Kansas City: Harvard University can’t argue that foreign students taking online-only classes in the U.S. will get a lesser education if they continue those studies from abroad, because Americans on its campus this fall will basically be learning the same way, the government said.
The Trump administration on Monday fired back at a lawsuit filed last week by Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The two sued over a new ban on visas for foreign students attending U.S. colleges that are switching to virtual instruction to protect students from infection by the coronavirus.
In a brief filed in federal court in Boston, the U.S. said Harvard and MIT can’t persuasively argue that “there is a correlation between physical presence in the United States and the quality of education these reputable organizations provide” if they require almost all their students to learn online.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement posted the new rules a week ago, after Harvard announced a reopening plan involving almost exclusively online classes. The two colleges — now supported by more than a hundred other schools, dozens of states and cities and some of the country’s biggest technology companies — said in their suit that the government had failed to consider the harm to students.
The two cited the impact on businesses as well, and on the U.S. gross domestic product, the broadest measure of economic output, citing “the loss of the tens of billions of dollars that international students contribute to U.S. GDP each year.” They pointed to the role foreign students play in American innovation.
The two acknowledge that some students could, in theory, take part in online classes from their home countries, but not without serious disruption. They cite time zone differences, unreliable or state-managed Internet and armed conflict in some of the students’ homelands.
“The loss of the ability to perform research or fieldwork, or even participate in basic coursework under reasonable conditions, will force many students to interrupt their studies” with leaves of absence or even withdrawal from the institutions, the colleges say.
We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.
Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.
And they argue that the value of a Harvard or MIT education for the student body at large “hinges on the diversity of perspective” offered by students from other countries. If they can’t attend class, even virtually, the value is decreased for everyone, they say.
Work for NASA
Among a number of anonymous testimonials filed in support of the lawsuit is one by an MIT student from Lebanon who says the National Aeronautics and Space Administration is depending on their research.
“Returning to Lebanon would halt my progress on my graduate studies and would negatively impact the team that I work with,” the student writes, adding that “NASA is counting on our work” and that “because of the ongoing crisis in Lebanon, I am concerned about my safety and access to food in my home country.”
The submission is anonymous “due to fears that, based on my participation in this litigation, I could face retaliation from immigration authorities,” the student says.
The government said it wasn’t indifferent to the impact of its decision on foreign students. If so, it might simply have rescinded guidance it published March 9 that students could take all their classes online during the pandemic. Instead, it now requires at least one in-person class for schools under a hybrid model, such as MIT’s, but permits more online classes than it normally would, the U.S. said.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey on Monday filed a separate lawsuit against the new ICE policy, representing the attorneys general of 17 states and the District of Columbia.- Bloomberg
Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram
News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it
You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.
You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.
We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.
At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.
This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.
If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.