Denver stun Clippers\, Bam\'s block gives Heat first blood

Advertisement

Denver stun Clippers, Bam's block gives Heat first blood

Denver's dynamic duo of Jamal Murray and Nikola Jokic led another stunning turnaround as the Nuggets advanced to the western conference finals for the first time since 2009.

Murray scored 40 points, Jokic had a triple-double by the third quarter and Denver again overcame a double-digit deficit to shock the Los Angeles Clippers 104-89 in game seven on Wednesday (AEST).

Denver became the first team in NBA history to rally from a 3-1 series deficit twice in the same post-season.

Even more history: The Nuggets are the third team in the US major professional sports to rally from a pair of 3-1 deficits in the same play-offs, joining the 1985 Kansas City Royals and 2003 Minnesota Wild.

Advertisement

Denver will face LeBron James and the Los Angeles Lakers in the conference finals.

Jokic had a monster game with 16 points, 13 assists and 22 rebounds, which were the most by a Nuggets player in an NBA play-off game. He broke his record of 19 that he set last season and shared with Marcus Camby.

The Nuggets' Jamal Murray (right) takes on the Clippers' Patrick Beverley.Credit:Getty Images

In a familiar trend, the Nuggets found themselves down by 12 in the first half. They also trailed 61-54 with 10:50 let in the third when they caught fire. The Nuggets went on a 35-13 run to build up a 15-point lead in the fourth quarter.

They led by as many as 20.

Murray helped the Nuggets pour it on down the stretch to give coach Michael Malone a 49th birthday present.

The team also rallied back from double-digit margins in their last two games as well to stun the Clippers.

Despite the additions of Kawhi Leonard and Paul George, the Clippers fell short of the conference finals, where they've never been. They fell to 0-8 all-time in games where they could clinch a trip to the conference finals.

Leonard finished with 14 points on six-of-22 shooting, while George had 10 points on four-of-16 shooting.

It was Denver’s talented twosome that stole the show.

Jokic insisted the third-seeded Nuggets weren't feeling any pressure. He said game seven was just another game. After all, this was Denver's fourth straight game seven dating to the play-offs last season.

After trailing by as many as 12 in the first half, the Nuggets worked their way back into the game behind the shooting of Murray. He scored 25 before intermission as the Clippers elected to double-team Jokic.

Bam Adebayo blocks Jayson Tatum's attempt.Credit:AP

Earlier, Miami Heat struck first in the opening match of the eastern conference finals against Boston with a 117-114 win.

The Celtics' Jayson Tatum thought he had a dunk to tie the game.

But Bam Adebayo had other ideas — and in the biggest moment of his young NBA career, Miami’s All-Star big man more than rose to the occasion.

Jimmy Butler’s three-point play with 12 seconds left put Miami ahead for good, Adebayo finished it off with a stunning rejection of Tatum at the rim on the ensuing Boston possession.

“When you have great competition like this, you just have to make plays that you can’t even really explain,” Heat coach Erik Spoelstra said. “And that was Bam tonight.”

The Heat were down by 13 in the opening minutes, down by 14 in the final quarter and felt like a bad call took the lead from them in the final seconds. They found a way in overtime, improving to an NBA-best 9-1 so far in these play-offs.

Goran Dragic scored 29 points, Jae Crowder scored 22, Butler had 20 and Adebayo had 18. But even after a night when Butler made a go-ahead three-pointer late in regulation and had the go-ahead-for-good points again in overtime, he pointed at Adebayo for his favourite moment.

“Bam. That seals the game for us,” Butler said. “I love how he does any and everything that you ask him to do. I really do. You ask him to pass the ball, he does that. Score, he does that. Come up with a huge defensive stop, block, he does that.

"He’s a huge part to our winning. I’ve been saying it all year long and I’ll repeat it again.”

AP

Most Viewed in Sport

Loading

Denver stun Clippers\, Bam\'s block gives Heat first blood

Facebook does not profit from hate speech: India MD - Times of India

Facebook does not profit from hate speech: India MD

BENGALURU: Facebook India MD Ajit Mohan said Facebook doesn’t profit from hate speech of any kind.
Speaking publicly for the first time after the recent controversy around not banning influential people posting hate messages on its platform, Mohan told TOI: “It’s not good for us, not for people on the platform. There is no constituency that benefits from hate speech…(We) lean in as much as we can to both enforce our community standards and keep all kinds of harm away from the platform.”
Asked about the alleged delayed action in banning BJP MLA Raja Singh for his hate messages, Mohan said what has been missed by most people during recent discussions is that Raja’s hate messages were taken off in 2018 and 2019.
He indicated the issue of banning someone from the platform is a more complicated one, and Facebook was close to concluding that evaluation on Raja when the controversy broke. “The bias is for more speech to be on the platform than less. If it’s the speech of an elected official, the idea is that the voters and constituents should be able to make a call for themselves in terms of the nature of that speech...we should not be in a position, which is possible, of censorship, of speech from elected officials or political leaders. But having said that, there is no exception for hate speech and therefore even in this case, going back to 2018, we have taken down content that violated our community standards on the platform,” he said.
Facebook banned Singh earlier this month, a few weeks after the Wall Street Journal wrote that it had not banned Singh because of pressure from the ruling BJP.
Mohan, who took over his current role 20 months ago, said Facebook’s commitment towards curbing hate speech has been visible in the last three years. He said it removed over 22 million pieces of hateful content from the platform in the June quarter. This was just about 1.7 million in the December quarter of 2017. “That’s the multiplier movement between 2017-end and mid-2020. We have made enormous investments in automation and AI to make sure we are dramatically improving our capability to pick up content that violates our community standards, including hate speech, even before people report them. Of all the content pieces taken down, more than 90% were identified by these automated systems,” he said.
Mohan said there are also more than 35,000 people who work on issues linked to safety and security which include enforcement of Facebook’s community standards. “That’s a big shift over the last 2-3 years. Besides investing in automation capabilities, we have human reviewers to identify hateful content before users report it,” he said.
Early this month, Mohan was called before a Parliamentary panel to discuss the alleged misuse of the social media platform. He was also summoned by the Delhi Assembly on the matter. Union IT minister Ravi Shankar Prasad wrote to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg accusing the India management of deleting pages to reduce the reach of “right-of-centre ideology.”
Asked about criticism that Facebook is succumbing to demands from political parties in power, Mohan said it doesn’t look at party affiliations or any kind of other criteria, apart from taking an objective view of things – whether something violates its guidelines or not. “There are established protocols for legal orders. When there are legal orders for content take-down that involve issues related to law enforcement, security of all kinds, we honour that,” he said.
Asked about 41 NGOs around the world writing to Zuckerberg demanding that the India public policy head Ankhi Das be sent on administrative leave for her alleged role in perpetuating hate speech on the platform, Mohan said Facebook follows processes and systems designed to make sure that content policies meet community standards and no one individual can make an unilateral decision.
“We feel comfortable that the decisions that have been taken on the content enforcement side are objective and non-partisan. We take it extraordinarily seriously that we need to be neutral as a platform. Second, it's important to highlight that the public policy team that Ankhi leads as part of my team is separate from the content policy team that enforces these decisions. In India, it's separate and independent. In this case, public policy in India was not a decision maker,” he said.
In Video:Facebook India MD breaks silence, says FB does not profit from hate speech

    Coronavirus outbreak

    Business News

    LATEST VIDEOS

    More from TOI

    Navbharat Times

    Featured Today in Travel

    Get the app