles it. If you’re gaming on balanced mode, with a lot of background tasks, you may see some lags, but the performance mode deals with high end gaming and multitasking just fine. That said, the device tends to heat up very easily when in the Performance mode.

Xiaomi Mi4 benchmark comparison

For regular use, you may want to keep the Mi4 in the Balanced mode, as this does offer a higher battery life, but switch it back to Performance later.

The UI again is quite resource intensive, in the sense that we never quite saw over 1.5GB of free RAM out of the 3GB that the device comes with. This, to be honest, was a little disappointing, considering that the phone might have performed even better had the UI been less resource intensive.

Battery

The 3100 mAh battery on the Mi4 is another similarity that the device has with the OnePlus One. That said, it is also one of its weakest areas. The battery lasted only five and a half hours in our battery test, whereas its competitors, the Honor 6 and OnePlus One, both last almost double of that. It also didn't beat them in the PC Mark for Android battery test.

With above average gaming and web browsing, the Mi4 couldn’t last us through the day. In fact, after a lot of huffing and puffing and using the balanced mode predominantly, we could get the device to last 10 hours at best. This could turn into a big weakness for the phone in as competitive a market as India. The battery life goes up by almost an hour in the PC Mark test, when put in the Balanced mode, but in general you'll have to charge it at least twice everyday.

The Mi4 does have fast charging though and it charges very fast, so that will take care of some of your battery woes. It doesn’t take much time to charge the device, with our only issue being the fact that the charger itself malfunctioned a few times. That, of course, was a device specific issue and we’ve already notified the company of the same. We will be updating this review, whenever we get a new charger.

Update: We received another charger from the company and the new one is working fine. Chargers can malfunction for a variety of reasons, including faulty plug points, sudden power surges etc. What's certain though is that the phone itself is still working fine.

Camera

We had loved the Mi3’s camera earlier and Xiaomi has done quite well with cameras since then. The Mi4 continues the tradition, except, we like the Mi3's camera better. Both the smartphones have 13MP rear cameras, but the Mi3 seems to do better with the white balance.

Images taken by the Mi4 came overexposed sometimes. That said, the focus dot, which doubles up as the exposure control is a nice touch. The fact that it shows you how the picture is going to look in real time allows you to take good shots.

If you’re more of a point-and-shoot kind of camera user, then the Huawei Honor 6 presents a better option for you. The Mi4 on the other hand will be loved by camera enthusiasts.

Also, the exposure control helps a lot in low light conditions and the Mi4 is one of the best smartphones in this segment for low light imaging.

Storage

The Moto X (2nd Gen) is arguably the best Android device out there today, but when Motorola launched the 16GB version, without a memory card, we rued the choice. The same shall be said of the Mi4, which has no external storage option and only 16GB internal.

You get about 13GB of usable storage space, which is hardly enough, especially for a power user. On the first day of usage, we were left with about just over 1GB of storage, after putting our apps and music on the phone.

While Xiaomi did say that the 64GB version would be available sometime in the future, for now, this is the only version that you get.

Bottomline

At Rs. 19,999, the Xiaomi Mi4 is really a value for money device, except the fact that it comes with only 16GB of storage, with no memory card slot.  In addition, its closest competitor, the Honor 6 has expandable memory and is priced at Rs. 17,999 right now. Slightly higher is the OnePlus One, which costs Rs. 21,999 and comes with 64GB external storage. Also, the Honor 6 takes more balanced images easily.

While phablet lovers would almost always go for the OnePlus One, if you have a below 20k budget, then the Honor 6 presents a better option, because of its expandable storage space. Personally, we wouldn’t buy this simply because of that, but if 16GB seems like enough space for you, then knock yourself out.

Buy MI4 on Flipkart

Xiaomi Mi4 Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 13 Jul 2015
Variant: 64GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    5" (1080 x 1920)
  • Camera Camera
    13 | 8 MP
  • Memory Memory
    64 GB/3 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3080 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

Xiaomi Mi 10 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

logo
Prasid Banerjee

Trying to explain technology to my parents. Failing miserably.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Xiaomi Mi4

Xiaomi Mi4

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Serious criminals to serve two-thirds of jail term in justice shake-up

Google Pixel 2 XL Review

Google Pixel 2 XL Review

By Prasid Banerjee | Updated May 22 2019
Google Pixel 2 XL Review
  • PROS
  • Good camera
  • Smooth and fluid performance
  • Now Playing is awesome
  • CONS
  • Camera is inconsistent
  • Undersaturated display with poor viewing angles
  • Larger form factor than needed

Verdict

Yes, the Google Pixel 2 XL has a class-leading camera, but it's also inconsistent. And that's an issue with this device. Combined with the sub-par display, the overall experience is rather disappointing and we can't recommend the Pixel 2 XL over its competition.

BUY Google Pixel 2 XL
Buy now on amazon Available 45499
Buy now on flipkart Out of Stock 39999

Google Pixel 2 XL detailed review

Google’s quest to become a mobile hardware behemoth depends heavily on software, particularly including AI and machine learning. You could make a drinking game out of the number of times the company mentioned these technologies during its Pixel keynote this year. And that should tell you everything you need to know about the Pixel 2 XL. It’s high end mobile hardware, driven by artificial intelligence and machine learning. But is the world, and especially India, ready for a device like this?


More importantly, in its quest to provide functional software solutions did Google skimp out on the hardware side of things? After all, the Pixel 2 XL, like the Pixel last year, has been plagued with issues from the get go. On paper, the Google Pixel 2 XL takes some of the best mobile hardware available today and tries to augment it with software. It aims to deliver what Google thinks is the best mobile experience you can find. And it works in a lot of ways, but if I’m being honest, the Pixel 2 XL for me has been like those TV shows my friends oversold to me before I watched them, building my expectations to perhaps unrealistic levels. I must admit that I’m somewhat disappointed with this device, and as it was last year, I’m not sold on many of Google’s decisions. Let me explain how.

We begin with the noted issues

Every friend or acquaintance who wanted to buy the Pixel 2 XL has asked me about the screen burn-in issue. The review unit I have hasn’t shown the problem yet, despite keeping still images on the screen for hours on end. Yet, it’s an issue Google has acknowledged that will make the consumer uneasy. If the Pixel 2 XL is showing problems with burn-in or image retention already, I wouldn’t blame you for not buying this phone.

For me, the larger problem is with how colours are represented on this screen. Google says it’s working on a software fix for this problem, but I don’t see that helping with the poor viewing angles of this phone. Flagship or not, a phone in 2017 shouldn’t be showing a blue tint from off angles, especially when they’re not even acute angles. That’s not to suggest that every phone has good viewing angles, but you can rest assured that all other flagships do.

I found a temporary fix for this problem, with Night Light. You can turn on Night Light (which is a blue light filter on your phone) and turn its intensity to lowest. It will make the display yellowish when viewed up front, but it looks whiter from angles. That said, that’s still a colour shift, so it’s not a real fix by any stretch. And this is only accentuated by the undersaturated colours on the screen, another problem Google aims to solve with a software update.

The company says the Pixel 2 XL’s pOLED display is tuned to a sRGB+10% gamut. That’s because Android could only support sRGB till Oreo came along. But given that the Pixel 2 XL was always meant to be amongst the first phones on Oreo, that explanation doesn’t seem adequate enough to me. The fact is that Samsung, Apple, Sony, Xiaomi and almost every other Android manufacturer has produced better looking displays. What’s stopping Google from doing so?

Furthermore, tuning a display to sRGB in 2017 is archaic. The DCI-P3 colour gamut is not new and pretty much every high quality movie you watch today is shot in that colour space.

How does this matter to you?

While all of the above is true, it’s also true that the terms sRGB and DCI-P3 make no sense or difference to regular consumers. What does make a difference though, are understaurated colours. The Pixel 2 XL’s display feels like a gloomy and hazy day, instead of warm and sunny. There’s a washed out feeling about the whole thing that’s neither natural, nor pleasant. If it's natural you want, I’d direct you to the colour tones Apple chooses, although the iPhone maker has also moved to slightly warmer tones with the last two iPhones. This also means you will never really be sure what photos from the excellent Pixel 2 camera look like, since you will be looking at them on the phone’s display. For those who like to use apps like Snapseed, Lightroom and more, editing pictures on this screen is a strict no no.

The blue tint won’t matter as long as you’re looking at the display up front. But lie down on a bed with the phone next to you, or try and watch a video with friends, and the colours do suffer. Personally, the fact that the Pixel 2 XL doesn’t have a crisp, vibrant screen alone is a deal breaker for me.

Note: Google has now added a new "Saturated Mode" to the phone, which makes the Pixel 2 XL's display more pleasant. That said, the blue tint issue remains and we're still not completely fond of the display. The update basically makes colours more vibrant, though the Pixel 2 XL's display still pales in comparison to the iPhone X or Galaxy Note 8.

Build and Design: Utilitarian, but sturdy...

I’m also not a big fan of the big bezels on the Pixel 2 XL. It has an 18:9 display and yet it’s unnecessarily wide. That makes the Pixel 2 XL unwieldy and difficult to use. Since most videos/movies won’t support 18:9 right now, they are already pillarboxed, but the Pixel 2 XL’s large bezels make them look like they’re pillarboxed as well. I find that distracting and it seems to reduce the total screen real estate.

Otherwise, the Pixel 2 XL is a well built smartphone. Its aluminium casing feels solid and sturdy, though it could do with some heft. The screen curves into the edges on all four sides, which is a nice touch. The back is aluminium, but with a plastic-like textured finish on about three fourths of it. The top fourth is glass for improved antenna performance, with a slightly protruding camera module placed here. The fingerprint sensor lies below this, centered for where your finger will be falling naturally. I’ll also take this opportunity to mention that Pixel imprint is as fast as it was last year.

Due to the Pixel 2 XL’s form factor, you will have to shift your grip to reach the power button on its right. The volume rocker rests under your thumb, but the power button is placed nearer to the top. The phone’s SIM slot is on the left and USB Type-C port on the bottom. Google skipped the headphone jack this time, and sadly, the company doesn’t bundle headphones in the box either. That’s a definite fail for a phone that costs you over Rs. 70,000. You do get a Type-C to 3.5mm dongle inside the box though.

You could argue against Google’s design philosophy here, but the Pixel 2 XL does look unique to some extent. My black review unit looks distinctly pedestrian compared to almost all other competitors, but at the end of the day, it is still functional.

Camera: Par excellence, but...

Unlike Apple, Google actually tries to make the Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL feel the same. And a lot of that has to do with the fact that they have identical cameras. The 12MP sensor on the back, accompanied by Google’s AI and machine learning mumbo jumbo makes for an impressive shooter. I’m going to break this down into parts, because though the Pixel 2/XL have great cameras, I’m not entirely convinced that they’re the best smartphone cameras in the world today.

Pixel camera:

At the offset, it’s important to mention that the Pixel’s camera is par excellence. I do have my reservations with it, but I’ll get to that in the next section. Why is the Pixel 2’s camera better than compatriots? That would be because of the impressive amount of details it produces in photos. The photos do look dull on the phone’s own display, but they can well and truly wow you otherwise. Google’s algorithms are somehow good enough to manage colour differentiation even in shadow areas on low light shots, something phones like the Galaxy Note 8 promptly ignore. From a few shots I took with the iPhone X and Pixel 2 XL side by side, I’m pretty sure Google’s camera is better at details, but we will be comparing these two very soon.

The Pixel 2 XL can capture amazing details in photos

There’s some finer noise that you can see when you zoom in. In that state, edges may look somewhat soft, but that’s not really a practical use-case. And Google knows that. The Pixel 2/XL’s is designed to put a nail in the point and shoot coffin once and for all. Though the phone does that, it doesn’t necessarily improve on point and shoot cameras.

Why not?

That’s because the Pixel 2’s camera is finicky. It has a better camera than the Galaxy Note 8, but I’m far more comfortable using what Samsung provided. I know what the results will be and what I can expect when. With the Pixel 2 XL, I either get the best photos a smartphone can do today, or an absolutely average shot that’s not worthy of the “highest rated smartphone camera” tag.

The Pixel 2 XL messed up white balance in many of the photos I took. In unconventional conditions, like the halogen lights inside hotels, the Pixel 2 produced unnaturally high levels of noise. For instance, the photo of the piano below is clicked under halogen lights, and the Pixel 2 XL produced lots of noise here. Similarly, in the second photo, it produces blue light in between the trees, whereas the original scene had only regular fluorescent street lamps.

It’s worth noting that we took photos from two different units of the Pixel 2 XL and one Pixel 2, which means these issues aren’t confined to a single unit.

Portrait Mode

Google’s making a real statement with the Portrait Mode on the Pixel 2 XL. The phone has a single sensor on the back and front each, but there’s portrait mode on either side. The fact that Google could accomplish this was a feat in itself, and I must commend its efforts too. That said, I would warn you against expecting the same bokehs you get from the two cameras on iPhones or the Note 8.

Rear camera portrait shots (above and below)

Front camera portrait

Being entirely dependent on software, the Pixel 2s can often falter with how they blur the background. You will sometimes find patches behind your subject that aren’t blurred properly. At other times, it will sharpen the subject unnaturally. The portrait mode typically checks off a feature Google needed this year and it’s neither impressive, nor disappointing.

Video

YouTubers and those who shoot lots of videos with their phones will drool at the Pixel 2 XL. The phone offers impressive stabilisation just like last year's Pixel. I shot videos while on a train and they came out completely stable and shake-free. The Pixel 2 XL also shifts focus across subjects really fast, making it an ideal phone to shoot videos with. The first impressions video below was shot using the Pixel 2 XL in a moving train.

Google Lens

It’s also worth noting that the Indian versions of the Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL do not have Google Lens as of now. I’m yet to receive a confirmation from Google on when and if this is coming to India.

Adding it all up

A lot has been said about DXOMark’s 98 rating for the Pixel 2’s camera. Personally, I’ve never depended on DXOMark’s ratings alone, and phones like the Pixel 2 XL are why. I mentioned in the beginning that the Pixel 2 XL has an excellent camera, and I stand by that. But, I would warn you against expecting excellent shots all the time. Personally, I’m put off by the white balance problems and I do not think this is a dependable camera.

Performance: Android at its best...but not the fastest

It’s a fact that Android phones slow down over time. Believe it or not, the Pixel 2 XL will too. But it’s fast out of the box. The Snapdragon 835 is the fastest processor you can find and the phone powers through most everything you can throw at it. App load times are the lowest Android can offer today and lags and frame drops are non-existent. For those wondering, the Pixel 2 XL also comes on top of benchmarks, and yes, it’s not as powerful as the 2017 iPhones, on paper.

On regular usage, the Pixel 2 XL is smooth and fluid. But as a Google phone it needed to be the smoothest and fastest Android phone out there. That, the Pixel 2 XL is not. And that will probably matter only to nitpickers like me. I’m talking on miniscule differences here, that won’t matter to most anyone. However, my Note 8 connects to WiFi when I’m below my home, while the Pixel 2 XL connects when I reach the door. Similarly, the OnePlus 5 feels snappier than the Pixel 2 XL when I tap on games like Sim City BuildIt. Admittedly though, these are minor differences and shouldn’t be held against the Pixel 2 XL.

If you’re looking for a fast Android phone, the Pixel 2 XL is certainly one of them. It has no heating issues, though it can get noticeably warm if you’re downloading lots of apps together while performing other tasks. All things considered, the Pixel 2 XL is one of the fastest Android phones today. The question users like me will ask is, did it need to be the fastest? The answer likely, is yes.

Battery: Just about enough...

I and most reviewers like me will readily trade a lot of “features” for extended battery life. Google promises a day’s worth of battery life, and I concur with the same. However, I could get noticeably higher battery life from the Galaxy Note 8. On a busy work day, with two 15 minute Facebook lives, seven phone calls, live tweeting for 20 minutes, shooting two short 1080p videos and streaming music for 40 minutes, the Pixel 2 XL lasted me from 10am to 5pm. Is seven hours on heavy usage enough for you?

The Pixel 2 XL will last most everyone through the work day, requiring a charge every evening. That puts it in the same league as most flagships today, barring the iPhone 8 Plus (review). The Galaxy Note 8 (review) will give you about two hours more battery life.

Now Playing: By far my favourite feature...

The Google Assistant is always listening on the Pixel 2, and it tells you songs that are playing around you all day long. So, I don’t have to pull out my phone and launch Shazam when I need to know what song is playing. It works well too.

For instance, I listen to the radio while driving to and from work. In that time I often find songs I want to know about, but can’t. The Pixel 2 always has the song name ready on the Always On display, whenever I need it too.

Now Playing is quite accurate too. I tested it with obscure songs and it could even recognise some of the obscure music I threw at it. It did fail a few times, but it took some doing to beat Google’s knowledge database. Now Playing works offline, identifying music off a database that's prebuilt into the Pixel 2 XL. So, you could expect it to miss sometimes, especially when playing covers. Google says the database is updated on a weekly basis and should take up about 500MB of storage space on the device at any time.

While working offline is a good idea, assuring users that while the phone is continuously listening, it's not sending anything to the cloud. It also uses less battery than it would if the feature was connected to the Internet. That said, Now Playing surely has an impact on battery life, though nothing that noticeably reduces the Pixel 2 XL's battery life.

Active Edge

With its $1.1 billion investment in buying HTC's teams, Google also used its edge-squeeze feature on the Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL. With this, you squeeze the edges to turn on Google Assistant. While that seems like a nifty feature, I never really used it. That's because Google Assistant is barely of any use in India. I don't see a big change in functionalities from last year's Pixel here.

Moreover, with the Pixel 2 XL's wide form factor, I find it rather inconvenient to squeeze its edges when needed. It's easier to do on the Pixel 2. You can't customise this feature either, so you're stuck with that one use-case only. Didn't we already have a shortcut for the Assistant by long pressing the home button?

Lastly, to set its intensity, you go to Settings -> Apps & Notifications -> Default Apps -> Assist & Voice Input -> Active Edge. You can of course use the search bar inside settings to skip the multiple taps.

Should you buy the Pixel 2 XL?

So, the Pixel 2 XL is fast but not the fastest, it has a disappointing display, a great but inconsistent camera and average battery life. At Rs. 73,000, that doesn’t make a very good value proposition. It’s for sure a functional and even a good smartphone, but I’m not sure that’s enough at this price. You could still buy the Pixel 2 XL for its excellent camera, but personally, I’m not convinced by it.

Google Pixel 2 XL Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Price:
Release Date: 01 Sep 2017
Variant: 64GB , 128GB
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Screen Size Screen Size
    6" (1440 x 2880)
  • Camera Camera
    12.2 | 8 MP
  • Memory Memory
    64 GB/4 GB
  • Battery Battery
    3520 mAh

Related Reviews

Nokia 5.3 Review

Oppo Reno4 Pro Review

Asus ROG Phone 3 Review

OnePlus Nord Review

OnePlus 8 Pro Review

logo
Prasid Banerjee

Trying to explain technology to my parents. Failing miserably.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Google Pixel 2 XL

Google Pixel 2 XL

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status

Serious criminals to serve two-thirds of jail term in justice shake-up

India condemned Pakistan for harassing Hindus, Sikhs and other minorities - हिंदुओं, सिखों और अन्य अल्पसंख्यकों को प्रताड़ित करने के लिए भारत ने पाकिस्तान की निंदा की | World News in Hindi

हिंदुओं, सिखों और अन्य अल्पसंख्यकों को प्रताड़ित करने के लिए भारत ने पाकिस्तान की निंदा की

जिनेवा में मानवाधिकार परिषद के 45वें सत्र में पाकिस्तान की ओर से की गई टिप्पणी पर भारतीय प्रतिनिधि ने जवाब दिया

हिंदुओं, सिखों और अन्य अल्पसंख्यकों को प्रताड़ित करने के लिए भारत ने पाकिस्तान की निंदा की

प्रतीकात्मक फोटो.

जिनेवा:

भारत ने मंगलवार को पाकिस्तान (Pakistan) को ''आतंकवाद का केंद्र'' बताते हुए कहा कि इस्लामाबाद किसी को अकारण मानवाधिकार (Human Rights) पर व्याख्यान न दे क्योंकि उसने लगातार जातीय और हिंदुओं, सिखों और इसाईयों समेत अन्य धार्मिक अल्पसंख्यकों को प्रताड़ित किया है. 

जिनेवा में मानवाधिकार परिषद के 45वें सत्र में पाकिस्तान की ओर से की गई टिप्पणी पर जवाब देने के अपने अधिकार का इस्तेमाल करते हुए भारतीय प्रतिनिधि ने कहा कि झूठे और मनगढंत आरोप लगाकर अपने कुत्सित इरादों की पूर्ति करने के उद्देश्य से भारत को बदनाम करने की पाकिस्तान की आदत हो गई है.

भारतीय राजनयिक ने कहा कि न ही भारत को और न ही किसी अन्य को मानवाधिकार पर एक ऐसे देश से आख्यान सुनने की जरूरत है जो लगातार अपने जातीय और धार्मिक अल्पसंख्यकों को प्रताड़ित करता रहा हो. यह आतंकवाद का केंद्र है, संयुक्त राष्ट्र की प्रतिबंधों की सूची में शामिल लोगों को पेंशन देने की इस देश की विशेषता है और इस देश के प्रधानमंत्री ने गर्व के साथ जम्मू-कश्मीर में लड़ाई के लिए हजारों आतंकवादियों को प्रशिक्षण देने की बात स्वीकारी है.



(इस खबर को एनडीटीवी टीम ने संपादित नहीं किया है. यह सिंडीकेट फीड से सीधे प्रकाशित की गई है।)

Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com

अन्य खबरें
 

Serious criminals to serve two-thirds of jail term in justice shake-up

Sony WH-XB900N Review
Sony WH-XB900N Review

Sony WH-XB900N Review

Dhriti Datta   |  18 Dec 2019
DIGIT RATING
71 /100
  • design

    77

  • performance

    74

  • value for money

    69

  • features

    70

  • PROS
  • Extremely comfortable
  • Impressive battery life
  • Quick Attention Mode is a brilliant addition
  • CONS
  • Disappointing ANC and isolation
  • Bluetooth 4.2 instead of 5.0
  • Uncomfortably bass-heavy

Verdict

Lower pricing doesn’t necessarily mean better value and unfortunately, the Sony WH-XB900N highlights just this. Priced at Rs 16,990 (Rs 16,499 on Amazon India), the headphones do seem to provide some budgetary relief to users vying to own a great pair of wireless headphones, but unfortunately, they do so at the expense of sound quality. These cans feature wireless connectivity with the slightly archaic, at this point, Bluetooth 4.2, as well as ANC (Active Noise Cancellation). The looks and feel of the product do resemble the WH-1000XM3 but the bass is highly exaggerated and the price is cut down significantly, maybe as an attempt by Sony to capture and appease the Beats-lovers in the world. The sound profile, as the XB (Extra Bass) in the model name suggests, is dominantly bass-y. The cans offer a comfortable fit and an accompanying Android and iOS app, which is great. There’s a lot to love here, but a lot to dislike as well, especially for listeners who prefer an ‘audiophile sound profile’ rather than just booming bass.

 

BUY Sony WH-XB900N

Sony WH-XB900N detailed review

Essentially existing as a bridge between Sony’s Extra Bass series and the much-acclaimed Sony WH-1000XM3, the Sony WH-XB900N attempt to provide something of value to numerous kinds of users at a lower price point than the exorbitantly-priced WH-1000XM3. On paper, the Sony WH-XB900N have a lot to offer including extra oomph down below (a little too much, as we will cover later), ANC, high-end codecs support, and more, all at a lower price! Sounds ideal, doesn’t it? Let’s find out.

Build and Design

The build of the Sony WH-XB900N is extremely reminiscent of the Sony WH-1000XM3, particularly the shape and styling, but you will ‘feel’ the difference more than ‘see’ it since they feel much more plasticky than the WH-1000XM3. As you slide these cans out of their box, you will first notice that they are crafted out of lightweight plastic, weighing 254 grams, and as you put them on, you will notice that the weight is distributed evenly across the headband. The large over-ear cups and the underside of the headband feature thick and plushy memory foam and the overall fit and comfort level is excellent. However, the memory foam on the cups does get significantly warm over extended periods of usage, as per our tests. This tends to lead to sweat formation around the earcups due to the lack of outlets for heat dissipation. Nevertheless, if you listen to music for relatively short periods of time at a stretch, you shouldn’t experience any kind of discomfort.

The colour of the memory foam is the same as the rest of the plastic exterior which lends the headphones a single-tone, clean look. The glossy embossed Sony logo is etched on either side of the headphones and the texture separates itself slightly from the overall matte texture of the headphones. The bass vents which lie hidden under the part of the headband intersecting with the earcups have a glossy black texture.

The headphones are ridiculously flexible and almost straightened up completely in our durability tests without so much as a creak. They are fairly portable as well since the earcups can rotate 90 degrees and fold at the hinges to achieve a smaller footprint. When the headband is extended, you will see a glossy stainless steel reinforcing band with plastic on the underside which serves as an aesthetic contrast visually.

The left earcup houses a 3.5mm audio socket to accommodate the 3.5mm cable which means that you can keep listening to music even when the juice in these cans have run dry (which will take a while, but more on that later). It also features a USB-C charging port, one of the microphones, an NFC logo and two physical buttons - a power button and a customisable button. The customisable button can be assigned as an ANC profile controller or to activate your preferred voice assistant (Google Assistant, Siri or Alexa). Over on the right-hand side, the earcup houses another microphone and the embedded touch-sensitive panel on top of the earcup.

Overall, the Sony WH-XB900N are extremely comfortable to wear, even over long periods of usage, owing to the large over-ear cups, the memory foam padding and a tried-and-tested design feature in the WH-1000XM3. They sport an inconspicuous and clean design that is not really meant to draw attention to itself. The headphones come along with a cloth carrying pouch, which isn’t as ideal as a hard case, a 3.5mm cable as well as a USB-C cable. 

Features

The Sony WH-XB900N serves up a plethora of features present in the WH-1000XM3 at a lower price point to users. Let’s delve into the array of features and their effectiveness. First up, the headphones come equipped with ANC (Active Noise Cancellation), however, the calibre of this technology is miles away from the WH-1000XM3, which is far superior even though they sport the same chip which Sony has dubbed the "HD Noise Canceling Processor QN1". Isolation, when ANC is turned on, is extremely disappointing, especially in the bass range which renders it unsuitable for commute. In our tests, we could hear the railway tracks’ sounds, wind rumble and traffic on the road as clear as day even with ANC turned on, which is frankly distracting, especially when you’re attempting to gaze out of the local train window, listening to your favourite tracks, looking all pensive. 

However, the ANC performance indoors is starkly different since it works extremely well in office environments. It completely veils speech and background sounds in such environments, providing a truly immersive experience. This suggests that ANC does well in blocking out the middle-range and treble external sounds, such as the voices of our noisy editorial team. 

The headphones also boast an accompanying app - Sony | Headphones Connect available for Android and iOS users. The WH-XB900N can access a plethora of features and customisations through the app including adaptive sound control, ambient sound control, a capable EQ, sound position control and DSEE mode. Note: To access more granular equaliser controls on the app, you will need to revert to SBC streaming.

We found ourselves testing out Adaptive Sound Control quite a bit, which is an equivalent to the Jabra 85H’s ‘Moments’. Adaptive Sound Control essentially detects your surroundings and actions using its microphones and AI capabilities to set an ambient mode for you. The modes include - Staying, Walking, Running, and Transport. The ambient sound is heightened in walking mode and ramped up even more in running mode to ensure that you stay vigilant of your surroundings, while it goes into complete ANC during transport and allows minimal ambient sound during Staying mode. Using the app, you can tweak these settings according to your preference. Personally, the reviewer changed Staying Mode from allowing minimal ambient sound in, to no ambient sound at all.

The feature works quite well, with it detecting staying (indoors), walking and running extremely accurately. However, when it came to Transport, it had trouble detecting when we were on a train and kept switching erratically between Transport and Walking which extremely frustrating really quick, since there’s an audible ‘beep’ that interrupts your music every time it switches the ANC mode. You’d probably be better off turning off Adaptive Sound Control if you travel a lot, especially by train. 

Additionally, these cans also have a feature called Quick Attention mode, which by far is our favourite feature on the Sony WH-XB900N headphones. It’s a simple feature which lets you momentarily pay attention to your surroundings by placing your palm on the right earcup. Essentially, what it does is, allows ambient noise through and reduces the media volume to a minimum as long as you keep your hand pressed on the touchpad. This is an extremely useful and intuitive feature, the kind that makes you wonder why everyone else hasn’t implemented this already since it is a gateway into having quick conversations or even eavesdropping… 

Speaking of the touchpad, the touch-sensitive controls are extremely responsive and easy-to-use. A double-tap will pause/play music or answer calls, swipe up or down will control the volume and swipe left or right will skip and go to the previous track respectively. Simple and intuitive, just how we like it.

Additionally, Sony has incorporated support for an array of Bluetooth codecs such as SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, and LDAC which will thrill audiophiles. There’s also NFC for quick pairing which involves simply tapping your device to the headphones’ ear cup. Unfortunately, Sony has implemented Bluetooth version 4.2 instead of the industry-standard Bluetooth 5.0, which is seen on headphones costing less than the WH-XB900N as well.

Performance

Staying true to the ‘XB’ moniker in the headphones’ model name, the Sony WH-XB900N are ridiculously bass-heavy. Yes, we’re talking bass-heavy on the levels where Beats fans might be pushed to switching ship. Sony uses custom electro bass boosters that alter the lows to deliver powerful, deep and resounding bass. However, in this case, we found the bass levels to be quite jarring and unpleasant at times.

The sound quality of these headphones that sport 40mm dynamic drivers leans heavily to a warm sound signature and the mids and vocals are effectively recessed due to this. While bass lovers may enjoy the actual physical thumps these headphones produce, especially over higher volumes, the audiophile or even the casual listener may find this booming profile a bit too muddy. 

The bass is highly over-emphasised which resoundingly brings in an excess of thump and rumble in almost every genre of music, even the ones that aren’t meant to feature it. This is clearly indicated in tracks such as Another One Bites the Dust by Queen and Mark Ronson and Bruno Mars’ Uptown Funk. The fine details in a plethora of non-bass instruments are relegated to the background due to this making it very one-dimensional, which is not a great thing.

Coming to the mid-range performance, it is quite decent and even fairly balanced, however, as mentioned above, mid-range instruments and male vocals are thinned out due to the excessive bass. The highs are not very pleasant and the response is quite uneven in this frequency range. You can witness this in Serotonia by Highly Suspect, especially at the 2.38 mark. The highs have the tendency to become shrill at times, and overall the headphones just lack in detail and brightness in this range, which is sorely disappointing, since the WH-1000XM3 is one of the best-sounding headphones, if not the best, in the wireless headphones segment.

The soundstage is just about as decent as you'd expect out of wireless headphones, nothing too great here. When testing sound leakage, we found it to be decent, with about 45dB of leakage recorded which is not too bad. 

Overall these headphones are purely for bass-heads when it comes to audio performance, and genres such as EDM, pop and hip-hop. If you listen to a lot of rock and metal, steer clear of these and consider the Jabra 85H or invest some more and get the Bose QC 35 II or Sony WH-1000XM3.

Coming to battery life, these headphones are the charge-them-once-and-forget-them kinds. The company has rated the battery at 30 hours with ANC on and 38 hours without. There’s also a quick charge feature which gets you an hour worth of listening just out of 10 minutes of charging, which is neat. In our tests, the battery on these cans lasted 29 hours with ANC being turned on for about two-thirds of that time, which is still extremely good. The headphones took around 4 and a half hours to charge from near empty, which is a tad slower than expected but nothing unmanageable. 

Wireless range and connection stability are both stellar on these headphones, despite only having Bluetooth 4.2 instead of 5.0. We experienced no random lags, stutters or dropouts while listening to audio. Also, the headphones are rated at 30 feet of wireless range, however, we experienced dropouts much further than that, at about 40-45 feet, which is commendable.

Watching media on these cans are a good experience, except that more attuned users will be able to feel some delay between the image and audio. The headphones latency is at about 200ms, however, with aptX or aptX HD active, it gets much better. However, we recommend using the 3.5mm cable while consuming media for a more seamless experience.

Bottomline

The Sony WH-XB900N is an affordable alternative to the more expensive Sony WH-1000XM3, and it does compromise on audio quality, as per our tests. The sound signature, while it may be ideal for bass-heads, is a bit too bass-y and muddy to the average consumer and especially the audiophile. The headphones do offer a host of features such as support for high-end codecs, touch-sensitive control pad, adaptive sound control, ANC and more. However, the isolation in ANC mode is disappointing and doesn’t match up to the calibre of competitors such as Jabra 85H and Bose QC 35 II. The headphones, however, are extremely comfortable, but they do get a bit warm over long periods of continuous usage. They are suitable for bass-heavy genres such as EDM, hip-hop and pop. If you want a pair of wireless headphones that concentrates heavily on booming bass, these may be the cans for you.

 

 

 

Sony WH-XB900N Key Specs, Price and Launch Date

Release Date: 01 Jun 2019
Variant: None
Market Status: Launched

Key Specs

  • Playback Time Playback Time
    NA
  • Frequency Range Frequency Range
    NA
  • Channels Channels
    NA
  • Dimensions Dimensions
    NA

Related Reviews

Sony WI-1000XM2 Review

Sony WF-XB700 Review

Sony WF-SP800N Review

Sony WI-SP510 Review

Sony WF-1000XM3 Review

logo
Dhriti Datta

Perpetually sporting a death stare, this one can be seen tinkering around with her smartphone which she holds more dear than life itself and stuffing her face with copious amounts of bacon.

Advertisements

Trending Articles

Latest Reviews

view all
Advertisements

Popular Reviews

View All

Sony WH-XB900N

Sony WH-XB900N

Digit caters to the largest community of tech buyers, users and enthusiasts in India. The all new Digit in continues the legacy of Thinkdigit.com as one of the largest portals in India committed to technology users and buyers. Digit is also one of the most trusted names when it comes to technology reviews and buying advice and is home to the Digit Test Lab, India's most proficient center for testing and reviewing technology products.

We are about leadership-the 9.9 kind! Building a leading media company out of India.And,grooming new leaders for this promising industry.

DMCA.com Protection Status