Mistakes must also be historical to go into history. One is a knife and one is a gold knife. Others do not get gold, so some people kill it in their stomachs. The opening layers one after another in the Sushant case have confirmed the idea once again. When Adhir Ranjan Chaudhary waved the flag of custody as accused Riya Chakraborty, a Brahmin of Bengal, the circle was complete. Sushant Singh Rajput had become the son of political Bihar and the daughter of Kangana Himachal. What to say about the Shiv Sena. Every battle of his starts in the name of Asmita of Maharashtra. The irony is that all this is happening on the Rangbhumi of Mumbai, where an industry running from the All India market fills its chest.

The talk started with death. Its central characters were associated with the film industry, which is itself a well-known example of money, fame, and mystically complex interiors. The power of glamor and immense wealth blurs the soot of means there. This backdrop also has a history of smugglers, underworld dons, many film personalities, and their convenient political connections. In the last few years, there has been a huge overhaul of the principle of shame and public shame. While corporatization has regulated the sources of funds, the objectives have also shifted. Earlier art lovers used to make a project and used to raise money for it and now the art is raised on which project the money will come from. So now there is no hesitation in using relationships openly instead of hiding them. As one of our young creators, Mitra Dushyant said, now journalists speak the language of leaders, leaders speak the language of goons, goons speak the language of religious gurus, religious gurus of capitalists. And the bourgeoisie…? Everything is a breakup.

In the midst of this breakup, all the maharathis are opening their business 'outlets' on the digital platform. Opportunities are available on the agenda. The ruthless squid of ideological enemies of devotees and slanderers continues to present in the name of the food of the soul. In this way, the business of theorists on both sides goes on.

That is why Kangana Ranaut's example should not be seen in isolation. He has his own business past. She emerged as the first, feminist to challenge established power. As long as the characters in his films were pulling the box office by addressing the new generation market, all was well for the industry. But in practice, such interference in the prohibited areas that frightens the internal business interests increases the risk. Seeing the imminent danger, images like the Liberals, supporters of independence, the motivators of art, and the guardians of talent, finally find their liberation only in protecting the collective business interests. In this market, Sanjay Dutt's crime or Salman's punishments do not matter. 'Meitu' or 'dynastic gang' injuries also prove to be selective. In Kangana's case, this war became multi-faceted. While there were hurt people within the industry, the issue of being 'nationalist' also created a flood of rival intellectual platforms against them.

Interestingly, the warriors who once called Shiv Sena a communal group of chaotic elements also went on to serve Shiv Sena in a big way. Enemy's enemy friend. He erased the 'Maharashtra Minister of Home Affairs' and 'action of Shiv Sena holiday groups' with intellectual rubber. In this way, a collective celebration of silence was created in the breakdown of 'Manikarnika'. There was also industry politics and also the industry of politics.

Now at most one of its culmination will be that Kangana Ranaut will be properly transformed from actor to leader. The floods raised in support of accused Riya Chakraborty have hardly anything to do with knowing the truth of Sushant's death. That is the ultimate attainment of the eagle speed to pounce on his own side. (For consolation, however, the movement to legalize marijuana has already begun).

Amidst all this, where is the compassion for one death even among the so-called theorists? It is said that the Shiv Sena was so overwhelmed by the prospect of casting a shadow on one of its influentials that the issue was passed to Maharashtra-Bihar-Himachal-Bengal Asmita after the police records related to the death of Disha Saliyan. This episode has proved that in this brutal time everything, even a young man's death, is only a minor item of high political battle. And, as always, the truth is that when the speculation of power is being played in the Intellectual Casino, the loser is the master of ideology. Would Sushant ever have imagined this great ideological TRP scene?