
India-China Border Face-off Latest News Live Updates: At the all-party meeting convened to discuss the tense border situation with China, Prime Minister Narendra Modi Friday denied the Chinese intrusion across the Line of Actual Control (LAC). “Neither has anyone entered our border nor has any of our posts been in the possession of anyone else,” the Prime Minister told presidents of various political parties in the virtual meeting. Stating that India has “never accepted any external pressure”, PM Modi said, “Whatever construction of infrastructure is necessary for national security, it will continue to be carried forward at a similar pace.”
Congress president Sonia Gandhi, on the other hand, posed several questions before the government, enquiring whether the military intelligence alerted the government about the intrusion and the build-up of Chinese forces along the LAC. “Did our external intelligence agencies not report any unusual activity along the LAC? Did the Military Intelligence not alert the government about the intrusion and the build-up of massive forces along the LAC? In the government’s considered view, was there a failure of intelligence?,” Gandhi asked.
In a major development from the ground zero, the Chinese army on Thursday evening returned from its custody 10 Indian soldiers, including four officers, involved in Monday’s violent showdown in the Galwan Valley. The soldiers were returned on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) following hectic negotiations between the two sides, including three rounds of talks at the Major General level. This was the first time after the 1962 Sino-India War that Indian soldiers were taken into custody by the Chinese side.
In the worst flare-up on the LAC in more than five decades, 20 Indian Army personnel, including the commanding officer of 16 Bihar, were killed Monday night in the Galwan valley where disengagement of troops on either side was underway. This is the first time in the last 45 years that Indian or Chinese troops have been killed on the LAC.
"Certainly, what the Chinese have done on LAC, the whole country is hurt, angry. This feeling has been shown repeatedly through you all during our discussion," PM Modi said at the all-party meet.
"I am also assuring you that our army is leaving no stone unturned to protect the country. Be it deployment, action, counter-action, in the water-sky, our forces are doing what they have to do to protect the country," PM Modi said.
"Today, we have this capability that no one can see us with an inch towards the ground. Today India's forces, in different sectors, are also able to move together," PM Modi said.
"India wants peace and friendship, but protecting its sovereign is paramount for us. And you all have expressed the same sentiment," PM said.
"Over the years, the country has given priority to infrastructure development in border areas to secure its borders. We have also laid a lot of emphasis on other requirements of our forces, such as Fighter Planes, modern helicopters, missile defense systems, etc.," PM said.
"Be it trade, connectivity, counter terrorism, India has never accepted any external pressure. Whatever is necessary for national security, whatever is the construction of necessary infrastructure, it will continue to be carried forward at a similar pace," PM said.
"I again assure all of you, all political parties, that our forces are fully capable of defending the borders. We have given them complete leeway to take appropriate action," PM concluded.
Addressing the all-party meeting on the LAC situation, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said neither have the Chinese intruded into the Indian territory nor has any post been taken over by them. "20 of our jawans were martyred, but those who dared Bharat Mata, they were taught a lesson," PM Modi was quoted as saying by ANI. The Prime Minister said that Indian armed forces are doing what they have to do to protect the country, whether it is deployment, action or counter-action.
Former Tripura chief minister Manik Sarkar has said that the LAC crisis should be addressed and resolved through proper dialogue between both India and China. In a video made available to the media today, Sarkar said, “There was an unprecedented incident two days back in the Indo-China border. Twenty Indian soldiers were martyred there. We pay our respects to them and express condolences to their bereaved families”. He further said that the standoff between India and China can only be resolved through a "proper dialogue". He also advised all Indians to stand together in unity, solidarity among themselves to maintain peace, integrity and sovereignty.
Debraj Deb reports from Agartala
Telangana Chief Minister K C Chandrasekhar Rao announced a compensation of Rs 5 crore, a house, and Group-1 job to the widow of Colonel Santosh Babu who lost his life in the violent face-off with Chinese troops in the Galwan Valley, along with 19 others. He also announced Rs 10 lakh assistance to the families of 19 other soldiers who were killed in the LAC showdown.
West Bengal Chief Minister and TMC chief Mamata Banerjee: "China is not a democracy.They are a dictatorship.They can do what they feel. We, on the other hand, have to work together. India will win, China will lose. Speak with unity. Think with unity. Work with unity. We are solidly with the Govt".
Bihar Chief Minister and JD(U) chief Nitish Kumar: "There is nationwide anger against China. There should be no differences among us. We are together". "Goods from China flooding Indian markets have major problems. They're plastic heavy, aren't eco-friendly and they harm environment. Electronic waste associated with them is high. Chinese products don’t even last long. It's our duty to be one and support the Centre".
Meghalaya CM and NPP chief Conrad Sangma: "Infrastructure work along the border should not stop. China sponsored activities in Myanmar and Bangladesh is worrying. PM Modi has been working on Northeast infra and it must go on".
DMK chief MK Stalin: "We are united when it comes to patriotism". He also welcomed the recent statements by the PM on China issue.
TRS Chief and Telangana CM K Chandrasekhar Rao said the PM's clarity on Kashmir and his emphasis on Kashmir's development has angered China. He also stressed that the PM's call of Atmanirbhar Bharat has rattled China.
BJD's Pinaki Misra: "Strong action will have to be initiated (against China). Whatever that action may be, the BJD will fully support the government".
CPI's D Raja said, "We need to resist US efforts to drag us into their alliance" while CPI(M)'s Sitaram Yechuri stressed on the principles of Panchsheel pact.
Source: ANI
Posing several questions, Congress president Sonia Gandhi enquired whether the military intelligence alerted the government about the intrusion and the build-up of Chinese forces along the Line of Actual Control. "Did our external intelligence agencies not report any unusual activity along the LAC? Did the Military Intelligence not alert the government about the intrusion and the build-up of massive forces along the LAC? In the government’s considered view, was there a failure of intelligence?," Sonia Gandhi asked the government at the all-party meeting.
She also asked the government on the roadmap ahead and stressed that the entire country would like an assurance that status quo ante would be restored and that China will revert back to the original position on the LAC.
Air Chief Marshal RKS Bhadauria paid a two-day visit to Leh and Srinagar to oversee preparedness of the IAF in view of the massive escalation in tension with China following the violent Galwan Valley clash that left 20 Indian Army personnel dead and 76 injured, news agency PTI reported quoting its military sources. The Indian Air Force has put all its frontline bases along the 3,500-km de-facto border with China on high alert .
The all-party meeting, convened by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to discuss the tense situation on the border with China, is presently underway. The meeting has been called upon to build much-needed domestic political consensus on the explosive situation.
Paying homage to the fallen soldiers in the Galwan valley, Mizoram Chief Minister Zoramthanga tweeted that his state stands with the nation in this time of uncalled crisis. He is presently attending an all-party meeting convened by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to discuss the tense border situation with China.
An all-party meeting called by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to discuss the situation along the India-China border is currently underway. Presidents of various political parties, including the BJP, Congress, TMC, AIADMK, DMK, TRS, JD(U), BJD, LJP, BSP, SP, Shiv Sena and NCP among others, are taking part in this virtual meeting. PTI
Appreciating PM Modi's decision to call for an all-party meeting, former prime minister H D Devegowda and JD(S) chief has listed a couple of suggestions.
The AAP has not been invited to an all-party meeting called by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the border conflict with China, two senior party leaders claimed on Friday. AAP leader Sanjay Singh said the party has a government in Delhi and in Punjab, it is the main opposition party, but still the BJP does not want its opinion on such an important matter. "The BJP government at the Centre should take everyone along on a serious issue like national security. It is unfortunate for democracy that a three-time chief minister has not called for suggestions on an important subject," Singh told reporters. Singh further said the sacrifice of Indian soldiers should not go in vain. "The government must avenge the martyrdom of our soldiers. "The government should immediately take back the land that China has acquired from India," he said. "Not giving the country correct information on the border dispute is a big betrayal with the country. "Why did the central government hide information from the country, the central government will have to answer," he said.
The RJD took exception to not being invited to the all-party meeting, saying the "largest" party in Bihar was ignored. Tejashwi Yadav, leader of opposition in Bihar Assembly, expressed dismay that his party was ignored despite having five members in Parliament and being "the largest in Bihar". "We want (Defence Minister) Rajnath Singh ji to clarify why RJD has not been invited," Yadav was quoted as saying by news agency PTI in Patna. Manoj Jha, RJD's national spokesman and a Rajya Sabha member, tweeted that "the untenable logic of FIVE MEMBERS gets exposed" and cited the examples of Telugu Desam Party, Apna Dal, Shiromani Akali Dal, CPI and National Conference which have been invited to the all-party meeting despite having fewer number of MPs than the RJD. "There is more to it than what meets the eye," added Jha, whose party has been staunchly opposed to BJP ever since its foundation three decades ago. Misa Bharti, Lalu Prasad's eldest daughter and Rajya Sabha member, shared a tweet "jo sawaal daagenge, sahib usse bhaagenge (those in power try to avoid those who pose questions)".
Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh today paid floral tributes to three Indian army personnel, who died fighting the Chinese in Galwan Valley. The mortal remains of sepoys Gurbinder Singh (Sangrur), Gurtej Singh (Mansa) and sepoy Ankush Thakur (Hamirpur, HP) were brought to the Chandigarh Air Force station from Leh and will be taken by road to their native places in Punjab and Himachal Pradesh later. "Laying a wreath on the mortal remains of Sepoys Gurbinder Singh from Sangrur, Gurtej Singh from Mansa & Ankush from Hamirpur, HP at Chandigarh. Salute their supreme sacrifice at this young age. The nation is forever indebted. Jai Hind!" Singh tweeted. "The bodies were brought from Leh to Chandigarh. We paid our tributes. The mortal remains of two soldiers from Punjab and one from Himachal Pradesh will be taken to their native places," Singh told reporters while coming out from the Air Force station.
Chief Minister Captain Amarinder Thursday demanded accountability for the loss of lives in the clash, and said the whole nation was expecting a befitting response from the government to this horrific attack on its men. “Our soldiers at the front should be clearly told that if they kill one of ours, you kill three of theirs,” said Amarinder in a statement issued Thursday. Calling for an end to the ‘Hindi-Cheeni bhai bhai’ charade, the Chief Minister said India should not chicken out on this issue. “If China is a world power, then so are we,” he declared, adding that “60 years of diplomacy has not worked and it is time to tell them that enough is enough.”
Former chiefs and top commanders of the Indian defence forces have highlighted the importance of resolving the current situation along the LAC with China through diplomatic channels while maintaining a strong posture. Admiral Arun Prakash (Retd), former Chief of Naval Staff, said, “Any dispute of this nature has two solutions — one diplomatic and the other military. The recent diplomatic efforts go back to the 1993 Peace & Tranquility Agreement and the Border Cooperation Agreement of 2013. Our heads of government have met on numerous occasions. There have also been 22 meetings of Special Representatives. But no solutions have emerged. One wonders if our politicians and diplomats have not considered the issue of LAC urgent enough for early settlement or tried hard enough to find a solution. Having a boundary which is not fixed, not marked, not agreed upon, with a powerful country like China is a very unhealthy situation. When diplomatic solutions don’t succeed, armed forces have to be called in. In this case, it is unlikely that we can force a military solution on China; due to the huge asymmetry between our two countries: economic, military, technological and in many other fields. While we can certainly give them a ‘bloody nose’ in select locations, such military responses can potentially snowball into an all-out war. So, the question to ask ourselves with all honesty is — are we prepared for a war and can we (or even China) afford one? We will be fighting, not just China, because they also have a friend and ally in Pakistan, who will be keen to open a second front of war.”
General Bikram Singh (retd), the former Army chief who had pushed for raising a Mountain Strike Corps with the capability of striking at the enemy across mountains, notably along LAC, on Thursday said that given the statements emanating from Beijing and PLA headquarters, it is apparent that China has dug in its heels and is not inclined to disengage. “Military-level talks at various levels are unlikely to yield any perceptible results. An amicable resolution is now possible only through diplomatic and political channels. However, such initiatives should not lull us into complacency. At the military level, we should be prepared to use force to evict the PLA from the intrusion areas and effectively deal with the escalation, which is bound to occur.’’
The mortal remains of slain Army jawan Sunil Kumar were brought to his residence in Patna on June 18. Hawaldar Sunil Kumar was among the 20 personnel who lost his life in the violent face-off with China in Ladakh’s Galwan Valley.
While one can understand the outrage that Indians feel when they hear about the brutal deaths of their soldiers, turning a border or defence dispute into a trade one is an ill-advised move. There are several reasons.
1. Trade deficits are not necessarily bad: One of the main reasons why banning trade has been the first reaction is the notion that having a trade deficit is somehow a “bad” thing. The fact is altogether different. Trade deficits/surpluses are just accounting exercises and having a trade deficit against a country doesn’t make the domestic economy weaker or worse off.
2. Will hurt the Indian poor the most: More often than not, the poorest consumers are the worst-hit in a trade ban of this kind because they are the most price-sensitive. For instance, if Chinese ACs were replaced by either costlier Japanese ACs or less efficient Indian ones, richer Indians may still survive this ban — by buying the costlier option — but a number of poor, who could have otherwise afforded an AC, would either have to forgo buying one because it is now too costly (say a Japanese or European firm) or suffer (as a consumer) by buying a less efficient Indian one.
3. Will punish Indian producers and exporters: Some may argue that trading with China hurts many Indian producers. This is true, but it is also true that trading hurts only the less efficient Indian producers while helping the more efficient Indian producers and businesses.
4. Will barely hurt China: The trouble is this is a near-impossible task not just because of China’s centrality in global trade and global value chains but also because even teams of bureaucrats will find it tough to map Chinese involvement in all our trade on a real-time basis. On the whole, it is much easier for China to replace India than for India to replace China.
Former army commander Arun Sahni writes: "The India-China LAC in Ladakh is an outcome of the territory illegally retained by China after the 1962 conflict. The Chinese occupation of parts of Aksai Chin is not supported by historical or legal documents. China’s aspiration to be a global power has renewed its interest in the region. To this end, it is in the relentless pursuit for secure access to the warm-water port of Gwadar in Pakistan. The China Pakistan Economic Corridor is an important element of the BRI." He adds: "The nation should speak in unison, reflecting our resolve and support for a befitting response to China. The handling of this ugly turn of events will signal the future tenor of India-China relations."