Cannot expect 70 per cent attendance when all classes not held: Delhi High Court to DU

The HC also issued notice to the Centre, Bar Council of India and the university seeking their stand on the student’s appeal against a single judge order of November last year dismissing his plea.

Published: 26th August 2020 08:19 AM  |   Last Updated: 26th August 2020 09:03 AM   |  A+A-

Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court (Photo | EPS)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI:  The Delhi High Court on Tuesday said that the Delhi University cannot expect students to have 70 per cent minimum attendance to sit for exams if it was not taking classes for the entire period prescribed for a course.

“You cannot ask students have to have 70 per cent minimum attendance while you teach only 40 per cent of the prescribed study period,” a bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan told the varsity while hearing the plea of a law student who could not sit for his semester exams last year on medical grounds.

The high court also issued notice to the Centre, Bar Council of India and the university seeking their stand on the student’s appeal against a single judge order of November last year dismissing his plea. The single judge had dismissed his plea on the ground that there was a division bench order of the Delhi HC which held that in professional courses, the requirement of minimum attendance was non-negotiable.

During the hearing on Tuesday, the bench headed by Chief Justice said to the varsity and the BCI that there should be some mechanism to take care of students like the petitioner, who since March 2017 has been suffering from an illness for which there was no clear and certain diagnosis.

According to the plea of Abhishek Singh, while typhoid was suspected there was also a possibility that he was suffering from tuberculosis. His lawyer, Kamal Mehta, told the bench that the first semester last year began from September 1, 2019 and the exams were held in December.

During the hearing, Singh’s lawyer said that representations were made to the varsity to allow the student to sit for the exams, despite the lack of attendance, in view of his health. However, no response was received from DU and later he was told his name would be struck off the varsity rolls.

HC asks lawyer to check on dates
The HC asked the varsity to confirm when the first semester commenced last year and when the exams were held. It also told the student’s lawyer to find out what was the minimum period of study prescribed  for LLB course by the varsity.