Econom

Australia eyes trade with India as China spat exposes dependence

Bloomber September 16 | Updated on September 16, 2020 Published on September 16, 2020

India’s diaspora is now the third-largest Down Under, just behind China and the UK

Australia’s escalating tensions with Beijing have shown up its reliance on China trade and propelled a push to increase links with Asia’s other giant economy, India.

New enrolments of international students from India expanded 32 per cent in 2019 from a year earlier and it’s the fastest growing major market for Australian services. India has overtaken China as the largest source of net migration to Australia, and its diaspora is the third-largest Down Under, just behind China and the UK.

India’s swelling population — set to overtake China’s in 2027 — suggests ongoing opportunities for Australia to diversify a trade portfolio that currently makes it the developed world’s most China-dependent economy. The need to switch things up has accelerated as ties sank to their lowest ebb in 30 years after Canberra’s calls for an international inquiry into Covid-19’s origins was taken by Beijing as a political attack, with China imposing barriers on barley, beef and wine from Down Under.

This has Australia looking to its democratic, cricket-loving ally to fill the void. Prime Minister Scott Morrison held a virtual summit with his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi in June and the two signed a defense agreement and upgraded ties to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. The trade ministers of Japan, India and Australia recently agreed to work toward achieving supply chain resilience in the Indo-Pacific region.

“We can sell India education, health care, and there’s potential in science and technology,” said Ian Hall, a professor of international relations at Griffith University in Queensland. “It’s much more the consumer market of India’s growing middle class than goods.”

Yet trade with India has its own challenges. Its government is wedded to economic nationalism, as showcased last year when it pulled out of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership designed to free up trade.

“Delhi wants to send lots of people to Australia on work visas and doesn’t want to reduce tariffs,” according to former Australian Trade Minister Craig Emerson, who initiated the Australia-India free trade negotiations in 2011, resulting in a two-way trade around just one tenth of China-Australia shipments.

“India is highly concerned about its trade deficit,” said Lai-Ha Chan, a political scientist at the University of Technology in Sydney, who notes that after signing free trade agreements with South Korea and Japan, India’s trade deficit with those nations ballooned. It would be very worried about Australian farm products, like dairy, harming Indian farmers.

Australia’s most valuable export — iron ore — hasn’t been caught in China’s cross hairs yet, perhaps due to a lack of alternative suppliers. Yet Beijing appears to be giving itself greater flexibility, with Emerson noting that China is buying ore carriers that improve the economics of long-distance shipping from Brazil and purchasing Guinea mines.

“It’s entirely possible China, once it gets all three mineral provinces in a row — Guinea, Brazil and Australia — will play one off against the other to get a better price,” he said. “If you’re China, you’d say where’s our vulnerability? Iron ore. So, let’s diversify, let’s fix that. They may never need to activate it, but it’s there, it’s available.”

What Bloomberg’s Economists Say

Australia’s services exports have been experiencing a quiet tectonic shift over the past 18 months. In education, growth in Indian enrolments has seen the number of Indian student visa holders eclipse Chinese students. While China’s dominance of Australia’s goods exports reflects commodities demand, in the employment-intensive services sector, China’s importance has been challenged by a doubling of services exports to India over the past two years.

Follow us on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Linkedin. You can also download our Android App or IOS App.

Published on September 16, 2020
Chin
Australi
  1. Comments will be moderated by The Hindu Business Line editorial team.
  2. Comments that are abusive, personal, incendiary or irrelevant cannot be published.
  3. Please write complete sentences. Do not type comments in all capital letters, or in all lower case letters, or using abbreviated text. (example: u cannot substitute for you, d is not 'the', n is not 'and').
  4. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.
  5. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name, to avoid rejection.

Australia eyes trade with India as China spat exposes dependence

Diego noise pollution disrupts virtual classes: ‘I can’t hear myself think’

Diego noise pollution disrupts virtual classes: ‘I can’t hear myself think’

A resident of Diego Martin has said a nearby business has been the source of constant loud music in the area.

The mother of a ten-year-old who began virtual classes on Monday, said she has contacted the police on several occasions since January, but her requests have fallen on deaf ears.

She asked to be anonymous for fear of retribution.

“This goes on from Sunday to Sunday, sometimes until midnight…I am trying to be law-abiding, but it is getting harder to control my urges. It feels as if I am going insane. I cannot concentrate on my work.”

She said she called the police on several occasions, and also made complaints through the police app.

But she said when the police visit the business and ask the owner, a young man, to turn it down, he complies, waits for the police to leave, and then blares his music again.

To taunt surrounding residents, she said, he would play Jamaican artist Vybes Kartel’s Nuh Fraid, a song promoting gun violence against those deemed to be enemies.

The affected woman said it was not until stay-at-home measures were implemented in March that she realised how bad it was for neighbouring residents.

“I didn’t realise it was all day…I don’t mind you are enjoying yourself (but) you are not the neighbourhood DJ.”

At the time of Newsday's phone interview with her, music could be heard in the background. She said she put her daughter in another room, as far from the source of the noise as possible, but even with a headset on, she can still hear it.

“She is still being affected, but for the most part she is coping. (He) is not thinking about people with children…How are children going to get through their curriculum for the day with the noise?

"It is not a personal issue; it is a national issue.

“I know I am not the only one being affected, (but) I do not even want to talk to the neighbours for people to think I am talking. People are not nice. I do not trust anyone. I don't want it to be even rumoured that I was the person who made the call.”

She said she tried to contact Attorney General Faris Al-Rawi, Minister of Health Terrence Deyalsingh and the Prime Minister via social media but has not had a response.

Her last attempt to get help was a phone call to the Environmental Management Agency (EMA), where she was told by an agent, whose name she could not recall, that the legal decibel limit for the daytime is 65, and at night it is 80. The decibel is a unit used to measure sound.

The representative advised her to go to the police to get them to look into the matter, but when she called the police, they said they did not have the equipment to measure sound, and would not be able to tell if the business owner was over the legal limit.

Newsday contacted the EMA on Monday and was told by an official that the EMA does not deal with noise complaints, which are dealt with by the police.

Police Communications Manager Francis Joseph told Newsday, to his knowledge, the EMA is indeed tasked with monitoring public noise complaints.

“The EMA has police officers. They have a unit that deals with these things. They can shut down loud music.”

He said the police do not have the decibel meters needed to measure sound.

The resident told Newsday on Tuesday an Environmental Police Unit (an extension of the EMA) officer contacted her and said someone would visit the business on Tuesday or Wednesday.

The Noise Pollution Control rules, part of the Environmental Management Act, states "... no person shall emit or cause to be emitted any sound that causes the sound pressure levels to be greater than the prescribed standards."

It also states, where the sound pressure level is greater than the prescribed standards, a sign should be placed that reads "WARNING: Sound level may cause adverse effect to human health and well-being."

Comments

"Diego noise pollution disrupts virtual classes: ‘I can’t hear myself think’"

More in this section