Mumbai: Amid coastal reclamation\, 2\,000 sq metre foreshore off Juhu beach goes under water

Top news

Mumbai: Amid coastal reclamation, 2,000 sq metre foreshore off Juhu beach goes under water

At a time when Mumbai authorities are reclaiming portions of the sea for big ticket infrastructure projects, the sea has come into a 2,000 square metre strip of the foreshore land at Juhu on the west coast.

Written by Sandeep Ashar | Mumbai | September 16, 2020 3:55:08 am
Juhu beach, coastal reclamation, Mumbai authorities, infrastructure projects, Mumbai news, Indian express newsPortion of the Juhu beach that has gone under water. (Photo: Shankar Mangela)

Life as he knew it has literally gone under water for 61-year-old Shankar Mangela, as he rows his boat through what used to be a sandy beach where he and other fishermen docked their boats and dried their fish until a few months ago.

At a time when Mumbai authorities are reclaiming portions of the sea for big ticket infrastructure projects, the sea has come into a 2,000 square metre strip of the foreshore land at Juhu on the west coast.

“You would find seven to 10 boats anchored here before. The (Juhu) foreshore took a pounding during the Nisarga (cyclone) storm (in June) and within a few days, the sea reclaimed this entire portion,” said Shankar, as he and his friend Shashikant Tandel (56) rowed their boat around the area.

In Moragaon, an old fishing village off Juhu beach where Shankar and Tandel live, residents are on edge as the water laps a few metres away. “Some of us moved our boats in the nick of the time, others were not that lucky. A couple of boats have suffered damage,” Shankar said.

On Tuesday, Dashrath Mangela, chairman of Juhu Moragaon Macchimaar Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Sanstha Limited, wrote to the suburban collector, the Maharashtra Maritime Board and the state fisheries department, bringing the erosion to their notice and demanding that steps be taken to prevent the sea from coming in further. “We are feeling the impact of the changes in tidal patterns first hand. We are more vulnerable now than ever before,” said Dashrath.

His brother Rajesh, who is also a member of the Maharashtra Macchimmar Kruti Samiti that fights for the rights of coastal communities, said that the now submerged portion is a part of a 45,000 sq m land on the foreshore that was earmarked for fishing activities.

Rajesh fears that the erosion may not be localised but part of a larger fallout triggered by a rise in the sea level due to coastal reclamations. “Back in 2001, the point where the creek met the sea was far away from the beach. Since then, Juhu and Versova have seen a lot of reclamation for high-rise buildings. This has significantly affected the tidal activity, now causing the scouring of the channel from the portion of the foreshore itself,” said Rajesh, armed with before and after satellite images of the recently-submerged area.

Local fishermen also pointed out that as part of a beach nourishment plan, the Maharashtra Maritime Board had last year installed tetrapods across an adjoining portion of the beach, near Saat Rasta, to prevent sea waves from hitting a slum that has sprung up on the foreshore land. “The water was bound to come out from somewhere else,” Rajesh said.

Godfrey Pimenta, lawyer and trustee of NGO Watchdog Foundation, agreed. “There is enough evidence to suggest that coastal erosion is often a result of the reclamation of the sea bed and building tetrapods or sea walls cannot be seen as a solution to this problem. Water will find its way out,” he said. The NGO has been at the forefront of protests against reclamations.

Shweta Wagh, an associate professor of the Kamala Raheja Vidyanidhi Institute for Architecture, who has been mapping the impact of reclamations on coastal communities, said: “According to geomorphologists, changes in tidal activity due to reclamations may not be localised. Ongoing reclamation for the coastal road project in south Mumbai will also impact tidal activity to the north of the island city.”

Wagh is also the founder member of Collective for Spatial Alternatives (CSA), which has filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court against the Rs14,000-crore coastal highway project. The PIL is being heard.

Both Pimenta and Wagh alleged that coastal reclamations had also played a role in the severe flooding witnessed in south Mumbai this monsoon. In 2019, the CSA had prepared a report on the impact the project will have on coastal communities, which has now been tendered in the SC.

Pimenta cautioned that much of the shoreline at Dadar Chowpatty had similarly been lost to reclamation for the Bandra-Worli Sea Link project.

When contacted, Principal Secretary (Environment) Manisha Mhaiskar said her department would look into the erosion issue. So did Fisheries Commissioner Atul Patne.

While senior officials from BMC, which is implementing the highway project, argued that the work was being done following a social impact assessment and that mitigation measures will be taken up, Wagh claimed the “so-called” assessment report “neither acknowledged the existence of traditional fishing zone nor the customary use of the nearshore and foreshore areas for artisanal fishing activity”. Pimenta demanded that fishermen be seen as “project-affected people” for reclamation projects.

Zaman Ali, an independent environmental lawyer, said: “The government should urgently examine the relation of coastal communities and fragile ecosystems.”

Seated in his boat, Shankar, meanwhile, cited the irony of it all. “Land that was originally earmarked for us (fishermen at Moragoan) for fish drying and the docking of boats have been encroached by big bungalow owners. And now, the sea has consumed the part of the beach we had been using as an alternative.”

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Mumbai News, download Indian Express App.

Advertisement
Live Blog

    Best of Express

    Advertisement

    Must Read

    Advertisement

    Buzzing Now

    Advertisement

    Mumbai: Amid coastal reclamation\, 2\,000 sq metre foreshore off Juhu beach goes under water

    Covid19 separates couple after 37 years

    Covid19 separates couple after 37 years

    Retired couple, Glendora Kennedy and Keith Kennedy, have been separated by covid19 restrictions on entry to TT. -
    Retired couple, Glendora Kennedy and Keith Kennedy, have been separated by covid19 restrictions on entry to TT. -

    A RETIRED couple has been forced to separate from each other for the first time in 37 years for fear of losing everything they built together.

    TT national Keith Kennedy is currently at home after being granted an exemption to return and staying two weeks in paid quarantine after leaving Barbados. His wife, Glendora Kennedy, a Barbadian, remains there after being told she could not join him in travelling to Trinidad. Both are 62 and have health complications.

    "It's very difficult for us to live apart," the husband pleaded, speaking with Newsday.

    "She takes care of everything in the house. I'm having a nervous breakdown without her around.

    "I'm functioning but just by the grace of God."

    Originally, they were in New York where they own a business when the borders closed. They had already booked a plane ticket to leave in April, less than two weeks after the borders closed in TT on March 22.

    With plans to start a new life together in Trinidad, they also packed a 40-ft container with all their belongings to furnish a house, which they bought two years prior.

    "We were getting ready to spend our retirement in Trinidad. I did not plan to be a burden on the country," his wife said.

    She explained why they took the route they did.

    "We had no idea when we would be able to leave New York. Not only that but the covid numbers were getting so high."

    "We were advised to go to Barbados, which wasn't a problem. We put our names on the list and I think it was a two-week process.

    Apart from the situation in New York, the proximity and relationship between the two countries, were among the factors for their travelling to Barbados, where they arrived on July 4.

    The wife said they were in Barbados when they were told, verbally, that they were approved.

    "But then they called and said they would allow him to go but not me. He went off," she said. "He went berserk and I tried to take the phone from him because I realised that wasn't helping the situation.

    "He said to them, 'are you telling me to abandon my wife? How can you ask me to abandon my wife. We have everything we own in Trinidad.'"

    Her husband said the only reason he left her for Trinidad is to ensure the safety of all their belongings and the house they spent all their money on.

    Keith was eventually allowed to return to TT but not his wife. He spent US$2,000 for a private flight – the only option available to get home.

    But that was just the tip of the iceberg in terms of expending their life savings, both told Newsday. They have spent tens of thousands for accommodation, although they have a home in Trinidad.

    Their container, filled with practically everything they own apart from their car, has been sitting at the docks in Port of Spain for months. That expense is causing them further financial distress.

    They are both past the point of desperation, they said.

    Keith said his wife did practically everything for him, including the preparation of all his meals, given that he has a special vegetarian diet.

    She, too, said that their separation was becoming too difficult in terms of money and obvious mental toll.

    She said she devoted much of her time and resources in Trinidad, and given her intention to continue doing so, the situation was particularly disheartening.

    "We've always lived together and done everything together, what exactly is the point of separating us now? If I was a risk, he would have been just as much a risk."

    In spite of the uncertainty, she said her husband is adamant that she live with him in TT.

    She applied for residency in TT but was told to resubmit the documents because one of her husband's names were in the incorrect order. That was just before the last time he left TT in February.

    Comments

    "Covid19 separates couple after 37 years"

    More in this section

    Mumbai: Amid coastal reclamation\, 2\,000 sq metre foreshore off Juhu beach goes under water

    Death toll rises, dozens still missing amid West Coast wildfires