
New Delhi: The Supreme Court Wednesday issued contempt notice to Advocate Prashant Bhushan for two of his tweets on Chief Justice of India S.A. Bobde as well as former CJIs.
A bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra, B.R. Gavai and Krishna Murari asked Bhushan to show cause as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him.
In one of his tweets on 27 June, Bhushan had written about the “role of the Supreme Court” in the “destruction” of democracy during the last 6 years, and had also mentioned the “role of the last 4 CJIs” in it.
In another tweet, on 29 June, Bhushan had commented on Chief Justice of India S.A. Bobde astride a Harley Davidson bike. He had questioned the CJI for riding a bike without a helmet and a face mask, while “he keeps the SC in lockdown mode”.
The bench also issued notice to Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, to seek his opinion on the issue. Twitter Incorporated will also be filing a reply.
While the apex court had initiated a suo motu case against Bhushan Tuesday, a Madhya Pradesh lawyer, Mahek Maheshwari had also filed a petition against Bhushan and Twitter on 2 July, asking for contempt proceedings to be initiated against Bhushan.
He had cited Bhushan’s Harley Davidson tweet.
We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.
Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.
Maheshwari’s petition had called Bhushan’s remarks “too inhuman”, and had highlighted the efforts of the judges in ensuring that cases were being heard through video conferencing. The petition noted that the tweet put a “big question on the sovereign functions of the CJI and their abiding nature to the Constitution”.
Maheshwari also called the tweet a “cheap publicity stunt… to spread hatred in the form of anti-India campaign”.
The matter will be heard next on 5 August.
Not the first time Bhushan’s tweets have landed him in trouble
This isn’t the first time that Bhushan’s tweet has landed him within the court’s contempt jurisdiction.
In March 2019, AG Venugopal and the central government had filed a contempt plea against Bhushan, for his tweet alleging that the government misled the Supreme Court on the appointment of M. Nageswara Rao as the interim Director of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
However, during the proceedings, Bhushan accepted that he had made a “genuine mistake”, prompting Venugopal to offer to withdraw his contempt plea.
However, in the meantime, Bhushan had filed an application seeking Justice Mishra’s recusal from the bench hearing the case. Following this, the central government remained firm about not withdrawing the contempt plea.
While hearing the case, the court decided to examine whether it was open to anyone criticising court proceedings in order to influence public opinion and to what extent this affects the rights of litigants and administration of justice.
This matter was last heard in April 2019.
Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram
News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it
You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.
You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.
We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.
At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.
This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.
If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.