Maharashtra Youth Congress bats for same-sex marriage

Updated: 16 September, 2020 07:42 IST | Dharmendra Jore | Mumbai

Youth wing of the main opposition party says there is no mould of what a family should look like, judiciary has historic opportunity to further the frontiers of Freedom to Love

Representation/Getty Images

A day after Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta told the Delhi High Court that marriage between same-sex couples is "not recognised by our laws, legal system, society and our values," the Maharashtra Youth Congress has extended its wholehearted and unequivocal support for marriage equality in India.

Representing the Union Government, the SG on Monday opposed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to legalise same-sex marriages under the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA) and Special Marriage Act. He said: "Our laws, our legal system, our society and our values do not recognise marriage, which is a sacrament, between same-sex couples."

'Time India did it'

The youth wing of the main opposition party has said, "It is time that India takes her rightful place amongst the 27 progressive countries which recognise same-sex marriage. Marriage is about families, and there is no mould of what a family should look like. Same-sex couples and their children deserve the recognition and protection of the law, beginning with the Hindu Marriage Act and Special Marriage Act."

A statement signed by the Maharashtra unit president Satyajeet Tambe and spokesperson Latoya Ferns-Advani, urged the Delhi High Court to uphold India's Right to Love. "This is a historic opportunity for the judiciary to further the frontiers of the Freedom to Love. This was famously enshrined in the order of the five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India in September 2018, which decriminalised conjugal relations between consenting adults of the same sex and held Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code unconstitutional," it said.

According to the generation next Congress leaders, it was unconscionable that the canard of cultural exceptionalism should be cited by the central government to violate this basic and universal human right to freely choose one's spouse, bear or adopt children, and safeguard property rights and succession within the legal system. "We, the Maharashtra Youth Congress, hold as foreign to India's culture the colonial heteronormativity they espouse. Lifelong love will always be a sacrament, regardless of sex and gender," the leaders added.

Violation of Right to Equality

Lawyer Abhijit Iyer Mitra, and three others had filed a PIL in the Delhi High Court. The petition has contended that despite the Supreme Court decriminalising consensual homosexual acts, marriages between same-sex couples are still not possible.

The SG had said the petition can't be permissible because it asked the court to legislate, and any relief granted would run contrary to various statutory provisions under the Hindu Marriage Act. He raised a question on who would be assigned the roles of wife and husband where a same-sex couple was concerned. Mehta told the court that the 2018 judgment of the Constitution bench of the Supreme Court merely decriminalises homosexuality or lesbianism, nothing more nothing less.

The court has asked the lawyer appearing for the petitioner to give details of the people who were not permitted to register their same-sex marriage. The bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan has listed the matter for further hearing on October 21.

With inputs from PTI

21
Day next month when Delhi HC will hear matter next

Keep scrolling to read more news

Catch up on all the latest Mumbai news, crime news, current affairs, and a complete guide from food to things to do and events across Mumbai. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates.

Mid-Day is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@middayinfomedialtd) and stay updated with the latest news

First Published: 16 September, 2020 06:55 IST

Sign up for all the latest news, top galleries and trending videos from Mid-day.com

Read inOther Languages

Fake News Caused Migrant Exodus: Government's 2nd Shocker In Parliament

The Home Ministry was responding to a written question by Trinamool Congress MP Mala Roy on steps taken to protect migrant labourers before the lockdown was announced on March 25.

On migrant deaths, Nityanand Rai replied that those details were "not centrally maintained" (File)

New Delhi:

The mass movement of migrants after the country went into lockdown in March to fight the coronavirus was because of "fake news", the government said in parliament on Tuesday, delivering a new shocker a day after saying there was no data on migrant deaths, therefore "no question of" compensation.

The Home Ministry was responding to a written question by Trinamool Congress MP Mala Roy on steps taken to protect migrant labourers before the lockdown was announced on March 25, the reasons why thousands of labourers ended up walking home and the number of migrants labourers who died on their journey home.

"The migration of large number of migrant workers was triggered by panic created by fake news regarding duration of lockdown, and people, especially migrant labourers, were worried about adequate supply of basic necessities like food, drinking water, health services and shelter," replied Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai.

"However, the central government was fully conscious of this, and took all necessary measures to ensure that during the period of the inevitable lockdown, no citizen should be deprived of basic amenities of food, drinking water, medical facilities etc," the minister told Lok Sabha.

According to him, the centre "allowed the state governments to use the State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF) on 28th March itself" for providing temporary accommodation, food, clothing, medical care, etc., to homeless people as well as migrant workers. To augment the funds with the states, the Centre released an advance Rs.11, 092 crores from the state disaster funds to states on April 3, Mr Rai said.

On migrant deaths, he replied that those details were "not centrally maintained".

On Day One of the first session held in the virus crisis, the government told Parliament it does not have data on migrants who died or were injured. He was asked whether the families of those who lost their lives were compensated.

"No such data is maintained. Question does not arise in view of the above," Union Labour Minister Santosh Gangwar told Lok Sabha.

Images of tens of thousands of workers leaving various states after losing their jobs and homes in the nationwide shutdown were compared by many to the tragic scenes of mass exodus after the Partition of 1947.

With no money or food to feed their families, migrant workers started on foot for their hometowns hundreds of kilometres away. Many died on the brutal journey home. The opposition accused the government of imposing a lockdown without a plan for the poorest and those who lost their daily earnings.

Comments

lockdown migrant labourers migrant labourers death