New Delhi: Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan Tuesday refused to tender an unconditional apology to the Supreme Court in a decade-old contempt case against him, but expressed regret if his comments had caused any hurt or lowered the prestige of the judiciary.
In a statement issued Tuesday, Bhushan said, “In my interview to Tehelka in 2009, I have used the word corruption in a wide sense meaning lack of propriety. I did not mean only financial corruption or deriving any pecuniary advantage.”
He asserted that he “regrets the same”, if his remarks “caused hurt to any of them or to their families in any way”.
“I unreservedly state that I support the institution of the judiciary and especially the Supreme Court of which I am a part, and had no intention to lower the prestige of the judiciary in which I have complete faith. I regret if my interview was misunderstood as doing so, that is, lower the reputation of the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court, which could never have been my intention at all,” Bhushan added.
The case dates back to November 2009 when Bhushan gave an interview to Tehelka magazine in which he had allegedly made serious imputations against former chief justices of India S.H. Kapadia and K.G. Balakrishnan.
The Supreme Court had then taken suo motu cognisance of the statements after a complaint was filed by senior advocate Harish Salve. Before this year, the matter was last heard in May 2012.
The issue came up around 21 July 2020 when Bhushan was issued a contempt notice for two of his tweets on Chief Justice of India S.A. Bobde and several former CJIs. This case will be heard next on 5 August.
We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.
Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.
Order reserved
The statement was issued after the Supreme Court Tuesday sought an apology from Bhushan in the case.
However, in its order, the bench comprising Justice Arun Mishra, Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Krishna Murari noted that it has not received any explanation or apology from Bhushan so far.
“In case we do not accept the explanation/apology, we will hear the matter,” the bench said, reserving its order on whether or not it would accept Bhushan’s statement.
Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram
News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it
You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.
You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.
We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.
At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.
This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.
If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.