An independent group of government advisors has called for tax rates for conventionally fuelled cars to be increased to help raise money to fund climate change initiatives.
The Committee on Climate Change (CCC), an independent public body formed in 2008 following the Climate Change Act, has called for the action in its latest progress report on the UK's 'Road to Zero' strategy. It has also restated its previous call for the government to bring forward the proposed ban on combustion-engined new car sales from 2035 to 2032.
The CCC believes the measures are needed to help the government achieve its goal of the UK achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. It says that should be achieved by reducing traffic levels and facilitating the mass rollout of low-carbon vehicles (LCVs).
The report claims higher taxes on carbon emissions could be introduced while fuel prices are currently low following the coronavirus pandemic to minimise the effect on drivers: “Greater use of carbon taxes can support the public finances and strengthen incentives to reduce emissions. They are particularly attractive when global oil prices, and therefore consumers' energy costs, are low, as they are now.”
Alongside an increase for higher-emissions vehicles, the CCC recommends that the Vehicle Excise Duty (road tax) system could be overhauled to make LCV ownership more appealing. It added that the government’s plans to expand the UK’s EV charging network are in line with its net zero ambitions but should be delivered now.
The CCC claims that, in order to meet the 2050 deadline, sales of new combustion-engined cars must stop within the next 12 years: “There should be a rising mandate for car companies to sell a minimum share of zero-emissions vehicles, reaching 100% by 2032 at the latest.”
The government is currently consulting on its plans to ban the sale of non-zero-emission cars and vans by 2035 or earlier, with an online consultation process open until 31 July.
The CCC said: “The UK government is consulting on bringing forward the date for phasing out petrol and diesel cars and vans (including hybrids) from 2040 to 2035 or earlier, in line with the Committee's advice. The Committee's assessment is that the date should be brought forward to 2032 at the latest, and backed by detailed policy arrangements to deliver it.”
It added: “Initial steps towards a net-zero policy package have been taken, but this was not the year of policy progress that the Committee called for in 2019.
“There were important new announcements on transport, buildings, industry, energy supply, agriculture and land use. But these steps do not yet measure up to meet the size of the net zero challenge and we are not making adequate progress in preparing for climate change.”
Join the debate
NavalReserve
Political suicide
So much for levelling up!
Lapps
A kangaroo court?
Looked up this Committee's Terms of Reference. It seems to be the equivalent of picking a jury from a group of people who have filled in a questionnaire saying they believe the accused is guilty, before the trial. What a stitch up!
Anyone want to join my "Committee to prove global warming is caused by the hot air released by politicians"?
Citytiger
Well considering
The report states increase the level of taxation whilst fuel prices and energy demand are low during the pandemic, does that mean the level will decrease once demand goes up? I dont think it will, and the other problem is, as more people have started to return to work, fuel prices have already risen, as much as 10p a litre within the last couple of weeks.
Its all a con as NavalReserve states to tax the poor off the road, as for London, a recent article by Mike Rutherford has highlighted just how expesive it can now be to travel in London by car, over £100 a day in charges. Scrapping HS2 would raise far more money, who really want to travel to Birmingham 20 minutes faster?
pah68
Let's all go back to the middle ages
So, with the state of our public transport network being mostly fossil fuelled and unreachable in much of rural UK a move away from all forms of fossil fuelled vehicles in a short time scale to expensive BEVs (and alternatives) will lead the poorer members of society to be stuck where they live - I'm sure my early history lessons taught me about a society very much like that from several hundred years ago. Is that really what we want? We need huge investment in the entire public transport infrastructure, electric charging infrastructure and the national grid not just focussed investment on single benefit projects like HS2. Or perhaps we're to all end up like the sci-fi movies in megacities with the rural regions a wasteland.
I also read Mike Rutherford's article about a day of costs in London and to be honest I laughed at his £100/day costs. Let's be honest, if you can't manage to find somewhere to park in London for less than £75/day then you deserve to be paying that. Even the most expensive space in a Mayfair NCP only costs £58 all day and it's possible to pay a lot less than that. Mike Rutherford seems to be too far on the side of the motorist with these scare stories and certainly not providing the kind of balanced journalism that I would pay any attention to. I agree totally that motorists are very unfairly penalised but I don't see his kind of "rants" being helpful to those of us who really do need a car that is both affordable to buy and use and capable of travelling more than 300 miles in a day.
Adrian Barlow
Climate Change
It's amazing that this fraud, hoax, scam has been running for so long, over 40 years, and is believed by millions and millions of otherwise-intelligent people.
Apparently, the world has increased in temperature by one centigrade degree over the last 140 years, it's all our fault, the effects of this warming are all bad, and unless you all pay loads and loads of extra tax and give up travelling on cars, buses or aeroplanes, we'll all be dead in ten more years.
Well, I'm sorry, but I just don't believe it.
artill
Dealing with Climate change,
Dealing with Climate change, you might be able to take the public along with you if it doesnt cost them anything. They wont mind too much while they think it will cost others more either, but as soon as the public in general realise just how much these people want to take off them for driving, heating their homes, flying etc, its going to be very hard to get popular support.
Cobnapint
How much did that report cost FFS
Add your comment